1
|
Keller DS, Curtis N, Burt HA, Ammirati CA, Collings AT, Polk HC, Carrano FM, Antoniou SA, Hanna N, Piotet LM, Hill S, Cuijpers ACM, Tejedor P, Milone M, Andriopoulou E, Kontovounisios C, Leeds IL, Awad ZT, Barber MW, Al-Mansour M, Nassif G, West MA, Pryor AD, Carli F, Demartines N, Bouvy ND, Passera R, Arezzo A, Francis N. EAES/SAGES evidence-based recommendations and expert consensus on optimization of perioperative care in older adults. Surg Endosc 2024; 38:4104-4126. [PMID: 38942944 PMCID: PMC11289045 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-024-10977-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2024] [Accepted: 05/30/2024] [Indexed: 06/30/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND As the population ages, more older adults are presenting for surgery. Age-related declines in physiological reserve and functional capacity can result in frailty and poor outcomes after surgery. Hence, optimizing perioperative care in older patients is imperative. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) pathways and Minimally Invasive Surgery (MIS) may influence surgical outcomes, but current use and impact on older adults patients is unknown. The aim of this study was to provide evidence-based recommendations on perioperative care of older adults undergoing major abdominal surgery. METHODS Expert consensus determined working definitions for key terms and metrics related to perioperative care. A systematic literature review and meta-analysis was performed using the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Clinicaltrials.gov databases for 24 pre-defined key questions in the topic areas of prehabilitation, MIS, and ERAS in major abdominal surgery (colorectal, upper gastrointestinal (UGI), Hernia, and hepatopancreatic biliary (HPB)) to generate evidence-based recommendations following the GRADE methodology. RESULT Older adults were defined as 65 years and older. Over 20,000 articles were initially retrieved from search parameters. Evidence synthesis was performed across the three topic areas from 172 studies, with meta-analyses conducted for MIS and ERAS topics. The use of MIS and ERAS was recommended for older adult patients particularly when undergoing colorectal surgery. Expert opinion recommended prehabilitation, cessation of smoking and alcohol, and correction of anemia in all colorectal, UGI, Hernia, and HPB procedures in older adults. All recommendations were conditional, with low to very low certainty of evidence, with the exception of ERAS program in colorectal surgery. CONCLUSIONS MIS and ERAS are recommended in older adults undergoing major abdominal surgery, with evidence supporting use in colorectal surgery. Though expert opinion supported prehabilitation, there is insufficient evidence supporting use. This work has identified evidence gaps for further studies to optimize older adults undergoing major abdominal surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deborah S Keller
- Department of Digestive Surgery, University of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, FR, USA
| | - Nathan Curtis
- Surgical Unit, Dorset County Hospital, Dorchester, Dorset, UK
| | | | | | - Amelia T Collings
- Department of Surgery, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, KY, USA
| | - Hiram C Polk
- Department of Surgery, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, KY, USA
| | - Francesco Maria Carrano
- Department of General and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Busto Arsizio Circolo Hospital, ASST-Valle Olona, Varese, Italy
| | - Stavros A Antoniou
- Department of General Surgery, Papageorgiou General Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Nader Hanna
- Department of Surgery, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | | | - Sarah Hill
- Department of Surgery, The University of Toledo College of Medicine and Life Sciences, Toledo, OH, USA
| | - Anne C M Cuijpers
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Patricia Tejedor
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, University Hospital Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Marco Milone
- Department of Clinical and Surgical Gastrointestinal Diseases, University of Naples "Federico II", Via Pansini 5, Naples, Italy
| | - Eleni Andriopoulou
- Department of Surgery, Hellenic Red Cross Korgialeneio Benakeio NHS, Athens, Greece
| | - Christos Kontovounisios
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, Chelsea and Westminster Campus and the Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK
| | - Ira L Leeds
- Department of Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Ziad T Awad
- Department of Surgery, University of Florida, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Meghan Wandtke Barber
- Department of Surgery, The University of Toledo College of Medicine and Life Sciences, Toledo, OH, USA
| | - Mazen Al-Mansour
- Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - George Nassif
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, AdventHealth, Orlando, FL, USA
| | - Malcolm A West
- Cancer Sciences Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
- Complex Cancer and Exenterative Service, University Hospitals Southampton, Southampton, UK
- NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, Perioperative and Critical Care Theme, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Aurora D Pryor
- Long Island Jewish Medical Center and System Chief for Bariatric Surgery, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell Health, Great Neck, NY, USA
| | - Franco Carli
- Department of Anesthesia, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
| | | | - Nicole D Bouvy
- Innovative Surgical Techniques, Endoscopic and Endocrine Surgery, Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Roberto Passera
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, University of Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - Alberto Arezzo
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - Nader Francis
- Department of Surgery, Yeovil District Hospital, Higher Kingston, Yeovil, UK.
