Cutaneous Metastasis of a Mucoepidermoid Carcinoma of the Pancreas: First Reported Case

A case report of pancreatic mucoepidermoid carcinoma responded to gemcitabine and paclitaxel

Mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC) typically manifests in the salivary glands, but occurrences in the pancreatic gland are exceedingly rare. Surgical resection proves effective; however, pancreatic MEC is prone to metastasis, and lacking a standardized postoperative treatment. We discussed the experience of a 51-year-old female patient with pancreatic MEC who received paclitaxel and gemcitabine as postoperative care. Within a predetermined amount of time, this regimen successfully stopped the spread of metastatic tumors and returned tumor markers to normal. A Stable Disease status was achieved within 6 months after chemotherapy. In summary, gemcitabine and paclitaxel display efficacy in treating pancreatic MEC.

Rapidly Progressing Anaplastic Carcinoma of the Pancreas with Mucoepidermoid Carcinoma: An Autopsy Case Report

A 75-year-old man visited our hospital for the examination of a tumor in the pancreas. Computed tomography showed an 85×85-mm low-density tumor in the pancreas. The tumor was pathologically diagnosed as poorly differentiated carcinoma by endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration. Although we started chemotherapy, the patient died 84 days after the diagnosis. An autopsy demonstrated a ruptured anaplastic carcinoma with mucoepidermoid carcinoma of the pancreas. Anaplastic carcinoma with mucoepidermoid carcinoma is a very rare histologic subtype of pancreatic carcinoma, so pathological findings are important for predicting the patient's prognosis. Physicians should be aware of this rare but fatal disease.

Targeted-Gene Sequencing and Bioinformatics Analysis of Patients with Pancreatic Mucoepidermoid Carcinoma: A Case Report and Literature Review

Background

Primary pancreatic mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC) is an extremely rare malignant tumor with unclear etiology and pathogenesis. There are only eleven reported cases in English papers published from 1959 to 2020. MEC generally occurs in the salivary gland, but cases in the pancreas have also been reported. Although being considered as a low-grade indolent carcinoma, pancreatic MEC always invades the surrounding lymph node and metastasizes. The prognosis of pancreatic MEC is unsatisfactory. To date, the genetic alterations, mechanistic relationships among mutated genes and signaling pathways of pancreatic MEC are unclear.

Patient and Methods

This paper presents a case of rare primary pancreatic MEC in a 56-year-old male patient with liver metastasis. Radical surgery of distal pancreatectomy and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of two liver metastatic lesions is conducted. Targeted-gene sequencing and bioinformatics analysis tools, including STRING, DAVID, cBioPortal, DGidb and Human Protein Atlas database (HPA), are used to clarify the biological functions and features of mutated genes in pancreatic MEC.

Results

Eight gene mutations (TP53, KRAS, ATR, FLI1, FLT4, MAGI2, RBM10, and TNFAIP3) were observed, and a tumor mutation burden (TMB) of 5.6 muts/Mb was calculated in the pancreatic MEC using targeted-gene sequencing. The patient subsequently underwent adjuvant chemotherapy and died three months after surgery. Gene–gene interaction network was constructed, which showed the significant interactions among eight mutated genes. In terms of the functions and pathways of eight gene mutations based on GO and KEGG, 20 tumor-related results are presented in this paper, Furthermore, the biological functions and features of pancreatic MEC are further compared with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Conclusion

Pancreatic MEC requires early and effective treatment, and lymph node metastases and multiple organ metastases were unfavorable prognostic factors. Pancreatic MEC can be compared with other pancreatic cancers that have characteristic clinical phenotype, molecular alterations, functional information and enrichment pathway.

Adenosquamous Carcinoma of the Pancreas Comprise a Heterogeneous Group of Tumors With the Worst Outcome: A Clinicopathological Analysis of 25 Cases Identified in 562 Pancreatic Carcinomas Resected With Curative Intent

OBJECTIVES

Information of the clinicopathological characteristics and outcome data of patients with adenosquamous carcinoma of the pancreas (ASCAP) remains limited. This study's aim is to describe the clinical, pathological, and molecular characteristics of 25 resected ASCAPs.

METHODS

Of all 25 cases, patient characteristics, follow-up data, and pathological/immunohistological features were reviewed and analyzed.

