IPAA Is More "Desmoidogenic" Than Ileorectal Anastomosis in Familial Adenomatous Polyposis

Risk of Cancer and Reoperation After Ileorectal Anastomosis and Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis in Familial Adenomatous Polyposis

INTRODUCTION

To prevent colorectal cancer, most patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) undergo (procto)colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis (IRA) or ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA). After surgery, these patients remain at risk of developing cancer in the remnant rectum or rectal cuff/pouch. We aimed to compare the long-term risk of cancer after IRA or IPAA in FAP.

METHODS

We performed an international multicenter historical cohort study of FAP patients undergoing IRA or IPAA from 1990 to 2023. The proportion of patients developing cancer after surgery was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

(Procto)colectomy was performed in 685 patients (53.6% female); 366 (53.4%) had IRA, and 319 (46.6%) had IPAA. Median age at IRA and IPAA was 23 and 27 years, and the median follow-up was 12 and 15 years, respectively. Overall, 8 patients (2.2%) developed rectal and/or rectal cuff/pouch cancer after IRA and 0.9% after IPAA. The estimated 10- and 20-year cancer incidence after IRA vs IPAA was 1.6% vs 0.4% and 2.5% vs 0.9%, respectively (log-rank P = 0.15). Reoperations, mainly for extensive polyposis, were performed in 39 (10.7%) patients with an IRA and 24 (7.5%) patients after IPAA. The number of postoperative endoscopic surveillance endoscopies was higher in patients with an IRA compared with those with an IPAA ( P < 0.001).

DISCUSSION

Over the past 3 decades, few patients were diagnosed with cancer in the rectum or rectal cuff/pouch after (procto)colectomy in FAP. This might be due to an improved selection of the type of (procto)colectomy and close endoscopic surveillance including prophylactic polypectomies.

Development of Desmoid Tumors After Ileorectal Anastomosis Versus Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis in Familial Adenomatous Polyposis

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Desmoid tumors (DT) are an important cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP). DT development might be related to the type and approach of colectomy. We aimed to compare DT development after colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis (IRA) and proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA).

METHODS

We performed an international historical cohort study in patients with FAP who underwent IRA or IPAA between 1961 and 2020. The primary outcome was the incidence of abdominal DT (either mesenteric, retroperitoneal, or abdominal wall). Patients with a DT diagnosis before or at colectomy were excluded. Time to DT was considered censored at an eventual secondary proctectomy after IRA. We used multivariable Cox regression modelling to adjust for potential confounders.

RESULTS

We analyzed data from 852 patients: 514 after IRA and 338 after IPAA (median follow-up, 21 and 16 years, respectively). DTs were diagnosed in 64 IRA patients (12%) and 66 IPAA patients (20%). The cumulative DT incidence at 5 and 10 years was 7.5% and 9.3% after open IRA and 4.7% and 10.9% after laparoscopic IRA. These estimates were 13.6% and 15.4% after open IPAA and 8.4% and 10.0% after laparoscopic IPAA. The postoperative risk was significantly higher after IPAA (P < .01) in multivariable analysis, whereas approach did not significantly influence the risk.

CONCLUSIONS

The risk of developing an abdominal DT was found to be significantly higher after IPAA than after IRA. Postoperative DT risk should be taken into account when choosing between IRA and IPAA in FAP.

Pouch abandonment is extremely rare even in the reoperative setting: A high-volume referral center experience

BACKGROUND

Ileal pouch anal anastomosis is the preferred method for restoration of intestinal continuity after proctocolectomy. Successful ileal pouch anal anastomosis requires adequate reach of the ileal mesentery to the pelvis. Reach issues are a common cause for intraoperative pouch abandonment; however, data regarding contemporary abandonment rates are rare and nonexistent in the revisional setting.

METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted of consecutive ileal pouch anal anastomosis surgery at a single referral center. Both initial or "primary" pouches and revisional pouch surgery were included.

RESULTS

In total, 447 attempts at pouch anal anastomosis were made, with an 1.6% overall rate of intraoperative abandonment. Pouch abandonment was attributed to inadequate mesenteric reach during 3 surgeries, desmoid tumors in 2 surgeries, and insufficient remaining small bowel in 2 surgeries. Twelve patients required lengthening maneuvers including 6 S pouches (1%) and 6 H pouches (1%). One half (49%) of operations were revisional ileal pouch anal anastomosis surgery. Overall, reach issues led to intraoperative abandonment in only 0.4% of attempted primary pouches and 1.0% of revisional surgeries. A preoperative diagnosis of familial adenomatous polyposis was associated with pouch abandonment (P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Extremely low pouch abandonment rates as a result of mesenteric reach can be achieved even in the revisional setting at a high-volume center with institutional expertise. In the revisional setting, intra-abdominal desmoids or the potential for short gut affects pouch abandonment rates as much as reach issues.