- The Griffin Institute, Northwick Park and St Mark's Hospital, Y Block, Watford Rd, Harrow, HA1 3UJ, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Sauro KM, Smith C, Ibadin S, Thomas A, Ganshorn H, Bakunda L, Bajgain B, Bisch SP, Nelson G. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Guidelines and Hospital Length of Stay, Readmission, Complications, and Mortality: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials. JAMA Netw Open 2024; 7:e2417310. [PMID: 38888922 PMCID: PMC11195621 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.17310] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2024] [Accepted: 04/17/2024] [Indexed: 06/20/2024] Open
Abstract
Importance A comprehensive review of the evidence exploring the outcomes of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) guidelines has not been completed. Objective To evaluate if ERAS guidelines are associated with improved hospital length of stay, hospital readmission, complications, and mortality compared with usual surgical care, and to understand differences in estimates based on study and patient factors. Data Sources MEDLINE, Embase, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and Cochrane Central were searched from inception until June 2021. Study Selection Titles, abstracts, and full-text articles were screened by 2 independent reviewers. Eligible studies were randomized clinical trials that examined ERAS-guided surgery compared with a control group and reported on at least 1 of the outcomes. Data Extraction and Synthesis Data were abstracted in duplicate using a standardized data abstraction form. The study followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. Risk of bias was assessed in duplicate using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Random-effects meta-analysis was used to pool estimates for each outcome, and meta-regression identified sources of heterogeneity within each outcome. Main Outcome and Measures The primary outcomes were hospital length of stay, hospital readmission within 30 days of index discharge, 30-day postoperative complications, and 30-day postoperative mortality. Results Of the 12 047 references identified, 1493 full texts were screened for eligibility, 495 were included in the systematic review, and 74 RCTs with 9076 participants were included in the meta-analysis. Included studies presented data from 21 countries and 9 ERAS-guided surgical procedures with 15 (20.3%) having a low risk of bias. The mean (SD) Reporting on ERAS Compliance, Outcomes, and Elements Research checklist score was 13.5 (2.3). Hospital length of stay decreased by 1.88 days (95% CI, 0.95-2.81 days; I2 = 86.5%; P < .001) and the risk of complications decreased (risk ratio, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.59-0.87; I2 = 78.6%; P < .001) in the ERAS group. Risk of readmission and mortality were not significant. Conclusions and Relevance In this meta-analysis, ERAS guidelines were associated with decreased hospital length of stay and complications. Future studies should aim to improve implementation of ERAS and increase the reach of the guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Khara M. Sauro
- Department of Community Health Sciences and O’Brien Institute of Public Health, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Department of Surgery, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Department of Oncology and Charbonneau Cancer Institute, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Christine Smith
- Department of Community Health Sciences and O’Brien Institute of Public Health, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Seremi Ibadin
- Department of Community Health Sciences and O’Brien Institute of Public Health, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Abigail Thomas
- Department of Community Health Sciences and O’Brien Institute of Public Health, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Heather Ganshorn
- Libraries and Cultural Resources, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Linda Bakunda
- Department of Community Health Sciences and O’Brien Institute of Public Health, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Bishnu Bajgain
- Department of Community Health Sciences and O’Brien Institute of Public Health, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Steven P. Bisch
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Gregg Nelson
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Ariadne Labs, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lirk P, Badaoui J, Stuempflen M, Hedayat M, Freys SM, Joshi GP. PROcedure-SPECific postoperative pain management guideline for laparoscopic colorectal surgery: A systematic review with recommendations for postoperative pain management. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2024; 41:161-173. [PMID: 38298101 DOI: 10.1097/eja.0000000000001945] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/02/2024]
Abstract
Colorectal cancer is the second most common cancer diagnosed in women and third most common in men. Laparoscopic resection has become the standard surgical technique worldwide given its notable benefits, mainly the shorter length of stay and less postoperative pain. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the current literature on postoperative pain management following laparoscopic colorectal surgery and update previous procedure-specific pain management recommendations. The primary outcomes were postoperative pain scores and opioid requirements. We also considered study quality, clinical relevance of trial design, and a comprehensive risk-benefit assessment of the analgesic intervention. We performed a literature search to identify randomised controlled studies (RCTs) published before January 2022. Seventy-two studies were included in the present analysis. Through the established PROSPECT process, we recommend basic analgesia (paracetamol for rectal surgery, and paracetamol with either a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug or cyclo-oxygenase-2-specific inhibitor for colonic surgery) and wound infiltration as first-line interventions. No consensus could be achieved either for the use of intrathecal morphine or intravenous lidocaine; no recommendation can be made for these interventions. However, intravenous lidocaine may be considered when basic analgesia cannot be provided.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philipp Lirk
- From the Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital (PL, JB, MS), Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA (MH), Department of Surgery, DIAKO Ev. Diakonie-Krankenhaus, Bremen, Germany (SMF) and Department of Anesthesiology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA (GPJ)
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
El-Kefraoui C, Do U, Miller A, Kouyoumdjian A, Cui D, Khorasani E, Landry T, Amar-Zifkin A, Lee L, Feldman LS, Fiore JF. Impact of enhanced recovery pathways on patient-reported outcomes after abdominal surgery: a systematic review. Surg Endosc 2023; 37:8043-8056. [PMID: 37474828 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-023-10289-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2023] [Accepted: 07/05/2023] [Indexed: 07/22/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Evidence supports that enhanced recovery pathways (ERPs) reduce length of stay and complications; however, these measures may not reflect the perspective of patients who are the main stakeholders in the recovery process. This systematic review aimed to appraise the evidence regarding the impact of ERPs on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) after abdominal surgery. METHODS Five databases (Medline, Embase, Biosis, Cochrane, and Web of Science) were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) addressing the impact of ERPs on PROs after abdominal surgery. We focused on distinct periods of recovery: early (within 7 days postoperatively) and late (beyond 7 days). Risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane's RoB 2.0. Results were appraised descriptively as heterogeneity hindered meta-analysis. Certainty of evidence was evaluated using GRADE. RESULTS Fifty-six RCTs were identified [colorectal (n = 18), hepatopancreaticobiliary (HPB) (n = 11), upper gastrointestinal (UGI) (n = 10), gynecological (n = 7), urological (n = 7), general surgery (n = 3)]. Most trials had 'some concerns' (n = 30) or 'high' (n = 25) risk of bias. In the early postoperative period, ERPs improved patient-reported general health (colorectal, HPB, UGI, urological; very low to low certainty), physical health (colorectal, gynecological; very low to low certainty), mental health (colorectal, gynecological; very low certainty), pain (all specialties; very low to moderate certainty), and fatigue (colorectal; low certainty). In the late postoperative period, ERPs improved general health (HPB, UGI, urological; very low certainty), physical health (UGI, gynecological, urological; very low to low certainty), mental health (UGI, gynecological, urological; very low certainty), social health (gynecological; very low certainty), pain (gynecological, urological; very low certainty), and fatigue (gynecological; very low certainty). CONCLUSION This review supports that ERPs may have a positive impact on patient-reported postoperative health status (i.e., general, physical, mental, and social health) and symptom experience (i.e., pain and fatigue) after abdominal surgery; however, data were largely derived from low-quality trials. Although these findings contribute important knowledge to inform evidence-based ERP implementation, there remains a great need to improve PRO assessment in studies focused on postoperative recovery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charbel El-Kefraoui
- Division of Experimental Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Steinberg-Bernstein Centre for Minimally Invasive Surgery and Innovation, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Centre for Outcomes Research and Evaluation (CORE), Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Uyen Do
- Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Andrew Miller
- Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Araz Kouyoumdjian
- Division of Experimental Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Department of Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - David Cui
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Elahe Khorasani
- Division of Experimental Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Steinberg-Bernstein Centre for Minimally Invasive Surgery and Innovation, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Centre for Outcomes Research and Evaluation (CORE), Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Tara Landry
- Bibliothèque de la Santé, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Medical Libraries, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | | | - Lawrence Lee
- Division of Experimental Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Steinberg-Bernstein Centre for Minimally Invasive Surgery and Innovation, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Centre for Outcomes Research and Evaluation (CORE), Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Department of Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Liane S Feldman
- Division of Experimental Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Steinberg-Bernstein Centre for Minimally Invasive Surgery and Innovation, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Centre for Outcomes Research and Evaluation (CORE), Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Department of Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Julio F Fiore
- Division of Experimental Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
- Steinberg-Bernstein Centre for Minimally Invasive Surgery and Innovation, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada.
- Centre for Outcomes Research and Evaluation (CORE), Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada.