RESULTS

In this 3-institutional retrospective analysis of 562 pancreatic cancer patients, we identified 25 cases with histologically confirmed ASCAP (4.4%). Follow-up was available in 21 ASCAP and 50 pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma control patients with a median overall survival of 8.2 and 21 months, respectively. Age, tumor size, localization in the tail, lymph node status, and resection margin seem to be the most significant factors of survival in our ASCAP cohort. In contrast to pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, positive expression of p63, keratins K5/14, and the epidermal growth factor receptor are a robust marker profile of these tumors.

CONCLUSIONS

Adenosquamous carcinoma of the pancreas comprises a group of neoplasms in which stage and adverse morphological features contribute to its bad prognosis. Further work must be pursued to improve detection and treatment options to reduce mortality. Specifically, differences in biology might become a target for the development of possible therapies.

"Pancreatic Mucoepidermoid Carcinoma" Is not a Pancreatic Counterpart of CRTC1/3-MAML2 Fusion Gene-related Mucoepidermoid Carcinoma of the Salivary Gland, and May More Appropriately be Termed Pancreatic Adenosquamous Carcinoma With Mucoepidermoid Carcinoma-like Features

"Mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC)" has been accepted as a synonym for pancreatic adenosquamous carcinoma (ASC). Pancreatic ASC can show salivary gland-type MEC-like morphology. CRTC1/3-MAML2 fusion gene is a characteristic molecular feature of MEC of the salivary gland. We conducted this study to clarify whether the pancreatic ASC with salivary gland-type MEC-like morphology (Pan-MEC) is a pancreatic counterpart of salivary gland-type MEC (Sal-MEC). We retrospectively analyzed 37 pancreatic ASCs including 16 Pan-MECs and 21 tumors without MEC-like features (ASC-NOS [not otherwise specified]), and we investigated (1) clinicopathologic features, (2) the presence of CRTC1/3-MAML2 fusion gene by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction, (3) the presence of rearrangement of MAML2 gene by fluorescence in situ hybridization, and (4) mucin core proteins by immunohistochemistry. We also compared 16 Pan-MECs with 20 Sal-MECs by immunohistochemistry for mucin core protein. There were no significant differences of any clinicopathologic characteristics and survival analysis between the Pan-MECs and ASCs-NOS. Of note, the pancreatic ASCs (including Pan-MEC and ASC-NOS) were significantly more aggressive than conventional pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. In addition, all Pan-MECs were histologically high-grade. CRTC1/3-MAML2 fusion gene and MAML2 gene rearrangement were not detected in any ASCs including Pan-MECs. There were significant differences of MUC5AC and MUC6 between the Pan-MECs and Sal-MECs, but no significant differences of mucin core protein between the Pan-MECs and pancreatic ASCs-NOS. Pan-MEC is histologically and biologically high-grade and unrelated to CRTC1/3-MAML2 fusion gene, unlike Sal-MEC which is related to CRTC1/3-MAML2 fusion gene. Pan-MEC is not a pancreatic counterpart of CRTC1/3-MAML2 fusion gene-related Sal-MEC.

You cannot miss it: Pancreatic mucoepidermoid carcinoma: A case report and literature review

RATIONALE

Pancreatic mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC) is a rare disease with no more than 10 cases reported in literature. The prognosis is poor and few patients can survival more than 1 year.

PATIENT CONCERNS

We presented a case of patient manifested as left upper abdominal pain. Computed tomography demonstrated a low-density shadow measuring 2.1 × 2.4 cm situated at the transition area of neck and body of the pancreas with obscure boundary and irregular enhancement. The preoperative symptoms and imaging features were unspecific.

DIAGNOSES

Pancreatic MEC.

INTERVENTIONS

Curative surgery of distal pancreatectomy was conducted. Postoperatively, the patient subsequently underwent 8 cycles of chemotherapy using cisplatin (25 mg/m) on day 1 to day 3; and gemcitabine (1000 mg/m) on day 1 and day 8, repeated every 21 days.

OUTCOMES

The patient was monitored on a regular basis at our outpatient department and survived 23 months after surgery.

LESSONS

Preoperative diagnosis of pancreatic MEC is difficult. Patients with pancreatic MEC may have a survival benefit from the multimodal treatment of curative surgery combined with chemotherapy.