Lymph node status does not predict local recurrence in the total mesorectal excision era

Pretreatment MRI-detected extramural venous invasion as a prognostic and predictive biomarker for neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in non-metastatic rectal cancer: a propensity score matched analysis

OBJECTIVES

This study evaluated pretreatment magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-detected extramural venous invasion (pmrEMVI) as a predictor of survival after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Medical records of 1184 patients with rectal adenocarcinoma who underwent TME between January 2011 and December 2016 were reviewed. MRI data were collected from a computerized radiologic database. Cox proportional hazards analysis was used to assess local, systemic recurrence, and disease-free survival risk based on pretreatment MRI-assessed tumor characteristics. After propensity score matching (PSM) for pretreatment MRI features, nCRT therapeutic outcomes according to pmrEMVI status were evaluated. Cox proportional hazards analysis was used to identify risk factors for early recurrence in patients receiving nCRT.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 62.8 months. Among all patients, the presence of pmrEMVI was significantly associated with worse disease-free survival (DFS; HR 1.827, 95% CI 1.285-2.597, p = 0.001) and systemic recurrence (HR 2.080, 95% CI 1.400-3.090, p < 0.001) but not local recurrence. Among patients with pmrEMVI, nCRT provided no benefit for oncological outcomes before or after PSM. Furthermore, pmrEMVI( +) was the only factor associated with early recurrence on multivariate analysis in patients receiving nCRT.

CONCLUSIONS

pmrEMVI is a poor prognostic factor for DFS and SR in patients with non-metastatic rectal cancer and also serves as a predictive biomarker of poor DFS and SR following nCRT in LARC. Therefore, for patients who are positive for pmrEMVI, consideration of alternative treatment strategies may be warranted.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

This study demonstrated the usefulness of pmrEMVI as a predictive biomarker for nCRT, which may assist in initial treatment decision-making in patients with non-metastatic rectal cancer.

KEY POINTS

• Pretreatment MRI-detected extramural venous invasion (pmrEMVI) was significantly associated with worse disease-free survival and systemic recurrence in patients with non-metastatic rectal cancer. • pmrEMVI is a predictive biomarker of poor DFS following nCRT in patients with LARC. • The presence of pmrEMVI was the only factor associated with early recurrence on multivariate analysis in patients receiving nCRT.

Synchronous rectal adenocarcinoma and intestinal mantle cell lymphoma: A case report

BACKGROUND

Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) of the gastrointestinal tract is a rare malignancy, accounting for about 0.2% of malignant colorectal tumors. MCL synchronous with rectal adenocarcinoma is extremely rare. We know of only a few cases reported in the literature. We describe the case of a patient with synchronous rectal adenocarcinoma and intestinal MCL.

CASE SUMMARY

A 63-year-old man was admitted to our hospital due to abdominal pain and hematochezia over the past month. The patient was diagnosed with middle rectal cancer cT2N0M0 and underwent surgery. However, we found a large tumor in the small intestine during surgery. The patient underwent total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer and resectioning of the ileal segment containing the large mass. Pathology and immunohistochemistry revealed the presence of both rectal adenocarcinoma and pathognomonic MCL stage IIE presenting as multiple lymphomatous polyposis. The patient subsequently underwent RDHAP/RCHOP chemotherapy and was maintained with rituximab. A Positron Emission Tomography and Computed Tomography (PET/CT) scan showed that the disease responded well to treatment without tumor-increased metabolism in the gastrointestinal tract.

CONCLUSION

Synchronous rectal adenocarcinoma and intestinal MCL presenting as multiple lymphomatous polyposis are extremely rare. MCL is often discovered fortuitously when rectal cancer is diagnosed. The coexistence of these tumors poses treatment challenges.