- Department of Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
- Montreal General Hospital, 1650 Cedar Ave, R2-104, Montreal, QC, H3G 1A4, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Bloc S, Alfonsi P, Belbachir A, Beaussier M, Bouvet L, Campard S, Campion S, Cazenave L, Diemunsch P, Di Maria S, Dufour G, Fabri S, Fletcher D, Garnier M, Godier A, Grillo P, Huet O, Joosten A, Lasocki S, Le Guen M, Le Saché F, Macquer I, Marquis C, de Montblanc J, Maurice-Szamburski A, Nguyen YL, Ruscio L, Zieleskiewicz L, Caillard A, Weiss E. Guidelines on perioperative optimization protocol for the adult patient 2023. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med 2023; 42:101264. [PMID: 37295649 DOI: 10.1016/j.accpm.2023.101264] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The French Society of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine [Société Française d'Anesthésie et de Réanimation (SFAR)] aimed at providing guidelines for the implementation of perioperative optimization programs. DESIGN A consensus committee of 29 experts from the SFAR was convened. A formal conflict-of-interest policy was developed at the outset of the process and enforced throughout. The entire guidelines process was conducted independently of any industry funding. The authors were advised to follow the principles of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system to guide assessment of quality of evidence. METHODS Four fields were defined: 1) Generalities on perioperative optimization programs; 2) Preoperative measures; 3) Intraoperative measures and; 4) Postoperative measures. For each field, the objective of the recommendations was to answer a number of questions formulated according to the PICO model (population, intervention, comparison, and outcomes). Based on these questions, an extensive bibliographic search was carried out using predefined keywords according to PRISMA guidelines and analyzed using the GRADE® methodology. The recommendations were formulated according to the GRADE® methodology and then voted on by all the experts according to the GRADE grid method. As the GRADE® methodology could have been fully applied for the vast majority of questions, the recommendations were formulated using a "formalized expert recommendations" format. RESULTS The experts' work on synthesis and application of the GRADE® method resulted in 30 recommendations. Among the formalized recommendations, 19 were found to have a high level of evidence (GRADE 1±) and ten a low level of evidence (GRADE 2±). For one recommendation, the GRADE methodology could not be fully applied, resulting in an expert opinion. Two questions did not find any response in the literature. After two rounds of rating and several amendments, strong agreement was reached for all the recommendations. CONCLUSIONS Strong agreement among the experts was obtained to provide 30 recommendations for the elaboration and/or implementation of perioperative optimization programs in the highest number of surgical fields.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sébastien Bloc
- Clinical Research Department, Ambroise Pare Hospital Group, Neuilly-sur-Seine, France; Department of Anesthesiology, Clinique Drouot Sport, Paris, France.
| | - Pascal Alfonsi
- Department of Anesthesia, University of Paris Descartes, Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint-Joseph, 185 rue Raymond Losserand, F-75674 Paris Cedex 14, France
| | - Anissa Belbachir
- Service d'Anesthésie Réanimation, UF Douleur, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, APHP.Centre, Site Cochin, Paris, France
| | - Marc Beaussier
- Department of Digestive, Oncologic and Metabolic Surgery, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Université de Paris, 42 Boulevard Jourdan, 75014, Paris, France
| | - Lionel Bouvet
- Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital Femme Mère Enfant, Lyon, France
| | | | - Sébastien Campion
- AP-HP, Groupe Hospitalier Universitaire APHP-Sorbonne Université, site Pitié-Salpêtrière, Département d'Anesthésie-Réanimation, F-75013 Paris, France; Sorbonne Université, INSERM, UMRS1158 Neurophysiologie Respiratoire Expérimentale et Clinique, F-75005 Paris, France
| | - Laure Cazenave
- Department of Anaesthesia and Critical Care, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France; Groupe Jeunes, French Society of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine (SFAR), 75016 Paris, France
| | - Pierre Diemunsch
- Unité de Réanimation Chirurgicale, Service d'Anesthésie-réanimation Chirurgicale, Pôle Anesthésie-Réanimations Chirurgicales, Samu-Smur, Hôpital de Hautepierre, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, 1, Avenue Molière, 67098 Strasbourg Cedex, France
| | - Sophie Di Maria
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, AP-HP, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France
| | - Guillaume Dufour
- Service d'Anesthésie-Réanimation, CHU de Pitié-Salpêtrière, 47-83, Boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75013 Paris, France
| | - Stéphanie Fabri
- Faculty of Economics, Management & Accountancy, University of Malta, Malta
| | - Dominique Fletcher
- Université de Versailles-Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Ambroise-Paré, Service d'Anesthésie, 9, Avenue Charles-de-Gaulle, 92100 Boulogne-Billancourt, France
| | - Marc Garnier
- Sorbonne Université, GRC 29, DMU DREAM, Service d'Anesthésie-Réanimation et Médecine Périopératoire Rive Droite, Paris, France
| | - Anne Godier
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, European Georges Pompidou Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, France
| | | | - Olivier Huet
- CHU de Brest, Anesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, Brest, France
| | - Alexandre Joosten
- Department of Anesthesiology, Erasme Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium; Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, Paul Brousse Hospital, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP), Villejuif, France
| | | | - Morgan Le Guen
- Paris Saclay University, Department of Anaesthesia and Pain Medicine, Foch Hospital, 92150 Suresnes, France
| | - Frédéric Le Saché
- Department of Anesthesiology, Clinique Drouot Sport, Paris, France; DMU DREAM Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Isabelle Macquer
- Bordeaux University Hospitals, Bordeaux, Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine Department, Bordeaux, France
| | - Constance Marquis
- Clinique du Sport, Département d'Anesthésie et Réanimation, Médipole Garonne, 45 rue de Gironis - CS 13 624, 31036 Toulouse Cedex 1, France
| | - Jacques de Montblanc
- Departments of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Paris-Saclay University, Bicêtre Hospital, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
| | | | - Yên-Lan Nguyen
- Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine Department, Cochin Academic Hospital, APHP, Université de Paris, 75014 Paris, France
