Perspectives on Sudden Death Prevention in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

Prognostic implications of different clinical profiles in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is a myocardial genetic disease relatively common in the general population with heterogenous clinical presentation, natural history and prognosis. About 60% of HCM patients have a stable clinical course, while others may experience a variety of HCMrelated complications which follows relatively independent pathways, and that can be distinguished in different subgroups. These subgroups are represented by patients with left ventricular outflow tract obstruction; patients with end-stage disease and reduced or preserved systolic function; patients with apical hypertrophy; patients with apical aneurysm; patients with atrial fibrillation, patients at high risk of sudden death and patients with pre-clinical HCM. The purpose of this review is to describe each of these clinical profiles with its prognostic implications.

Validation of the new American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Guidelines for the risk stratification of sudden cardiac death in a large Mediterranean cohort with Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

BACKGROUND

The aim of our study was to assess the performance of the new American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA) Guidelines, with respect to sudden cardiac death (SCD) prevention, in comparison with the established risk score of the European Society of Cardiology (hypertrophic cardiomyopathy [HCM] Risk-SCD), in a large Mediterranean cohort of HCM patients.

METHODS

The clinical and imaging characteristics of 784 HCM patients (mean age at first evaluation 52 ± 16 years, 67.2% males) were analyzed retrospectively. The sensitivity, specificity, and negative predictive value for SCD events of the presence of ≥1 risk factor for SCD according to the ACC/AHA Guidelines 2020 and of the HCM Risk-SCD≥6% and HCM Risk-SCD≥4% were estimated during follow-up.

RESULTS

During follow-up, 47 (6%) patients suffered an SCD event. The presence of ≥1 major risk factor for SCD according to the new ACC/AHA Guidelines had 96% sensitivity (95% CI 85.5-99.5%) with modest specificity of 59% (95% CI 55-62.2%) and negative predictive value of 99.5% (95% CI 98.2-99.9%). On the contrary, HCM- Risk-SCD≥6% had a relatively low sensitivity (32%, 95% CI 19.1-47.1%) and high specificity of 95% (95% CI 93.1-96.4%), whereas, HCM-Risk-SCD≥4% had sensitivity of 60% (95% CI 44-74%) and specificity of 83.9% (95% CI 80-85.6%). Both the HCM Risk-SCD cut-off values demonstrated lower negative predictive value but higher accuracy than the ACC/AHA algorithm for SCD prediction.

CONCLUSION

The novel ACC/AHA proposed algorithm identifies most of the patients with an SCD event with the cost of numerous defibrillator implantations. HCM-Risk-SCD demonstrated higher specificity, whereas its sensitivity and negative predictive value are modest.

The predictive value of left ventricular and left atrial mechanics for atrial fibrillation and heart failure in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: a prospective cohort study

Atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure (HF) represent clinical turning points, altering the natural history of HCM and influencing long-term outcome of the disease. The aim of this study was to evaluate the ability of left ventricular (LV) and left atrial (LA) myocardial deformation parameters to predict new-onset AF and HF outcomes in patients with HCM. This was a prospective study that included HCM patients without severe valvular heart disease, prior myocardial infarction or history of AF. The study sample consisted of 250 patients (mean age 50.8 ± 15.8, 67.2% male). Two-dimensional (2D) speckle tracking deformation parameters including global longitudinal strain (GLS), radial strain, circumferential strain, LA reservoir strain (LAε_res), LA conduit strain (LAε_con) and LA booster strain(LAε_boost) were examined. During a mean follow-up of 2.5 ± 1.2 years, 44 patients developed new-onset AF. All the LV and LA deformation parameters were significant univariate predictors of AF. GLS and LAε_res had the highest C statistic among the LV and LA functional indices. In multivariable analysis, only LAε_res remained an independent predictor of the arrhythmia (HR 0.91, 95% CI 0.85-0.98, p: 0.008). Similarly, GLS and LAε_res had the highest predictive value among the 2D speckle tracking parameters for HF outcomes. LAε_res remained an independent predictor after adjusting for significant covariates. GLS and LAε_res demonstrated high predictive value for the development of AF and HF in HCM. LAε_res was the only independent predictor of both outcomes.Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04112511.

Prognostic role of left ventricular apical aneurysm in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to systematically review and quantitatively synthesize existing evidence about the prognostic value of LV apical aneurysm in patients with HCM.

BACKGROUND

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) represents a common inherited heart disease associated with enormous diversity in morphologic expression and clinical course. With the increasing penetration of advanced high resolution cardiovascular imaging into routine HCM practice, a subset of HCM patients with left ventricular (LV) apical aneurysm have become more widely recognized.

METHODS

Medline was searched for studies describing the prognostic implication of LV apical aneurysm in patients with HCM. In the main analysis the combined endpoint of major HCM-related outcomes was assessed. Separate analyses for sudden cardiac death (SCD) events and thromboembolic events were also performed.

RESULTS

Six studies comprising of 2382 patients met the inclusion criteria. In the pooled analysis, the presence of LV apical aneurysm was significantly associated with major adverse outcomes (pooled OR: 5.13, 95 CI: 2.85 to 9.23, I²:31%), increased risk of SCD arrhythmic events (pooled OR: 4.67, 95% CI: 2.30 to 9.48, I²: 38%) and thromboembolic events (pooled OR: 6.30, 95% CI: 1.52 to 26.19, I²: 66%).

