1
|
Juliebø-Jones P, Semins MJ, Seitz C, Krambeck A, Keller EX, Davis NF, Tzelves L, Geraghty R, Beisland C, Ulvik Ø, Æsøy MS, Bres-Niewada E, Hameed BMZ, Gauhar V, Contreras P, Skolarikos A, Somani BK. Management of Kidney Stones in Pregnancy: A Worldwide Survey of Practice Patterns. J Endourol 2024. [PMID: 39078335 DOI: 10.1089/end.2024.0012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/31/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Kidney stones in pregnant is not a common emergency, but it is one that is extremely challenging to manage. There exists no previous survey, which maps the different practice patterns adopted. Our aim was to deliver a survey to evaluate the current status of practice patterns across different parts of the world regarding the management of stone disease in pregnancy. Methods: Through an iterative process, 19-item survey was devised. This contained the following five sections: (1) Demographics, (2) General items, (3) Diagnosis and Imaging, (4) Initial management, (5) Surgery. It was disseminated via social media and email chains. Results: A total of 355 responses were collected, and the majority (66.2%) reported no established hospital protocol for stones in pregnancy. Ultrasound was the most popular first line imaging choice (89.9%) but 8% would choose non-contrast CT. The latter was also chosen as second line choicer in 34.6% as opposed to magnetic resonance imaging. A large proportion (42.5%) had requested CT in pregnancy previously. With equivocal ultra sound results, only 19.4% would proceed to ureteroscopy (URS) but 40.9% would opt for CT. Twenty-four-48 hours were the most popular (37.6%) time period to observe before surgical intervention. Ureteral stent and nephrostomy were regarded as equally effective, and 6 weeks was most popular frequency for an exchange. Most do not use fetal heart rate monitoring intraoperatively. A total of 3.94% had previously performed percutaneous nephrolithotomy during pregnancy. Conclusion: Practice patterns vary widely for suspected kidney stones in pregnancy and use of CT appears increasingly popular. This includes when faced with equivocal ultrasound results and instead of proceeding to ureteroscopy. Most hospitals lack an established management protocol for this scenario.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patrick Juliebø-Jones
- Department of Urology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
- EAU YAU Urolithiasis group, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Michelle J Semins
- Department of Urology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Christian Seitz
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Amy Krambeck
- Department of Urology, Northwestern University School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | | | - Niall F Davis
- Department of Urology, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Lazaros Tzelves
- EAU YAU Urolithiasis group, Arnhem, The Netherlands
- Department of Urology, Sismanogleio Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Robert Geraghty
- Department of Urology, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, United Kingdom
| | - Christian Beisland
- Department of Urology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Øyvind Ulvik
- Department of Urology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Mathias Sørstrand Æsøy
- Department of Urology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Ewa Bres-Niewada
- Department of Urology, Roefler Memorial Hospital, Pruszków, Poland
- Faculty of Medicine, Łazarski University, Warsaw, Poland
| | | | - Vineet Gauhar
- Department of Urology, Ng Teng Fong General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Pablo Contreras
- Department of Urology, Hospital Alemán de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Andreas Skolarikos
- Department of Urology, Sismanogleio Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Bhaskar K Somani
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Di Bello F, Califano G, Morra S, Ruvolo CC, Fraia A, Pezone G, Di Mauro E, Aprea S, Napolitano L, Saccone G, Creta M, Longo N. Urological Challenges during Pregnancy: Current Status and Future Perspective on Ureteric Stent Encrustation. J Clin Med 2024; 13:3905. [PMID: 38999471 PMCID: PMC11242795 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13133905] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2024] [Revised: 06/25/2024] [Accepted: 07/02/2024] [Indexed: 07/14/2024] Open
Abstract
The management of ureter hydronephrosis and urolithiasis during pregnancy has been changed by the adoption of ureteric stents. Despite their broad use for several other conditions, from emergency to elective settings, their complications cannot be ignored. Being most prevalent during pregnancy, urinary tract infections and stent encrustations are particularly common and can affect either fetal growth or maternal-fetal homeostasis, leading to obstetric complications. The main concern associated with ureteric stents is the indwelling time, which could represent the potential trigger of those complications. However, to ensure the optimal management of a ureteric stent during pregnancy, factors such as the grading of encrustations and the presence, size, and location of stones should be evaluated in pre-operative planning. As a consequence, a multimodal approach, including obstetrics, gynecologists, urologists, and nurses, is essential to ensure a complication-free procedure and successful ureteric stent removal. Finally, future research should focus on utilizing biodegradable and biocompatible materials to reduce and even eliminate the complications related to forgotten stents in order to reduce the financial burden associated with stent replacement and the management of stent-encrustation-related complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Di Bello
- Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples "Federico II", 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Gianluigi Califano
- Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples "Federico II", 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Simone Morra
- Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples "Federico II", 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Claudia Collà Ruvolo
- Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples "Federico II", 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Agostino Fraia
- Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples "Federico II", 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Gabriele Pezone
- Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples "Federico II", 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Ernesto Di Mauro
- Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples "Federico II", 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Salvatore Aprea
- Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples "Federico II", 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Luigi Napolitano
- Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples "Federico II", 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Gabriele Saccone
- Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples "Federico II", 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Massimiliano Creta
- Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples "Federico II", 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Nicola Longo
- Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples "Federico II", 80131 Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Di Bello F, Califano G, Ruvolo CC, Morra S, La Rocca R, Creta M, Napolitano L, Longo N, Celentano G. Management and cost of stent encrustation in pregnancy. Nat Rev Urol 2024; 21:3-4. [PMID: 38049673 DOI: 10.1038/s41585-023-00841-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/06/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Di Bello
- Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy.
| | - Gianluigi Califano
- Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy
| | - Claudia Collà Ruvolo
- Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy
| | - Simone Morra
- Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy
| | - Roberto La Rocca
- Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy
| | - Massimiliano Creta
- Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy
| | - Luigi Napolitano
- Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy
| | - Nicola Longo
- Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Celentano
- Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Juliebø‐Jones P, Ventimiglia E, Somani BK, Æsøy MS, Gjengstø P, Beisland C, Ulvik Ø. Single use flexible ureteroscopes: Current status and future directions. BJUI COMPASS 2023; 4:613-621. [PMID: 37818020 PMCID: PMC10560621 DOI: 10.1002/bco2.265] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2023] [Revised: 05/18/2023] [Accepted: 06/04/2023] [Indexed: 10/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Single use ureteroscopes are a technological innovation that have become available in the past decade and gained increased popularity. To this end, there are now an increasing number of both benchside and clinical studies reporting outcomes associated with their use. Our aim was to deliver a narrative review in order to provide an overview of this new technology. Methods A narrative review was performed to gain overview of the history of the technology's development, equipment specifications and to highlight potential advantages and disadvantages. Results Findings from preclinical studies highlight potenial advantages in terms of the design of single use ureteroscopes such as the lower weight and more recent modifications such as pressure control. However, concerns regarding plastic waste and environmental impact still remain unanswered. Clinical studies reveal them to have a non inferior status for outcomes such as stone free rate. However, the volume of evidence, especially in terms of randomised trials remains limited. From a cost perspective, study conclusions are still conflicting and centres are recommended to perform their own micro cost analyses. Conclusions Most clinical outcomes for single use ureteroscopes currently match those achieved by reusable ureteroscopes but the data pool is still limited. Areas of continued debate include their environmental impact and cost efficiency.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patrick Juliebø‐Jones
- Department of UrologyHaukeland University HospitalBergenNorway
- Department of Clinical MedicineUniversity of BergenBergenNorway
- EAU YAU Urolithiasis groupArmhemNetherlands
| | - Eugenio Ventimiglia