| | - Laura Ruscio
- Departments of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Paris-Saclay University, Bicêtre Hospital, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France; INSERM U 1195, Université Paris-Saclay, Saint-Aubin, Île-de-France, France
| | - Laurent Zieleskiewicz
- Service d'Anesthésie Réanimation, Hôpital Nord, AP-HM, Marseille, Aix Marseille Université, C2VN, France
| | - Anaîs Caillard
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire La Cavale Blanche Université de Bretagne Ouest, Anaesthesiology, Critical Care and Perioperative Medicine Department, Brest, France
| | - Emmanuel Weiss
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Beaujon Hospital, DMU Parabol, AP-HP, Nord, Clichy, France; University of Paris, Paris, France; Inserm UMR_S1149, Centre for Research on Inflammation, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Cheon S, Oh SH, Kim JT, Choi HG, Park H, Chung JE. Nutrition Therapy by Nutrition Support Team: A Comparison of Multi-Chamber Bag and Customized Parenteral Nutrition in Hospitalized Patients. Nutrients 2023; 15:nu15112531. [PMID: 37299494 DOI: 10.3390/nu15112531] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2023] [Revised: 05/26/2023] [Accepted: 05/26/2023] [Indexed: 06/12/2023] Open
Abstract
This study aimed to investigate the activity of a nutrition support team (NST) and the trends of multi-chamber bag (MCB) and customized parenteral nutrition (PN) with NST consultations in South Korea. Data were obtained from the National Inpatient Sample Cohort between 2015 and 2020. Three datasets were constructed for NST consultation, MCB-PN product prescriptions, and aseptic preparation of total PN. The intersections of the NST consultation and each PN dataset were compiled into MCB-PN with NST or customized PN with a NST sub-dataset, respectively. Using personal identifiers, the patients' characteristics were evaluated in the NST cohort. A total of 91,384 reimbursements and 70,665 patients were included. The NST activity had increased by more than 50% over 6 years. Approximately 70% and 11%, respectively, of the NST cohort were classified into two subgroups: MCB-PN with NST (M-NST) and customized PN with NST (C-NST). M-NST had many elderly patients with cancer and showed a higher in-hospital mortality than C-NST (12.6% vs. 9.5%). C-NST included a larger number of patients under the age of 5 years, and the hospitalization period was more extended than M-NST (26.2 vs. 21.2 days). The present study showed that NST activities and the proportion of PN with NST consultation are gradually increasing in South Korea.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seunghyun Cheon
- College of Pharmacy and Institute of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology, Hanyang University, Ansan-si 15588, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea
| | - Sang-Hyeon Oh
- College of Pharmacy and Institute of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology, Hanyang University, Ansan-si 15588, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea
| | - Jung-Tae Kim
- Department of Pharmacy, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, Seoul 05278, Republic of Korea
| | - Han-Gon Choi
- College of Pharmacy and Institute of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology, Hanyang University, Ansan-si 15588, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea
| | - Hyojung Park
- Department of Pharmaceutical Services, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul 06351, Republic of Korea
- School of Pharmacy, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon-si 16419, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea
| | - Jee-Eun Chung
- College of Pharmacy and Institute of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology, Hanyang University, Ansan-si 15588, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Sharon CE, Strohl C, Saur NM. Frailty Assessment and Prehabilitation as Part of a PeRioperative Evaluation and Planning (PREP) Program for Patients Undergoing Colorectal Surgery. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 2023; 36:184-191. [PMID: 37113278 PMCID: PMC10125297 DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1761151] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/29/2023]
Abstract
Frailty assessment and prehabilitation can be incrementally implemented in a multidisciplinary, multiphase pathway to improve patient care. To start, modifications can be made to a surgeon's practice with existing resources while adapting standard pathways for frail patients. Frailty screening can identify patients in need of additional assessment and optimization. Personalized utilization of frailty data for optimization through prehabilitation can improve postoperative outcomes and identify patients who would benefit from adapted care. Additional utilization of the multidisciplinary team can lead to improved outcomes and a strong business case to add additional members of the team.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cimarron E. Sharon
- Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Catherine Strohl
- Department of Geriatrics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
- Geriatric Surgery Program, Pennsylvania Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Nicole M. Saur
- Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
- Geriatric Surgery Program, Pennsylvania Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Shah TA, Knapp L, Cohen ME, Brethauer SA, Wick EC, Ko CY. Truth of Colorectal Enhanced Recovery Programs: Process Measure Compliance in 151 Hospitals. J Am Coll Surg 2023; 236:543-550. [PMID: 36852926 DOI: 10.1097/xcs.0000000000000562] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Commonly cited studies have reported substantial improvements (defined as >20%) in process measure compliance after implementation of colorectal enhanced recovery programs (ERPs). However, hospitals have anecdotally reported difficulties in achieving similar improvement gains. This study evaluates improvement uniformity among 151 hospitals exposed to an 18-month implementation protocol for 6 colorectal ERP process measures (oral antibiotics, mechanical bowel preparation, multimodal pain control, early mobilization, early liquid intake, and early solid intake). STUDY DESIGN One hundred fifty-one hospitals implemented a colorectal ERP with pathway, educational and supporting materials, and data capture protocols; 906 opportunities existed for process compliance improvement across the cohort (151 hospitals × 6 process measures). However, 240 opportunities were excluded due to high starting compliance rates (ie compliance >80%) and 3 opportunities were excluded because compliance rates were recorded for fewer than 2 cases. Thus, 663 opportunities for improvement across 151 hospitals were studied. RESULTS Of 663 opportunities, minimal improvement (0% to 20% increase in compliance) occurred in 52% of opportunities, substantial improvement (>20% increase in compliance) in 20%, and worsening compliance occurred in 28%. Of the 6 processes, multimodal pain control and use of oral antibiotics improved the most. CONCLUSIONS Contrary to published ERP literature, the majority of study hospitals had difficulty improving process compliance with 80% of the opportunities not achieving substantial improvement. This discordance between ERP implementation success rates reported in the literature and what is observed in a large sample could reflect differences in hospitals' culture or characteristics, or a publication bias. Attention needs to be directed toward improving ERP adoption across the spectrum of hospital types.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tejen A Shah
