1
|
Kabir M, Thomas-Gibson S, Tozer PJ, Warusavitarne J, Faiz O, Hart A, Allison L, Acheson AG, Atici SD, Avery P, Brar M, Carvello M, Choy MC, Dart RJ, Davies J, Dhar A, Din S, Hayee B, Kandiah K, Katsanos KH, Lamb CA, Limdi JK, Lovegrove RE, Myrelid P, Noor N, Papaconstantinou I, Petrova D, Pavlidis P, Pinkney T, Proud D, Radford S, Rao R, Sebastian S, Segal JP, Selinger C, Spinelli A, Thomas K, Wolthuis A, Wilson A. DECIDE: Delphi Expert Consensus Statement on Inflammatory Bowel Disease Dysplasia Shared Management Decision-Making. J Crohns Colitis 2023; 17:1652-1671. [PMID: 37171140 DOI: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjad083] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2023] [Indexed: 05/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Inflammatory bowel disease colitis-associated dysplasia is managed with either enhanced surveillance and endoscopic resection or prophylactic surgery. The rate of progression to cancer after a dysplasia diagnosis remains uncertain in many cases and patients have high thresholds for accepting proctocolectomy. Individualised discussion of management options is encouraged to take place between patients and their multidisciplinary teams for best outcomes. We aimed to develop a toolkit to support a structured, multidisciplinary and shared decision-making approach to discussions about dysplasia management options between clinicians and their patients. METHODS Evidence from systematic literature reviews, mixed-methods studies conducted with key stakeholders, and decision-making expert recommendations were consolidated to draft consensus statements by the DECIDE steering group. These were then subjected to an international, multidisciplinary modified electronic Delphi process until an a priori threshold of 80% agreement was achieved to establish consensus for each statement. RESULTS In all, 31 members [15 gastroenterologists, 14 colorectal surgeons and two nurse specialists] from nine countries formed the Delphi panel. We present the 18 consensus statements generated after two iterative rounds of anonymous voting. CONCLUSIONS By consolidating evidence for best practice using literature review and key stakeholder and decision-making expert consultation, we have developed international consensus recommendations to support health care professionals counselling patients on the management of high cancer risk colitis-associated dysplasia. The final toolkit includes clinician and patient decision aids to facilitate shared decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Misha Kabir
- Division of GI Services, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Department of Surgery and Cancer or Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London , London, UK
| | - Siwan Thomas-Gibson
- Department of Surgery and Cancer or Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London , London, UK
- Department of Gastroenterology or Department of Colorectal Surgery, St Mark's Hospital, London, UK
| | - Phil J Tozer
- Department of Surgery and Cancer or Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London , London, UK
- Department of Gastroenterology or Department of Colorectal Surgery, St Mark's Hospital, London, UK
| | - Janindra Warusavitarne
- Department of Surgery and Cancer or Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London , London, UK
- Department of Gastroenterology or Department of Colorectal Surgery, St Mark's Hospital, London, UK
| | - Omar Faiz
- Department of Surgery and Cancer or Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London , London, UK
- Department of Gastroenterology or Department of Colorectal Surgery, St Mark's Hospital, London, UK
| | - Ailsa Hart
- Department of Surgery and Cancer or Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London , London, UK
- Department of Gastroenterology or Department of Colorectal Surgery, St Mark's Hospital, London, UK
| | - Lisa Allison
- Department of Gastroenterology, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK
| | - Austin G Acheson
- Department of Surgery, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
| | - Semra Demirli Atici
- Department of Surgery, University of Health Sciences Tepecik Training and Research Hospital, Izmir, Turkey
| | - Pearl Avery
- Department of Gastroenterology or Department of Colorectal Surgery, St Mark's Hospital, London, UK
| | - Mantaj Brar
- Department of Surgery, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Michele Carvello
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
- Department of Surgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Matthew C Choy
- Department of Gastroenterology, Austin Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Division of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Austin Academic Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Robin J Dart
- Department of Gastroenterology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London, London, UK
| | - Justin Davies
- Department of Gastroenterology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
- Department of Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Anjan Dhar
- Department of Gastroenterology, Darlington Memorial Hospital, County Durham & Darlington NHS Foundation Trust, Darlington, UK
- Department of Gastroenterology, Teesside University, UK, Middlesbrough, UK
| | - Shahida Din
- Edinburgh IBD Unit, NHS Lothian, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Bu'Hussain Hayee
- Department of Gastroenterology, King's College Hospital, London, UK
| | - Kesavan Kandiah
- Department of Gastroenterology, St. George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Konstantinos H Katsanos
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Ioannina School of Health Sciences, Ioannina, Greece
| | - Christopher Andrew Lamb
- Translational & Clinical Research Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
