The effects of age and parity on anorectal function

Association between sleep disorders and constipation Risk: A systematic review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to evaluate the potential relationship between sleep disturbances and various types of constipation in patients.

METHODS

We conducted systematic searches in the research databases PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library to identify qualifying studies. Using Stata software version 14.0, we calculated the Odds Ratio (OR) and 95 % confidence interval (CI) for constipation in patients with sleep disorders. If P > 0.1 and I2 ≤ 50 %, we employed a fixed-effects model; otherwise, we applied a random-effects model. We assessed publication bias using funnel plots and Egger's test.

RESULT

The pooled analysis demonstrated that individuals with sleep disorders were associated with an increased risk of all-cause constipation (OR = 1.47; 95 %CI: 1.31-1.64; I2 = 88.8 %, P＜0.001). Specifically, both children (OR = 1.29; 95 %CI: 1.16-1.42; I2 = 63.8 %, P＜0.001) and adults (OR = 1.65; 95 %CI: 1.39-1.97; I2 = 92.4 %, P＜0.001) with a history of sleep disorders exhibited an increased risk of all-cause constipation.. Furthermore, patients with a history of insufficient sleep were also associated with an increased risk of constipation (OR = 1.33; 95 %CI: 1.20-1.46; I2 = 6.7 %, P＜0.001). Additionally, patients with poor sleep quality were found to have an increased risk of constipation (OR = 1.56; 95 %CI: 1.0-2.45; I2 = 90.9 %, P = 0.05). Lastly, patients with insomnia were found to have the highest risk of constipation (OR = 1.94; 95 %CI: 1.37-2.76; I2 = 97.8 %, P＜0.001).

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis indicates that sleep disorders are associated with an elevated risk of constipation. Insomnia, poor sleep quality, and insufficient sleep duration all contribute to elevating the risk of constipation. These findings emphasize the significance of recognizing sleep disorders as an independent risk factor for constipation in both children and adults.

Effects of Aging and Gender on the Anorectal Function of Healthy Subjects Assessed with Conventional Anorectal Manometry

Background/Aims

Anorectal functions are influenced by gender and age. This study sought to define the normal anorectal pressure values measured with conventional anorectal manometry (ARM) and to evaluate the effects of age and gender on anorectal function in asymptomatic subjects.

Methods

Conventional ARM was used to measure the anorectal pressures of 164 asymptomatic healthy subjects, including 86 males and 76 females.

Results

The resting anal pressures of males and females aged >60 years were significantly lower than those ≤60 years (males, 44.09±14.22 vs. 57.45±17.69, p<0.001; females, 44.09±14.22 vs. 57.45±17.69, p<0.001). The anal high-pressure zone was significantly lower in older males than in younger males (2.42±0.93 vs. 2.82±0.739, p=0.048). In both age groups (<60 and ≥60 years), the anal squeezing pressures of males were significantly higher than those of females (<60 years old, 168.40±75.94 vs. 119.15±57.53, p=0.001; ≥60 years, 149.61±64.68 vs. 101.3±54.92, p=0.006).

Conclusions

The normal anorectal pressure values measured with ARM in males and females were different. Older males and females had lower anal resting pressures than those of the younger subjects, but squeezing pressure was not affected by age.

Epidemiology of Constipation in Elderly People in Parts of China: A Multicenter Study

Purpose

To investigate the epidemiological characteristics of constipation in people aged 65 years and older in several regions of China.

Patients and Methods

A cross-sectional study based on a cluster sampling design was conducted in four cities of China: Tianjin, Xiamen, Cangzhou and Harbin. A total of 5,222 cases (age ≥ 65 years) were recruited, and the survey was conducted via centralized and household questionnaires that included the following: basic demographic characteristics such as sex, age, education, marital status, living status and occupation; social activities; duration of sleep at night; duration of menstruation and delivery times (in females); and if the participant had constipation symptoms, the severity of constipation. Constipation was diagnosed according to the Rome IV criteria.

Results

Of the 5,222 participants, 919 were diagnosed with constipation. The prevalence of constipation was 17.60% in elderly people ≥65 years old. Prevalence increased with age and was significantly higher in females than males (P < 0.05). Prevalence was lower in the manual compared to the non-manual worker group, and significantly increased with decreasing duration of night sleep (P < 0.05). Older age, female sex and shorter sleep duration at night were risk factors for constipation in elderly people.

Conclusion

The prevalence of constipation in the elderly people in four cities of China was 17.60%, and was significantly affected by age, sex and sleep duration at night.

Gender differences in chronic constipation on anorectal motility

BACKGROUND

The epidemiology of chronic constipation (CC) skews toward female predominance, yet men make up an important component of those suffering from CC. We sought to determine whether there are sex-specific differences in symptoms and physiologic parameters on anorectal manometry (ARM).

METHODS

We performed a case-control analysis of sequential men and age-matched women (2:1 ratio) presenting for ARM as part of the evaluation of CC. We collected physiologic parameters derived from 3D high-resolution ARM in addition to the ROME III constipation module and the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory 20 (PFDI-20) questionnaires. We analyzed univariate, sex-specific differences in ARM physiologic parameters and PFDI-20 parameters and adjusted for putative confounders using multivariate logistic regression.