- From the Division of Research and Optimal Patient Care, American College of Surgeons (Shah, Knapp, Cohen, Ko)
- Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH (Shah, Brethauer)
| | - Leandra Knapp
- From the Division of Research and Optimal Patient Care, American College of Surgeons (Shah, Knapp, Cohen, Ko)
| | - Mark E Cohen
- From the Division of Research and Optimal Patient Care, American College of Surgeons (Shah, Knapp, Cohen, Ko)
| | - Stacy A Brethauer
- Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH (Shah, Brethauer)
| | - Elizabeth C Wick
- Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA (Wick)
| | - Clifford Y Ko
- From the Division of Research and Optimal Patient Care, American College of Surgeons (Shah, Knapp, Cohen, Ko)
- Department of Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA (Ko)
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Taffurelli G, Montroni I, Ghignone F, Zattoni D, Garutti A, Di Candido F, Mazzotti F, Frascaroli G, Tamberi S, Ugolini G. Frailty assessment can predict textbook outcomes in senior adults after minimally invasive colorectal cancer surgery. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY 2023; 49:626-632. [PMID: 36396488 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2022.11.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2022] [Revised: 10/21/2022] [Accepted: 11/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
AIM Colorectal cancer (CRC) surgery can be associated with suboptimal outcomes in older patients. The aim was to identify the correlation between frailty and surgical variables with the achievement of Textbook Outcome (TO), a composite measure of the ideal postoperative course, by older patients with CRC. METHOD All consecutive patients ≥70years who underwent elective CRC-surgery between January 2017 and November 2021 were analyzed from a prospective database. To obtain a TO, all the following must be achieved: 90-day survival, Clavien-Dindo (CD) < 3, no reintervention, no readmission, no discharge to rehabilitation facility, no changes in the living situation and length of stay (LOS) ≤5days/≤14days for colon and rectal surgery respectively. Frailty and surgical variables were related to the achievement of TO. RESULTS Four-hundred-twenty-one consecutive patients had surgery (97.7% minimally invasive), 24.9% for rectal cancer, median age 80 years (range 70-92), median LOS of 4 days (range 1-96). Overall, 288/421 patients (68.4%) achieved a TO. CD 3-4 complications rate was 6.4%, 90-day mortality rate was 2.9%. At univariate analysis, frailty and surgical variables (ileostomy creation, p = 0.045) were related to. However, multivariate analysis showed that only frailty measures such as flemish Triage Risk Screening Tool≥2 (OR 1.97, 95%CI: 1.23-3.16; p = 0.005); Charlson Index>6 (OR 1.61, 95%CI: 1.03-2.51; p = 0.036) or Timed-Up-and-Go>20 s (OR 2.06, 95%CI: 1.01-4.19; p = 0.048) independently predicted an increased risk of not achieving a TO. CONCLUSION The association between frailty and comprehensive surgical outcomes offers objective data for guiding family counseling, managing expectations and discussing the possible loss of independence with patients and caregivers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giovanni Taffurelli
- Colorectal and General Surgery Unit, Ospedale per gli Infermi Faenza and Ospedale Santa Maria delle Croci Ravenna, AUSL Romagna, Italy.
| | - Isacco Montroni
- Colorectal and General Surgery Unit, Ospedale per gli Infermi Faenza and Ospedale Santa Maria delle Croci Ravenna, AUSL Romagna, Italy
| | - Federico Ghignone
- Colorectal and General Surgery Unit, Ospedale per gli Infermi Faenza and Ospedale Santa Maria delle Croci Ravenna, AUSL Romagna, Italy
| | - Davide Zattoni
- Colorectal and General Surgery Unit, Ospedale per gli Infermi Faenza and Ospedale Santa Maria delle Croci Ravenna, AUSL Romagna, Italy
| | - Anna Garutti
- Department of Medical Oncology, Ospedale per gli Infermi, Faenza, AUSL Romagna, Italy
| | - Francesca Di Candido
- Colorectal and General Surgery Unit, Ospedale per gli Infermi Faenza and Ospedale Santa Maria delle Croci Ravenna, AUSL Romagna, Italy
| | - Federico Mazzotti
- Colorectal and General Surgery Unit, Ospedale per gli Infermi Faenza and Ospedale Santa Maria delle Croci Ravenna, AUSL Romagna, Italy
| | - Giacomo Frascaroli
- Colorectal and General Surgery Unit, Ospedale per gli Infermi Faenza and Ospedale Santa Maria delle Croci Ravenna, AUSL Romagna, Italy
| | - Stefano Tamberi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Ospedale per gli Infermi, Faenza, AUSL Romagna, Italy
| | - Giampaolo Ugolini
- Colorectal and General Surgery Unit, Ospedale per gli Infermi Faenza and Ospedale Santa Maria delle Croci Ravenna, AUSL Romagna, Italy; University of Bologna, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Early and late anastomotic leak after colorectal surgery: A systematic review of the literature. Cir Esp 2023; 101:3-11. [PMID: 35882311 DOI: 10.1016/j.cireng.2022.07.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2022] [Accepted: 06/24/2022] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
The aim of this study was to review and to assess the quality of the scientific articles regarding early and late anastomotic leak (AL) after colorectal surgery and their risk factors. An electronic systematic search for articles on Colorectal Surgery, AL and its timing was undertaken using the MEDLINE database via PubMed, Cochrane and Embase. The selected articles were thoroughly reviewed and assessed for methodological quality using a validated methodology quality score (MINCIR score). This review was registered in the PROSPERO registry under ID: CRD42022303012. 9 articles were finally reviewed in relation to the topic of early and late anastomotic leak. There is a lack of consensus regarding the exact cut-off in time to define early and late anastomotic leak, but it is clear that they are two differentiated entities. The first, occurring in relation to technical factors; whereas the latter, is related to impaired healing.