- Department of Gastroenterology, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle upon Tyne, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Jimmy K Limdi
- Department of Gastroenterology, Northern Care Alliance NHS Foundation Trust, Greater Manchester, UK
- Department of Gastroenterology, University of Manchester , Manchester, UK
| | - Richard E Lovegrove
- Department of Surgery, Worcestershire Acute Hospitals NHS Trust , Worcester, UK
| | - Pär Myrelid
- Department of Surgery, Linköping University Hospital, Linköping, Sweden
- Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Nurulamin Noor
- Department of Gastroenterology, Cambridge University Hospitals, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - Ioannis Papaconstantinou
- Department of Surgery, Aretaieion Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, A thens, Greece
| | - Dafina Petrova
- Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria ibs.GRANADA, Granada, Spain
- Escuela Andaluza de Salud Pública [EASP], Granada, Spain
- CIBER of Epidemiology and Public Health [CIBERESP], Madrid, Spain
| | - Polychronis Pavlidis
- Department of Gastroenterology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Thomas Pinkney
- Department of Surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - David Proud
- Department of Surgery, Austin Health, Heidelberg Victoria, VIC, Australia
| | - Shellie Radford
- Department of Surgery, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
| | - Rohit Rao
- Department of Gastroenterology, Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Shaji Sebastian
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Hull, UK
| | - Jonathan P Segal
- Department of Gastroenterology, Northern Hospital Epping, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Christian Selinger
- Department of Gastroenterology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Antonino Spinelli
- Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK
- Department of Surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Kathryn Thomas
- Department of Surgery, Nottingham University Hospitals, UK
| | - Albert Wolthuis
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Leuven, The Netherlands
| | - Ana Wilson
- Department of Surgery and Cancer or Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London , London, UK
- Department of Gastroenterology or Department of Colorectal Surgery, St Mark's Hospital, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Almario CV, van Deen WK, Chen M, Gale R, Sidorkiewicz S, Choi SY, Bonthala N, Ha C, Syal G, Dupuy T, Liu X, Melmed GY, Spiegel BM. Interactive Inflammatory Bowel Disease Biologics Decision Aid Does Not Improve Patient Outcomes Over Static Education: Results From a Randomized Trial. Am J Gastroenterol 2022; 117:1508-1518. [PMID: 35973146 PMCID: PMC9450884 DOI: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000001866] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2022] [Accepted: 06/02/2022] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION To support shared decision-making (SDM) between patients and providers surrounding biologic treatments, we created IBD&me ( ibdandme.org )-a freely available, unbranded, interactive decision aid. We performed a multicenter comparative effectiveness trial comparing the impact of IBD&me on SDM vs a biologics fact sheet developed by the Crohn's & Colitis Foundation. METHODS We enrolled patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) being seen at a clinic within IBD Qorus-a multicenter adult IBD learning health system-between March 5, 2019, and May 14, 2021. Eligible patients included those with recent IBD-related symptoms who reported that they wanted to discuss biologics with their provider during their upcoming visit. Patients were randomized 1:1 using stratified block randomization and received an e-mail 1 week before their visit inviting them to review either IBD&me or a fact sheet. The primary outcome was patient perception of SDM as measured by the 9-Item SDM Questionnaire (0-100 scale; higher = better); the Student t test was used to compare outcomes between arms. RESULTS Overall, 152 patients were randomized (biologics fact sheet 75, IBD&me 77); most patients had Crohn's disease (66.4%) and were biologic-experienced (82.9%). No differences were seen between groups regarding SDM (fact sheet 72.6 ± 25.6, IBD&me 75.0 ± 20.8; P = .57). Most patients stated they would be likely to recommend the fact sheet (79.6%) or IBD&me (84.9%; P = .48) to another patient with IBD. DISCUSSION No differences in outcomes were seen between IBD&me and the biologics fact sheet in this comparative effectiveness study; patients reported high satisfaction with both resources. Further study, particularly among biologic naïve patients, is needed to determine the utility of interactive components to IBD decision aids.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher V. Almario
- Karsh Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology,
Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Cedars-Sinai Center for Outcomes Research and Education
(CS-CORE), Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Welmoed K. van Deen
- Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Division
of Health Technology Assessment, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam,
Netherlands
| | | | - Rebecca Gale
- Cedars-Sinai Center for Outcomes Research and Education
(CS-CORE), Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | | | - So Yung Choi
- Biostatistics and Bioinformatics Research Center,
Cedars-Sinai Cancer, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Nirupama Bonthala
- Karsh Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology,
Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Inflammatory Bowel and Immunobiology Research Institute,
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Christina Ha
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic,
Scottsdale, AZ, USA
| | - Gaurav Syal
- Karsh Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology,
Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Inflammatory Bowel and Immunobiology Research Institute,
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Taylor Dupuy
- Cedars-Sinai Center for Outcomes Research and Education
(CS-CORE), Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Xiaoyu Liu
- Cedars-Sinai Center for Outcomes Research and Education
(CS-CORE), Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Gil Y. Melmed
- Karsh Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology,
Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Inflammatory Bowel and Immunobiology Research Institute,
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Brennan M.R. Spiegel
- Karsh Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology,
Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Cedars-Sinai Center for Outcomes Research and Education
(CS-CORE), Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Xu D, Zhang H, Chen Y. Patients' views of shared decision making in inflammatory bowel disease: a survey in China. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2021; 21:340. [PMID: 34872536 PMCID: PMC8650369 DOI: 10.1186/s12911-021-01702-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2021] [Accepted: 11/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Recently, decision-making process has become increasingly complex. But there is limited information on Chinese patients’ views of shared decision making (SDM) in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). This questionnaire investigation aimed to understand Chinese patients’ perspectives and expectations of SDM in IBD and analyze the possible factors that influence their views. Methods An online survey was conducted from July 19th to 24th, 2020. A total of 1118 patients completed the survey. Results One-third of patients were dissatisfied with the current decision-making model, and the satisfaction of inpatients was lower than that of outpatients. 84% of patients preferred to participate in SDM, who were young and had a high education level, high income, commercial insurance, strong learning ability and knowledge of SDM. Most of those who did not want to participate (72%) were worried about the cost. The kind of medicine (948, 84.8%), surgical indications (505, 45.2%) and operation methods (482, 43.1%) were the topics that patients thought most require SDM. Side effects of medicine (837, 74.9%), costs of therapy (675, 60.4%), and surgical risks (563, 50.4%) were considered to be the most influential factors for SDM. 52.7% of all patients hoped experts in different disciplines would participate in SDM. The most desirable amount of time for discussion was 30 to 60 min (562/1118, 50.3%), that were associated with the cost of SDM. Conclusion We can meet the needs of patients by reducing costs and strengthening online patient education and exploring a model suitable for Chinese IBD patients. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12911-021-01702-8.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dingting Xu
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Jiefang Road 88, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310009, People's Republic of China
| | - Hanyun Zhang
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Jiefang Road 88, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310009, People's Republic of China
| | - Yan Chen
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Jiefang Road 88, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310009, People's Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Cohan JN, Ozanne EM, Hofer RK, Kelly YM, Kata A, Larsen C, Finlayson E. Ileostomy or ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis: patient participation and decisional needs. BMC Gastroenterol 2021; 21:347. [PMID: 34538236 PMCID: PMC8451075 DOI: 10.1186/s12876-021-01916-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2020] [Accepted: 08/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Up to 30% of patients with ulcerative colitis will undergo surgery resulting in an ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) or permanent end ileostomy (EI). We aimed to understand how patients decide between these two options. METHODS We performed semi-structured interviews with ulcerative colitis patients who underwent surgery. Areas of questioning included the degree to which patients participated in decision-making, challenges experienced, and suggestions for improving the decision-making process. We analyzed the data using a directed content and thematic approach. RESULTS We interviewed 16 patients ranging in age from 28 to 68 years. Nine were male, 10 underwent IPAA, and 6 underwent EI. When it came to participation in decision-making, 11 patients felt independently responsible for decision-making, 3 shared decision-making with the surgeon, and 2 experienced surgeon-led decision-making. Themes regarding challenges during decision-making included lack of support from family, lack of time to discuss options with the surgeon, and the overwhelming complexity of the decision. Themes for ways to improve decision-making included the need for additional information, the desire for peer education, and earlier consultation with a surgeon. Only 3 patients were content with the information used to decide about surgery. CONCLUSIONS Patients with ulcerative colitis who need surgery largely experience independence when deciding between IPAA and EI, but struggle with inadequate educational information and social support. Patients may benefit from early access to surgeons and peer guidance to enhance independence in decision-making. Preoperative educational materials describing surgical complications and postoperative lifestyle could improve decision-making and facilitate discussions with loved ones.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica N Cohan
- Department of Surgery, University of Utah, 30 North 1900 East, Salt Lake City, UT, 84132, USA.
