Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: Maximizing the Response to Biventricular Pacing

Evaluating the predictive efficacy of real-time 3D echocardiography in cardiac resynchronization therapy

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study is to assess the predictive efficacy of real-time three-dimensional echocardiography (RT-3DE) and QRS wave duration in determining the response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) and assessing left ventricular systolic function pre- and post-CRT device implantation.

METHOD

A total of 51 patients with heart failure undergoing CRT at the Second Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University between January 1, 2013, and October 31, 2020, were enrolled in this study. Traditional two-dimensional echocardiography and RT-3DE were performed pre and post-CRT, with QRS wave width data from electrocardiograms and additional clinical information collected. Patients were categorized into CRT responder (n = 36) and CRT non-responder (n = 15) groups based on their response to CRT device implantation. Comparative analyses were conducted on the general characteristics of both groups, as well as the predictive efficacy of RT-3DE and QRS wave width for CRT responsiveness and left ventricular systolic function. Data on the standard deviation (Tmsv16-SD, Tmsv12-SD, Tmsv6-SD) and maximum difference (Tmsv16-Dif, Tmsv12-Dif, Tmsv6-Dif) of left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV) at segments 16, 12, and 6, as well as QRS wave width, were collected and analyzed.

RESULTS

The indicators Tmsv6-Dif, Tmsv12-Dif, Tmsv16-Dif, Tmsv6-SD, Tmsv12-SD, Tmsv16-SD, and QRS wave width exhibited significantly higher values in the CRT responder group when compared to the CRT non-responder group (P < 0.05). Among these, Tmsv16-SD demonstrated superior predictive performance for post-CRT response, with a sensitivity of 88.9%, specificity of 80.0%, and a diagnostic cut-off value of 6.19%. This predictive capability exceeded that of the conventional indicator, QRS wave width.

CONCLUSION

RT-3DE enables accurate prediction of post-CRT patient response and significantly facilitates quantitative assessment of CRT therapy efficacy.

Left ventricle and mitral valve reverse remodeling in response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in nonischemic cardiomyopathy

BACKGROUND

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) improves left heart geometry and function in nonischemic cardiomyopathy (NICMP). We aimed to detail the effects of CRT on left ventricular (LV) and mitral valve (MV) remodeling using 2-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography.

METHODS

Forty-five consecutive patients with NICMP who underwent CRT implantation between 2009 and 2012, and had pre-CRT and follow-up echocardiograms available, were included. Paired t test, linear and logistic regression, and Kaplan-Meier survival analyses were used for statistical assessment.

RESULTS

The mean age and QRS duration were 60 years and 157 ms, respectively, and 13 (28.9%) were female. At a mean follow-up of 3 years, there were 22 (48.9%) "CRT responders" (≥15% reduction in LV end-systolic volume index [LVESVi]). Significant improvements were observed in LV ejection fraction (26.3% vs 34.3%) and LVESVi (87.7 vs 71.1 mL/m² ), as well as mitral regurgitation vena contracta width, MV tenting height and area, and end-systolic interpapillary muscle distance. Five-year actuarial survival was 87.5%. Multivariate regression analyses revealed the pre-CRT LVESVi (β = 0.52), and MV coaptation length (β = -0.34) and septolateral annular diameter (β = 0.25) as good correlates of follow-up LVESVi. Variables associated with CRT response were pre-CRT MV coaptation length (OR 1.75, 95% CI 1.0-3.1) and posterior leaflet tethering angle (OR 1.07, 95% CI 1.0-1.14), irrespective of baseline QRS morphology and duration (all P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Cardiac resynchronization therapy improves LV and MV geometry and function in half of patients with NICMP, which is paralleled by decreased mitral regurgitation severity. The extent of pre-CRT LV remodeling and MV tethering are associated with CRT response.

Mechanisms of Protective Effects of SGLT2 Inhibitors in Cardiovascular Disease and Renal Dysfunction

Type 2 diabetes mellitus is one of the most common forms of the disease worldwide. Hyperglycemia and insulin resistance play key roles in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Renal glucose reabsorption is an essential feature in glycaemic control. Kidneys filter 160 g of glucose daily in healthy subjects under euglycaemic conditions. The expanding epidemic of diabetes leads to a prevalence of diabetes-related cardiovascular disorders, in particular, heart failure and renal dysfunction. Cellular glucose uptake is a fundamental process for homeostasis, growth, and metabolism. In humans, three families of glucose transporters have been identified, including the glucose facilitators GLUTs, the sodium-glucose cotransporter SGLTs, and the recently identified SWEETs. Structures of the major isoforms of all three families were studied. Sodium-glucose cotransporter (SGLT2) provides most of the capacity for renal glucose reabsorption in the early proximal tubule. A number of cardiovascular outcome trials in patients with type 2 diabetes have been studied with SGLT2 inhibitors reducing cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. The current review article summarises these aspects and discusses possible mechanisms with SGLT2 inhibitors in protecting heart failure and renal dysfunction in diabetic patients. Through glucosuria, SGLT2 inhibitors reduce body weight and body fat, and shift substrate utilisation from carbohydrates to lipids and, possibly, ketone bodies. These pleiotropic effects of SGLT2 inhibitors are likely to have contributed to the results of the EMPA-REG OUTCOME trial in which the SGLT2 inhibitor, empagliflozin, slowed down the progression of chronic kidney disease and reduced major adverse cardiovascular events in high-risk individuals with type 2 diabetes. This review discusses the role of SGLT2 in the physiology and pathophysiology of renal glucose reabsorption and outlines the unexpected logic of inhibiting SGLT2 in the diabetic kidney.