Association of certification, improved quality and better oncological outcomes for rectal cancer in a specialized colorectal unit

PURPOSE

Centralization of cancer care is expected to yield superior results. In Germany, the national strategy is based on a voluntary certification process. The effect of centre certification is difficult to prove because quality data are rarely available prior to certification. This observational study aims to assess outcomes for rectal cancer patients before and after implementation of a certified cancer centre.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

All consecutive patients treated for rectal cancer in our certified centre from 2009 to 2017 were retrieved from a prospective database. The dataset was analyzed according to a predefined set of 19 quality indicators comprising 36 quality goals. The results were compared to an identical cohort of patients, treated from 2000 to 2008 just before centre implementation.

RESULTS

In total, 1059 patients were included, 481 in the 2009-2017 interval and 578 in the 2000-2008 interval. From 2009 to 2017, 25 of 36 quality goals were achieved (vs. 19/36). The proportion of anastomotic leaks in low anastomoses was improved (13.5% vs. 22.1%, p = 0.018), as was the local 5-year recurrence rate for stage (y)pIII rectal cancers (7.7% vs. 17.8%, p = 0.085), and quality of mesorectal excision (0.3% incomplete resections vs. 5.5%, p = 0.002). Furthermore, a decrease of abdominoperineal excisions was noted (47.1% vs. 60.0%, p = 0.037). For the 2009-2017 interval, local 5-year recurrence rate in stages (y)p0-III was 4.6% and 5-year overall survival was 80.2%.

CONCLUSIONS

Certification as specialized centre and regular audits were associated with an improvement of various quality parameters. The formal certification process has the potential to enhance quality of care for rectal cancer patients.

The multidisciplinary management of rectal cancer

Rectal cancer treatment has evolved during the past 40 years with the use of a standardized surgical technique for tumour resection: total mesorectal excision. A dramatic reduction in local recurrence rates and improved survival outcomes have been achieved as consequences of a better understanding of the surgical oncology of rectal cancer, and the advent of adjuvant and neoadjuvant treatments to compliment surgery have paved the way for a multidisciplinary approach to disease management. Further improvements in imaging techniques and the ability to identify prognostic factors such as tumour regression, extramural venous invasion and threatened margins have introduced the concept of decision-making based on preoperative staging information. Modern treatment strategies are underpinned by accurate high-resolution imaging guiding both neoadjuvant therapy and precision surgery, followed by meticulous pathological scrutiny identifying the important prognostic factors for adjuvant chemotherapy. Included in these strategies are organ-sparing approaches and watch-and-wait strategies in selected patients. These pathways rely on the close working of interlinked disciplines within a multidisciplinary team. Such multidisciplinary forums are becoming standard in the treatment of rectal cancer across the UK, Europe and, more recently, the USA. This Review examines the essential components of modern-day management of rectal cancer through a multidisciplinary team approach, providing information that is essential for any practising colorectal surgeon to guide the best patient care.

Transanal total mesorectal excision in the prone jackknife position without being conscious of the size of prostatic enlargement for lower rectal cancer

In 1982, it was demonstrated that a total mesorectal excision alone could achieve low rectal cancer recurrence rates in the pelvis and high disease-free survival rates. Nowadays, the total mesorectal excision is the gold-standard surgery for rectal cancer. Currently, the transanal total mesorectal excision has attracted attention as a promising alternative to the anterior approach. The transanal approach is superior to the anterior approach, because it facilitates total mesorectal excisions of the lower rectum, improves visualization, and shortens the surgical time. Some factors are particularly favorable for the transanal approach, including lesions in the lower third of the rectum, a narrow pelvis, a large tumor, male sex, and a prostatic enlargement. The transanal total mesorectal excision is commonly performed in the Lloyd-Davies position. However, in the Lloyd-Davies position, the sacral bone prevents the mobilized rectum from moving away from the pelvic base. From the perspective of pelvic morphology, we reasoned that, in the prone jackknife position, the mobilized rectum could spontaneously move toward the head, due to gravity, and this would broaden the pelvic surgical field. Consequently, this position could facilitate the transanal total mesorectal excision. Here, we described a transanal total mesorectal excision performed in the prone jackknife position for treating lower rectal cancer with a prostatic enlargement.