KEY RESULTS

Our study enrolled 80 men and 165 age-matched women. Men had a higher median sphincter resting pressure (81.2 vs 75.2 mm Hg, P=.01) and mean squeeze pressure (257.0 vs 170.5 mm Hg, P<.0001) than women. Although men reported significantly less severe straining and incomplete evacuation, they had greater mean rectoanal pressure differential (-106.7 vs -71.1 mm Hg, P<.0001), smaller mean defecation index (0.17 vs 0.27, P=.03) and higher volume threshold for urgency (115.2 v. 103.4 mL, P=.03). However, women were more likely to have abnormal balloon expulsion time (BET) than men (52.7% vs 35.0%, P=.01). After multivariate analysis, male gender was the only independent predictor of a normal BET (OR: 0.48, 95% CI: 0.27-0.86, P=.01).

CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES

Men and women with CC differ with regard to symptom severity and physiologic parameters derived from ARM suggesting differences in their pathophysiology.

Stapled haemorrhoidopexy: is it time to move on?

Stapled haemorrhoidectomy was proposed as an 'ideal' solution for symptomatic haemorrhoids, with minimal postoperative pain, no perianal wound requiring postoperative wound care and a relatively short operative time. Some randomised controlled trials and reviews confirmed these findings, claiming that stapled haemorrhoidopexy is the most effective and safe procedure for haemorrhoids. However, there are increasing number of publications highlighting that the technique is associated with serious and life threatening complications. Maybe it is now the time to accept that stapled haemorrhoidopexy has done its role in directing our attention to the fact that modern surgical treatment of haemorrhoids should avoid excision of anorectal skin but should instead aim at treatment intervention above the dentate line.

Operative strategy for fistula-in-ano without division of the anal sphincter

INTRODUCTION

The treatment of perianal fistulas is diverse because no single technique is universally effective. Fistulotomy remains the most effective way of eradicating the pathology but it renders the patient at some risk of faecal incontinence, which many patients are reluctant to take. There are no data in the literature to indicate the healing rate of perianal fistulas when using an operative strategy that routinely avoids division of any part of the anal sphincter. The aim of this paper is to present the long-term results with an operative strategy that aims to avoid division of any part of the anal sphincter complex when treating all types of perianal fistulas, thereby minimising/eliminating the risk of postoperative incontinence.

METHODS

We report 54 consecutive cases of anal fistula that presented electively and as an emergency. Patients with known or subsequently diagnosed inflammatory bowel disease or malignancy were excluded from the study.

RESULT

Overall, 46 patients (37 male and 9 female) with a median age at presentation of 42 years (range: 19-73 years) were treated by lay-open of the subcutaneous tract of the perianal fistula and insertion of a loose seton for the part of the fistula tract related to the sphincter complex. The types of fistula treated were intersphincteric (89%), transsphincteric (4%) and high suprasphincteric (7%). The median length of time that the seton was left in place was 7 months (range: 1.5-24 months). The healing rate was 86% with a recurrence rate of 19% and a median follow-up duration of 42 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who are reluctant to take any risk of faecal incontinence could be treated using an operative strategy that routinely avoids division of any part of the anal sphincter complex as this has a recurrence rate that compares well with other treatment modalities.

Interpretation of overall colonic transit in defecation disorders in males and females

BACKGROUND

There is little information regarding gender-specific measurements of colonic transit and anorectal function in patients with defecation disorders (DD). To compare overall colonic transit by gender in DD.

METHODS

In 407 patients with constipation due to DD diagnosed by a single gastroenterologist (1994-2012), DD was characterized by anorectal manometry, balloon expulsion test, and colonic transit by scintigraphy. The primary endpoint was overall colonic transit (geometric center, GC) at 24 h (GC24). Effects of gender in DD on colonic transit, and comparison with transit in 208 healthy controls were assessed by Mann-Whitney rank sum test. Secondary endpoints were maximum anal resting (ARP) and squeeze (ASP) pressures. We also tested association of the physiological endpoints among DD females by pregnancy history and among DD patients by colectomy history.

KEY RESULTS

The DD patients were 67 males (M) and 340 females (F). Significant differences by gender in DD patients were observed in GC24 (median: M: 2.2; F: 1.8; P = 0.01), ARP (median: M: 87.8 mmHg; F: 82.4 mmHg; P = 0.04), and ASP (median: M: 182.4 mmHg; F: 128.7 mmHg; P < 0.001). GC24 was slower in DD compared with same-gender healthy controls. GC24 did not differ among DD females by pregnancy history. Anorectal functions and upper GI transit did not differ among DD patients by colectomy history.

CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES

Patients with DD have slower colonic transit compared with gender-matched controls. Among DD patients, males have higher ARP and ASP, and females have slower colonic transit. Although the clinical significance of these differences may be unclear, findings suggest that interpretation of these tests in suspected DD should be based on same-gender control data.