Necrobiosis Lipoidica With Elastophagocytosis on an Unusual Location

The Histopathology of Leg Ulcers

Ulcerations of the lower extremities are a frequently encountered problem in clinical practice and are of significant interest in public health due to the high prevalence of underlying pathologies, including chronic venous disease, diabetes and peripheral arterial occlusive disease. However, leg ulcers can also present as signs and symptoms of various rare diseases and even as an adverse reaction to drugs. In such cases, correct diagnosis ultimately relies on histopathological examination. Apart from the macroscopic presentation, patient history and anatomic location, which are sometimes indicative, most ulcers have very distinct histopathological features. These features are found in different layers of the skin or even associated vessels. In this narrative review, we discuss and highlight the histopathological differences of several types of leg ulcers that can contribute to efficient and accurate diagnosis.

Elastophagocytosis and interstitial granulomatous infiltrate are more common in extragenital vs genital lichen sclerosus

BACKGROUND

Genital and extragenital lichen sclerosus (LS) share similar histopathologic features. A recent small series documented elastophagocytosis uniquely in extragenital LS. We evaluated a larger series of LS for elastophagocytosis, elastic fiber loss, and other histopathologic features. We evaluated matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) expression to determine if these proteins play an etiologic role.

METHODS

Genital (n = 42) and extragenital (n = 41) LS biopsies were examined for histopathologic features, elastic fiber alteration (Verhoeff van Gieson staining), and MMP-2 and MMP-9 expression (immunohistochemistry).

RESULTS

Elastophagocytosis and an interstitial granulomatous pattern were significantly more common in extragenital LS than genital LS (43.9% vs 4.7% and 56.1% vs 9.5%). Extragenital LS had mild/focal elastic fiber loss (43.9%), while genital LS had moderate (61.9%) or marked (19%) loss. MMP-9 was diffusely expressed in histiocytes in both types of LS (genital 97.5%; extragenital 100%). Weak MMP-2 expression was seen in genital (58%) and extragenital (55%) LS.

CONCLUSIONS

Extragenital LS, but not genital LS, frequently exhibits elastophagocytosis and interstitial granulomatous infiltrate, and these patterns could contribute to elastic fiber destruction in extragenital LS. While MMP-2 and MMP-9 expression are common in LS, expression did not significantly differ depending on anatomic site and thus is unlikely to explain observed histopathologic differences.

Keratoacanthomatous Changes: Unifying the Histologic Spectrum of Actinic Granuloma

Actinic granuloma (AG) manifests as annular plaques on sun-damaged skin. There remains no universal consensus on the nosology, etiology, or clinicopathologic criteria of AG as a distinct entity. Broadly, AG is characterized by granulomatous inflammation, multinucleated giant cells, elastophagocytosis, and the absence of mucin and necrobiosis. It is not uncommon, however, to encounter overlapping histological features of other granulomas, such as granuloma annulare and necrobiosis lipoidica, confounding the diagnosis of this controversial entity. Herein, we describe 2 cases of AG with features of granuloma annulare and necrobiosis lipoidica, supporting the concept of AG as a histologic spectrum. These 2 cases displayed dilated follicular infundibula and pseudoepitheliomatous hyperplasia analogous to changes in keratoacanthomas. These unique epithelial changes, in tandem with characteristic elastin alterations and clinical findings, are helpful and unifying features that permit accurate diagnosis of this controversial entity.