Long-term outcomes of surgery alone versus surgery following preoperative chemoradiotherapy for early T3 rectal cancer: A propensity score analysis

Recently, a few studies have raised the question of whether preoperative chemoradiotherapy (PCRT) is essential for all T3 rectal cancers. This case-matched study aimed to compare the long-term outcomes of surgery alone with those of PCRT + surgery for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-assessed T3ab (extramural depth of invasion ≤5 mm) and absent mesorectal fascia invasion (clear MRF) in mid/lower rectal cancer patients.From January 2006 to November 2012, 203 patients who underwent curative surgery alone (n = 118) or PCRT + surgery (n = 85) were enrolled in this retrospective study. A 1:1 propensity score-matched analysis was performed to eliminate the inherent bias. Case-matching covariates included age, sex, body mass index, histologic grade, carcinoembryonic antigen, operation method, follow-up period, tumor height, and status of lymph node metastasis. The end-points were the 5-year local recurrence (LR) rate and disease-free-survival (DFS).After propensity score matching, 140 patients in 70 pairs were included. Neither the 5-year LR rate nor the DFS was significantly different between the 2 groups (the 5-year LR rate, P = 0.93; the 5-year DFS, P = 0.94). The 5-year LR rate of the surgery alone was 2% (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.2%-10.9%) versus 2% (95% CI 0.2%-10.1%) in the PCRT + surgery group. The 5-year DFS of the surgery alone was 87% (95% CI 74.6%-93.7%) versus 88% (95% CI 77.8%-93.9%) in the PCRT + surgery group.In patients with MRI-assessed T3ab and clear MRF mid/lower rectal cancer, the long-term outcomes of surgery alone were comparable with those of the PCRT + surgery. The suggested MRI-assessed T3ab and clear MRF can be used as a highly selective indication of surgery alone in mid/lower T3 rectal cancer. Additionally, in those patients, surgery alone can be tailored to the clinical situation.

Clinically Node Negative, Pathologically Node Positive Rectal Cancer Patients Who Did Not Receive Neoadjuvant Therapy

PURPOSE

Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy is the preferred standard of care for clinical stages II-III rectal cancer. It is uncertain whether clinically node negative (cN-) tumors found to be pathologically stage III could be optimally treated with surgery alone and avoid adjuvant treatments. The aim of our study was to define the outcomes of such patients.

METHODS

Patients undergoing radical surgery using total mesorectal excision (TME) techniques for rectal cancer (≤12 cm from the anal verge) with curative intent during 2000-2012 and found to have stage III disease on final pathology were identified from a prospectively maintained database. Patients were staged with abdominopelvic CT, transrectal endoscopic ultrasound, and/or pelvic MRI. Exclusion criteria were cN+ without neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, hereditary colorectal syndromes, inflammatory bowel diseases, lack of preoperative nodal staging, intraoperative radiotherapy, and follow-up <3 years. We compared cN-/pN+ patients according to the postoperative treatment received (group 1 if no further treatment, group 2 if any postoperative treatments), using ypN+ patients (neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy + surgery) as controls (group 3). Oncological outcomes evaluated included overall survival (OS), disease-specific survival (DSS), disease-free survival (DFS), local recurrence (LR), and distant recurrence (DR).

RESULTS

Out of 218 patients included in the study, 77 cN- patients underwent initial surgery with a pN+ surgical specimen. Eighteen of these patients received no postoperative treatment due to associated comorbidity, patient preference, or postoperative complications while the remaining 59 (group 2) patients received chemoradiotherapy (n = 21) or chemotherapy alone (n = 38), respectively, and group 3 included 141 patients. Distal, radial resection margins and TME grading when available were comparable among groups. cN-/pN+ patients treated with surgery alone were associated with significantly poorer cancer outcomes compared with cN-/pN+ patients who received any form of adjuvant therapy and to ypN+ patients.

CONCLUSION

TME surgery is not sufficient to optimize outcomes among rectal cancer patients believed to be node negative and found to be stage III based on specimen pathology.