Does the SORG Orthopaedic Research Group Hip Fracture Delirium Algorithm Perform Well on an Independent Intercontinental Cohort of Patients With Hip Fractures Who Are 60 Years or Older?

Using Artificial Intelligence to predict outcomes of operatively managed neck of femur fractures

Aims/Background Patients with neck of femur fractures present a tremendous public health problem that leads to a high incidence of death and dysfunction. An essential factor is the postoperative length of stay, which heavily impacts hospital costs and the quality of care. As an extension of traditional statistical methods, machine learning (ML) provides the possibility of accurately predicting the length of hospital stay. This review assesses how machine learning can effectively use healthcare data to predict the outcomes of patients with operatively managed neck of femurs. Methods A narrative literature review on the use of Artificial Intelligence to predict outcomes in the neck of femurs was undertaken to understand the field and critical considerations of its application. The papers and any relevant references were scrutinised using the specific inclusion and exclusion criteria to produce papers that were used in the analysis. Results Thirteen papers were used in the analysis. The critical themes recognised the different models, the 'backbox' conundrum, predictor identification, validation methodology and the need to improve efficiency and quality of care. Through reviewing the themes in this paper, current issues, and potential avenues of advancing the field are explored. Conclusions This review has demonstrated that the use of machine learning in Orthopaedic pathways is in its infancy. Further work is needed to leverage this technology effectively to improve outcomes.

Systematic review of machine-learning models in orthopaedic trauma

Aims

Machine-learning (ML) prediction models in orthopaedic trauma hold great promise in assisting clinicians in various tasks, such as personalized risk stratification. However, an overview of current applications and critical appraisal to peer-reviewed guidelines is lacking. The objectives of this study are to 1) provide an overview of current ML prediction models in orthopaedic trauma; 2) evaluate the completeness of reporting following the Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis (TRIPOD) statement; and 3) assess the risk of bias following the Prediction model Risk Of Bias Assessment Tool (PROBAST) tool.

Methods

A systematic search screening 3,252 studies identified 45 ML-based prediction models in orthopaedic trauma up to January 2023. The TRIPOD statement assessed transparent reporting and the PROBAST tool the risk of bias.

Results

A total of 40 studies reported on training and internal validation; four studies performed both development and external validation, and one study performed only external validation. The most commonly reported outcomes were mortality (33%, 15/45) and length of hospital stay (9%, 4/45), and the majority of prediction models were developed in the hip fracture population (60%, 27/45). The overall median completeness for the TRIPOD statement was 62% (interquartile range 30 to 81%). The overall risk of bias in the PROBAST tool was low in 24% (11/45), high in 69% (31/45), and unclear in 7% (3/45) of the studies. High risk of bias was mainly due to analysis domain concerns including small datasets with low number of outcomes, complete-case analysis in case of missing data, and no reporting of performance measures.

Conclusion

The results of this study showed that despite a myriad of potential clinically useful applications, a substantial part of ML studies in orthopaedic trauma lack transparent reporting, and are at high risk of bias. These problems must be resolved by following established guidelines to instil confidence in ML models among patients and clinicians. Otherwise, there will remain a sizeable gap between the development of ML prediction models and their clinical application in our day-to-day orthopaedic trauma practice.

Artificial intelligence in orthopedics: A qualitative exploration of the surgeon perspective

Artificial intelligence (AI) is currently integrated into many medical services. AI is utilized in many aspects of orthopedic surgery. The scope ranges from diagnosis to complex surgery. To evaluate the perceptions, attitudes, and interests of Sudanese orthopedic surgeons regarding the different applications of AI in orthopedic surgery. This qualitative questionnaire-based study was conducted through an anonymous electronic survey using Google Forms distributed among Sudanese orthopedic surgeons. The questionnaire entailed 4 sections. The first section included the participants' demographic data. The remaining 3 sections included questions for the assessment of the perception, attitude, and interest of surgeons toward (AI). The validity and reliability of the questionnaire were tested and piloted before the final dissemination. One hundred twenty-nine surgeons responded to the questionnaires. Most respondents needed to be more aware of the basic concepts of AI. However, most respondents were aware of its use in spinal and joint replacement surgeries. Most respondents had doubts regarding the safety of (AI). However, they were highly interested in utilizing (AI) in many orthopedic surgical aspects. Orthopedic surgery is a rapidly evolving branch of surgery that involves adoption of new technologies. Therefore, orthopedic surgeons should be encouraged to enroll in research activities to generate more studies and reviews to assess the usefulness and safety of emerging technologies.