Collapse
|
11
|
Irani JL, Hedrick TL, Miller TE, Lee L, Steinhagen E, Shogan BD, Goldberg JE, Feingold DL, Lightner AL, Paquette IM. Clinical Practice Guidelines for Enhanced Recovery After Colon and Rectal Surgery From the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons and the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons. Dis Colon Rectum 2023; 66:15-40. [PMID: 36515513 PMCID: PMC9746347 DOI: 10.1097/dcr.0000000000002650] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer L. Irani
- Department of Surgery, Division of Colorectal Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Traci L. Hedrick
- Department of Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Timothy E. Miller
- Department of Anesthesiology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Lawrence Lee
- Department of Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Emily Steinhagen
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Benjamin D. Shogan
- Department of Surgery, University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Joel E. Goldberg
- Department of Surgery, Division of Colorectal Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Daniel L. Feingold
- Department of Surgery, Section of Colorectal Surgery, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey
| | - Amy L. Lightner
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland Clinic
| | - Ian M. Paquette
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Irani JL, Hedrick TL, Miller TE, Lee L, Steinhagen E, Shogan BD, Goldberg JE, Feingold DL, Lightner AL, Paquette IM. Clinical practice guidelines for enhanced recovery after colon and rectal surgery from the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons and the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons. Surg Endosc 2023; 37:5-30. [PMID: 36515747 PMCID: PMC9839829 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-022-09758-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/04/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons (ASCRS) and the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) are dedicated to ensuring high-quality innovative patient care for surgical patients by advancing the science, prevention, and management of disorders and diseases of the colon, rectum, and anus as well as minimally invasive surgery. The ASCRS and SAGES society members involved in the creation of these guidelines were chosen because they have demonstrated expertise in the specialty of colon and rectal surgery and enhanced recovery. This consensus document was created to lead international efforts in defining quality care for conditions related to the colon, rectum, and anus and develop clinical practice guidelines based on the best available evidence. While not proscriptive, these guidelines provide information on which decisions can be made and do not dictate a specific form of treatment. These guidelines are intended for the use of all practitioners, healthcare workers, and patients who desire information about the management of the conditions addressed by the topics covered in these guidelines. These guidelines should not be deemed inclusive of all proper methods of care nor exclusive of methods of care reasonably directed toward obtaining the same results. The ultimate judgment regarding the propriety of any specific procedure must be made by the physician in light of all the circumstances presented by the individual patient. This clinical practice guideline represents a collaborative effort between the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons (ASCRS) and the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) and was approved by both societies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer L Irani
- Department of Surgery, Division of Colorectal Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Traci L Hedrick
- Department of Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Timothy E Miller
- Duke University Medical Center Library, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Lawrence Lee
- Department of Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Emily Steinhagen
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Benjamin D Shogan
- Department of Surgery, University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Joel E Goldberg
- Department of Surgery, Division of Colorectal Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Daniel L Feingold
- Section of Colorectal Surgery, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Amy L Lightner
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, USA
| | - Ian M Paquette
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine Surgery (Colon and Rectal), 222 Piedmont #7000, Cincinnati, OH, 45219, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Škrabec CG, Carné AV, Pérez MC, Corral J, Pujol AF, Cuadrado M, Troya J, Ibáñez JFJ, Parés D. Early and late anastomotic leak after colorectal surgery: A systematic review of the literature. Cir Esp 2023. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ciresp.2022.06.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
|
14
|
Foulon A, Fauvet R, Villefranque V, Bourdel N, Simonet T, Sylvestre CL, Canlorbe G, Azaïs H. Definition, general principles and expected benefits of Enhanced Recovery in Surgery. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod 2022; 51:102373. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2022.102373] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2022] [Accepted: 04/04/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
15
|
Liu L, He L, Qiu A, Zhang M. Rapid rehabilitation effect on complications, wound infection, anastomotic leak, obstruction, and hospital re-admission for gastrointestinal surgery subjects: A meta-analysis. Int Wound J 2022; 19:1539-1550. [PMID: 35191597 PMCID: PMC9493214 DOI: 10.1111/iwj.13753] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2021] [Revised: 12/14/2021] [Accepted: 01/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
We performed a meta‐analysis to evaluate the effect of rapid rehabilitation on the curative effect of gastrointestinal surgery subjects. A systematic literature search up to October 2021 was done and 31 studies included 4448 subjects with gastrointestinal surgery at the start of the study: 2242 of them were provided with rapid rehabilitation and 2206 were standard care. They were reporting relationships about the effect of rapid rehabilitation on the curative effect of gastrointestinal surgery subjects. We calculated the odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to assess the effect of rapid rehabilitation on the curative effect of gastrointestinal surgery subjects using the dichotomous method with a random‐ or fixed‐effect model. Rapid rehabilitation had significantly lower complications (OR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.54‐0.71, P < .001) and wound infection (OR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.55‐0.98, P = .03) compared with standard care in subjects with gastrointestinal surgery. However, rapid rehabilitation had no significant effect on the anastomotic leak (OR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.66‐1.22, P = .49), obstruction (OR, 0.92; 95% CI, −0.64 to 1.31, P = .65), and hospital re‐admission (OR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.57‐1.08, P = .13) compared with standard care in subjects with gastrointestinal surgery. Rapid rehabilitation had significantly lower complications and wound infection, and had no significant effect on the anastomotic leak, obstruction, and hospital re‐admission compared with standard care in subjects with gastrointestinal surgery. Further studies are required to validate these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lixiu Liu
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Heilongjiang Haerbin, China
| | - Lihuang He
- Department of Oncology, Affiliated Hospital of Xiangnan University, Chenzhou, China
| | - Afang Qiu
- Department of Internal Medicine, Yantai Qishan hospital, Yantai, China
| | - Min Zhang
- Department of Outpatient, Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China (Chinese Academy of Sciences Sichuan Translational Medicine Research Hospital), Chengdu, China
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Abbas M, Gaïa N, Buchs NC, Delaune V, Girard M, Andrey DO, Meyer J, Schrenzel J, Ris F, Harbarth S, Lazarevic V. Changes in the gut bacterial communities in colon cancer surgery patients: an observational study. Gut Pathog 2022; 14:2. [PMID: 34983654 PMCID: PMC8729125 DOI: 10.1186/s13099-021-00477-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2021] [Accepted: 12/17/2021] [Indexed: 02/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Colon surgery has been shown to modulate the intestinal microbiota. Our objective was to characterize these changes using state-of-the-art next generation sequencing techniques. Methods We performed a single-centre prospective observational cohort study to evaluate the changes in the gut microbiota, i.e., taxon distribution, before and after elective oncologic colon surgery in adult patients with different antimicrobial prophylaxis regimens (standard prophylaxis with cefuroxime/metronidazole versus carbapenems for extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales [ESBL-E] carriers). We obtained rectal samples on the day of surgery, intraoperative luminal samples, and rectal or stoma samples 3 days after surgery. We performed metataxonomic analysis based on sequencing of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene marker. Similarities and differences between bacterial communities were assessed using Bray–Curtis similarity, visualised using principal coordinates analysis and statistically tested by PERMANOVA. Comparison of taxa relative abundance was performed using ANCOM. Results We included 27 patients between March 27, 2019 and September 17, 2019. The median age was 63.6 years (IQR 56.4–76.3) and 44% were females. Most (81%) patients received standard perioperative prophylaxis as they were not ESBL carriers. There was no significant association between ESBL carriage and differences in gut microbiome. We observed large and significant increases in the genus Enterococcus between the preoperative/intraoperative samples and the postoperative sample, mainly driven by Enterococcus faecalis. There were significant differences in the postoperative microbiome between patients who received standard prophylaxis and carbapenems, specifically in the family Erysipelotrichaceae. Conclusion This hypothesis-generating study showed rapid changes in the rectal microbiota following colon cancer surgery. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13099-021-00477-7.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohamed Abbas
- Infection Control Programme, Geneva University Hospitals and Faculty of Medicine, Geneva, Switzerland.
