A Pilot Study of the Immunologic, Virologic, and Pathologic Consequences of Intra-anal 5% Imiquimod in HIV-1-Infected Men With High-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions

A phase I study of intra-anal artesunate (suppositories) to treat anal high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions

BACKGROUND

Ablation or surgical excision is the typical treatment of anal high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL). Recurrences are common due to the persistence of underlying human papillomavirus (HPV) infection. Additional well-tolerated and effective non-surgical options for HPV-associated anal disease are needed.

METHODS

This 3+3 dose escalation Phase I clinical trial evaluated the safety and tolerability of artesunate suppositories in the treatment of patients with biopsy-proven HSIL.

RESULTS

The maximal tolerated dose was 400 mg, administered in 3 cycles. All adverse events associated with the use 200- and 400-mg artesunate suppositories were Grade 1. At the 600-mg dose, patients experienced clinically significant nausea.

CONCLUSION

Artesunate suppositories are a safe treatment option for anal HSIL.

Evaluating the efficacy of treatment options for anal intraepithelial neoplasia: a systematic review

PURPOSE

Anal intraepithelial neoplasia (AIN) is the accepted precursor of anal squamous cell carcinoma (ASCC). There has long been a hypothesis that treating AIN may prevent ASCC. Many different treatment modalities have been suggested and studied. We conducted this systematic review to evaluate their efficacy and the evidence as to whether we can prevent ASCC by treating AIN.

METHODS

MEDLINE and EMBASE were electronically searched using relevant search terms. All studies investigating the use of a single treatment for AIN that reported at least one end outcome such as partial or complete response to treatment, recurrence after treatment and/or ASCC diagnosis after treatment were included.

RESULTS

Thirty studies were included in the systematic review investigating 10 treatment modalities: 5% imiquimod, 5-fluorouracil, cidofovir, trichloroacetic acid, electrocautery, surgical excision, infrared coagulation, radiofrequency ablation, photodynamic therapy and HPV vaccination. All treatment modalities demonstrated some initial regression of AIN after treatment; however, recurrence rates were high especially in HIV-positive patients. Many of the studies suffered from significant bias which prevented direct comparison.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the theory persists that by inducing the regression of AIN, we may be able to reduce the risk of ASCC, there was no clinical evidence within the literature advocating that treating AIN does prevent ASCC.

The effectiveness and tolerability of imiquimod suppositories to treat extensive intra-anal high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions/warts in HIV-infected individuals

Topical imiquimod is a potential treatment for intra-anal condyloma and squamous intraepithelial lesions caused by human papillomavirus (HPV). We aimed to assess the effectiveness and tolerability of imiquimod suppositories for the treatment of anal high-grade intraepithelial lesions (HSIL) and condylomas in HIV-infected patients. We conducted a retrospective analysis in a prospectively followed cohort. High-resolution anoscopy was used for diagnosis and assessment following treatment. Patients’ tolerability was assessed with a self-administered survey. Ninety-five patients (94.7% men) were analyzed. All were on combination antiretroviral therapy. Median CD4 T-cell count was 690 cells/µL, 89% had undetectable plasma viral load. Response to imiquimod was seen in 46.3% (complete: 12.5%, partial: 33.8%) in the intent-to-treat analysis, and in 55.2% (complete: 14.9%, partial: 40.3%) in the on-treatment analysis. Higher response rates were observed for anal condyloma compared with HSIL. A significantly poorer response rate was observed in smokers and in individuals with lower nadir CD4 T-cell counts. Imiquimod tolerability was “good” in 57.1% (n = 36), “acceptable” in 33.3% (n = 21), and “poor” in 9.5% (n = 6). Systemic side effects were reported in 20.7% (n = 13). There was no association between treatment effect and tolerability. In conclusion, imiquimod stands as a well-tolerated option for the treatment of HPV-associated intra-anal pathology in HIV-infected individuals.

Intra-anal use of imiquimod: what is the clinical evidence?

Imiquimod has been demonstrated to be rather effective in patients with anal as well as perianal high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSILs). Nevertheless, until now the intra-anal use of imiquimod has been considered off-label. The aim of this study is to review the clinical evidence related to the intra-anal use of imiquimod in the treatment of human papillomavirus-related anal lesions. A systematic search in PubMed and Scopus was performed. In total, 422 patients were included. The most common referred comorbidity was HIV infection (281 patients, 66.6%). The principal clinical entities, which were treated with intra-anal imiquimod, were HSILs. The most frequent formulation was self-applied imiquimod cream. In the HSIL group, there was complete healing in 74 patients (35%) and partial in 44 patients (20.9%), while in the wart group, there was complete healing in 128 patients (67%). Recurrence of HSIL was present in 19 patients (15%), while in cases with warts recurrence was present in 38 patients (19.8%). The most common adverse events were pain, itching, and burning sensation. In conclusion, the adverse effects associated with the intra-anal use of imiquimod seem to be minor. The present clinical evidence suggests that imiquimod may be proposed as effective, safe, and relatively well tolerated treatment.