1
|
Zitnay JL, Tashjian RZ, Walch G, Chalmers PN, Joyce CD, Henninger HB. Inlay vs. onlay humeral components in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a biorobotic shoulder simulator study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2024; 33:1377-1386. [PMID: 38036254 PMCID: PMC11098709 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2023.10.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2023] [Revised: 10/09/2023] [Accepted: 10/22/2023] [Indexed: 12/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Both inlay and onlay humeral implants are available for reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA), but biomechanical data comparing these components remain limited. This study investigated the effects of inlay and onlay rTSA humeral components on shoulder biomechanics using a biorobotic shoulder simulator. METHODS Twenty fresh-frozen cadaveric shoulders were tested before and after rTSA with either an inlay or onlay humeral implant. Comparisons were performed between the most commonly implanted configurations for each implant (baseline) and with a modification to provide equivalent neck-shaft angles (NSAs) for the inlay and onlay configurations. Specimens underwent passive range-of-motion (ROM) assessment with the scapula held static, and scapular-plane abduction was performed, driven by previously collected human-subject scapulothoracic and glenohumeral kinematics. Passive ROM glenohumeral joint angles were compared using t tests, whereas muscle force and excursion data during scapular-plane elevation were evaluated with statistical parametric mapping and t tests. RESULTS Maximum passive elevation was reduced for the inlay vs. onlay humeral components, although both implants caused reduced passive elevation vs. the native joint. Inlay rTSA also demonstrated reduced passive internal rotation at rest and increased external rotation at 90° of humerothoracic elevation vs. the native joint. All preoperative planning estimates of ROM differed from experiments. Rotator cuff forces were elevated with an onlay vs. inlay humeral implant, but simulated muscle excursions did not differ between systems. Compared with the native joint, rotator cuff forces were increased for both inlay and onlay implants and deltoid forces were reduced for inlay implants. Muscle excursions were dramatically altered by rTSA vs. the native joint. Comparisons of inlay and onlay humeral implants with equivalent NSAs were consistent with the baseline comparisons. CONCLUSIONS Rotator cuff forces required to perform scapular-plane abduction increase following rTSA using both inlay and onlay implants. Rotator cuff forces are lower with inlay implants compared with onlay implants, although inlay implants also result in reduced passive-elevation ROM. Deltoid forces are lower with inlay implants in comparison to the native joint but not with onlay implants. The differences between inlay and onlay components are largely unaffected by NSA, indicating that these differences are inherent to the inlay and onlay designs. In those patients with an intact rotator cuff, decreased rotator cuff forces to perform abduction with an inlay humeral implant compared with an onlay implant may promote improved long-term outcomes owing to reduced deltoid muscle fatigue when using an inlay implant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jared L Zitnay
- Department of Orthopaedics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Robert Z Tashjian
- Department of Orthopaedics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Gilles Walch
- Hôpital Privé Jean Mermoz-Groupe Ramsay, Centre Orthopédique Santy, Lyon, France
| | - Peter N Chalmers
- Department of Orthopaedics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | | | - Heath B Henninger
- Department of Orthopaedics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA; Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Levin JM, Pugliese M, Gobbi F, Pandy MG, Di Giacomo G, Frankle MA. Impact of reverse shoulder arthroplasty design and patient shoulder size on moment arms and muscle fiber lengths in shoulder abductors. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2023; 32:2550-2560. [PMID: 37419441 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2023.05.035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2023] [Revised: 05/17/2023] [Accepted: 05/28/2023] [Indexed: 07/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) increases the moment arm of the deltoid; however, there is limited knowledge on the accompanying changes in muscle architecture that play a role in muscle force production. The purpose of this study was to use a geometric shoulder model to evaluate the anterior deltoid, middle deltoid, and supraspinatus regarding (1) the differences in moment arms and muscle-tendon lengths in small, medium, and large native shoulders and (2) the impact of 3 RSA designs on moment arms, muscle fiber lengths, and force-length (F-L) curves. METHODS A geometric model of the native glenohumeral joint was developed, validated, and adjusted to represent small, medium, and large shoulders. Moment arms, muscle-tendon lengths, and normalized muscle fiber lengths were assessed for the supraspinatus, anterior deltoid, and middle deltoid from 0° to 90° of abduction. RSA designs were modeled and virtually implanted, including a lateralized glenosphere with an inlay 135° humeral component (lateral glenoid-medial humerus [LGMH]), a medialized glenosphere with an onlay 145° humeral component (medial glenoid-lateral humerus [MGLH]), and a medialized glenosphere with an inlay 155° humeral component (medial glenoid-medial humerus [MGMH]). Descriptive statistics were used to compare moment arms and normalized muscle fiber lengths. RESULTS As shoulder size increased, the moment arms and muscle-tendon lengths for the anterior deltoid, middle deltoid, and supraspinatus increased. All RSA designs achieved greater moment arms for the anterior and middle deltoid, with the MGLH design achieving the largest increase. The resting normalized muscle fiber length of the anterior and middle deltoid was substantially increased in the MGLH (1.29) and MGMH (1.24) designs, shifting the operating ranges of these muscles to the descending portions of their F-L curves, whereas the LGMH design maintained a resting deltoid fiber length (1.14) and operating range similar to the native shoulder. All RSA designs demonstrated a decrease in the native supraspinatus moment arm in early abduction, with the largest decrease in the MGLH design (-59%) and minimal decrease in the LGMH design (-14%). The supraspinatus operated on the ascending limb of its F-L curve in the native shoulder and remained on this portion of the F-L curve for all RSA designs. CONCLUSION Although the MGLH design maximizes the abduction moment arm for the anterior and middle deltoid, overlengthening of the muscle may compromise deltoid muscle force production by forcing the muscle to operate on the descending portion of its F-L curve. In contrast, the LGMH design increases the abduction moment arm for the anterior and middle deltoid more modestly while allowing the muscle to operate near the plateau of its F-L curve and maximizing its force-producing potential.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jay M Levin
