Hypertension in the Kidney Transplant Recipient: Overview of Pathogenesis, Clinical Assessment, and Treatment

Strategies to prevent, diagnose and treat kidney disease related to systemic arterial hypertension: a narrative review from the Mexican Group of Experts on Arterial Hypertension

This narrative review highlights strategies proposed by the Mexican Group of Experts on Arterial Hypertension endorsed to prevent, diagnose, and treat chronic kidney disease (CKD) related to systemic arterial hypertension (SAH). Given the growing prevalence of CKD in Mexico and Latin America caused by SAH, there is a need for context-specific approaches to address the effects of SAH, given the diverse population and unique challenges faced by the region. This narrative review provides clinical strategies for healthcare providers on preventing, diagnosing, and treating kidney disease related to SAH, focusing on primary prevention, early detection, evidence-based diagnostic approaches, and selecting pharmacological treatments. Key-strategies are focused on six fundamental areas: 1) Strategies to mitigate kidney disease in SAH, 2) early detection of CKD in SAH, 3) diagnosis and monitoring of SAH, 4) blood pressure targets in patients living with CKD, 5) hypertensive treatment in patients with CKD and 6) diuretics and Non-Steroidal Mineralocorticoid Receptor Inhibitors in Patients with CKD. This review aims to provide relevant strategies for the Mexican and Latin American clinical context, highlight the importance of a multidisciplinary approach to managing SAH, and the role of community-based programs in improving the quality of life for affected individuals. This position paper seeks to contribute to reducing the burden of SAH-related CKD and its complications in Mexico and Latin America.

[Hypertension as a common element of renal transplantation with pressor kidney and posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome]

Secondary arterial hypertension accounts for only 5-10% of cases of arterial hypertension, hence the importance of its clinical suspicion for diagnosis. One of the most common causes of secondary hypertension is renovascular hypertension, caused by renal hypoperfusion and activation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system. In addition to arterial hypertension being one of the most prevalent cardiovascular risk factors in the population, its poor control can cause acute neurological disorders such as Posterior Reversible Leukoencephalopathy syndrome (PRES), being characteristic the appearance of visuals alterations. Next, we present the case of a kidney transplant patient with well-controlled arterial hypertension with worsening secondary to renal artery stenosis and development of PRES.

Incidence and Factors Associated with Uncontrolled Hypertension at 12 months after Kidney Transplantation in Saudi Arabia

INTRODUCTION

Uncontrolled blood pressure (uBP) after kidney transplantation (KTx) is very common and is associated with significant morbidity. However, studies that assess its incidence and risk factors are limited and outdated in the Middle East.

METHODS

This is a single-center retrospective study of KTx recipients (KTRs) in our center between January 2017 and May 2020 with a 12-month follow-up period. The target of hypertension treatment during the time of this study was <140/90 mm Hg, according to the published guidelines. We divided patients according to their blood pressure (BP) control at 1 year into two groups: controlled BP (cBP) (<140/90) and uBP (≥140/90). We studied the association between uBP and patients' demographics, baseline cardiovascular risk factors, and changes in their metabolic and cardiovascular profile during the first 12 months post-KTx.

