Effects of Anti-Inflammatory Medications in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: A Focus on Losmapimod

An open-label pilot study of losmapimod to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and changes in biomarker and clinical outcome assessments in participants with facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy type 1

INTRODUCTION

Facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD) is a genetic disease caused by aberrant DUX4 expression, leading to progressive muscle weakness. No effective pharmaceutical treatment is available. Losmapimod, a small molecule selective inhibitor of p38 α/β MAPK, showed promising results in a phase 1 trial for the treatment of FSHD, prompting additional studies. We report the findings of an open-label phase 2 trial (NCT04004000) investigating the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and exploratory efficacy of losmapimod in participants with FSHD1.

METHODS

This study was conducted at a single site in the Netherlands from August 2019 to March 2021, with an optional, ongoing open-label extension. Participants aged 18 to 65 years with FSHD1 took 15 mg of losmapimod twice daily for 52 weeks. Primary endpoints were measures of losmapimod safety and tolerability. Secondary endpoints were assessments of losmapimod pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics.

RESULTS

Fourteen participants were enrolled. No deaths, serious treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), or discontinuations due to TEAEs were reported. Losmapimod achieved blood concentrations and target engagements that were previously associated with decreased DUX4 expression in vitro. Clinical outcome measures showed a trend toward stabilization or improvement.

CONCLUSIONS

Losmapimod was well tolerated and may be a promising new treatment for FSHD; a larger phase 3 study is ongoing.

A meta-analysis evaluating efficacy and safety of colchicine for prevention of major cardiovascular events in patients with coronary artery disease

BACKGROUND

Inflammatory plays a key role in the development of coronary artery disease (CAD). Colchicine as an anti-inflammatory treatment for CAD has attracted much attention, its efficacy and safety are controversial and deserved further exploration.

METHODS AND RESULTS

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of colchicine for patients with CAD, relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were identified by searching several databases including PubMed, Web of Science, and EMBASE from January 1992 to May 2022. Fourteen eligible trials of colchicine therapy include populations with chronic coronary syndrome (CCS) (N = 2), acute coronary syndrome (ACS) (N = 5), and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) (N = 7), and involve a total of 13,235 patients which include 6654 subjects in colchicine group and 6581 subjects in the respective control arms. The outcome was reported as odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI), as the relative measure of association. Overall, the incidences of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) (OR 0.65; 95% CI 0.54-0.77, p < 0.01), new ACS (OR 0.68; 95% CI 0.57-0.81, p < 0.01), coronary revascularization (OR 0.65; 95% CI 0.53-0.78, p < 0.01), and stroke (OR 0.51; 95% CI 0.32-0.82, p < 0.01), were lower in the colchicine group than in the placebo arm. We did not find a significant reduction in the incidence of atrial fibrillation (OR 0.84; 95% CI 0.68-1.04, p = 0.11), all-cause mortality (OR 1.06; 95% CI 0.83-1.35, p = 0.83), cardiovascular mortality (OR 0.77; 95% CI 0.52-1.15, p = 0.21). However, we found that colchicine did increase non-cardiovascular mortality (OR 1.44; 95% CI 1.04-2.01, p = 0.03). Although the incidence of gastrointestinal events in the colchicine treatment group was higher than that in the placebo arms (OR 2.08; 95% CI 1.39-3.12, p < 0.01), the symptoms disappeared rapidly after drug withdrawal and could be tolerated by most patients. Colchicine did not increase the incidence of infections (OR 1.42; 95% CI 0.82-2.46, p = 0.22), pneumonia (OR 1.55; 95% CI 0.58-4.18, p = 0.39), cancers (OR 0.98; 95% CI 0.79-1.22, p = 0.88), bleeding (OR 1.14; 95% CI 0.41-3.14, p = 0.80).

CONCLUSIONS

Colchicine is an effective, relatively safe drug that could be considered for the treatment of CAD. However, we need to pay attention to the increasing occurrence of non-cardiovascular mortality and infection especially pneumonia possibly caused by colchicine. Efficacy and safety of colchicine for patients with CAD. CAD coronary artery disease; RCTs randomized controlled trials; OR odds ratio; MACEs major adverse cardiovascular events; ACS acute coronary syndrome; NNT number needed to treat; NNH number needed to harm.

