Is K-ras gene mutation a prognostic factor for colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Imaging features associated with survival outcomes among colorectal cancer patients with and without KRAS mutation

Background

Mutations in Kirsten rat sarcoma proto-oncogene (KRAS) have been shown to be associated with advanced-stage colorectal cancer (CRC), negative disease outcomes, and poor response to treatment. The purpose of this study was to investigate which CT features are biomarkers for KRAS gene mutation and impact the survival outcomes of colorectal cancer patients.

Results

Of the 113 CRC patients included in the study, 46 had KRAS mutations (40.71%) and 67 had no mutations (59.29%). Regional lymph node necrosis was the only imaging feature significantly associated with KRAS mutation (P = 0.011). Higher T staging and liver, lung, and distant metastasis were prognostic factors for CRC (P = 0.014, P < 0.001, P = 0.022, P < 0.001, respectively). There were no significant differences in overall survival between patients with KRAS mutations and those without (P = 0.159). However, in patients with no KRAS mutation, those with CRC on the left side had a significantly higher rate of survival than those with CRC on the right (P = 0.005).

Conclusion

Regional lymph node necrosis may be an imaging biomarker of CRC with KRAS mutation, possibly indicating poor prognosis.

Predictive factors of survival of colorectal cancer patients after para-aortic lymph node metastasis

BACKGROUND

Para-aortic lymph node (PALN) metastasis is an ominous manifestation indicating a poor prognosis in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients; however, some treatments prolong survival. In this study, we investigated predictors of prolonged survival in CRC patients after PALN metastasis.

METHODS

We examined 141 patients with CRC that metastasized to the PALNs from CRC with or without extra-PALN metastasis. Among clinicopathological parameters, factors associated with survival after PALN metastasis were identified by multivariate analyses using Cox's proportional hazard models.

RESULTS

The mean hemoglobin and albumin values at diagnosis were 12.3 g/dL and 3.7 g/dL, respectively. Rectal cancer was predominant (n = 81). Mutated RAS was detected in 43%. One hundred and four patients had differentiated adenocarcinoma. Patients underwent PALN dissection (n = 11), radiotherapy (n = 6), and systemic therapy (n = 120). Biologics were administered to 95 patients. The median survival time was 29.1 months. On multivariate analysis, independent factors associated with reduced survival after PALN metastasis were low albumin (hazard ratio [HR] 2.33 per -1 g/dL), mutated RAS (HR 2.55), other than differentiated adenocarcinoma (HR 2.75), rectal cancer (HR 3.38 against right-sided colon, and 3.48 against left-sided colon), the presence of extra-PALN metastasis (HR 6.56), and no use of biologics (HR 3.04).

CONCLUSIONS

This study revealed that hypoalbuminemia as well as RAS mutation, undifferentiated histology, rectal cancer, other site metastasis, and no use of biologics contribute to poor prognosis in CRC patients with PALN metastasis. Nutritional management may be important for improving survival of these patients.

Mutation Status and Prognostic Value of KRAS and BRAF in Southeast Iranian Colorectal Cancer Patients: First Report from Southeast of Iran

MAIN PURPOSE

This study aimed to determine any association of KRAS and BRAF mutations in colorectal cancer with clinicopathological features and overall survival (OS) of Southeast Iranian colorectal cancer (CRC) patients.

METHODS

Overall, KRAS and BRAF status were assessed in 100 Iranian CRC subjects. A hundred consecutive stages I-IV CRC patients, who underwent surgical tumor resection from February 2012 to August 2015, were prospectively attained from three centers and were enrolled in the research. Direct sequencing and real-time PCR methods were used to the detection of KRAS and BRAF mutations, respectively. Logistic regression models were used to detect associations of KRAS and BRAF mutations with clinical/clinicopathological features. Kaplan-Meier model was used to estimate overall survival.

RESULTS

In total, KRAS and BRAF mutations were detected in 29 (29%) and 7 (7%) of 100 CRC patients, respectively. BRAF mutations that all comprised V600E and KRAS mutations were found in codon 12, 13, and 61 (72.4%, 20.7 and 6.9%), respectively. In a multivariate analysis, older age (≥ 60) was significantly associated with higher KRAS mutations rate and high BRAF mutation rate was significantly associated with older age (≥ 60) and poorly differentiated tumors. KRAS and BRAF mutant vs. wild type of KRAS and BRAF, 5-year OS was 62.1% vs. 71.8% (p value > 0.05) and 57.1% vs. 67.7% (p value > 0.05), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Mutations were found in both KRAS and BRAF genes in Iranian colorectal cancers patients and were associated with clinical/clinicopathologic features. Our data emphasizes the importance of these molecular features in Iranian CRC patients.

Mutation status and prognostic value of KRAS and NRAS mutations in Moroccan colon cancer patients: A first report

This study aimed to estimate the incidence of KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF mutations in the Moroccan population, and investigate the associations of KRAS and NRAS gene mutations with clinicopathological characteristics and their prognosis value. To achieve these objectives, we reviewed medical and pathology reports for 210 patients. RAS testing was investigated by Sanger sequencing and Pyrosequencing technology. BRAF (exon 15) status was analyzed by the Sanger method. The expression of MMR proteins was evaluated by Immunohistochemistry. KRAS and NRAS mutations were found in 36.7% and 2.9% of 210 patients, respectively. KRAS exon 2 mutations were identified in 76.5% of the cases. RAS-mutated colon cancers were significantly associated with female gender, presence of vascular invasion, classical adenocarcinoma, moderately differentiated tumors, advanced TNM stage III-IV, left colon site, higher incidence of distant metastases at the time of diagnostic, microsatellite stable phenotype, lower number of total lymph nodes, and higher means of positive lymph nodes and lymph node ratio. KRAS exon 2-mutated colon cancers, compared with KRAS wild-type colon cancers were associated with the same clinicopathological features of RAS-mutated colon cancers. NRAS-mutated patients were associated with lower total lymph node rate and the presence of positive lymph node. Rare RAS-mutated tumors, compared with wild-type tumors were more frequently moderately differentiated and associated with lower lymph node rate. We found that KRAS codon 13-mutated, tumors compared to codon 12-mutated tumors were significantly correlated with a higher death cases number, a lower rate of positive lymph, lower follow-up time, and poor overall survival. Our findings show that KRAS and NRAS mutations have distinct clinicopathological features. KRAS codon 13-mutated status was the worst predictor of prognosis at all stages in our population.