RESULTS

A total of 254 KTRs were included. 79.2% developed post-KTx hypertension, 74% were ≥30 years, 58% were men, and 80% were living donor KTRs. The renal replacement modality among our patients pre-KTx was hemodialysis in 78.4%, peritoneal dialysis in 11.5%, and 10.1% underwent preemptive transplantation. At 1 year, 76 (29.9%) KTRs did not attain the target BP goal. Systolic BP (SBP) decreased from baseline to 12 months by 13 ± 24 mm Hg in the cBP group and increased by 8.7 ± 21 mm Hg in the uBP group (p < 0.001). Additionally, diastolic BP (DBP) decreased by 8.5 ± 16.9 mm Hg in the cBP group and increased by 2.3 ± 18.8 mm Hg in the uBP group (p < 0.001). Factors associated with uBP included age (47 vs. 41 years, p = 0.008) and diabetes mellitus (p = 0.012). Contrarily, gender, dialysis vintage, preemptive transplantation, type of dialysis (hemodialysis vs. peritoneal dialysis), type of transplant (living donor KTx vs. deceased donor KTx), and smoking were not different among the two groups. There were no significant differences between the two groups in regard to changes in creatinine, weight, A1c, low-density lipoprotein, and parathyroid hormone levels. Additionally, rate of rejection, new onset diabetes post-transplant, and persistent hyperthyroidism were not different between the groups. However, higher body mass index at 12 months was associated with a higher incidence of uBP (27.2 ± 5.9 vs. 29.2 ± 5.4, p = 0.013). Using multivariate analysis, we found that serum creatinine at 12 months was the only predictor of uBP (OR = 1.005 [1-1.011], p = 0.036).

CONCLUSION

At 1-year post-renal transplantation, about one-third of KTRs had uBP despite multiple antihypertensive medications. SBP and DBP significantly trended upward after transplantation in uBP patients, whereas SBP and DBP significantly trended downward after transplantation in cBP patients. Serum creatinine at 12 months was the only factor independently associated with uBP.

Obesity and Kidney Transplant Candidates: An Outcome Analysis Based on Body Mass Index

Background Obesity is a well-established risk factor for a decline in renal function and post-operative complications. Also, obese patients suffer worse outcomes such as higher rates of wound complications, longer hospital stays, and delayed graft function (DGF) when compared to nonobese patients. The correlation between having a high BMI and the postoperative outcomes of kidney transplantation has not been investigated yet in Saudi Arabia. There is scarce evidence that patients with obesity who have undergone kidney transplantation are devoid of any complications before, during, or after their procedure. Methodology A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted using charts of nearly 142 patients in King Abdullah Specialist Children's Hospital in Riyadh, who had kidney transplant surgery in the organ transplantation department. All Obese patients with BMI >29.9 who underwent Kidney Transplant Surgery in King Abdulaziz Medical City from 2015 to 2022 were used. Details of hospital admissions were retrieved. Results A total of 142 patients fulfilling the inclusion criteria were included. There was a significant difference between patients regarding pre-surgical history where all cases (100%; 2) with class three obesity were hypertensive and on dialysis versus (77.8%; 21) and (70.4%; 19) of class two obesity and (86.7%; 98) and (78.8%; 89) of class one obesity cases, respectively (P = 0.041). Regarding medical history, hypertension was reported among 121 (85%), followed by dialysis (77%; 110), diabetes mellitus (DM) (52%; 74), dyslipidemia (24%; 35), endocrine diseases (15%; 22), and cardiovascular diseases (16%; 23). Considering post-transplant complications, 14.1% (20) of the study cases had DM (16.8% of obese class one, 3.7% of obese class two, and none of obese class three; P = 0.996) and urinary tract infection (UTI) among 7% (10) of the cases (6.2% of obese class one, 11.1% of obese class two, and none of obese class three; P = 0.996). All these differences according to patients' BMI were statistically insignificant. Conclusion Obese patients are more likely to experience difficult intraoperative management along with a complicated postoperative course due to numerous concomitant comorbidities. Post-transplant DM (PTDM) was the most prominent post-transplant complication followed by UTI. A remarkable reduction in serum creatinine and blood urea nitrogen (BUN) has been observed at the time of discharge and after six months compared to pre-transplant measurements.