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
| | - Mattia Pugliese
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Concordia Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Fabrizio Gobbi
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Concordia Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Marcus G Pandy
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | | | - Mark A Frankle
- Shoulder & Elbow Service, Florida Orthopaedic Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Burton W, Crespo IR, Andreassen T, Pryhoda M, Jensen A, Myers C, Shelburne K, Banks S, Rullkoetter P. Fully automatic tracking of native glenohumeral kinematics from stereo-radiography. Comput Biol Med 2023; 163:107189. [PMID: 37393783 DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2023.107189] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2023] [Revised: 06/12/2023] [Accepted: 06/19/2023] [Indexed: 07/04/2023]
Abstract
The current work introduces a system for fully automatic tracking of native glenohumeral kinematics in stereo-radiography sequences. The proposed method first applies convolutional neural networks to obtain segmentation and semantic key point predictions in biplanar radiograph frames. Preliminary bone pose estimates are computed by solving a non-convex optimization problem with semidefinite relaxations to register digitized bone landmarks to semantic key points. Initial poses are then refined by registering computed tomography-based digitally reconstructed radiographs to captured scenes, which are masked by segmentation maps to isolate the shoulder joint. A particular neural net architecture which exploits subject-specific geometry is also introduced to improve segmentation predictions and increase robustness of subsequent pose estimates. The method is evaluated by comparing predicted glenohumeral kinematics to manually tracked values from 17 trials capturing 4 dynamic activities. Median orientation differences between predicted and ground truth poses were 1.7∘ and 8.6∘ for the scapula and humerus, respectively. Joint-level kinematics differences were less than 2∘ in 65%, 13%, and 63% of frames for XYZ orientation DoFs based on Euler angle decompositions. Automation of kinematic tracking can increase scalability of tracking workflows in research, clinical, or surgical applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William Burton
- Center for Orthopaedic Biomechanics, University of Denver, 2155 E. Wesley Ave., Denver, CO, 80210, USA.
| | - Ignacio Rivero Crespo
- Center for Orthopaedic Biomechanics, University of Denver, 2155 E. Wesley Ave., Denver, CO, 80210, USA
| | - Thor Andreassen
- Center for Orthopaedic Biomechanics, University of Denver, 2155 E. Wesley Ave., Denver, CO, 80210, USA
| | - Moira Pryhoda
- Center for Orthopaedic Biomechanics, University of Denver, 2155 E. Wesley Ave., Denver, CO, 80210, USA
| | - Andrew Jensen
- Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, University of Florida, 939 Center Dr., Gainesville, FL, 32611, USA
| | - Casey Myers
- Center for Orthopaedic Biomechanics, University of Denver, 2155 E. Wesley Ave., Denver, CO, 80210, USA
| | - Kevin Shelburne
- Center for Orthopaedic Biomechanics, University of Denver, 2155 E. Wesley Ave., Denver, CO, 80210, USA
| | - Scott Banks
- Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, University of Florida, 939 Center Dr., Gainesville, FL, 32611, USA
| | - Paul Rullkoetter
- Center for Orthopaedic Biomechanics, University of Denver, 2155 E. Wesley Ave., Denver, CO, 80210, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Sulkar HJ, Aliaj K, Tashjian RZ, Chalmers PN, Foreman KB, Henninger HB. High and low performers in internal rotation after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a biplane fluoroscopic study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2023; 32:e133-e144. [PMID: 36343789 PMCID: PMC10023281 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2022.10.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2022] [Revised: 09/25/2022] [Accepted: 10/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Internal rotation in adduction is often limited after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA), but the origins of this functional deficit are unclear. Few studies have directly compared individuals who can and cannot perform internal rotation in adduction. Little data on underlying 3D humerothoracic, scapulothoracic, and glenohumeral joint relationships in these patients are available. METHODS Individuals >1-year postoperative to rTSA were imaged with biplane fluoroscopy in resting neutral and internal rotation in adduction poses. Subjects could either perform internal rotation in adduction with their hand at T12 or higher (high, N = 7), or below the hip pocket (low, N = 8). Demographics, the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, Simple Shoulder Test, and scapular notching grade were recorded. Joint orientation angles were derived from model-based markerless tracking of the scapula and humerus relative to the torso. The 3D implant models were aligned to preoperative computed tomography models to evaluate bone-implant impingement. RESULTS The Simple Shoulder Test was highest in the high group (11 ± 1 vs. 9 ± 2, P = .019). Two subjects per group had scapular notching (grades 1 and 2), and 3 high group and 4 low group subjects had impingement below the glenoid. In the neutral pose, the scapula had 7° more upward rotation in the high group (P = .100), and