Do Cost Limitations of Extended Prophylaxis After Surgery Apply to Ulcerative Colitis Patients?

Tofacitinib Is Associated With Increased Risk of Postoperative Venous Thromboembolism in Patients With Ulcerative Colitis

BACKGROUND

In 2019, the Food and Drug Administration issued a black box warning for increased risk of venous thromboembolism in patients with rheumatoid arthritis exposed to tofacitinib. There are limited data regarding postoperative venous thromboembolism risk in patients with ulcerative colitis exposed to tofacitinib.

OBJECTIVE

To assess whether preoperative exposure to tofacitinib is associated with increased odds of postoperative venous thromboembolism.

DESIGN

Retrospective review.

SETTINGS

Tertiary academic medical center.

PATIENTS

Consecutive patients exposed to tofacitinib within 4 weeks before total abdominal colectomy or total proctocolectomy, with or without ileostomy, from 2014 to 2021, matched 1:2 for tofacitinib exposure or no exposure.

INTERVENTION

Tofacitinib exposure versus no exposure.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Ninety-day postoperative venous thromboembolism rate.

RESULTS

Forty-two patients with tofacitinib exposure and 84 case-matched patients without tofacitinib exposure underwent surgery for medically refractory ulcerative colitis. Nine (22.0%) tofacitinib-exposed patients and 7 (8.5%) unexposed patients were diagnosed with venous thromboembolism within 90 days of surgery. In univariate logistic regression, patients exposed to tofacitinib had 3.01 times increased odds of developing venous thromboembolism within 90 days after surgery compared to unexposed patients ( p = 0.04; 95% CI, 1.03-8.79). Other venous thromboembolism risk factors were not significantly associated with venous thromboembolisms. Venous thromboembolisms in both groups were most commonly portomesenteric vein thromboses (66.7% in the tofacitinib-exposed group and 42.9% in the unexposed group) and were diagnosed at a mean of 23.2 days (range, 3-90 days) postoperatively in the tofacitinib-exposed group and 7.9 days (1-19 days) in the unexposed group. There were no statistically significant differences in location or timing between the 2 groups.

LIMITATIONS

Retrospective nature of the study and associated biases. Reliance on clinically diagnosed venous thromboembolisms may underreport the true incidence rate.

CONCLUSIONS

Tofacitinib exposure before surgery for medically refractory ulcerative colitis is associated with 3 times increased odds of venous thromboembolism compared with patients without tofacitinib exposure. See Video Abstract .

TOFACITINIB SE ASOCIA CON UN MAYOR RIESGO DE TROMBOEMBOLISMO VENOSO POSTOPERATORIO EN PACIENTES CON COLITIS ULCEROSA

ANTECEDENTES:En 2019, la FDA emitió una advertencia de recuadro negro sobre un mayor riesgo de tromboembolismo venoso en pacientes con artritis reumatoide expuestos a tofacitinib. Hay datos limitados sobre el riesgo de tromboembolismo venoso postoperatorio en pacientes con colitis ulcerosa expuestos a tofacitinib.OBJETIVO:Evaluar si la exposición preoperatoria a tofacitinib se asocia con mayores probabilidades de tromboembolismo venoso postoperatorio.DISEÑO:Revisión retrospectiva.LUGARES:Centro médico académico terciario.PACIENTES:Pacientes consecutivos expuestos a tofacitinib dentro de las 4 semanas previas a la colectomía abdominal total o proctocolectomía total, con o sin ileostomía, entre 2014 y 2021, emparejados 1:2 para exposición a tofacitinib o ninguna exposición.INTERVENCIÓN(S):Exposición a tofacitinib versus ninguna exposición.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:Tasa de tromboembolismo venoso posoperatorio a los 90 días.RESULTADOS:Cuarenta y dos pacientes con exposición a tofacitinib y 84 pacientes de casos similares sin exposición a tofacitinib se sometieron a cirugía por colitis ulcerosa médicamente refractaria. Nueve (22,0%) pacientes expuestos a tofacitinib y 7 (8,5%) pacientes no expuestos fueron diagnosticados con tromboembolismo venoso dentro de los 90 días posteriores a la cirugía. En la regresión logística univariada, los pacientes expuestos a tofacitinib tuvieron 3,01 veces más probabilidades de desarrollar un tromboembolismo venoso dentro de los 90 días posteriores a la cirugía en comparación con los no expuestos ( p = 0,04, IC del 95 %: 1,03-8,79). Otros factores de riesgo de tromboembolismo venoso no se asociaron significativamente con el tromboembolismo venoso. Los tromboembolismos venosos en ambos grupos fueron más comúnmente trombosis de la vena portomesentérica (66,7% en los expuestos a tofacitinib y 42,9% en los no expuestos) y se diagnosticaron en una media de 23,2 días (rango, 3-90 días) después de la operación en los expuestos a tofacitinib y 7,9 días. (1-19 días) en los grupos no expuestos, respectivamente. No hubo diferencias estadísticamente significativas en la ubicación o el momento entre los dos grupos.LIMITACIONES:Carácter retrospectivo del estudio y sesgos asociados. La dependencia de tromboembolismos venosos diagnosticados clínicamente puede subestimar la tasa de incidencia real.CONCLUSIONES:La exposición a tofacitinib antes de la cirugía para la colitis ulcerosa médicamente refractaria se asocia con probabilidades 3 veces mayores de tromboembolismo venoso en comparación con los pacientes sin exposición a tofacitinib. (Traducción-Dr. Mauricio Santamaria ).