Arterial hypertension in kidney transplantation: huge importance, but few answers

Abstract Arterial hypertension (AH) after renal transplantation (RTX) is correlated with worse cardiovascular and renal outcomes, with loss of renal function, decreased graft survival and higher mortality. RTX recipients have discrepant blood pressure (BP) values when measured in the office or by systematic methodologies, such as Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring (ABPM), with significant prevalence of no nocturnal dipping or nocturnal hypertension, white coat hypertension and masked hypertension. The aim of the present study was to review the issue of hypertension in RTX, addressing its multifactorial pathophysiology and demonstrating the importance of ABPM as a tool for monitoring BP in these patients. Treatment is based on lifestyle changes and antihypertensive drugs, with calcium channel blockers considered first-line treatment. The best blood pressure target and treatment with more favorable outcomes in RTX are yet to be determined, through well-conducted scientific studies, that is, in terms of AH in RTX, we currently have more questions to answer than answers to give.

Hipertensão arterial no transplante renal: grande importância, mas poucas respostas

Resumo Hipertensão arterial (HA) no póstransplante renal (TXR) se correlaciona com piores desfechos cardiovasculares e renais, com perda de função renal, diminuição da sobrevida do enxerto e maior mortalidade. Receptores de TXR apresentam valores discrepantes de pressão arterial (PA) quando ela é obtida em consultório ou por metodologias sistematizadas, como a Monitorização Ambulatorial da PA (MAPA), com prevalências significantes de ausência de descenso noturno ou hipertensão noturna, hipertensão do avental branco e hipertensão mascarada. O objetivo do presente estudo foi rever a temática da hipertensão no TXR, abordando sua fisiopatologia multifatorial e demonstrando a importância da MAPA como ferramenta de acompanhamento da PA nesses pacientes. O tratamento é baseado em mudanças no estilo de vida e em fármacos anti-hipertensivos, sendo os bloqueadores de canais de cálcio considerados de primeira linha. A melhor meta pressórica e o tratamento com desfechos mais favoráveis no TXR ainda estão por ser determinados, por meio de estudos bem conduzidos cientificamente, ou seja, em termos de HA no TXR temos atualmente mais questões a responder do que respostas a dar.

Feasibility and acceptability of high-intensity interval training and moderate-intensity continuous training in kidney transplant recipients: the PACE-KD study

Background

Kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) exhibit unique elevated inflammation, impaired immune function, and increased cardiovascular risk. Although exercise reduces cardiovascular risk, there is limited research on this population, particularly surrounding novel high-intensity interval training (HIIT). The purpose of this pilot study was to determine the feasibility and acceptability of HIIT in KTRs.

Methods

Twenty KTRs (male 14; eGFR 58±19 mL/min/1.73 m²; age 49±11 years) were randomised and completed one of three trials: HIIT A (4-, 2-, and 1-min intervals; 80–90% watts at V̇O_2peak), HIITB (4×4 min intervals; 80–90% V̇O_2peak) or MICT (~40 min; 50–60% V̇O_2peak) for 24 supervised sessions on a stationary bike (approx. 3x/week over 8 weeks) and followed up for 3 months. Feasibility was assessed by recruitment, retention, and intervention acceptability and adherence.

Results

Twenty participants completed the intervention, and 8 of whom achieved the required intensity based on power output (HIIT A, 0/6 [0%]; HIITB, 3/8 [38%]; MICT, 5/6 [83%]). Participants completed 92% of the 24 sessions with 105 cancelled and rescheduled sessions and an average of 10 weeks to complete the intervention. Pre-intervention versus post-intervention V̇O_2peak (mL/kg^-1/min^-1) was 24.28±4.91 versus 27.06±4.82 in HIITA, 24.65±7.67 versus 27.48±8.23 in HIIT B, and 29.33±9.04 versus 33.05±9.90 in MICT. No adverse events were reported.

Conclusions

This is the first study to report the feasibility of HIIT in KTRs. Although participants struggled to achieve the required intensity (power), this study highlights the potential that exercise has to reduce cardiovascular risk in KTRs. HIIT and MICT performed on a cycle, with some modification, could be considered safe and feasible in KTRs. Larger scale trials are required to assess the efficacy of HIIT in KTRs and in particular identify the most appropriate intensities, recovery periods, and session duration. Some flexibility in delivery, such as incorporating home-based sessions, may need to be considered to improve recruitment and retention.