| | - Elissa M Ozanne
- Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Rebecca K Hofer
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Yvonne M Kelly
- Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Anna Kata
- Department of Surgery, Medstar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Craig Larsen
- Department of Surgery, New York Presbyterian-Queens, Flushing, NY, USA
| | - Emily Finlayson
- Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kim AH, Girgis A, De Cruz P, Siegel CA, Karimi N, Ruban SO, Sechi AJ, Ng WSW, Andrews JM, Connor SJ. Development and Feasibility of a Web-Based Decision Aid for Patients With Ulcerative Colitis: Qualitative Pilot Study. J Med Internet Res 2021; 23:e15946. [PMID: 33629956 PMCID: PMC7952232 DOI: 10.2196/15946] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2019] [Revised: 10/27/2020] [Accepted: 10/28/2020] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Shared decision making (SDM) is becoming an important part of ulcerative colitis (UC) management because of the increasing complexity of available treatment choices and their trade-offs. The use of decision aids (DA) may be effective in increasing patients’ participation in UC management but their uptake has been limited due to high attrition rates and lack of a participatory approach to their design and implementation. Objective The primary aim of this study is to explore the perspectives of Australian patients and their clinicians regarding the feasibility and acceptability of myAID, a web-based DA, in informing treatment decisions in UC. The secondary aim is to use the findings of this pilot study to inform the design of a cluster randomized clinical trial (CRCT) to assess the efficacy of the DA compared with usual care. Methods myAID, a DA was designed and developed using a participatory approach by a multidisciplinary team of clinicians, patients, and nonmedical volunteers. A qualitative pilot study to evaluate the DA, involving patients with UC facing new treatment decisions and inflammatory bowel disease clinicians, was undertaken. Results A total of 11 patients with UC and 15 clinicians provided feedback on myAID. Themes explored included the following: Acceptability and usability of myAID—myAID was found to be acceptable by the majority of clinicians as a tool to facilitate SDM, uptake was thought to vary depending on clinicians’ approaches to patient education and practice, potential to overcome time restrictions associated with outpatient clinics was identified, presentation of unbiased information enabling patients to digest information at their own pace was noted, and potential to provoke anxiety among patients with a new diagnosis or mild disease was raised; Perceived role and usefulness of myAID—discordance was observed between patients who prioritized voicing preferences and clinicians who prioritized treatment adherence, and myAID facilitated early discussion of medical versus surgical treatment options; Target population and timing of use—greatest benefit was perceived at the time of initiating or changing treatment and following commencement of immunosuppressive therapy; and Potential concerns and areas for improvement—some perceived that use of myAID may precipitate anxiety by increasing decisional conflict and impact the therapeutic relationship between patient and the clinician and may increase resource requirements. Conclusions These preliminary findings suggest that patients and clinicians consider myAID as a feasible and acceptable tool to facilitate SDM for UC management. These pilot data have informed a participatory approach to the design of a CRCT, which will evaluate the clinical efficacy of myAID compared with usual care. Trial Registration Australian New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry ACTRN12617001246370; http://anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?ACTRN=12617001246370.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew H Kim
- Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, South Western Sydney Clinical School, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.,Department of Gastroenterology, Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - Afaf Girgis
- Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, South Western Sydney Clinical School, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | - Peter De Cruz
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Austin Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.,Department of Medicine, Austin Academic Centre, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Corey A Siegel
- Section of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, United States
| | - Neda Karimi
- Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, South Western Sydney Clinical School, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | - Sasha O Ruban
- Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, South Western Sydney Clinical School, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | - Alexandra J Sechi
- Department of Gastroenterology, Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - Wa Sang Watson Ng
- Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, South Western Sydney Clinical School, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.,Department of Gastroenterology, Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - Jane M Andrews
- IBD Service, Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia.,Faculty of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Susan J Connor
- Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, South Western Sydney Clinical School, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.,Department of Gastroenterology, Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Fox JC, Lipstein EA. Shared Decision Making in Gastroenterology: Challenges and Opportunities. MAYO CLINIC PROCEEDINGS: INNOVATIONS, QUALITY & OUTCOMES 2020; 4:183-189. [PMID: 32280929 PMCID: PMC7139984 DOI: 10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2019.11.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2019] [Revised: 11/14/2019] [Accepted: 11/15/2019] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
This article reviews the current uses of shared decision making in gastroenterology and discusses additional areas of opportunity for shared decision making, especially in the area of functional gastrointestinal disorders. PubMed, MEDLINE, and Cochrane library databases were searched for articles published during a 10-year period from January 1, 2007, through December 31, 2017. Search terms included shared decision making and gastroenterology, shared decision making in gastrointestinal disease, shared decision making in functional GI disorders, and shared decision making and irritable bowel syndrome. Studies were not included in this review when a health care professional other than a gastroenterologist was involved, eg, an article that reported shared decision making regarding the use of radiation therapy in a patient with advanced rectal cancer in which the health care professional helping to make the decision was an oncologist.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jean C Fox
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Ellen A Lipstein
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, James M. Anderson Center for Health Systems Excellence, and Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, OH
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Casellas F, Navarro E, Amil P, Barber C, Marín L, Guardiola J, Espín E, Sainz E, Aldeguer X, Gallego M, Murciano F, García-Planella E, Martín-de-Carpi J, Mendive JM, González-Mestre A. Development and validation of the QUECOMIICAT questionnaire: a tool to assess disease-related knowledge in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. REVISTA ESPANOLA DE ENFERMEDADES DIGESTIVAS 2019; 111:586-592. [PMID: 31317762 DOI: 10.17235/reed.2019.6298/2019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION adequate knowledge of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is essential for a successful patient-centered management of IBD. OBJECTIVE due to the scarcity of up-to-date tools for measuring IBD literacy, this single-center, prospective study aimed to develop and validate a new questionnaire to assess IBD-related knowledge. MATERIAL AND METHODS the study included patients followed up at the Crohn-Colitis Care Unit (UACC) at the Hospital Vall d'Hebron (Barcelona, Spain). Patients admitted to the UACC for the first time were subsequently enrolled into a standard IBD educational program. A pilot questionnaire was developed and validated in 92 IBD patients by determining the internal consistency reliability (Cronbach's α test), feasibility, construct validity (correlation with the Crohn's and Colitis Knowledge [CCKNOW] questionnaire and a knowledge visual analog scale [VAS]) and sensitivity (score change before and after a standard IBD educational program). The questionnaire, named "Qüestionari Coneixements Malaltia Inflamatòria Intestinal Catalunya" (IBD-knowledge questionnaire Catalonia) (QUECOMIICAT) was written in Spanish and had 25 items addressing six dimensions: general concepts, clinic, treatment, surgery, habits and social context. RESULTS the median (interquartile range) completion time was 15 (10-20) minutes and the floor and ceiling effects were 1.1% and 2.1%, respectively. The Cronbach's α coefficient was α = 0.75. QUECOMIICAT significantly correlated with the VAS (rho = 0.34, p < 0.01) and CCKNOW questionnaires (rho = 0.74, p < 0.01). Patient knowledge significantly increased 24 hours after attending a standard IBD educational program and remained statistically significant one month later (Pearson's test-retest correlation coefficient r = 0.81, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION in conclusion, the QUECOMIICAT questionnaire is a new up-to-date tool to assess IBD-related knowledge with good feasibility and validation results for use in the routine clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ester Navarro
- Unitat Atenció Crohn-Colitis, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebrón
| | - Paloma Amil
- Programa Pacient Expert Catalunya®. Programa de pr, Direcció General de Planificació en Salut. Departament de Salut, Generalitat de Catalunya, Spain
| | - Claudia Barber
- Unitat Atenció Crohn-Colitis. , Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Laura Marín
- Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol. Badalona, Spain
| | - Jordi Guardiola
- Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge. L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain
| | - Eloy Espín
- Unitat d'Atenció Crohn-Colitis, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron. Barcelona, Spain
| | - Empar Sainz
- Hospital Universitari Arnau de Vilanova. Lleida, Spain
| | | | - Marta Gallego
- Hospital Clínic i Provincial de Barcelona. Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | | | - Juan Manuel Mendive
- CAP la Mina. SAP Litoral. Gerència d'Atenció Primària de Barcelona. Barcelona, Spain
| | - Assumpció González-Mestre