Management of Desmoid Disease in Familial Adenomatous Polyposis

Desmoid disease, though technically a benign condition, is nevertheless a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP). Desmoid disease impacts approximately 30% of FAP patients, with several known risk factors. It runs the gamut in terms of severity-ranging from small, slow-growing asymptomatic lesions to large, focally destructive, life-threatening masses. Desmoids usually occur following surgery, and several patient risk factors have been established, including female sex, family history of desmoid disease, 3' APC mutation, and extraintestinal manifestations of FAP. Desmoid disease-directed therapy is individualized and impacted by desmoid stage, severity, postsurgical anatomy, and consequences of disease. Medical therapy consists of options in multiple classes of drugs: nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, hormonal therapy, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, and cytotoxic agents. Surgical excision is sometimes an option, but can be limited by common location of disease at the root of the small bowel mesentery. Palliative surgical treatments are often considered in management of desmoid disease. Intestinal transplantation for severe desmoid disease is an emerging and promising option, though long-term data on efficacy and survival is limited.

Risk of Proctectomy After Ileorectal Anastomosis in Familial Adenomatous Polyposis in the Modern Era

BACKGROUND

Prophylactic surgery for familial adenomatous polyposis has evolved over several decades. Restorative proctocolectomy with IPAA provides an alternative to total abdominal colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis. We have previously shown that the rate of proctectomy and rectal cancer after total abdominal colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis in the "pre-pouch era" was 32% and 13%, respectively.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the rate of proctectomy and rectal cancer among familial adenomatous polyposis patients and relative rectal sparing (fewer than 20 rectal polyps) selected for total abdominal colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis in the modern era.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Single tertiary care institution with a hereditary colorectal cancer registry.

PATIENTS

Patients with familial adenomatous polyposis who underwent total abdominal colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis between 1993 and 2020.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Incidence of proctectomy for any indication and rectal cancer.

RESULTS

A total of 197 patients with a median age of 24 years (range, 10-67) were included. The median follow-up after total abdominal colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis was 13 years (interquartile range, 6-17). Sixteen patients (8%) underwent proctectomy. Indications included rectal cancer in 6 patients (3%; 2 stage I and 4 stage III), polyps with high-grade dysplasia in 4 (2%), progressive polyp burden in 3 (1.5%), defecatory dysfunction in 2 (1%), and anastomotic leak in 1 (0.5%). Among 30 patients (18%) with 20 or more rectal polyps at the time of total abdominal colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis, 8 patients (26%) underwent proctectomy and 3 patients developed rectal cancer (10%). Among 134 patients (82%) with fewer than 20 polyps, 8 patients (6%) underwent proctectomy and 3 patients developed rectal cancer (2%). Number of rectal polyps at the time of total abdominal colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis was associated with the likelihood of proctectomy (OR 1.1, p < 0.001) but not incident rectal cancer ( p = 0.3).

LIMITATION

Retrospective data collection.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with familial adenomatous polyposis selected for total abdominal colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis by rectal polyp number have low rates of proctectomy and rectal cancer compared to historical controls. With appropriate selection criteria and surveillance, total abdominal colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis remains an important and safe treatment option for patients with familial adenomatous polyposis. See Video Abstract .

