Intersphincteric Exploration With Ligation of Intersphincteric Fistula Tract or Attempted Closure of Internal Opening for Acute Anorectal Abscesses

Efficacy and safety of transanal opening of intersphincteric space in the treatment of high complex anal fistula: A meta‑analysis

The best treatment of high complex anal fistula (HCAF) is to avoid anal incontinence while improving the cure rate. On this basis, several surgical procedures for preserving the anal sphincter have been proposed. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of transanal opening of intersphincteric space for treating HCAF. PubMed, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure and the Wanfang databases were searched to collate all the articles on transanal opening of intersphincteric space for treating HCAF. A total of two researchers independently completed the whole process, from screening and inclusion to data extraction and the data was included in the RevMan 5.3 software for analysis. The main outcomes included the patients' essential characteristics, primary healing rate, management after recurrence, final healing rate, anal incontinence score before and after surgery, postoperative complication rate and types of complications. A total of six articles were included in this meta-analysis. The results showed that the weighted final healing rate of patients following transanal opening of intersphincteric space was 89% [risk differences (RD)=0.89; 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.86-0.92; I2=0%; P<0.00001]. The results of the anal incontinence score showed that there was no significant difference between the results before and after transanal opening of intersphincteric space surgery mean differences [(MD)=-0.04, Cl=-0.10-0.02, I2=0%; P=0.21]. Only 11 patients were reported to have complications, including urinary retention and bleeding following transanal opening of intersphincteric space with a complication rate of 8% (11/138) and the weighted average complication rate was 6% (RD=0.06,95% CI=0.02-0.10; I2=9%; P=0.003). Transanal opening of intersphincteric space has a high cure rate, a favorable anal incontinence score, fewer types of postoperative complications and a low complication rate; it can be used as a minimally invasive and sphincter-preserving surgical method for treating HCAF and is worthy of further promotion and research in clinical practice.

Collagen treatment of complex anorectal fistula: 3 years follow-up

Fistula in ano is a common anorectal disease in adults. Currently, surgery remains the definitive therapeutic approach, but in some cases, it can lead to serious complications as faecal or gas incontinence. Therefore, sphincter sparing treatments should be considered for complex fistulas. One of the sphincteric preserving treatment is the filling with a dermal extract commonly called "collagen glue" as Salvecoll-E^® gel. This is a multicentric, prospective, observational study on the use of Salvecoll-E^® gel in treatment of complex anal fistulas. We treated 70 patients from May 2016 to May 2017. In the first phase, we debrided the fistula tract using a loose seton kept for 4-6 weeks. In the second phase, the seton was removed and the fistula tract was filled with Salvecoll-E^® gel. In this article, we report results at 36 months of follow-up. Fifty patients (71.4%) had completely healed fistula within 36 months of follow-up. Twenty-eight patients (28.2%) had recurrences. Among these failures, 65% were within 6 months. All low transphincteric fistulas healed. Recurrences occurred only in median and high transphincteric fistulas. No patient had a worsening of continence status measured with Cleveland Clinic Florida Incontinence Severity score. Salvecoll-E^® gel is a recent finding among sphincter-sparing treatments. In this study, we demonstrate that it is a safe option in the treatment of complex fistulas. Final results are satisfactory and in line with the best results published in literature among mini-invasive treatments.

Non-Locatable Internal Opening in Anal Fistula Associated with Acute Abscess and Its Definitive Management by Garg Protocol

Background

Definitive management of acute fistula-abscess (anal fistulas associated with acute abscess) is gaining popularity against the two-staged approach (early abscess drainage with deferred fistula management). However, locating an internal opening (IO) in acute fistula-abscess can be difficult. A recent protocol (Garg protocol) has been shown to be effective in managing anal fistulas with non-locatable IO.

Purpose

To test the efficacy of the Garg protocol in managing acute fistula-abscess with non-locatable IO.

Methods

Patients with acute fistula-abscess operated by a definitive procedure were included. A preoperative MRI was done in all patients. Patients in whom the IO was non-locatable after clinical, MRI, and intraoperative examination were managed by the three-step Garg protocol. Garg protocol: 1) Reassessment of MRI; 2) In non-horseshoe fistulas, the IO was assumed to be at the point where the fistula tract reached closest to the sphincter-complex; 3) In horseshoe fistulas, the IO was assumed to be located in the midline (anterior or posterior as per the horseshoe location). Low fistulas were treated by fistulotomy and high fistulas by a sphincter-sparing procedure. The long-term healing rate and change in continence (Vaizey scores) were evaluated.

Results

A total of 201 patients with acute fistula-abscess were operated over six years, and 19 were lost to follow-up. A total of 182 patients (154-males) were followed up (median-37 months). The IO was locatable in 133/182 (73.1%) (control group) and was non-locatable in 49/182 (26.9%) (study group). The study group was managed as per the Garg protocol. The age, sex-ratio, and fistula parameters were comparable in both groups. The long-term healing rate was 112/133(84.2%) in the IO-locatable group and 43/49 (87.8%) in the IO-non-locatable group (p=0.64, not-significant). The objective continence scores did not change significantly after surgery in both groups.

Conclusion

Acute fistula-abscess with non-locatable IO can be managed successfully by the Garg protocol without any risk of incontinence.

Effectiveness of Mayinglong Musk Hemorrhoid Ointment on Wound Healing and Complications after Internal Hemorrhoid Ligation and External Hemorrhoidectomy

Objective

To investigate the effect of Mayinglong Musk Hemorrhoids Ointment on wound healing and complications after internal hemorrhoid ligation and external hemorrhoidectomy.

Methods

This is a retrospective study. A total of 100 patients with mixed hemorrhoids who were treated in our hospital from August 2019 to October 2020 were recruited and assigned to an operation group (n = 50, internal hemorrhoid ligation, and external hemorrhoidectomy) or a combined group (n = 50, use of Mayinglong Musk Hemorrhoid Ointment after internal hemorrhoid ligation and external hemorrhoidectomy). The wound-healing effect, wound-healing time, visual analog scale (VAS), anal function, and complications were compared between the two groups.

Results

The combined group exhibited a significantly higher total effective rate of wound healing when compared with the operation group (p < 0.05). The patients in the combined group experienced remarkably faster wound healing than the operation group (p < 0.05). The visual analog scale (VAS) score of the combined group was significantly lower than that of the operation group (p < 0.05). The combined group obtained superior anal function than the operation group (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

Mayinglong Musk Hemorrhoid Ointment combined with internal hemorrhoid ligation and external hemorrhoidectomy in the treatment of mixed hemorrhoids yields remarkable outcomes. It improves the wound healing outcomes, accelerates wound healing, relieves postoperative pain, enhances anal function, and reduces the occurrence of postoperative complications in the patient.

Comparison between recent sphincter-sparing procedures for complex anal fistulas-ligation of intersphincteric tract vs transanal opening of intersphincteric space

Complex anal fistulas are difficult to treat. The main reasons for this are a higher recurrence rate and the risk of disrupting the continence mechanism because of sphincter involvement. Due to this, several sphincter-sparing procedures have been developed in the last two decades. Though moderately successful in simple fistulas (50%-75% healing rate), the healing rates in complex fistulas for most of these procedures has been dismal. Only two procedures, ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract and transanal opening of intersphincteric space have been shown to have good success rates in complex fistulas (60%-95%). Both of these procedures preserve continence while achieving high success rates. In this opinion review, I shall outline the history, compare the pros and cons, indications and contraindications and future application of both these procedures for the management of complex anal fistulas.