Differences Between Recommended Surgical Margins and Measured Histological Margins in Malignant Melanoma In Situ and Malignant Melanomas

Melanoma surgery-An update

Cutaneous melanoma is the major cause of mortality from all skin cancers. The treatment has been revolutionized in recent years by introduction of immunotherapy and targeted therapy for melanoma patients Stages III and IV. Therefore, the role of surgery in melanoma treatment needs to be redefined. In this narrative review, we will focus on surgery for diagnosis, treatment of primary tumor, and metastases in the era of new and effective medical treatment options. Neoadjuvant therapy is currently investigated in several trials. Surgery for treatment-resistant metastases is another field of interest. In conclusion, surgery remains a cornerstone for diagnosis and treatment of primary melanoma. Therapeutic lymphadenectomy has lost importance while surgery in sentinel lymph node diagnostics and metastasectomy are useful in a tailored individual approach of combined treatments. There is a trend to less invasive surgical procedures.

Association between excision margins and local recurrence in 1407 patients with primary in situ melanomas

Background

Reliable evidence to guide the management of melanoma in situ (MIS) and minimize the risk of recurrence is lacking.

Objective

To identify clinicopathological predictors of local recurrence (LR) in patients with MIS and evaluate long-term outcomes according to pathological excision margins.

Methods

A case-control study of patients with MIS treated at a large Australian melanoma treatment center from January 2008 to December 2012 was undertaken. Clinicopathological characteristics of patients who developed LR and those who did not were compared.

Results

LR developed in 34 of 1407 patients with MIS (2.5%). Median time to LR was 20 months. The primary lesion was removed with pathological margins <4 mm (P < .001) in 67.6 % of patients with LR. Four patients died of metastatic melanoma following LR. Comparing patients with pathological margins <4 mm and ≥4 mm, the former were older (>60y, P < .001), more frequently had MIS on the head or neck (P < .001), had a greater LR rate (P < .001), and had a higher mortality from all causes (P < .001).

Limitations

Retrospective, single-institution study.

Conclusions

Pathological margins of ≥4 mm should be considered for patients with MIS who are treated with standard surgical excision and assessed by examining serial slices taken from the formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded specimen.