Investigating the utility of extended mutation analysis in gastrointestinal peritoneal metastasis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Outcomes for gastrointestinal peritoneal metastases (GI-PM) are worse compared to systemic metastases, with a paucity of data exploring extended mutation profiling. An exploratory mutation analysis in GI-PMs was performed as a "proof of concept" of potential predictive values of profiling in GI-PM and rates of actionable mutations.

METHODS

The study included 40 GI-PM patients: 14 low-grade mucinous carcinoma peritonei and 26 HG-PM (12 colons, 10 appendix, 4 small bowels). Demographics, histologies, peritoneal cancer indexes, cytoreduction scores, and survival data were collected. NGS 50-gene mutation profiling was performed on 38 specimens. The association of mutations with survival was evaluated in high-grade PM.

RESULTS

KRAS, TP53, and SMAD4 mutations were observed in 61%, 29%, and 8% of cases across all tumor histologies. In 66% cases >1 mutations occurred, associated with decreased survival in HG-PM: 32 vs 73 months, P = .03. TP53 or SMAD4 mutations were associated with decreased survival in HG-PM: 22 vs 48 months, P = .02. Actionable mutations were detected in 70%.

CONCLUSION

Actionable mutations were detected at high rates. GI-PMs have similar mutational profiles and TP53, SMAD4, and/or >1 mutation were associate with decreased survival in HG-PM. This data supports the concept of the extended mutation profiling utility in GI-PM warranting further investigation.

Evaluation of MGP gene expression in colorectal cancer

PURPOSE

Matrix Gla protein (MGP) is a vitamin K-dependent, γ-carboxylated protein that was initially found to be a physiological inhibitor of ectopic calcifications affecting mainly cartilage and the vascular system. Mutations in the MGP gene were found to be responsible for a human pathology, the Keutel syndrome, characterized by abnormal calcifications in cartilage, lungs, brain and vascular system. MGP was recently implicated in tumorigenic processes such as angiogenesis and shown to be abnormally regulated in several tumors, including cervical, ovarian, urogenital and breast. This fact has triggered our interest in analyzing the expression of MGP and of its regulator, the transcription factor runt related transcription factor 2 (RUNX2), in colorectal cancer (CRC).

METHODS

MGP and RUNX2 expression were analyzed in cancer and non-tumor biopsies samples from 33 CRC patients and 9 healthy controls by RT-qPCR. Consequently, statistical analyses were performed to evaluate the clinical-pathological significance of MGP and RUNX2 in CRC. MGP protein was also detected by immunohistochemical analysis.

RESULTS

Showed an overall overexpression of MGP in the tumor mucosa of patients at mRNA level when compared to adjacent normal mucosa and healthy control tissues. In addition, analysis of the expression of RUNX2 mRNA demonstrated an overexpression in CRC tissue samples and a positive correlation with MGP expression (Pearson correlation coefficient 0.636; p ≤ 0.01) in tumor mucosa. However correlations between MGP gene expression and clinical-pathological characteristics, such as gender, age and pathology classification did not provide relevant information that may shed light towards the differences of MGP expression observed between normal and malignant tissue.

CONCLUSIONS

We were able to associate the high levels of MGP mRNA expression with a worse prognosis and survival rate lower than five years. These results contributed to improve our understanding of the molecular mechanism underlying MGP deregulation in cancer.

Molecular characterization and biomarker identification in colorectal cancer: Toward realization of the precision medicine dream

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a major public health problem, both in the USA and globally. Over the past 20 years, significant advances have been made in the treatment of patients with metastatic CRC (mCRC). Recent efforts in the field of biomarkers have focused on the development of molecular diagnostics to define the subset of patients with mCRC that is likely to derive most benefit from anti-EGFR therapy. Herein, we review the recent advancements in molecular stratification of CRC and the role of current as well as emerging biomarkers in this disease. It is now clear that the presence of activating mutations in the KRAS and NRAS genes serves as reliable predictive markers for resistance to anti-EGFR therapy in mCRC. It is also clear that further improvements in the survival of mCRC patients will probably be made possible only with identification of new predictive molecular biomarkers and their evaluation using rational and innovative clinical trials. The recent advances in DNA sequencing technology and "omics"-based approaches have provided promising new strategies for the development of novel molecular biomarkers in this disease.

miR-211 regulates the expression of RRM2 in tumoral metastasis and recurrence in colorectal cancer patients with a k-ras gene mutation

Colorectal cancer (CRC) ranks as the third-leading cause of cancer-associated mortalities in Taiwan. The expression of ribonucleotide reductase M2 (RRM2) and p53R2 is associated with tumoral malignancy and progression in several types of cancer. The aim of the present study was to determine the association of p53R2/RRM2 with the upstream expression of microRNA (miR)-211 and the association of expression levels of p53, APC and k-ras with clinical outcomes in patients with CRC. The study consisted of 192 tumor tissue samples obtained from patients with CRC. Immunohistochemistry and direct sequencing of DNA were performed to analyze p53R2/RRM2 protein expression and p53/APC/k-ras gene mutations in these samples. The expression level of miR-211 was detected by reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction. The results showed that the expression of p53R2 was lower and that of RRM2 was higher in patients with lymph node metastasis, distant metastasis, and late-stage CRC compared with patients without lymph node metastasis, distant metastasis and early-stage CRC. A high expression of RRM2 in patients had a negative effect on overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) in CRC. Positive expression of RRM2 was detected in tumor tissues, and expression associated with the presence of k-ras gene mutation. Furthermore, it was detected that the upstream miR-211 expression was negatively associated with RRM2 expression in tumor tissues of patients with CRC. miR-211 expression was associated with survival and tumoral recurrence in patients with k-ras mutations. The present authors suggest that the downregulation of miR-211 and overexpression of RRM2 in tumor tissues of patients with CRC could be used to predict metastases and disease prognosis, particularly in patients with k-ras gene mutations.

Expression of miR-200c and its clinicopathological significance in patients with colorectal cancer

MicroRNA-200c (miR-200c) is known to play a pivotal role in the regulation of epithelial-to-mesenchymal and mesenchymal-to-epithelial transition processes. However, the biological function of miR-200c in human carcinogenesis remains controversial. We examined the association of miR-200c expression with various clinicopathological factors, including KRAS mutation status and survival, in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). The expression level of miR-200c was evaluated in 109 paired CRC and normal tissue samples using quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction. The KRAS mutation status of the CRC samples was determined using the PNAClamp™ KRAS Mutation Detection kit. Compared with the normal tissue group, miR-200c expression was significantly upregulated in the CRCs (P < .001). The expression of miR-200c was increased in CRCs with higher grade (P = .009), advanced stage (P = .042), and lymphovascular invasion (P = .003). Thirty-one CRCs (28.4%) had KRAS mutations in codon 12 or 13. CRCs with KRAS mutations had significantly higher miR-200c expression than CRCs with wild-type KRAS (P = .003). In survival analysis, high miR-200c expression was correlated with worse overall survival (P = .017) and recurrence-free survival (P = .048). Our results indicate that miR-200c is involved in tumor progression and aggressiveness in CRCs, and this oncogenic role of miR-200c may be triggered by activation of the KRAS signaling pathway.