the low group demonstrated 9° more posterior tilt (P = .017) and 14° more glenohumeral elevation (P = .047). In the internal rotation pose, axial rotation was >45° higher in the high group (P ≤ .008) and the low group again had 11° more glenohumeral elevation (P = .058). Large rotational differences within subject groups arose from a combination of differences in the resting neutral and maximum internal rotation in adduction poses, not only the terminal arm position. CONCLUSIONS Individuals who were able to perform high internal rotation in adduction after rTSA demonstrated differences in joint orientation and anatomic biases versus patients with low internal rotation. The high rotation group had 7° more resting scapular upward rotation and used a 15°-30° change in scapular tilt to perform internal rotation in adduction versus patients in the low group. The combination of altered resting scapular posture and restricted scapulothoracic range of motion could prohibit glenohumeral rotation required to reach internal rotation in adduction. In addition, inter-patient variation in humeral torsion may contribute substantially to postoperative internal rotation differences. These data point toward modifiable implant design and placement factors, as well as foci for physical therapy to strengthen and mobilize the scapula and glenohumeral joint in response to rTSA surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hema J Sulkar
- Department of Orthopaedics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Klevis Aliaj
- Department of Orthopaedics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Robert Z Tashjian
- Department of Orthopaedics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Peter N Chalmers
- Department of Orthopaedics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - K Bo Foreman
- Department of Orthopaedics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA; Department of Physical Therapy and Athletic Training, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Heath B Henninger
- Department of Orthopaedics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Knighton TW, Chalmers PN, Sulkar HJ, Aliaj K, Tashjian RZ, Henninger HB. Reverse total shoulder glenoid component inclination affects glenohumeral kinetics during abduction: a cadaveric study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2022; 31:2647-2656. [PMID: 35931329 PMCID: PMC9669184 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2022.06.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2022] [Revised: 06/02/2022] [Accepted: 06/27/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Optimal implant placement in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) remains controversial. Specifically, the optimal glenoid inclination is unknown. Therefore, a cadaveric shoulder simulator with 3-dimentional human motion specific to rTSA was used to study joint contact and muscle forces as a function of glenoid component inclination. METHODS Eight human cadaver shoulders were tested before and after rTSA implantation. Scapular plane abduction kinematics from control subjects and those with rTSA drove a cadaveric shoulder simulator with 3-dimentional scapulothoracic and glenohumeral motion. Glenoid inclination varied from -20° to +20°. Outputs included compression, superior-inferior (S/I) shear, and anterior-posterior shear forces from a 6° of freedom load cell in the joint, and deltoid and rotator cuff muscle forces. Data were evaluated with statistical parametric mapping and t-tests. RESULTS Inferior glenoid inclination (-) reduced S/I shear by up to 125% relative to superior inclination, with similar compression to the neutral condition (0°). Superior inclinations (+) increased the S/I shear force by approximately the same magnitude, yet decreased compression by 25% in the most superior inclination (+20°). There were few differences in deltoid or rotator cuff forces due to inclination. Only the middle deltoid decreased by approximately 7% for the most inferior inclination (-20°). Compared with native shoulders, the neutral (0°) rTSA inclination showed reduced forces of 30%-75% in the anterior deltoid and a trend toward decreased forces in the middle deltoid. Force demands on the rotator cuff varied as a function of elevation, with a trend toward increased forces in rTSA at peak glenohumeral elevation. CONCLUSIONS Inferior inclination reduces superior shear forces, without influencing compression. Superior inclination increased S/I shear, while decreasing compression, which may be a source of component loosening and joint instability after rTSA. Inferior inclination of the rTSA glenoid may reduce the likelihood of glenoid loosening by reducing the magnitude of cyclic shear and compressive loading during arm elevation activities, although this may be altered by specific-subject body habitus and motion. These factors are especially important in revision rTSA or glenoid bone grafting where there is already a 3-fold increase in glenoid baseplate loosening vs. primary rTSA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tyler W Knighton
- Department of Orthopaedics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA; Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Peter N Chalmers
- Department of Orthopaedics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Hema J Sulkar
- Department of Orthopaedics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Klevis Aliaj
- Department of Orthopaedics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Robert Z Tashjian
- Department of Orthopaedics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Heath B Henninger
- Department of Orthopaedics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA; Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Srikumaran U. CORR Insights®: Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Alters Humerothoracic, Scapulothoracic, and Glenohumeral Motion During Weighted Scaption. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2022; 480:2266-2268. [PMID: 36179279 PMCID: PMC9555886 DOI: 10.1097/corr.0000000000002383] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2022] [Accepted: 08/05/2022] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Uma Srikumaran
- Johns Hopkins School of Medicine. Division of Shoulder Surgery, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Columbia, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|