Comprehensive comparative analysis of the prognostic impact of systemic inflammation biomarkers for patients underwent cardiac surgery

Background

Inflammation plays an integral role in the development of cardiovascular disease, and few studies have identified different biomarkers to predict the prognosis of cardiac surgery. But there is a lack of reliable and valid evidence to determine the optimal systemic inflammatory biomarkers to predict prognosis.

Methods

From December 2015 and March 2021, we collected 10 systemic inflammation biomarkers among 820 patients who underwent cardiac surgery. Time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC) curve at different time points and C-index was compared at different time points. Kaplan-Meier method was performed to analyze overall survival (OS). Cox proportional hazard regression analyses were used to assess independent risk factors for OS. A random internal validation was conducted to confirm the effectiveness of the biomarkers.

Results

The area under the ROC of lymphocyte-to-C-reactive protein ratio (LCR) was 0.655, 0.620 and 0.613 at 1-, 2- and 3-year respectively, and C-index of LCR for OS after cardiac surgery was 0.611, suggesting that LCR may serve as a favorable indicator for predicting the prognosis of cardiac surgery. Patients with low LCR had a higher risk of postoperative complications. Besides, Cox proportional hazard regression analyses indicated that LCR was considered as an independent risk factor of OS after cardiac surgery.

Conclusion

LCR shows promise as a noteworthy representative among the systemic inflammation biomarkers in predicting the prognosis of cardiac surgery. Screening for low LCR levels may help surgeons identify high-risk patients and guide perioperative management strategies.

Inflammation and atherosclerosis: signaling pathways and therapeutic intervention

Atherosclerosis is a chronic inflammatory vascular disease driven by traditional and nontraditional risk factors. Genome-wide association combined with clonal lineage tracing and clinical trials have demonstrated that innate and adaptive immune responses can promote or quell atherosclerosis. Several signaling pathways, that are associated with the inflammatory response, have been implicated within atherosclerosis such as NLRP3 inflammasome, toll-like receptors, proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9, Notch and Wnt signaling pathways, which are of importance for atherosclerosis development and regression. Targeting inflammatory pathways, especially the NLRP3 inflammasome pathway and its regulated inflammatory cytokine interleukin-1β, could represent an attractive new route for the treatment of atherosclerotic diseases. Herein, we summarize the knowledge on cellular participants and key inflammatory signaling pathways in atherosclerosis, and discuss the preclinical studies targeting these key pathways for atherosclerosis, the clinical trials that are going to target some of these processes, and the effects of quelling inflammation and atherosclerosis in the clinic.

MTX Treatment Does Not Improve Outcome in Mice with AMI

BACKGROUND

Targeting inflammation in patients with coronary artery disease and/or acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is a matter of debate. Methotrexate (MTX) is one of the most widely used immunosuppressants. Cardiovascular Inflammation Reduction Trial (CIRT) recently failed to demonstrate reduced cardiovascular events in MTX-treated patients. However, it is not known if long-term MTX treatment improves cardiac outcome in AMI. Therefore, in this study, we investigated the postischemic phase in MTX-treated mice undergoing AMI.

METHODS

Wild-type mice received MTX medication intraperitoneally for 2 weeks. Afterward, AMI was induced by transient left anterior ascending artery ligation. Postischemic cardiac damage after 24 h was assessed.

RESULTS

MTX treatment did not affect infarct size as compared to control (IS/AAR: Con 76.20% ± 12.37%/AAR vs. MTX 73.51 ± 11.72%/AAR, p = 0.64). Moreover, systolic function and structural parameters did not differ between groups (24hejection fraction: Con 36.49 ± 3.23% vs. MTX 32.77 ± 2.29%, p = 0.41; 24hLVID; d: Con 3.57 ± 0.17 mm vs. MTX 3.19 ± 0.13 mm, p = 0.14). Platelets were increased by MTX (Con 1,442 ± 69.20 × 103/mm3 vs. MTX 1,920 ± 68.68 × 103/mm3, p < 0.0001). White blood cell and RBC as well as rate of monocytes, granulocytes, lymphocytes, and serum amyloid P levels were equal.

CONCLUSION

MTX medication did not improve postischemic cardiac damage in a murine model of AMI. Future trials are needed to identify and investigate other anti-inflammatory targets to improve cardiovascular outcome.