Low-Dose Rivaroxaban as Extended Prophylaxis Reduces Postdischarge Venous Thromboembolism in Patients With Malignancy and IBD

BACKGROUND

Despite guidelines suggesting the use of extended prophylaxis for prevention of venous thromboembolism in patients with colorectal cancer and perhaps IBD, routine use is low and scant data exist regarding oral forms of therapy.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose was to compare the incidence of postdischarge venous thromboembolism in patients given extended prophylaxis with low-dose rivaroxaban.

DESIGN

We used propensity matching to compare pre- and postintervention analyses from a 2-year period before instituting extended prophylaxis.

SETTING

All colorectal patients at a single institution were prospectively considered for extended prophylaxis.

PATIENTS

Patients with a diagnosis of IBD or colorectal cancer who underwent operative resection were included.

INTERVENTIONS

Those considered for extended prophylaxis were prescribed 10 mg of rivaroxaban for 30 days postsurgery.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome was venous thromboembolism incidence 30 days postdischarge. The secondary outcome was bleeding rates, major or minor.

RESULTS

Of the 498 patients considered for extended prophylaxis, 363 were discharged with rivaroxaban, 81 on baseline anticoagulation, and 54 without anticoagulation. Propensity-matched cohorts based on stoma creation, operative approach, procedure type, and BMI were made to 174 historical controls. After excluding cases of inpatient venous thromboembolism, postoperative rates were lower in the prospective cohort (4.8% vs 0.6%, p = 0.019). In the prospective group, 36 episodes of bleeding occurred, 26 (7.2%) were discharged with rivaroxaban, 8 (9.9%) discharged on other anticoagulants, and 2 (3.7%) with no postoperative anticoagulation. Cases of major bleeding were 1.1% (4/363) in the rivaroxaban group, and each required intervention.

LIMITATIONS

The study was limited to a single institution and did not include a placebo arm.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with IBD and colorectal cancer, extended prophylaxis with low-dose rivaroxaban led to a significant decrease in postdischarge thromboembolic events with a low bleeding risk profile. See Video Abstract .

RIVAROXABN EN DOSIS BAJAS COMO PROFILAXIS PROLONGADA REDUCE LA TROMBOEMBOLIA VENOSA POSTERIOR AL ALTA, EN PACIENTES CON NEOPLASIAS MALIGNAS Y ENFERMEDAD INFLAMATORIA INTESTINAL

ANTECEDENTES:A pesar de las normas que sugieren el uso de profilaxis extendida para la prevención del tromboembolismo venoso en pacientes con cáncer colorrectal y tal vez enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal, el uso rutinario es bajo y existen escasos datos sobre las formas orales de terapia.OBJETIVO:Comparar la incidencia de tromboembolismo venoso posterior al alta, en pacientes que recibieron profilaxis prolongada con dosis bajas de rivaroxabán.DISEÑO:Utilizamos el emparejamiento de propensión para comparar un análisis previo y posterior a la intervención de un período de 2 años antes de instituir la profilaxis extendida.AJUSTE:Todos los pacientes colorrectales en una sola institución fueron considerados prospectivamente para profilaxis extendida.PACIENTES:Incluidos pacientes con diagnóstico de enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal o cáncer colorrectal sometidos a resección quirúrgica.INTERVENCIONES:A los considerados para profilaxis extendida se les prescribió 10 mg de rivaroxabán durante 30 días postoperatorios.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:El resultado primario fue la incidencia de tromboembolismo venoso 30 días después del alta. El resultado secundario fueron las tasas de hemorragia, mayor o menor.RESULTADOS:De los 498 pacientes considerados para profilaxis extendida, 363 fueron dados de alta con rivaroxabán, 81 con anticoagulación inicial y 54 sin anticoagulación. Se realizaron cohortes emparejadas por propensión basadas en la creación de la estoma, abordaje quirúrgico, tipo de procedimiento y el índice de masa corporal en 174 controles históricos. Después de excluir los casos de tromboembolismo venoso hospitalizado, las tasas posoperatorias fueron más bajas en la cohorte prospectiva (4,8% frente a 0,6%, p = 0,019). En el grupo prospectivo ocurrieron 36 episodios de hemorragia, 26 (7,2%) fueron dados de alta con rivaroxaban, 8 (9,9%) fueron dados de alta con otros anticoagulantes y 2 (3,7%) sin anticoagulación posoperatoria. Los casos de hemorragia mayor fueron del 1,1% (4/363) en el grupo de rivaroxabán y cada uno requirió intervención.LIMITACIONES:Limitado a una sola institución y no incluyó un grupo de placebo.CONCLUSIONES:Entre los pacientes con enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal y cáncer colorrectal, la profilaxis extendida con dosis bajas de rivaroxabán condujo a una disminución significativa de los eventos tromboembólicos posteriores al alta, con un perfil de riesgo de hemorragia bajo. (Traducción-Dr. Fidel Ruiz Healy).