- Programa Pacient Expert Catalunya®. Programa de pr, Direcció General de Planificació en Salut. Departament de Salut, Generalitat de Catalunya, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Kamp KJ, Brittain K. Factors that Influence Treatment and Non-treatment Decision Making Among Individuals with Inflammatory Bowel Disease: An Integrative Review. PATIENT-PATIENT CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2018; 11:271-284. [PMID: 29313266 DOI: 10.1007/s40271-017-0294-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a chronic illness with periods of varying disease activity called flares and remissions. Since IBD impacts quality of life, patients make IBD disease management decisions every day. Previous research indicates limited insight about factors that influence decisions regarding disease management and the types of decisions IBD patients make. The purpose of this integrative review is to identify types of treatment and non-treatment decisions and the factors that influence decision making regarding disease management among individuals with IBD. An integrative literature review was performed based on the Whittemore and Knafl framework. PubMed, Web of Science, and PsychINFO were searched for relevant articles, from 2010-2016, using the key terms: decision making, patient preferences, self-management, self-care, nutrition, diet, stress, symptom, Colitis, Crohns, and IBD. Twenty-eight articles met the inclusion criteria. From these, research showed two types of decisions: treatment decisions related to medication and surgery, and non-treatment decisions focused on diet modification. Five themes that influence decisions were identified: experiencing symptoms, provider recommendations, convenience attributes, psychosocial factors, and informational needs. Most of the studies found a positive relationship between an increased number of symptoms and a patient's willingness to engage in treatment decisions. Although support from providers is highly influential for treatment decisions, most studies reported that provider recommendations did not align with patient preferences. Future work is needed to understand factors that influence decisions among recently diagnosed patients, to focus on non-treatment-related decisions, and to clarify the role of psychosocial factors in promoting disease decision making among IBD patients. This integrative review identified that, for patients, experiencing symptoms is the most important factor that influences treatment and non-treatment decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kendra J Kamp
- Michigan State University, 1355 Bogue St, East Lansing, MI, 48824, USA.
| | - Kelly Brittain
- Michigan State University, 1355 Bogue St, East Lansing, MI, 48824, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Gröne J, Lorenz EM, Seifarth C, Seeliger H, Kreis ME, Mueller MH. Timing of surgery in ulcerative colitis in the biologic therapy era-the patient's perspective. Int J Colorectal Dis 2018; 33:1429-1435. [PMID: 30003360 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-018-3129-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/07/2018] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is no general consensus regarding the ideal timing of surgery in patients with refractory ulcerative colitis (UC). Decision-making and timing of restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) is influenced by treating physicians and patients themselves. The aim of this study was to determine whether or not patients would have preferred the operation to be performed earlier, at the same time, or at a later point of time and to determine the reasons for their preference. METHODS Clinical data of 193 patients with UC who have undergone IPAA were documented in a prospective database at our institution between 2004 and 2015. From this database, 190 patients were identified and a standardized custom-made questionnaire was mailed for follow-up survey. Patients who did not respond were called by telephone and encouraged to complete the questionnaire. RESULTS One hundred nine questionnaires were eligible for analysis (57.4%). Average time between diagnosis and surgery was 11.2 ± 10.8 years (mean ± SD). Indications for surgery were refractory disease (70.6%), colitis-associated colorectal cancer (11.0%), high-grade dysplasia or stenosis (11.9%), and septic complications of UC (6.4%); 39 of 77 patients (50.6%) with refractory UC reported to have preferred their operation to be carried out earlier as it was actually performed (16.8 ± 11.9 months). Refractory course of the disease was identified as a predictor for a retrospectively desired earlier surgical approach (p = 0.014). CONCLUSION A substantial proportion of patients felt that they should have undergone surgery earlier than actually performed. It appears that timing of the decision to undergo surgery is suboptimal. This situation may be improved by earlier surgical consultation in the course of the disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jörn Gröne
- Department of Surgery, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Charité University Medicine, Berlin, Germany.,Department of Surgery, Rotes Kreuz Krankenhaus, Bremen, Germany
| | - Eva-Maria Lorenz
- Department of Surgery, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Charité University Medicine, Berlin, Germany
| | - Claudia Seifarth
- Department of Surgery, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Charité University Medicine, Berlin, Germany
| | - Hendrik Seeliger
- Department of Surgery, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Charité University Medicine, Berlin, Germany
| | - Martin E Kreis
- Department of Surgery, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Charité University Medicine, Berlin, Germany
| | - Mario H Mueller
- Department of Surgery, Vivantes Hospital Neukölln, Rudower Straße 48, 12351, Berlin, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Aquina CT, Fleming FJ, Becerra AZ, Hensley BJ, Noyes K, Monson JR, Temple LK, Cellini C. Who gets a pouch after colectomy in New York state and why? Surgery 2018; 163:305-310. [DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2017.07.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2017] [Revised: 07/30/2017] [Accepted: 07/31/2017] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
|