Trial registration

ISRCTN, ISRCTN17122775. Registered on 30 January 2017.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40814-022-01067-3.

Hypertension in Kidney Transplant Recipients: Where Are We Today?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death and allograft loss among kidney transplant recipients, and hypertension is an independent risk factor for cardiovascular morbidity of this patient population. The etiology of hypertension is multifactorial, including pre-transplant volume overload, post-transplant recipient and donor-associated variables, and transplant-specific causes (immunosuppressive medications, allograft dysfunction and surgical complications such as transplant artery stenosis).

RECENT FINDINGS

No randomized controlled trials have assessed the optimal blood pressure targets and explored the best antihypertensive regimen for kidney transplant recipients. According to the large observational studies, it is reasonable to achieve a blood pressure goal of equal to or less than 130/80 mmHg in the long-term follow-up for minimizing the cardiovascular morbidity. The selection of antihypertensive agents should be based on the patient's co-morbidities; however, the initial choice could be calcium channel blockers especially in the first few months of transplantation. In patients with cardiovascular indications of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibition, given the well-described benefits in diabetic and proteinuric patients, it is reasonable to consider the use of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors. There is a need for future prospective trials in the transplant population to define optimal blood pressure goals and therapies.

Frequency and Patterns of Prescribing Antihypertensive Agents in Outpatient Kidney Transplant Recipients Among Six Cities in China from 2011 to 2018

PURPOSE

Antihypertensive agents are frequently prescribed in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs). However, the frequency and patterns of prescribing antihypertensive agents remain uncharacterized in KTRs in China. Therefore, this investigation was carried out.

METHODS

Retrospective prescription data dated 2011 to 2018 from KTRs in China were accessed using the Hospital Prescription Analysis Program database. Information about sex, birth date, and identification number of the patient; city, date, and department of the medical visit; major diagnoses; and the generic names, specifications, quantities, and usage of prescribed drugs were collected. Antihypertensive agents were grouped into 5 classes: angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs), angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), β-blockers (BBs), calcium channel blockers (CCBs), and diuretics. The frequency and patterns of prescribing these antihypertensive agents were analyzed.

FINDINGS

Prescriptions from 174,749 KTRs (67.2% male; mean age, 42.5 [9.4] years) were obtained, and 58.2% of the patients were prescribed antihypertensive agents. The percentage of patients who received antihypertensive treatment increased from 52.9% in 2011 to 61.6% in 2018 and varied by city. Cyclosporine was associated with higher prescription frequency of antihypertensive agents than was tacrolimus (71.7% vs 63.4%; P < 0.0001). During the 8-year study period, CCBs were most frequently prescribed (39.0%), followed by ARBs (31.9%), BBs (14.3%), ACEIs (11.6%), and diuretics (3.2%). The mean (SD) number of antihypertensive drugs prescribed per KTR was 1.7 (0.8). Almost half of KTRs (51.2%) received just 1 antihypertensive drug. Co-administration of 2 or more antihypertensive drugs presented an obviously upward trend. The most commonly prescribed 2-drug combination was CCB + ARB (44.8%), followed by CCB + BB (20.1%) and CCB + ACEI (13.0%). In the patients who received 3 antihypertensive drugs, the 2 most frequently prescribed combinations were CCB + ARB + BB (37.5%) and CCB + ARB + ACEI (32.7%). Specific data varied by both year and city.

IMPLICATIONS

The prescribing patterns of antihypertensive agents in KTRs varied by city even within same country. Hence, more high-quality research studies on the use of antihypertensive agents in KTRs are needed.

Being Overweight Is Related to Faster Decline in Annual Glomerular Filtration Rate in Kidney Transplant

Few studies have examined the relationship between non-immunological factors and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) decline in kidney transplant. Correcting these factors in native kidneys slows the progression of chronic kidney disease. The aim of this study was to analyze the association between the control of non-immunological factors and the annual decline of GFR.