CONCLUSIONS

These data demonstrate that LV apical aneurysm in HCM patients is associated with an increased risk for SCD events and thromboembolism. This finding might encourage the inclusion of LV apical aneurysm into the HCM SCD risk stratification algorithm as a novel risk marker that supports consideration for primary prevention implantable cardioverter defibrillator and anticoagulation for stroke prophylaxis.

A simple algorithm for a clinical step-by-step approach in the management of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is the most common inherited heart disease with an autosomal dominant pattern and a reported prevalence of about 0.2%. In this review, we present a simple algorithm for the management of first diagnosed HCM patients. Initially, the clinical examination, medical and detailed family history and the ECG are essential. The etiological diagnosis of left ventricular hypertrophy is important in order to differentiate HCM due to sarcomeric genes mutation from other phenocopies, such as cardiac amyloidosis. The next step consists of the cardiovascular imaging and ambulatory electrocardiography. Cardiopulmonary exercise testing may also be considered if available. All of the above provide evidence for the critical step of the risk stratification of patients for sudden cardiac death. The therapeutic strategy, with respect to obstructive and nonobstructive disease, arrhythmias and end-stage HCM is also described.

Clinical characteristics of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in children: An 8-year single center experience

BACKGROUND

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is the second most common pediatric cardiomyopathy. Although there is a large body of literature about HCM in adults, there is limited information on HCM in childhood. We evaluated various aspects of pediatric HCM patients treated at our center.

METHODS

We identified 152 pediatric patients with HCM between October 2011 and October 2019. Clinical history, invasive (ICD, pacemaker, electrophysiologic study, catheter ablation therapy) and non-invasive (ECG, holter moniterization, echocardiography, cardiac MR, genetic study, medicam treatment) data were collected and evaluated.

RESULTS

The mean ± standard deviation age of patients was 8.9 ± 5.7 years (1 month-18 years) and 67.8% were male. The most frequent clinical symptoms were murmur and palpitations. Three cases (2%) had aborted sudden death as the first manifestation of HCM. Of these patients, 120 (78.9%) had non-syndromic HCM and 32 (27.2%) had syndromic HCM. Asymmetric septal hypertrophy was common (48.3%) in the non-syndromic group, whereas concentric hypertrophy was common (56.2%) in syndromic group. Left ventricular outflow tract obstruction (LVOTO) occurred in 39 (25.6%) patients. Nine (5.9%) patients underwent electrophysiologic study and/or ablation and 16 patients underwent surgical intervention. Implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) insertion was performed in 38 patients (26 transvenous, 12 epicardial). ICDs were inserted in three (7.9%) patients for secondary prevention; in the remaining patients (92.1%) the devices were placed for primary prevention. Mean SD follow-up time was 27.1 ± 22 months. Five (3.3%) patients died during the follow-up. No patient had heart transplantation or a long-term assistive device.

CONCLUSION

The etiology of HCM is heterogeneous and present at any age. It is important to determine the timing of surgery and potential risks for sudden cardiac arrest. As most cases of HCM are familial, evaluation of family members at risk should be a routine component of clinical management.

Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: What has Changed in The Guidelines?

Background

The new European Society of Cardiology guidelines for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) define the estimation of sudden cardiac death (SCD) risk as an integral part of clinical management. An implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) is recommended (class IIa) when the risk is ≥ 6%.

Objectives

To compare the SCD risk stratification according to the 2011 and 2014 recommendations for ICD implantation in patients with HCM.

Methods

Retrospective study including 105 patients diagnosed with HCM. The indication for ICD was assessed using the 2011 and 2014 guidelines. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS software version 19.0.0.2®. The tests performed were bilateral, considering the significance level of 5% (p < 0.05).

Results

Regarding primary prevention, according to the 2011 ACCF/AHA recommendations, 39.0% of the patients had indication for ICD implantation (level of evidence IIa). Using the 2014 guidelines, only 12.4% of the patients had an indication for ICD implantation. Comparing the two risk stratification models for patients with HCM, we detected a significant reduction in the number of indications for ICD implantation (p < 0.001). Of the 41 patients classified as IIa according to the 2011 recommendations, 68.3% received a different classification according to the 2014 guidelines.

Conclusion

Significant differences were found when comparing the SCD risk stratification for ICD implantation in the two guidelines. The current SCD risk score seems to identify many low-risk patients who are not candidates for ICD implantation. The use of this new score results in a significant reduction in the number of ICD implanted.

Is It Desirable that I Must Disclose My Genetic Data to Swiss Private Medical Insurances?

Genetic testing has far-reaching consequences, not only in terms of immediate patient management and the wider implications for the patient and their families, but also with respect to disclosure to insurance companies. The focus of this review is the controversial but important topic of the use of genetic data in private medical insurance. We discuss the current legal regulation of genetic data in the context of Swiss insurance, what type(s) of information is relevant to insurance companies, and why 'genetic exceptionalism' (the notion that genetic data has special status) persists. Furthermore, we discuss the sensitive area of handling genetic data from children. The consequences of legal regulation of disclosure of genetic information are considered, particularly from the economic perspective. Finally, we examine how legal conditions correspond to current insurance practice and contrast the Swiss system with the handling of genetic data in other countries in the context of private insurance. Switzerland has adopted fairly 'laissez-faire' regulations compared to other countries, and the public need education on the potential effects of genetic testing on their insurance, especially with respect to direct-to-consumer genetic testing, where there is no consultation from a qualified doctor, or when minors are involved.