| | - Nadia Gaïa
- Genomic Research Laboratory, Division of Infectious Diseases, University Hospitals and University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Nicolas C Buchs
- Division of Digestive Surgery, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Vaihere Delaune
- Division of Digestive Surgery, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Myriam Girard
- Genomic Research Laboratory, Division of Infectious Diseases, University Hospitals and University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Diego O Andrey
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Jeremy Meyer
- Division of Digestive Surgery, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Jacques Schrenzel
- Genomic Research Laboratory, Division of Infectious Diseases, University Hospitals and University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.,Division of Infectious Diseases, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.,Laboratory of Bacteriology, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Frédéric Ris
- Division of Digestive Surgery, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Stephan Harbarth
- Infection Control Programme, Geneva University Hospitals and Faculty of Medicine, Geneva, Switzerland.,Division of Infectious Diseases, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Vladimir Lazarevic
- Genomic Research Laboratory, Division of Infectious Diseases, University Hospitals and University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Colectomy in outpatient care or in an enhanced recovery setting: Is there truly any difference? J Visc Surg 2022; 159:2-4. [PMID: 34992009 DOI: 10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2021.12.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
|
18
|
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery in Older Adults Undergoing Colorectal Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Dis Colon Rectum 2021; 64:1020-1028. [PMID: 34214055 DOI: 10.1097/dcr.0000000000002128] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Enhanced recovery after surgery is increasingly applied in older adults undergoing colorectal surgery. OBJECTIVE This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the impact of enhanced recovery protocols on clinical outcomes including hospital-acquired geriatric syndromes in older adults undergoing colorectal surgery. DATA SOURCES This review was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, Scopus, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, CINAHL, and trial registry databases were searched (January 1980 to April 2020). STUDY SELECTION Two researchers independently screened all articles for eligibility. Randomized controlled trials evaluating enhanced recovery protocols in older adults undergoing colorectal surgery were included. INTERVENTION The enhanced recovery protocol was utilized. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Primary outcomes of interest were functional decline and delirium. Other outcomes studied were length of stay, complications, readmission, mortality, gut function, mobilization, pain, reoperation, quality of life, and psychological status. RESULTS Seven randomized trials (n = 1277 participants) were included. In terms of hospital-acquired geriatric syndromes, functional decline was reported in 1 study with benefits reported in enhanced recovery after surgery participants, and meta-analyses showed reduced incidence of delirium (risk ratio, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.21-0.98). Meta-analyses also showed reduction in urinary tract infections (risk ratio, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.31-0.90), time to first flatus (standardized mean differences, -1.00; 95% CI, -1.98 to -0.02), time to first stool (standardized mean differences, -0.59; 95% CI, -0.76 to -0.42), time to mobilize postoperatively (standardized mean differences, -0.92; 95% CI, -1.27 to -0.58), time to achieve pain control (standardized mean differences, -0.59; 95% CI, -0.90 to -0.28), and hospital stay (mean differences, -2.20; 95% CI, -3.46 to -0.94). LIMITATIONS The small number of randomized trials in older adults is a limitation of this study. CONCLUSIONS Enhanced recovery protocols in older adults undergoing colorectal surgery appear to reduce the incidence of delirium and functional decline, 2 important hospital-acquired geriatric syndromes, as well as to improve other clinical outcomes. Future research should measure these geriatric syndromes and focus on high-risk older adults including those with frailty.
Collapse
|
19
|
Montroni I, Saur NM, Shahrokni A, Suwanabol PA, Chesney TR. Surgical Considerations for Older Adults With Cancer: A Multidimensional, Multiphase Pathway to Improve Care. J Clin Oncol 2021; 39:2090-2101. [PMID: 34043436 PMCID: PMC10476754 DOI: 10.1200/jco.21.00143] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2021] [Revised: 03/20/2021] [Accepted: 04/07/2021] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Isacco Montroni
- Colon and Rectal Surgery, Ospedale “per gli Infermi”, AUSL Romagna, Faenza, Italy
| | - Nicole M. Saur
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Armin Shahrokni
- Geriatrics Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Pasithorn A. Suwanabol
- Department of Surgery, Center for Healthcare Outcomes and Policy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Tyler R. Chesney
- Department of Surgery, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Enhanced Recovery: A Decade of Experience and Future Prospects at the Mayo Clinic. HEALTHCARE (BASEL, SWITZERLAND) 2021; 9:healthcare9050549. [PMID: 34066696 PMCID: PMC8150975 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare9050549] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2021] [Revised: 03/26/2021] [Accepted: 04/12/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
This work aims to describe the implementation and subsequent learnings from the first decade after the full implementation of enhanced recovery pathway for colorectal surgery at a single institution. This paper will describe the diffusion efforts and plans through the Define, Measure, Analyze, Improve, Control (DMAIC) process of ongoing quality improvement and through research efforts. The information applies to all readers that provide surgical care within their organization as the fundamental principles of enhanced recovery for surgery are applicable regardless of the setting.
Collapse
|
21
|
Boon K, Bislenghi G, D’Hoore A, Boon N, Wolthuis AM. Do older patients (> 80 years) also benefit from ERAS after colorectal resection? A safety and feasibility study. Aging Clin Exp Res 2021; 33:1345-1352. [PMID: 32720244 DOI: 10.1007/s40520-020-01655-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2020] [Accepted: 07/10/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of a standard Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) program following colorectal resection in a geriatric population, aged 80 years and older. METHODS In this single-center before-after cohort study all patients aged 80 years and older were included after colorectal resection. Patients were divided in a pre-ERAS and an ERAS group, according to the type of perioperative care. Data were prospectively collected and analysed retrospectively. The primary outcome was short-term complication rate. Secondary outcome parameters were length of stay (LOS), 30-day mortality and readmission rate. RESULTS Over 4 years, 219 patients were included. Of those, 151 underwent colonic and 68 rectal resection, following the ERAS protocol perioperatively in 45 and 21 cases. There were no differences in complication rate, 30-day mortality or readmission rate in the pre-ERAS versus ERAS groups. LOS after colonic resection was reduced by 2.5 days in the ERAS group (p = 0.020). Laparoscopy was found to be an independent variable of LOS (p < 0.001, p = 0.009) and complication rate (p = 0.011, p < 0.001) for colonic and rectal surgery respectively. DISCUSSION A standard ERAS protocol is safe and feasible in older patients undergoing colorectal resection. Colon resection was related with shorter LOS without increasing morbidity, readmission rate nor 30-day mortality. No adverse outcome after rectal resection was found either. Laparoscopy was associated with lower complication rate and shorter LOS. CONCLUSION A laparoscopic approach within an ERAS protocol should be considered for colorectal resection in every patient regardless of age.