RIESGO DE PROCTECTOMA DESPUS DE ANASTOMOSIS ILEORRECTAL EN POLIPOSIS ADENOMATOSA FAMILIAR EN LA ERA MODERNA

ANTECEDENTES:La cirugía profiláctica para la poliposis adenomatosa familiar (PAF) ha evolucionado durante varias décadas. La proctocolectomía restauradora con anastomosis anal con bolsa ileal (IPAA) proporciona una alternativa a la colectomía abdominal total con anastomosis ileorrectal (TAC/IRA). Anteriormente hemos demostrado que la tasa de proctectomía y cáncer de recto después de TAC/IRA en la era "pre-bolsa" era del 32% y el 13%, respectivamente.OBJETIVO:Determinar la tasa de proctectomía y cáncer de recto entre pacientes con PAF y pacientes con preservación rectal relativa (<20 pólipos rectales) seleccionados para TAC/IRA en la era moderna.DISEÑO:Estudio de cohorte retrospectivo.ÁMBITO:Institución única de atención terciaria con un registro de cáncer colorrectal hereditario.PACIENTES:Pacientes con PAF que se sometieron a TAC/IRA entre 1993 y 2020.MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO PRINCIPALES:Incidencia de proctectomía por cualquier indicación y cáncer de recto.RESULTADOS:Se incluyeron 197 pacientes con una mediana de edad de 24 años (rango 10-67). La mediana de seguimiento tras TAC/IRA fue de 13 años (RIC 6-17). 16 pacientes (8%) fueron sometidos a proctectomía. Las indicaciones incluyeron cáncer de recto en 6 (3%) (2 en estadio I y 4 en estadio III); pólipos con displasia de alto grado en 4 (2%); carga progresiva de pólipos en 3 (1,5%), disfunción defecatoria en 2 (1%); y fuga anastomótica en 1 (0,5%). Entre 30 pacientes (18%) con ≥20 pólipos rectales en el momento de TAC/IRA, 8 pacientes (26%) se sometieron a proctectomía y 3 pacientes desarrollaron cáncer de recto (10%). Entre 134 pacientes (82%) con <20 pólipos, 8 pacientes (6%) se sometieron a proctectomía y 3 pacientes desarrollaron cáncer de recto (2%). El número de pólipos rectales en el momento de TAC/IRA se asoció con la probabilidad de proctectomía (OR 1,1, p <0,001), pero no con la incidencia de cáncer de recto (p = 0,3).LIMITACIÓN:Recopilación de datos retrospectivos.CONCLUSIÓN:Los pacientes con PAF seleccionados para TAC/IRA por el número de pólipos rectales tienen tasas bajas de proctectomía y cáncer de recto en comparación con los controles históricos. Con criterios de selección y vigilancia adecuados, TAC/IRA sigue siendo una opción de tratamiento importante y segura para los pacientes con PAF. (Pre-proofed version ).

Correlation Between the Severity of Adhesions and Desmoid Disease in Patients With Familial Adenomatous Polyposis: A Prospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Clinical experience teaches that intraperitoneal adhesions are more severe in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis than in patients without it. This impression may come from the common association of familial adenomatous polyposis with desmoid disease.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to determine whether patients with familial adenomatous polyposis and desmoid disease develop more severe adhesions than those without desmoid disease.

DESIGN

Prospectively collected data study.

SETTINGS

Hereditary colorectal cancer center in a tertiary referral hospital.

PATIENTS

Patients undergoing first reoperative intra-abdominal surgery for familial adenomatous polyposis; controls were those having their initial abdominal surgery.

INTERVENTIONS

Surgery and adhesiolysis.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Presence and type of desmoid disease; presence and severity of nondesmoid intraperitoneal adhesions. Where patients had multiple operations, only the first reoperative surgery was chosen. Desmoid disease was noted as reaction (sheet) or mass. Adhesions were graded as none, mild (<10 min for mobilization), average (10-30 min), and severe (>30 min or significant bowel damage). Patients having their first abdominal surgery for familial adenomatous polyposis were used as a control group.

RESULTS

A total of 211 patients had no prior surgery; 5% had desmoids and 1% had adhesions. One hundred thirty-seven patients underwent reoperative surgery: 39% had desmoid disease ( p < 0.05 vs no prior surgery), the highest rate being in patients after IPAA (57%), and 45% had severe adhesions ( p < 0.01 vs no prior surgery), worst after Koch pouch (89%), and total proctocolectomy with ileostomy (82%). Thirty-six percent of patients without desmoid disease had severe adhesions. Desmoid reaction was associated with severe adhesions in 47% of cases and desmoid tumors in 66% of cases.

LIMITATIONS

Possible limitations include the potential overlap between desmoid adhesions and nondesmoid adhesions and the potential for inaccuracy in defining the time of adhesiolyses.

CONCLUSIONS

Familial adenomatous polyposis is associated with severe postoperative adhesions after reoperative abdominal surgery, especially in patients who develop desmoid disease. See Video Abstract .

CORRELACIN ENTRE LA GRAVEDAD DE LAS ADHERENCIAS Y LA ENFERMEDAD DESMOIDEA EN PACIENTES CON POLIPOSIS ADENOMATOSA FAMILIAR ESTUDIO PROSPECTIVO DE COHORTES