Evolving notions on immune response in colorectal cancer and their implications for biomarker development

INTRODUCTION

Colorectal cancer (CRC) still represents the third most commonly diagnosed type of cancer in men and women worldwide. CRC is acknowledged as a heterogeneous disease that develops through a multi-step sequence of events driven by clonal selections; this observation is sustained by the fact that histologically similar tumors may have completely different outcomes, including a varied response to therapy.

METHODS

In "early" and "intermediate" stage of CRC (stages II and III, respectively) there is a compelling need for new biomarkers fit to assess the metastatic potential of their disease, selecting patients with aggressive disease that might benefit from adjuvant and targeted therapies. Therefore, we review the actual notions on immune response in colorectal cancer and their implications for biomarker development.

RESULTS

The recognition of the key role of immune cells in human cancer progression has recently drawn attention on the tumor immune microenvironment, as a source of new indicators of tumor outcome and response to therapy. Thus, beside consolidated histopathological biomarkers, immune endpoints are now emerging as potential biomarkers.

CONCLUSIONS

The introduction of immune signatures and cellular and molecular components of the immune system as biomarkers is particularly important considering the increasing use of immune-based cancer therapies as therapeutic strategies for cancer patients.

Molecular Testing for the Treatment of Advanced Colorectal Cancer: An Overview

Concurrent with an expansion in the number of agents available for the treatment of advanced CRC, there has been an increase in our understanding of selection biomarkers to optimize the management of patients with this disease. For CRC patients being considered for anti-EGFR therapy, expanded RAS testing is the standard of care to determine the subset of patients who can benefit from cetuximab or panitumumab in conjunction with chemotherapy. A small fraction of patients have HER2 amplification where emerging data suggest treatment with drugs targeting this alteration. Although advanced CRC patients who harbor the BRAF V600E mutation have a poorer prognosis, they are eligible for combinatorial therapy targeting EGFR/BRAF or BRAF/MEK within the MAP kinase signaling pathway. Once primarily thought to be a negative prognostic marker, BRAF V600E mutation is now considered as a positive predictive factor with an opportunity for clinical intervention. A growing body of evidence also supports MSI testing as clinical benefits with immune checkpoint blockade by cancer immunotherapy have been demonstrated in MSI-high patients whose tumors exhibit high mutational burden. It has been established that UGT1A1*28 polymorphism is associated with irinotecan toxicity, but this test is rarely performed as the management strategy has not been identified. No established predictive biomarker for anti-VEGF therapy has yet to be discovered.It is becoming increasingly apparent that our growing understanding of biomarkers is revolutionizing and improving our strategies in the treatment of advanced CRC. Traditional nonselective cytotoxic chemotherapy is gradually being augmented and even in some cases supplanted by selective targeted agents based on our increasing understanding of tumor signaling and mechanism at the molecular level. The prospect of personalized medicine in directing treatment approaches that are optimally beneficial for patients brings tremendous excitement to the growing field of cancer therapeutics. As discussed in this chapter, the concurrent development of molecular biomarkers with new treatment strategies holds great promise of precision medicine in improving outcomes for patients with advanced CRC.

Molecular Landscape and Treatment Options for Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

Over the last 20 years, median survival for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) has remarkably improved from about 12 to over 30 months, mainly because of the development of new agents and patient selection using predictive biomarkers. However, the identification of the most effective treatment for an individual patient is still a challenge. Molecular profiling of CRC has made great progress, but it is limited by tumor heterogeneity and absence of driver mutation. However, RAS, BRAF, and microsatellite instability are validated biomarker recommended by NCCN and ESMO. In this review, we discuss recent advances and future developments.

Immunohistochemistry with Anti-BRAF V600E (VE1) Mouse Monoclonal Antibody is a Sensitive Method for Detection of the BRAF V600E Mutation in Colon Cancer: Evaluation of 120 Cases with and without KRAS Mutation and Literature Review

The major aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of anti-BRAF V600E (VE1) antibody in colorectal tumors with and without KRAS mutation. KRAS and BRAF are two major oncogenic drivers of colorectal cancer (CRC) that have been frequently described as mutually exclusive, thus the BRAF V600E mutation is not expected to be present in the cases with KRAS mutation. In addition, a review of 25 studies comparing immunohistochemistry (IHC) using the anti-BRAF V600E (VE1) antibody with BRAF V600E molecular testing in 4041 patient samples was included. One-hundred and twenty cases with/without KRAS or BRAF mutations were acquired. The tissue were immunostained with anti-BRAF V600E (VE1) antibody with OptiView DAB IHC detection kit. The KRAS mutated cases with equivocal immunostaining were further evaluated by Sanger sequencing for BRAF V600E mutation. Thirty cases with BRAF V600E mutation showed unequivocal, diffuse, uniform, positive cytoplasmic staining and 30 cases with wild-type KRAS and BRAF showed negative staining with anti-BRAF V600E (VE1) antibody. Out of 60 cases with KRAS mutation, 56 cases (93.3%) were negative for BRAF V600E mutation by IHC. Four cases showed weak, equivocal, heterogeneous, cytoplasmic staining along with nuclear staining in 25-90% of tumor cells. These cases were confirmed to be negative for BRAF V600E mutation by Sanger sequencing. Overall, IHC with anti-BRAF V600E (VE1) antibody using recommended protocol with OptiView detection is optimal for detection of BRAF V600E mutation in CRC. Our data are consistent with previous reports indicating that KRAS and BRAF V600E mutation are mutually exclusive.

Multicenter analysis of risk factors for anastomotic leakage after middle and low rectal cancer resection without diverting stoma: a retrospective study of 319 consecutive patients

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the risk factors for anastomotic leakage (AL) after anterior resection for middle and low rectal cancer in order to help surgeons to decide which patients could benefit from a diverting stoma.