Collapse
|
22
|
Non-Doppler hemorrhoidal artery ligation and hemorrhoidopexy combined with pudendal nerve block for the treatment of hemorrhoidal disease: a non-inferiority randomized controlled trial. Int J Colorectal Dis 2021; 36:353-363. [PMID: 33025104 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-020-03768-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/01/2020] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In this study, we proposed a combined outpatient treatment modality for hemorrhoidal disease. METHODS This study was a prospective non-inferiority randomized controlled trial (RCT). The experimental group included the dearterialization and hemorrhoidopexy under pudendal nerve block, whereas the comparator consisted of the standard Doppler guided hemorrhoidal artery ligation and hemorrhoidopexy, under spinal anesthesia. As primary hypothesis, we considered the non-inferiority of the proposed modality in terms of the presenting symptom remission rate (non-inferiority margin: 10%). Randomization was based on a 1:1 ratio. Blinding was confined to the patient and the investigator. RESULTS Overall, 60 patients were enrolled. The primary hypothesis of this RCT (96.7% vs 73.3%) was validated. The experimental group was associated with a lower operation duration and an expedited onset of mobilization and feeding. Moreover, a favorable profile regarding short-term morbidity and analgesia was identified. The control group displayed a higher pile recurrence rate and a suboptimal patient satisfaction. A significant effect of the treatment modality in most of the SF-36 components was confirmed. CONCLUSIONS The proposed treatment modality was associated with favorable short and long-term outcomes. Due to specific limitations, further RCTs, with a larger sample size, are required. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov : NCT03298997.
Collapse
|
23
|
Enhanced recovery after elective surgery. A revolution that reduces post-operative morbidity and mortality. J Visc Surg 2020; 157:487-491. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2020.07.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
|
24
|
Viannay P, Hamel JF, Bougard M, Barbieux J, Hamy A, Venara A. Gastrointestinal motility has more of an impact on postoperative recovery than you might expect. J Visc Surg 2020; 158:19-26. [PMID: 32624336 DOI: 10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2020.06.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE While patient's reported autonomy (PRA) may help the physician to adapt the day of discharge, the link between postoperative ileus and length of stay and PRA is not known. The aim of this study was to evaluate the evolution of the PRA score during the postoperative period and to determine the factors possibly influencing such an evolution. METHODS This retrospective study on a prospective database took place in a single centre over 14 months. PRA was defined by the by using part I of the Groningen Activity Restriction Scale known as activity of daily life [from 9 (best) to 45 (worst)]. RESULTS Among the 101 patients operated on for elective or emergent colorectal surgery, 80% of the patients had recovered their preoperative PRA (±5 points) before discharge and maintained their PRA during the 2 days preceding discharge. While PRA was significantly decreased by surgery (P<0.0001), each postoperative day allowed for its progressive recovery. Interestingly, the day of recovery of GI transit was associated with a significant increase of PRA (-6.96 points, P<0.0001). Despite high variability of baseline autonomy level, patients presented very similar recovery processes, which were represented by very low slope variability in the linear mixed model. Laparoscopy reduced the decrease of postoperative PRA (P=0.03) while ASA score>2 increased PRA (P=0.03). Age, emergency surgery and the occurrence of postoperative morbidity did not affect postoperative autonomy. Finally, enhanced recovery programs (ERP) tended to improve postoperative autonomy recovery (P=0.09). CONCLUSION PRA may be used as a means of optimising a patient's day of discharge following colorectal surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Viannay
- Department of Endocrinal and Visceral Surgery, Angers University Hospital, 49933 Angers, France; Department of Medicine, Angers University of Health, 49000 Angers, France
| | - J F Hamel
- Department of Medicine, Angers University of Health, 49000 Angers, France; Department of Biostatistics, Maison de la Recherche, Angers University Hospital, 49933 Angers, France
| | - M Bougard
- Department of Endocrinal and Visceral Surgery, Angers University Hospital, 49933 Angers, France; Department of Medicine, Angers University of Health, 49000 Angers, France
| | - J Barbieux
- Department of Endocrinal and Visceral Surgery, Angers University Hospital, 49933 Angers, France; Department of Medicine, Angers University of Health, 49000 Angers, France
| | - A Hamy
- Department of Endocrinal and Visceral Surgery, Angers University Hospital, 49933 Angers, France; Department of Medicine, Angers University of Health, 49000 Angers, France
| | - A Venara
- Department of Endocrinal and Visceral Surgery, Angers University Hospital, 49933 Angers, France; Department of Medicine, Angers University of Health, 49000 Angers, France; UMR INSERM U1235, TENS, The Enteric Nervous System in Gut and Brain Disorders, Institut des Maladies de l'Appareil Digestif, 1, rue Gaston-Veil, 44035 Nantes, France.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Enhanced recovery program versus conventional care after colorectal surgery in the geriatric population: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 2020; 35:3166-3174. [DOI: 10.1007/s00464-020-07673-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2020] [Accepted: 05/22/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
|
26
|
Xia J, Paul Olson TJ, Tritt S, Liu Y, Rosen SA. Comparison of preoperative versus postoperative transversus abdominis plane and rectus sheath block in patients undergoing minimally invasive colorectal surgery. Colorectal Dis 2020; 22:569-580. [PMID: 31730291 DOI: 10.1111/codi.14910] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2019] [Accepted: 11/12/2019] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
AIM Ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane and rectus sheath block (TAPRSB) decreases pain scores and narcotic use postoperatively after colorectal surgery (CRS). It is unclear if the effectiveness of TAPRSB varies according to whether it is performed preoperatively or postoperatively. Our aim was to investigate this. METHOD We compared patients who underwent preoperative TAPRSB or postoperative TAPRSB during minimally invasive CRS. Primary end-points were pain scores and oral morphine milligram equivalent (MME) use postoperatively. Secondary end-points included perioperative factors affecting pain scores and postoperative MME. Summary statistics and univariate analysis by nonparametric tests were utilized. The mixed-effect model was applied to model the repeatedly measured pain score. RESULTS From April 2015 until May 2018 168 patients received TAPRSB before (115) or after (53) minimally invasive CRS. The cohort included 79 (47.0%) women, and had an average age of 59.11 (±12.32) years and mean body mass index of 28.32 (±5.82) kg/m2 . Indication for surgery was cancer in 66 (39.3%), polyp in 43 (25.6%) and diverticulitis in 43 (25.6%). Right colectomy was performed in 61 (36.3%), low anterior resection in 46 (27.4%) and sigmoid colectomy in 40 (23.8%) patients. The demographics of the groups were similar. Postoperative TAPRSB was only associated with lower pain scores at 12 h postoperatively. As secondary outcomes, average pain scores and MME were lower in patients who were older, had right colectomy or intracorporeal anastomosis. CONCLUSIONS Postoperative TAPRSB resulted in lower pain scores than preoperative TAPRSB 12 h after minimally invasive CRS, but otherwise no differences were seen in pain scores or MME use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Xia
- Department of Surgery, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - T J Paul Olson
- Department of Surgery, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - S Tritt
- Department of Anesthesia, Emory Johns Creek Hospital, Johns Creek, Georgia, USA
| | - Y Liu
- Department of Biostatistics, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - S A Rosen
- Department of Surgery, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| |
Collapse
|