ANTECEDENTES:La experiencia clínica demuestra que las adherencias intraperitoneales son más graves en pacientes con poliposis adenomatosa familiar que en pacientes sin enfermedad desmoidea. Esta impresión puede provenir de la asociación común de poliposis adenomatosa familiar con enfermedad desmoidea.OBJETIVOS:Ver si los pacientes con poliposis adenomatosa familiar y enfermedad desmoidea desarrollan adherencias más graves que aquellos sin enfermedad desmoidea.DISEÑO:Estudio de datos recolectados prospectivamente.AJUSTES:Centro de cáncer colorrectal hereditario en un hospital de referencia terciario.PACIENTES:Pacientes sometidos a una primera cirugía intraabdominal de caracter reoperatorio por poliposis adenomatosa familiar: los controles fueron los que se sometieron a su cirugía abdominal inicial.INTERVENCIONES:Cirugía y adhesiolisis.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:Presencia y tipo de enfermedad desmoidea; presencia y severidad de adherencias intraperitoneales no desmoideas. Cuando los pacientes tenían múltiples operaciones, solo se eligió la primera cirugía reoperatoria. La enfermedad desmoidea se anotó como reacción (hoja filamentosa) o masa. Las adherencias se calificaron como ninguna, leve (<10 minutos para la movilización), promedio (10 a 30 minutos) y severa (>30 minutos o daño intestinal significativo). Los pacientes sometidos a una primera cirugía abdominal por poliposis adenomatosa familiar se utilizaron como grupo de control.RESULTADOS:211 pacientes no tenían cirugía previa: 5% desmoideos y 1% adherencias. 137 pacientes se sometieron a cirugía reoperatoria: 39% tenía enfermedad desmoidea ( p < 0,05 frente aquellos sin cirugía previa), la tasa más alta se presentó en aquellos pacientes después de una anastomosis ileoanal con reservorio (57%) donde el 45% tenía adherencias graves ( p < 0,01 frente aquellos sin cirugía previa), peores resultados se observaron después de la confección de un reservorio de Koch (89%) y luego de proctocolectomía total con ileostomía (82%). El 36% de los pacientes sin enfermedad desmoidea tenían adherencias graves. La reacción desmoidea se asoció con adherencias graves en el 47% de los casos, y los tumores desmoides se asociaron con adherencias graves en el 66% de los casos.LIMITACIONES:Superposición potencial entre adherencias desmoideas y adherencias no desmoideas. Posible inexactitud en la definición del tiempo de adhesiolisis.CONCLUSIONES:La poliposis adenomatosa familiar se asocia con adherencias postoperatorias graves después de una cirugía abdominal reoperatoria, especialmente en pacientes que desarrollan enfermedad desmoidea. (Traducción-Dr. Xavier Delgadillo ).

Update on Familial Adenomatous Polyposis-Associated Desmoid Tumors

Desmoid tumors (DT) represent the second high risk of tumor in familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) patients. Although FAP-associated DTs (FAP-DT) are caused by germline mutations in the adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) gene, extracolonic manifestations, sex, family history, genotype, and the ileal pouch anal anastomosis procedure are all linked to the development of DTs in FAP patients. Multidisciplinary management has replaced aggressive surgery as the preferred treatment of DTs. There is growing evidence to support the use of active surveillance strategy as first-line treatment for FAP-DT patients. Radiotherapy for intra-abdominal desmoids is now rarely used because of severe late toxicity. Pharmacotherapy, however, represents a promising future with the improvement of traditional cytotoxic drugs and the investigation of targeted drugs. Although nonsurgery treatment has been used widely nowadays, surgery remains the mainstay when symptomatic or life-threatening DTs are present. Further research will be needed for more optimal clinical practice.

Nuances of Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis in Familial Adenomatous Polyposis

BACKGROUND

Patients with familial adenomatous polyposis are sometimes treated with prophylactic or therapeutic proctocolectomy to either prevent or treat the almost inevitable colorectal cancer that develops in the numerous, early onset tubular adenomas to which they are prone. These patients are potential candidates for a restorative IPAA.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to highlight the particular nuances of ileal pouch-anal surgery faced by patients with familial adenomatous polyposis and point out the implications of the syndrome for patients who are candidates for an IPAA and the surgeons operating on them.

STUDY SELECTION

A literature search was performed on PubMed and MEDLINE using the terms "ulcerative colitis," "familial adenomatous polyposis," "surgery," and "ileal pouch-anal anastomosis."

CONCLUSIONS

As a result of a fundamental difference in pathophysiology, there are significant differences in demographics, presentation, surgical strategy, and sequelae of proctocolectomy and IPAA between familial adenomatous polyposis and ulcerative colitis. Proctocolectomy with IPAA in selected familial adenomatous polyposis patients can be performed in 1 stage, but their lack of symptoms means that any complications assume a greater significance. In polyposis patients, postoperative endoscopic surveillance of residual large intestine begins immediately, whereas surveillance of the pouch itself becomes increasingly important. Symptoms leading to a diagnosis of pouchitis are instead often due to structural and functional issues.