METHODS

Data on 319 patients having a middle and low rectal cancer resection with anastomosis between May 2011 and October 2015 from two hospitals were included in the study. The analysis included the following variables: patient-related variables (gender, age, diabetes mellitus, ASA score, preoperative radiochemotherapy, body mass index, blood hemoglobin, and serum albumin level), tumor-related variables (K-ras status, distance of tumor from the anal verge, histopathologic grade, pathological T stage, pathological N stage, pathological M stage, TNM stage, and tumor size), and surgery-related variables (laparoscopic or open surgery, blood loss, and operative time). Univariate and multivariate regression analysis were carried out to identify risk factors for AL.

RESULTS

The AL rate was 11.91% (38/319). Male (OR 2.898, 95% CI 1.265-6.637, p = 0.012), diabetes mellitus (OR 2.482, 95% CI 1.004-6.134, p = 0.049), K-ras mutation (OR 2.544, 95% CI 1.210-5.348, p = 0.014), distance of tumor from the anal verge (OR 3.445, 95% CI 1.631-7.279, p = 0.001), and preoperative radiochemotherapy (OR 2.790, 95% CI 1.056-7.372, p = 0.039) were independent risk factors of AL. One (2.63%) in 38 patients with AL presented with no risk factor of AL, 6 (15.8%) in 38 patients with 1 risk factor, 16 (42.1%) in 38 patients with 2 risk factors, 9 (23.7%) in 38 patients with 3 risk factors, and 6 (15.7%) in 38 patients with 4 risk factors. No patient with 5 risk factors in our study. AL rate increased with the elevated number of risk factors clustering in individuals.

CONCLUSIONS

K-ras mutation is first reported to be an independent risk factor for AL after sphincter-preserving surgery without diverting stoma. A diverting stoma should be performed in sphincter-preserving surgery for middle and low rectal cancer patients with 2 or more risk factors identified in this analysis.

Prognostic value of KRAS codon 13 gene mutation for overall survival in colorectal cancer: Direct and indirect comparison meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The clinical significance of KRAS codon 13 mutation in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) remains controversial. A systematic review and meta-analysis is necessary for a more precise estimation of the predictive role of KRAS codon 13 mutations in CRC patients.

METHODS

We performed a systematic search using the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane library databases from January 2000 to November 2016. The prognostic value of KRAS codon 13 mutation for overall survival (OS) was investigated by measuring the hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). Data were analyzed with Review Manager Version 5.3 and the Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health software.

RESULTS

OS in CRC patients with KRAS codon 13 mutation was worse than that in CRC patients with KRAS wild-type (pooled HR = 1.37, 95% CI: 1.03-1.81, P = .03). Subgroup analysis of studies of enrolled CRC patients treated with antiepidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) therapy showed no significant difference in OS associated with KRAS codon 13 mutation in comparison to KRAS wild-type (pooled HR = 1.57, 95% CI: 0.98-2.51, P = .06). In the indirect comparison, no statistically significant association was observed between codon 12 and 13 mutations for OS in CRC patients (pooled HR = 0.88, 95% CI: 0.65-1.20, P = .43).

CONCLUSION

The current meta-analysis suggests that Codon 13 mutation of KRAS gene seems to correlate with the OS of patients with CRC, but has similar OS to those with KRAS wild-type in patients receiving anti-EGFR therapy. No difference was detected in the OS of CRC patients with codon 13 mutation versus codon 12 mutation.

Molecular Biomarkers for the Evaluation of Colorectal Cancer: Guideline From the American Society for Clinical Pathology, College of American Pathologists, Association for Molecular Pathology, and American Society of Clinical Oncology

OBJECTIVES

- To develop evidence-based guideline recommendations through a systematic review of the literature to establish standard molecular biomarker testing of colorectal cancer (CRC) tissues to guide epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) therapies and conventional chemotherapy regimens.

METHODS

- The American Society for Clinical Pathology, College of American Pathologists, Association for Molecular Pathology, and American Society of Clinical Oncology convened an expert panel to develop an evidence-based guideline to establish standard molecular biomarker testing and guide therapies for patients with CRC. A comprehensive literature search that included more than 4,000 articles was conducted.

RESULTS

- Twenty-one guideline statements were established.

CONCLUSIONS

- Evidence supports mutational testing for EGFR signaling pathway genes, since they provide clinically actionable information as negative predictors of benefit to anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody therapies for targeted therapy of CRC. Mutations in several of the biomarkers have clear prognostic value. Laboratory approaches to operationalize CRC molecular testing are presented.

Molecular Biomarkers for the Evaluation of Colorectal Cancer

Objectives: To develop evidence-based guideline recommendations through a systematic review of the literature to establish standard molecular biomarker testing of colorectal cancer (CRC) tissues to guide epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) therapies and conventional chemotherapy regimens. Methods: The American Society for Clinical Pathology, College of American Pathologists, Association for Molecular Pathology, and American Society of Clinical Oncology convened an expert panel to develop an evidence-based guideline to establish standard molecular biomarker testing and guide therapies for patients with CRC. A comprehensive literature search that included more than 4,000 articles was conducted. Results: Twenty-one guideline statements were established. Conclusions: Evidence supports mutational testing for EGFR signaling pathway genes, since they provide clinically actionable information as negative predictors of benefit to anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody therapies for targeted therapy of CRC. Mutations in several of the biomarkers have clear prognostic value. Laboratory approaches to operationalize CRC molecular testing are presented.

Molecular Biomarkers for the Evaluation of Colorectal Cancer: Guideline From the American Society for Clinical Pathology, College of American Pathologists, Association for Molecular Pathology, and American Society of Clinical Oncology

OBJECTIVES

To develop evidence-based guideline recommendations through a systematic review of the literature to establish standard molecular biomarker testing of colorectal cancer (CRC) tissues to guide epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) therapies and conventional chemotherapy regimens.

METHODS

The American Society for Clinical Pathology, College of American Pathologists, Association for Molecular Pathology, and American Society of Clinical Oncology convened an expert panel to develop an evidence-based guideline to establish standard molecular biomarker testing and guide therapies for patients with CRC. A comprehensive literature search that included more than 4,000 articles was conducted.

RESULTS

Twenty-one guideline statements were established.

CONCLUSIONS

Evidence supports mutational testing for EGFR signaling pathway genes, since they provide clinically actionable information as negative predictors of benefit to anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody therapies for targeted therapy of CRC. Mutations in several of the biomarkers have clear prognostic value. Laboratory approaches to operationalize CRC molecular testing are presented. Key Words: Molecular diagnostics; Gastrointestinal; Histology; Genetics; Oncology.