METHODS

A single-center, retrospective study was performed. We included 128 patients who received kidney transplants between 2000 and 2015, with at least 1-year post-transplant follow-up. Clinical records were reviewed. GFR was estimated by CKD-EPI. Three groups were defined according to the annual change in eGFR (ΔGFR 2016-1015): non-progressors (> -1 mL/min/1.73 m²), slow progressors (> -1 and < -5 mL/min/1.73 m²), and fast progressors (< -5 mL/min/1.73 m²). Percentage of achievement of KDIGO target was also analyzed.

RESULTS

The mean GFR was 62.5 mL/min/1.73 m². Glomerulonephritis was the most common cause of kidney failure (36%). When the fast progressor group was compared with the non-progressor group, they differed significantly in age-patients were younger (40 ± 12.3 vs 45 ± 13.1 years)-post-transplant body mass index (27.4 ± 5.6 vs 25.2 x ± 5.9 kg/m²), and serum uric acid, which was significantly higher (6.4 ± 1.7 vs 5.5 ± 1.58 mg/dL). There were no differences between the groups with regard to blood pressure, dyslipidemia, proteinuria, or venous bicarbonate. Target systolic blood pressure was achieved by 45% of patients. Biopsy-proven acute rejection was higher in the fast progression group, although this was not statistically significant (13 [24.5%] vs 8 [13.1%]).

CONCLUSIONS

High body mass index was associated with a faster decline in glomerular filtration rate in this study. Target blood pressure <140/90 mm Hg was achieved in less than 50% of cases.

Intravascular Renal Denervation in Renal Dialysis Patients with Uncontrolled Hypertension: A Case Series of Four Patients

Case series

Patient: Male, 24 • Female, 55 • Female, 56 • Male, 72

Final Diagnosis: Hypertension

Symptoms: Dyspnea

Medication: —

Clinical Procedure: Intravascular renal denervation

Specialty: Cardiology

Immunomodulatory plasticity of mesenchymal stem cells: a potential key to successful solid organ transplantation

Organ transplantation remains to be a treatment of choice for patients suffering from irreversible organ failure. Immunosuppressive (IS) drugs employed to maintain the allograft have shown excellent short-term graft survival, but, their long-term use could contribute to immunological and non-immunological risk factors, resulting in graft dysfunctionalities. Upcoming IS regimes have highlighted the use of cell-based therapies, which can eliminate the risk of drug-borne toxicities while maintaining efficacy of the treatment. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have been considered as an invaluable cell type, owing to their unique immunomodulatory properties, which makes them desirable for application in transplant settings, where hyper-activation of the immune system is evident. The immunoregulatory potential of MSCs holds true for preclinical studies while achieving it in clinical studies continues to be a challenge. Understanding the biological factors responsible for subdued responses of MSCs in vivo would allow uninhibited use of this therapy for countless conditions. In this review, we summarize the variations in the preclinical and clinical studies utilizing MSCs, discuss the factors which might be responsible for variability in outcome and propose the advancements likely to occur in future for using this as a "boutique/personalised therapy" for patient care.

Hypertension in the Pediatric Kidney Transplant Recipient

Hypertension after kidney transplant is a frequent occurrence in pediatric patients. It is a risk factor for graft loss and contributes to the significant burden of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in this population. The etiology of posttransplant hypertension is multifactorial including donor factors, recipient factors, medications, and lifestyle factors similar to those prevalent in the general population. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring has emerged as the most reliable method for measuring hypertension in pediatric transplant recipients, and many consider it to be essential in the care of these patients. Recent technological advances including measurement of carotid intima-media thickness, pulse wave velocity, and myocardial strain using specked echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging have improved our ability to assess CVD burden. Since hypertension remains underrecognized and inadequately treated, an early diagnosis and an appropriate control should be the focus of therapy to help improve patient and graft survival.