More problems, more money: Identifying and predicting high-cost rescue after colorectal surgery

Background

Successful rescue after elective surgery is associated with increased healthcare costs, but costs vary widely. Treating all rescue events the same may overlook targeted opportunities for improvement. The purpose of this study was to predict high-cost rescue after elective colorectal surgery.

Methods

We identified adult patients in the National Inpatient Sample (2016-2021) who underwent elective colectomy or proctectomy. Rescued patients were defined as those who underwent additional major procedures. Three groups were stratified: 1) uneventful recovery; 2) Low-cost rescue; 3) High-cost rescue. Multivariable Poisson regression was used to identify preoperative clinical predictors of high-cost versus low-cost rescue.

Results

We identified 448,590 elective surgeries, and rescued patients composed 4.8 %(21,635) of the total sample. The median increase in costs in rescued patients was $25,544(p < 0.001). Median total inpatient costs were $95,926 in the most expensive rescued versus $34,811 in the less expensive rescued versus $16,751 in the uneventfully discharged(p < 0.001). When comparing the secondary procedures between the less expensive and most expensive rescued groups, the most expensive had an increased proportion of reoperation (73.4 % versus 53.0 %,p < 0.001). When controlling for other factors and stratification by congestive heart failure due to an interaction effect, a reoperation was independently associated with high-cost rescue (RR with CHF = 3.29,95%CI:2.69-4.04; RR without CHF = 2.29,95%CI:1.97-2.67).

Conclusions

High-cost rescue after colorectal surgery is associated with disproportionately greater healthcare utilization and reoperation. For cost-conscious care, preemptive strategies that reduce reoperation-related complications can be prioritized.

Cost-Effectiveness of Aspirin for Extended Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis After Major Surgery for Inflammatory Bowel Disease

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Venous thromboembolism extended prophylaxis after inflammatory bowel disease surgery remains controversial. The purpose of this study was to evaluate if adopting an aspirin-based prophylaxis strategy may address current cost-effectiveness limitations.

METHODS

A decision analysis model was used to compare costs and outcomes of a reference case patient undergoing inflammatory bowel disease-associated colorectal surgery considered for post-discharge thromboembolism prophylaxis. Low-dose aspirin was compared to an enoxaparin regimen as well as no prophylaxis. Source estimates were obtained from aggregated existing literature. Secondary analysis included out-of-pocket costs. A 10,000-simulation Monte Carlo probabilistic sensitivity analysis accounted for uncertainty in model estimates.

RESULTS

An enoxaparin-based regimen compared to aspirin demonstrated an unfavorable incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $908,268 per quality-adjusted life year. Sensitivity analysis supported this finding in > 75% of simulated cases; scenarios favoring enoxaparin included those with > 4% post-discharge event rates. Aspirin versus no prophylaxis demonstrated a favorable ratio of $106,601 per quality-adjusted life year. Findings were vulnerable to a post-discharge thromboembolism rate < 1%, aspirin-associated bleeding rate > 1%, median hospital costs of bleeding > 3 × , and decreased efficacy of aspirin (RR > 0.75). The average out-of-pocket cost of choosing an aspirin ePpx strategy increased by $54 per patient versus $708 per patient with enoxaparin.

CONCLUSIONS

Low-dose aspirin extended prophylaxis following inflammatory bowel disease surgery has a favorable cost-safety profile and may be an attractive alternative approach.