Molecular Biomarkers for the Evaluation of Colorectal Cancer: Guideline From the American Society for Clinical Pathology, College of American Pathologists, Association for Molecular Pathology, and the American Society of Clinical Oncology

Purpose Molecular testing of colorectal cancers (CRCs) to improve patient care and outcomes of targeted and conventional therapies has been the center of many recent studies, including clinical trials. Evidence-based recommendations for the molecular testing of CRC tissues to guide epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) -targeted therapies and conventional chemotherapy regimens are warranted in clinical practice. The purpose of this guideline is to develop evidence-based recommendations to help establish standard molecular biomarker testing for CRC through a systematic review of the literature. Methods The American Society for Clinical Pathology (ASCP), College of American Pathologists (CAP), Association for Molecular Pathology (AMP), and the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) convened an Expert Panel to develop an evidence-based guideline to help establish standard molecular biomarker testing, guide targeted therapies, and advance personalized care for patients with CRC. A comprehensive literature search that included over 4,000 articles was conducted to gather data to inform this guideline. Results Twenty-one guideline statements (eight recommendations, 10 expert consensus opinions and three no recommendations) were established. Recommendations Evidence supports mutational testing for genes in the EGFR signaling pathway, since they provide clinically actionable information as negative predictors of benefit to anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody therapies for targeted therapy of CRC. Mutations in several of the biomarkers have clear prognostic value. Laboratory approaches to operationalize molecular testing for predictive and prognostic molecular biomarkers involve selection of assays, type of specimens to be tested, timing of ordering of tests and turnaround time for testing results. Additional information is available at: www.asco.org/CRC-markers-guideline and www.asco.org/guidelineswiki.

Prognostic impact of KRAS, NRAS, BRAF, and PIK3CA mutations in primary colorectal carcinomas: a population-based study

Background

Activation of oncogenes downstream the EGFR gene contributes to colorectal tumorigenesis and determines the sensitivity to anti-EGFR treatments. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic value of KRAS, BRAF, NRAS and PIK3CA mutations in a large collection of CRC patients from genetically-homogeneous Sardinian population.

Methods

A total of 1284 Sardinian patients with histologically-proven diagnosis of colorectal carcinoma (CRC) and presenting with metastatic disease were included into the study. Genomic DNA was isolated from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded primary tumour tissue samples of CRC patients and screened for mutations in RAS and BRAF genes, using pyrosequencing assays, and in PIK3CA gene, using automated DNA sequencing assays.

Results

Overall, mutation rates were 35.6 % for KRAS, 4.1 % for NRAS, and 2.1 % for BRAF. Among available DNA samples, 114/796 (14.3 %) primary CRCs were found to carry a mutation in the PIK3CA gene. In this subset of patients analysed in all four genes, a pathogenetic mutation of at least one gene was discovered in about half (378/796; 47.5 %) of CRC cases. A mutated BRAF gene was found to steadily act as a negative prognostic factor for either time to progression as metastatic disease (from detection of primary CRC to diagnosis of first distant metastasis; p = 0.009) or partial survival (from diagnosis of advanced disease to the time of death or last control; p = 0.006) or overall survival (p < 0.001). No significant impact on prognosis was observed for mutated KRAS, NRAS, and PIK3CA genes or combined RAS mutations (all RAS).

Conclusions

Our study defines both prevalence and prognostic role of main activated oncogenes in a population-based large collection of CRC patients.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12967-016-1053-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Prognostic significance of K-Ras mutation rate in metastatic colorectal cancer patients

Introduction: Activating mutations of K-Ras gene have a well-established role as predictors of resistance to anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients. Their prognostic value is controversial, and no data regarding the prognostic value of mutation rate, defined as the percentage of mutated alleles/tumor sample, are available. We aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of K-Rasmutation rate in a homogenous cohort of mCRC patients receiving first-line doublet plus bevacizumab.

Patients and Methods: This retrospective study enrolled 397 K-Ras mutant mCRC patients from 6 Italian centers, and 263 patients were fully evaluable for our analysis. K-Ras mutation rate was assessed by pyrosequencing. Patients with less than 60% of cancer cells in tumor tissue were excluded. No patients received anti-EGFR containing anticancer therapy, at any time. Median mutation rate was 40% and was adopted as cut-off. The primary and secondary endpoints were PFS and OS respectively.

Results: At univariate analysis, K-Ras mutation rate higher than 40% was significantly associated with lower PFS (7.3 vs 9.1 months; P < 0.0001) and OS (21 vs 31 months; P = 0.004). A multivariate model adjusted for age at diagnosis, site of origin of tumor tissue (primary vs metastases), referral center, number of metastatic sites, and first-line chemotherapy backbone, showed that K-Ras mutation rate remained a significant predictor of PFS and OS in the whole population.

Discussion: Our data demonstrate an association between K-Ras mutation rate and prognosis in mCRC patients treated with bevacizumab-containing first-line therapy. These data deserve to be verified in an independent validation set.

Peritoneal carcinomatosis of colorectal cancer: novel clinical and molecular outcomes

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to identify the prognostic impact of parameters in peritoneal carcinomatosis from colorectal cancer.

METHODS

We collected data from patients treated by cytoreductive surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for peritoneal carcinomatosis secondary to colorectal cancer.

RESULTS

Ninety-one procedures were performed. In univariate analysis, an increased peritoneal cancer index was associated with decreased survival (P < .001). The presence of signet ring cells was associated to a decrease in survival from 45.8 to 12.1 months (P < .001). Microsatellite sequences instability status was the only molecular prognostic factor correlated with an increase in median disease-free survival: 12.4 vs 24.9 months (P = .01). The presence of a mucinous component was associated with a decreased of survival from 51.9 to 35.1 months (P = .02).

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical factors were affecting the survival of patients. The absence of signet ring cells and mucinous component and the presence of microsatellite sequences instability may be favorable prognostic factors.