Anti-inflammatory effects of rosuvastatin treatment on coronary artery ectasia patients of different age groups

Background

Coronary artery ectasia (CAE) is an angiographic finding of abnormal coronary dilatation. Inflammation plays a major role in all phases of atherosclerosis. We investigated the relationship between CAE and serum high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) and interleukin-6 (IL-6) levels to test our hypothesis that patient age is associated with the efficacy of anti-inflammatory therapy for CAE.

Methods

We conducted a prospective analysis of 217 patients with CAE treated at the Department of Cardiology, Shanghai East Hospital, Ji’an Campus and the Baoshan People’s Hospital, from January 1, 2015 to July 30, 2019. Baseline data of patients, including sex; age; and history of hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and diabetes, were collected from patient medical records. Study participants were grouped by age as follows: CAE-A (n = 60, age ≤ 50 years), CAE-B (n = 83, 50 years <age ≤ 70 years), and CAE-C (n = 74, age > 70). Additionally, there was a control (NC) group (n = 73) with normal coronary arteries.

Results

All patients received oral rosuvastatin therapy (10 mg, QN quaque nocte) when they were diagnosed with CAE and maintained good follow-up, with a loss rate of 0.0% at the end of the 6-month follow-up. The NC group received regular symptom-relieving treatments and rosuvastatin therapy. Of these four groups, the inflammatory markers, hs-CRP and IL-6, were significantly higher in patients with CAE than in the NCs (p < 0.05). Post-hoc tests showed that hs-CRP and Il-6 levels had significant differences between the CAE-A and CAE-C groups (P = 0.048, P = 0.025). Logistic regression analysis showed that hs-CRP (OR = 1.782, 95% CI: 1.124–2.014, P = 0.021) and IL-6 (OR = 1.584, 95% CI: 1.112–1.986, P = 0.030) were independent predictors of CAE. The inflammatory markers were higher in the CAE-A group than in the CAE-B group and higher in the CAE-B group than in the CAE-C group. Follow-up after 6 months of rosuvastatin therapy showed a significantly greater reduction in hs-CRP and IL-6 levels in the CAE-A group than in the CAE-B group, which again were greater in the CAE-B group than in the CAE-C group.

Conclusions

Anti-inflammatory therapy using rosuvastatin was more effective in younger CAE patients, indicating the need for early statin therapy in CAE.

How Might Bromodomain and Extra-Terminal (BET) Inhibitors Operate in Cardiovascular Disease?

Bromodomain and extra-terminal (BET) inhibitors, acting via epigenetic mechanisms, have been developed recently as potential new treatments for cancer, including prostate cancer, and inflammatory conditions. Some BET inhibitors, such as RVX-208, also raise high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) and apolipoprotein A-1 levels. A recent meta-analysis of three small trials (n = 798) found that RVX-208 protected against major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), raising the question as to whether this protective effect was an artefact, a chance finding, or mediated by HDL-C, anti-inflammatory pathways, or other factors. Notably, the effect of RVX-208 on MACE was largely driven by revascularizations, but fewer interventions in the treatment arm could have arisen accidently from favorable effects of RVX-208 on HDL-C and C-reactive protein influencing decisions about patient care. A larger (n = 2400) trial of RVX-208, BETonMACE (NCT02586155), with a more restricted definition of MACE, excluding hospitalizations, will shortly provide clarity. A successful BETonMACE trial would raise the question as to whether RVX-208 operates via lipids, inflammation, or other means, because several previous HDL-C modulators and anti-inflammatories have not provided effective means of treating cardiovascular disease and reducing overall mortality. Re-conceptualizing cardiovascular disease within the well-established evolutionary biology theory that growth and specifically reproduction trade-off against longevity might provide a more comprehensive explanation. Drivers of the gonadotropic axis, particularly androgens, suppress both HDL-C and the immune system while promoting ischemic heart disease and stroke. As such, any effects of RVX-208 on cardiovascular disease might be the result of reducing androgens, of which higher HDL-C and reduced inflammation are biomarkers. Notably, several other effective treatments for cardiovascular disease, such as statins and spironolactone, are known anti-androgens. Results of the BETonMACE trial, and corresponding insight about the mechanism of BET inhibitors in cardiovascular disease, are eagerly awaited.