Electrocardiographic optimization techniques in resynchronization therapy

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is a cornerstone of therapy for patients with heart failure, reduced left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction, and a wide QRS complex. However, not all patients respond to CRT: 30% of CRT implanted patients are currently considered clinical non-responders and up to 40% do not achieve LV reverse remodelling. In order to achieve the best CRT response, appropriate patient selection, device implantation, and programming are important factors. Optimization of CRT pacing intervals may improve results, increasing the number of responders, and the magnitude of the response. Echocardiography is considered the reference method for atrioventricular and interventricular (VV) intervals optimization but it is time-consuming, complex and it has a large interobserver and intraobserver variability. Previous studies have linked QRS shortening to clinical response, echocardiographic improvement and favourable prognosis. In this review, we describe the electrocardiographic optimization methods available: 12-lead electrocardiogram; fusion-optimized intervals (FOI); intracardiac electrogram-based algorithms; and electrocardiographic imaging. Fusion-optimized intervals is an electrocardiographic method of optimizing CRT based on QRS duration that combines fusion with intrinsic conduction. The FOI method is feasible and fast, further reduces QRS duration, can be performed during implant, improves acute haemodynamic response, and achieves greater LV remodelling compared with nominal programming of CRT.

Cardiac resynchronization therapy: a comprehensive review

Despite improved understanding of heart failure (HF) and advances in medical treatments, its prevalence continues to rise, and the role of implantable devices continues to evolve. While cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is an accepted form of treatment for many suffering from HF, there is an ever-evolving body of evidence examining novel indications, optimization of lead placement and device programming, with several competing technologies now also on the horizon. This review aims to take a clinical perspective on the major trials, current indications, controversies and emerging aspects of CRT in the treatment of HF.

Prediction of clinical outcome in patients treated with cardiac resynchronization therapy - the role of NT-ProBNP and a combined response score

BACKGROUND

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is an established therapy for appropriately selected patients with heart failure. Response to CRT has been heterogeneously defined using both clinical and echocardiographic measures, with poor correlation between the two.

METHODS

The study cohort was comprised of 202 CRT-treated patients and CRT response was defined at 6 months post-implant. Echocardiographic response (E+) was defined as a reduction in LVESV ≥ 15%, clinical response as an improvement of ≥ 1 NYHA class (C+), and biomarker response as a ≥ 25% reduction in NT-proBNP(B+). The association of response measures (E+, B+, C+; response score range 0-3) and clinical endpoints at 3 years was assessed in landmarked Cox models.

RESULTS

Echo and clinical responders demonstrated greater declines in NT-proBNP than non-responders (median [E+/B+]: -52%, [E+]: -27%, [C+]: -39% and [E-/C-]: -13%; p = 0.01 for trend). Biomarker (HR 0.43 [95% CI: 0.22-0.86], p = 0.02) and clinical (HR 0.40 [0.23-0.70] p = 0.001) response were associated with a significantly reduced risk of the primary endpoint. When integrating each response measure into a composite score, each 1 point increase was associated with a 31% decreased risk for a composite endpoint of mortality, LVAD, transplant and HF hospitalization (HR 0.69 [95% CI: 0.50-0.96], p = 0.03), and a 52% decreased risk of all-cause mortality (HR 0.48 [95% CI: 0.26-0.89], p = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

Serial changes in NT-proBNP are associated with clinical outcomes following CRT implant. Integration of biomarker, clinical, and echocardiographic response may discriminate CRT responders versus non-responders in a clinically meaningful way, and with higher accuracy.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The cohort was combined from study NCT01949246 and the study based on local review board approval 2011/550 in Lund, Sweden.

Targeting Obesity and Diabetes to Treat Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a major unmet medical need that is characterized by the presence of multiple cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular comorbidities. Foremost among these comorbidities are obesity and diabetes, which are not only risk factors for the development of HFpEF, but worsen symptoms and outcome. Coronary microvascular inflammation with endothelial dysfunction is a common denominator among HFpEF, obesity, and diabetes that likely explains at least in part the etiology of HFpEF and its synergistic relationship with obesity and diabetes. Thus, pharmacological strategies to supplement nitric oxide and subsequent cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP)-protein kinase G (PKG) signaling may have therapeutic promise. Other potential approaches include exercise and lifestyle modifications, as well as targeting endothelial cell mineralocorticoid receptors, non-coding RNAs, sodium glucose transporter 2 inhibitors, and enhancers of natriuretic peptide protective NO-independent cGMP-initiated and alternative signaling, such as LCZ696 and phosphodiesterase-9 inhibitors. Additionally, understanding the role of adipokines in HFpEF may lead to new treatments. Identifying novel drug targets based on the shared underlying microvascular disease process may improve the quality of life and lifespan of those afflicted with both HFpEF and obesity or diabetes, or even prevent its occurrence.