Prognostic role of KRAS mutations in Sardinian patients with colorectal carcinoma

The presence of mutations in the KRAS gene is a predictor of a poor clinical response to EGFR-targeted agents in patients affected by colorectal cancer (CRC), but its significance as a global prognostic factor remains unclear. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the impact of the KRAS mutational status on time to first metastasis (TTM) and overall survival (OS) in a cohort of Sardinian CRC patients. A total of 551 patients with metastatic CRC at the time of enrolment were included. Clinical and pathological features of the disease, including follow-up information, were obtained from medical records and cancer registry data. For mutational analysis formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue samples were processed using a standard protocol. The coding sequence and splice junctions of exons 2 and 3 of the KRAS gene were screened for mutations by direct automated sequencing. Overall, 186 KRAS mutations were detected in 183/551 (33%) patients: 125 (67%) were located in codon 12, 36 (19%) in codon 13, and 18 (10%) in codon 61. The remaining mutations (7; 4%) were detected in uncommonly-affected codons. No significant correlation between KRAS mutations and gender, age, anatomical location and stage of the disease at the time of diagnosis was identified. Furthermore, no prognostic value of KRAS mutations was found considering either TTM or OS. When patients were stratified by KRAS mutational status and gender, males were significantly associated with a longer TTM. The results of the present study indicate that KRAS mutation correlated with a slower metastatic progression in males with CRC from Sardinia, irrespective of the age at diagnosis and the codon of the mutation.

High frequency of KRAS mutation in early onset colorectal adenocarcinoma: implications for pathogenesis

While the incidence of sporadic early onset (defined here as ≤40 years of age) colorectal cancer is increasing, its molecular pathogenesis remains unclear. In particular, previous studies have suggested that the genetic initiating events in these patients may be distinct from those observed in older colorectal cancer patients. We aimed to study clinical, histopathological, and molecular features of early onset colorectal cancer. We identified 68 consecutive sporadic early onset colorectal cancer cases with available molecular data treated in our institution between 2007 and 2014. Consistent with previous reports, the majority of sporadic early onset colorectal cancer patients had left-sided tumors, which were predominantly of low histologic grade, but advanced clinical stage. A subset of tumors (<40%) contained mucinous or signet ring cell features. DNA mismatch repair pathway, commonly associated with Lynch syndrome, was abnormal only in a minor subset of cases. In contrast to the low prevalence (<30%) of KRAS mutations reported by previous studies, we found that a significantly higher proportion (54%) of early onset colorectal cancer cases harbored KRAS mutations, a finding that was independent of tumor stage. The high prevalence of KRAS mutation in early onset colorectal cancer suggests that it shares common genetic initiating events with colorectal cancer in older patients.

Mutation spectra of RAS gene family in colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

The clinicopathologic features and frequency of KRAS mutations in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients have been reported; however, the characteristics and impact of NRAS and HRAS mutations on the survival of CRC patients have seldom been addressed.

METHODS

Under institutional review board approval, 1,519 CRC patients who underwent surgery were enrolled. Mutation status of RAS was determined by polymerase chain reaction and mass spectrophotometry.

RESULTS

The frequency of KRAS, NRAS, and HRAS mutations was 39.6%, 4.3%, and 1.7%, respectively. The KRAS mutation was associated with fewer left-sided tumors, fewer poor differentiated tumors, more mucin component, and less lymphovascular invasion. The NRAS or HRAS mutations were not associated with any of the clinicopathologic features examined. After univariate analysis, only NRAS mutation was associated with patients' overall and disease-free survival. However, the association of NRAS with patients' overall and disease-free survival disappeared after stepwise elimination.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates the clinicopathologic characteristics of CRC patients with RAS mutations. Patients with NRAS mutation tended to have worse outcomes.

[Surgery for pulmonary metastases from colorectal cancer: Predictive factors for survival]

INTRODUCTION

Colorectal cancer is the 3rd commonest cause of death from cancer: 5% of patients will develop lung metastases. The management of oligometastatic disease is based on the objective of optimal local control.

STATE OF THE ART

To date, no results from randomized control trials support the resection of pulmonary metastases in oligometastastic colorectal cancer patients. However, numerous series, mainly retrospective, report long-term survival for highly selected patients, with 5-year survival ranging from 45 to 65% in the most recent series. The consensual predictive factors of a good prognosis are: a disease free-interval>36 months, a number of metastases≤3, a normal level of carcino-embryonic antigen and the absence of hilar or mediastinal lymph node involvement.

PERSPECTIVES

Around 20 to 40% of patients will develop recurrence, probably linked to the presence of undetectable micrometastases. Therefore, experimental work is being undertaken to develop new treatment techniques such as isolated lung perfusion, radiofrequency ablation and stereotactic radiation therapy.

CONCLUSION

Highly selected patients suffering from colorectal cancer lung metastases could benefit from resection with improved survival and disease-control.

Early onset of colorectal cancer in a 13-year-old girl with Lynch syndrome

Lynch syndrome is the most common inherited colon cancer syndrome. Patients with Lynch syndrome develop a range of cancers including colorectal cancer (CRC) and carry a mutation on one of the mismatched repair (MMR) genes. Although CRC usually occurs after the fourth decade in patients with Lynch syndrome harboring a heterozygous MMR gene mutation, it can occur in children with Lynch syndrome who have a compound heterozygous or homozygous MMR gene mutation. We report a case of CRC in a 13-year-old patient with Lynch syndrome and congenital heart disease. This patient had a heterozygous mutation in MLH1 (an MMR gene), but no compound MMR gene defects, and a K-RAS somatic mutation in the cancer cells.

miR-1, regulated by LMP1, suppresses tumour growth and metastasis by targeting K-ras in nasopharyngeal carcinoma

There is evidence to show that downregulation of miR-1 expression is closely related to cancer progression, including in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). However, the molecular mechanisms underlying miR-1 downregulation in NPC remain largely unknown, especially its association with Epstein-Barr virus (EBV). In this study we found that restoration of miR-1 dramatically inhibited cell invasion in vitro, together with tumour growth and metastasis in vivo. Importantly, we found that LMP1, an Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-associated protein, suppressed miR-1 expression. Furthermore, we identified K-ras as a novel direct target of miR-1. Our results demonstrated for the first time that miR-1 was suppressed by LMP1 and its tumour-suppressive effects were mediated chiefly by repressing K-ras expression. We propose that miR-1 could serve as an independent biomarker to identify patients with different clinical characteristics.