- EAU YAU Urolithiasis groupArmhemNetherlands
- Department of UrologyIRCCS Ospedale San RaffaeleMilanItaly
| | | | | | - Peder Gjengstø
- Department of UrologyHaukeland University HospitalBergenNorway
| | - Christian Beisland
- Department of UrologyHaukeland University HospitalBergenNorway
- Department of Clinical MedicineUniversity of BergenBergenNorway
| | - Øyvind Ulvik
- Department of UrologyHaukeland University HospitalBergenNorway
- Department of Clinical MedicineUniversity of BergenBergenNorway
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Juliebø-Jones P, Keller EX, De Coninck V, Uguzova S, Tzelves L, Æsøy MS, Beisland C, Somani BK, Ulvik Ø. Controversies in ureteroscopy: lasers, scopes, ureteral access sheaths, practice patterns and beyond. Front Surg 2023; 10:1274583. [PMID: 37780913 PMCID: PMC10533910 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1274583] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2023] [Accepted: 09/04/2023] [Indexed: 10/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Ureteroscopy has become an increasingly popular surgical intervention for conditions such as urinary stone disease. As new technologies and techniques become available, debate regarding their proper use has risen. This includes the role of single use ureteroscopes, optimal laser for stone lithotripsy, basketing versus dusting, the impact of ureteral access sheath, the need for safety guidewire, fluoroscopy free URS, imaging and follow up practices are all areas which have generated a lot of debate. This review serves to evaluate each of these issues and provide a balanced conclusion to guide the clinician in their practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patrick Juliebø-Jones
- Department of Urology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
- EAU Young Academic urology Urolithiasis Group, Arnhem, Netherlands
| | - Etienne Xavier Keller
- EAU Young Academic urology Urolithiasis Group, Arnhem, Netherlands
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Vincent De Coninck
- EAU Young Academic urology Urolithiasis Group, Arnhem, Netherlands
- Department of Urology, AZ Klina, Brasschaat, Belgium
| | - Sabine Uguzova
- Department of Urology, Royal Preston Hospital, Preston, United Kingdom
| | - Lazaros Tzelves
- EAU Young Academic urology Urolithiasis Group, Arnhem, Netherlands
- 2nd Department of Urology, Sismanogleion Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Mathias Sørstrand Æsøy
- Department of Urology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Christian Beisland
- Department of Urology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Bhaskar K. Somani
- Department of Urology, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Øyvind Ulvik
- Department of Urology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Juliebø-Jones P, Beisland C, Gjengstø P, Ulvik Ø. Ureteroscopy in pregnancy can be a preferred option and not just a last resort. World J Urol 2023; 41:1993-1994. [PMID: 36547680 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-022-04265-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2022] [Accepted: 12/12/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Patrick Juliebø-Jones
- Department of Urology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
- EAU YAU Urolithiasis Group, Bergen, Norway.
| | - Christian Beisland
- Department of Urology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Peder Gjengstø
- Department of Urology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - Øyvind Ulvik
- Department of Urology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Tzelves L, Geraghty RM, Hughes T, Juliebø-Jones P, Somani BK. Innovations in Kidney Stone Removal. Res Rep Urol 2023; 15:131-139. [PMID: 37069942 PMCID: PMC10105588 DOI: 10.2147/rru.s386844] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2023] [Accepted: 04/05/2023] [Indexed: 04/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Urolithiasis is a common clinical condition, and surgical treatment is performed with different minimally invasive procedures, such as ureteroscopy, shockwave lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Although the transition from open surgery to endourological procedures to treat this condition has been a paradigm shift, ongoing technological advancements have permitted further improvement of clinical outcomes with the development of modern equipment. Such innovations in kidney stone removal are new lasers, modern ureteroscopes, development of applications and training systems utilizing three-dimensional models, artificial intelligence and virtual reality, implementation of robotic systems, sheaths connected to vacuum devices and new types of lithotripters. Innovations in kidney stone removal have led to an exciting new era of endourological options for patients and clinicians alike.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lazaros Tzelves
- Department of Urology, Sismanogleio Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | | | - Thomas Hughes
- Department of Urology, Warwick Hospital, Warwick, UK
| | | | - Bhaskar K Somani
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, UK
- Correspondence: Bhaskar K Somani, Department of Urology, University Hospital Southampton NHS Trust, 19 Tremona Road, Southampton, SO535DS, UK, Tel +44-2381206873, Email
| |
Collapse
|