Relationship Between 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Uptake and V-Ki-Ras2 Kirsten Rat Sarcoma Viral Oncogene Homolog Mutation in Colorectal Cancer Patients: Variability Depending on C-Reactive Protein Level

To evaluate clinical values of clinicopathologic and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT)-related parameters for prediction of v-Ki-ras2 Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS) mutation in colorectal cancer (CRC) and to investigate their variability depending on C-reactive protein (CRP) levels. In total, 179 CRC patients who underwent PET/CT scans before curative resection and KRAS mutation evaluation following surgery were enrolled. Maximum standardized uptake value (SUV max), peak standardized uptake value (SUV peak), metabolic tumor volume, and total lesion glycolysis were determined semiquantitatively. Associations between clinicopathologic and PET/CT-related parameters and KRAS expression were analyzed. Elevated CRP (> 6.0 mg/L; n = 47) was associated with higher primary tumor size, higher SUV max, SUV peak, metabolic tumor volume, and total lesion glycolysis, compared with those for the group with a CRP lower than that the cutoff value (< 6.0 mg/L; n = 132). Interestingly, the CRC patients (having CRP < 6.0 mg/L) with KRAS mutations had significantly higher (P < 0.05) SUV max and SUV peak values than the patients expressing wild-type KRAS mutations. Multivariate analysis revealed SUV max and SUV peak to be significantly associated with KRAS mutations (odds ratio = 3.3, P = 0.005, and odds ratio = 3.9, P = 0.004), together with histologic grade and lymph node metastasis. 18F-FDG uptake was significantly higher in CRC patients with KRAS mutations and with normal CRP levels. A severe local inflammation with raised CRP levels, however, might affect accurate 18F-FDG quantification in CRC tumors. Positron emission tomography/computed tomography-related parameters could supplement genomic analysis to determine KRAS expression in CRC; however, care should be exercised to guarantee proper patient selection.

Prognostic value of KRAS mutations in colorectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

AIM: To evaluate the prognostic significance of KRAS mutations among Chinese colorectal cancer patients.

METHODS: Clinical studies on the correlation between KRAS mutations and the prognosis of colorectal cancer patients were retrieved from PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Wan Fang database and CNKI. The latest search was done in April, 2015. Both case-control studies and cohort studies were included. Hazard ratios (HRs) were used to evaluate the outcomes. Meta-analysis was performed with Stata 12.0.

RESULTS: A total of 19 clinical studies with 2938 patients were qualified to this meta-analysis. Patients with KRAS mutations were associated with shorter overall survival (OS) (HR = 1.71, 95%CI: 1.28-2.29) and progression free survival (PFS) (HR = 2.36, 95%CI: 1.24-4.50). In addition, codons 12 and 13 mutations of KRAS were related with prognosis of colorectal cancer patients.

CONCLUSION: KRAS mutations are a possible risk factor for prognosis in patients with colorectal cancer. Patients with KRAS mutations show an increased risk of mortality and progression of disease. More clinical studies need to be performed to confirm our conclusion.

Discrepancies between the K-ras mutational status of primary colorectal cancers and corresponding liver metastases are found in codon 13

K-ras mutation status has remained elusive in the metastatic liver tumors of colorectal cancer (CRC) in contrast to the primary CRC tumors. In this study, K-ras mutational status of the primary and corresponding liver metastatic tumors was investigated in the 43 CRC patients. Codons 12 and 13 of K-ras were directly sequenced, and a K-ras mutation was evident in 17 cases (39.5%). In 6 cases, the K-ras mutation was evident only in the liver metastasis, but not in the primary CRC, where the mutation was found in codon 13. This discrepancy between primary and metastatic lesions with regard to codon 13 of the K-ras gene may explain the clinical discrepancy of EGFR antibody therapy. In conclusion, the current data may lead to the development of personalized medicine for recurrent CRC, although further validation study is still required.

Up-front systemic chemotherapy is a feasible option compared to primary tumor resection followed by chemotherapy for colorectal cancer with unresectable synchronous metastases

Background

In stage IV colorectal cancer (CRC) with unresectable metastases, whether or not resection of the primary tumor should be indicated remains controversial. We aim to determine the impact of primary tumor resection on the survival of stage IV CRC patients with unresectable metastases.

Methods

We retrospectively investigated 103 CRC patients with stage IV colorectal cancer with metastases, treated at Hiroshima University Hospital between 2007 and 2013. Of these, those who had resectable primary tumor but unresectable metastases and received any chemotherapy were included in the study. We analyzed the overall survival (OS) and short-term outcomes between the patients who received up-front systemic chemotherapy (USC group) and those who received primary tumor resection followed by chemotherapy (PTR group).

Results

Of the 57 included patients, 15 underwent USC and 42 PTR. The median survival times were 13.4 and 23.9 months in the USC and PTR groups, respectively (P = 0.093), but multivariate analysis for the overall survival showed no significant difference between the two groups (hazard ratio, 1.30; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.60 to 2.73, P = 0.495). In the USC group, the disease control rate of primary tumor was observed in 12 patients (80.0%), but emergency laparotomy was required for 1 patient. Morbidity in the PTR group was observed in 18 cases (42.9%).

Conclusions

The overall survival did not differ significantly between the USC and PTR groups. USC may help avoid unnecessary resection and consequently the high morbidity rate associated with primary tumor resection for stage IV CRC with unresectable metastases.

KRAS gene mutation in a series of unselected colorectal carcinoma patients with prognostic morphological correlations: a pyrosequencing method improved by nested PCR

INTRODUCTION

Inhibition of EGFR is a strategy for treating metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. KRAS sequencing is mandatory for selecting wild-type tumor patients who might benefit from this treatment. DNA from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues is commonly used for routine clinical detection of mutations, and its amplification succeeds only when all preanalytical histological processes have been controlled. In cases that are not properly processed, the DNA results can be poor, with low peak pyrosequencing findings. We designed and tested a pair of forward and reverse primers for a nested PCR method, followed by pyrosequencing, in a single Latin American institution series of 422 unselected CRC patients, correlating KRAS mutations with pathological and clinical data.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patient DNA samples from tumors were obtained by scraping or laser microdissection of cells from FFPE tissue and extracted using a commercial kit. DNA was first amplified by PCR using 2 primers that we designed; then, nested PCR was performed with the amplicon from the preamplification PCR using the KRAS PyroMark™ Q96 V2.0 kit (Qiagen). Pathological data were retrieved from pathology reports.

RESULTS

KRAS mutation was observed in 33% of 421 cases. Codon 12 was mutated in 76% of cases versus codon 13 in 24%. Right-sided CRCs harbored more KRAS mutations than left-sided tumors, as did tumors that presented with perineural invasion.

CONCLUSION

Our findings in this Latin American population are consistent with the literature regarding the frequency of KRAS mutations in CRC, their distribution between codons 12 and 13, and type of nucleotide substitution. By combining nested PCR and pyrosequencing, we achieved a high rate of conclusive results in testing KRAS mutations in CRC samples - a method that can be used as an ancillary test for failed assays by conventional PCR.

Global impact of KRAS mutation patterns in FOLFOX treated metastatic colorectal cancer

Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most frequent events in oncology. Advances in molecular understanding of the processes of carcinogenesis have shed light on the fundamental mechanisms of tumorigenesis. Currently, knowledge of the molecular basis of its pathogenesis is being used to improve patient care and devise more rational therapeutics. Still, the role played by the mutation patterns of mutated genes in the clinical outcomes that patients on pharmacological treatment receive remains unclear. In this study, we propose to analyze the different clinical outcomes and disease prognosis of patients with stage IV CRC treated with FOLFOX chemotherapy (fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin) based on different Kirsten ras (KRAS) mutation patterns.

Methods: In this cohort study, 148 patients diagnosed with stage IV CRC and treated with FOLFOX were studied between 2008 and 2013. Mutational status of KRAS was determined. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were measured, and all deaths were verified. Survival analysis was performed using Kaplan–Meier analysis, comparison among groups was analyzed using the log-rank test, and multivariate analysis was conducted using Cox proportional-hazards regression.

Results: Among a total of 148 patients, 48 (32%) had mutated KRAS, 77% at codon 12 and 23% at codon 13. The PFS was significantly worse in the mutant KRAS patients in comparison to wild type KRAS patients (p < 0.05). The OS did not show significant differences between the two groups. Multivariate analysis showed KRAS mutation as an independent negative prognostic factor for PFS. Among the various subtypes of KRAS mutation, G12D was significantly associated with a poor prognosis in PFS (p = 0.02).

Conclusion: In our population, the KRAS mutation had an adverse impact on the prognosis for stage IV CRC patients treated with the FOLFOX regimen.

KRAS mutations in tumor tissue and plasma by different assays predict survival of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer

Background

The optimal laboratory assay for detecting KRAS mutations in different biospecimens from patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), and the clinical relevance of these gene alterations is still in question. We analyzed the prognostic–predictive relevance of KRAS status, determined in tumor and plasma DNA by two different assays, in a large mono-institutional series of mCRC patients.

Methods

DNA sequencing and peptide-nucleic-acid-mediated-polymerase chain reaction clamping (PNA-PCR) were used to determine KRAS status in 416 tumor and 242 matched plasma DNA samples from mCRC patients who received chemotherapy only. Relationships with outcomes were analyzed with respect to the different assays and tissue types.

Results

PNA-PCR was significantly more sensitive in detecting KRAS mutations than sequencing (41% vs. 30%, p < 0.001). KRAS mutations were more frequent in tumor tissue than in plasma (sequencing, 38% vs. 17%, p < 0.001; PNA-PCR, 47% vs. 31%, p < 0.001). Median OS was consistently shorter in KRAS-mutated patients than KRAS wild-type patients, independent from the assay and tissue tested; the largest difference was in plasma samples analyzed by PNA-PCR (KRAS mutated vs. wild-type: 15.7 vs. 19.1 months, p = 0.009). No association was observed between KRAS status and other outcomes. When tumor and plasma results were considered together, median OS in patients categorized as tissue/plasma KRAS negative/negative, tissue/plasma KRAS discordant, and tissue/plasma KRAS positive/positive were 21.0, 16.9 and 15.4 months, respectively (p = 0.008).

Conclusions

KRAS mutation status is of prognostic relevance in patients with mCRC. KRAS mutations in both tumor tissue and plasma are a strong prognostic marker for poor outcomes.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13046-014-0104-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Expression and significance of DOK2 in colorectal cancer

A reduction in the levels of docking protein 2 (DOK2) expression has previously been reported in lung adenocarcinoma and gastric cancer, indicating that this protein acts as a tumor suppressor in solid tumors. The aim of the current study was to determine the significance of DOK2 in colorectal cancer. The study consisted of 102 patients who underwent curative surgery for colorectal cancer. Histopathological and immunohistochemical analysis of DOK2 protein expression levels was performed in issue samples, and univariate and multivariate analyses were used to investigate the correlation between prognosis and the clinicopathological parameters. DOK2 expression was confirmed in the normal colorectal mucosa tissues, which is consistent with the literature, whereas 34 out of 102 (33.3%) tumor specimens were negative. The results revealed that recurrence was more likely to develop in DOK2(−) patients compared with DOK2(+) patients. The DOK2(−) patients also exhibited a poorer five-year overall survival rate (59.1%) compared with the DOK2(+) group (76.4%; P=0.0328). These results indicate that DOK2 may potentially be used as a marker of poor prognosis in patients with colorectal cancer following curative resection.

Clinical impact of c-MET expression and genetic mutational status in colorectal cancer patients after liver resection

c-MET is implicated in the pathogenesis and growth of a wide variety of human malignancies, including colorectal cancer (CRC). The aim of the present study was to clarify the association between c-MET expression and tumor recurrence in CRC patients after curative liver resection, and to evaluate concordance in c-MET expression and various mutations of KRAS, BRAF and PIK3CA between primary CRC and paired liver metastases. A cohort of patients was tested for c-MET immunoreactivity (i.e. immunohistochemistry [IHC]) and KRAS, BRAF and PIK3CA mutations. Analyses were performed both on primary tumors and paired liver metastases, and the association between IHC and mutations results were assessed. A total of 108 patients were eligible. A total of 53% of patients underwent simultaneous resection of primary tumors and metastases, and the others underwent metachronous resection. Levels of concordance between primary tumors and metastases were 65.7%, 87.7%, 100% and 95.2% for c-MET, KRAS, BRAF and PIK3CA, respectively. High levels of c-MET expression (c-MET-high) in the primary tumors were observed in 52% of patients. Relapse-free survival was significantly shorter for patients with c-MET-high primary tumors (9.7 months) than for those with c-MET-low primary tumors (21.1 months) (P = 0.013). These results suggest that a high level of genetic concordance in KRAS, BRAF and PIK3CA between primary tumors and liver metastases, and c-MET-high in the primary tumors were associated with shorter relapse-free survival after hepatic metastasectomy.

The prognostic values of EGFR expression and KRAS mutation in patients with synchronous or metachronous metastatic colorectal cancer

Background

The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)/RAS/RAF/MEK/MAPK pathway is an important pathway in the carcinogenesis, invasion and metastasis of colorectal cancers (CRCs). We conducted a retrospective study to determine the prognostic values of EGFR expression and KRAS mutation in patients with metastatic CRC (mCRC) based on synchronous or metachronous status.

Methods

From October 2002 to March 2012, 205 patients with mCRC were retrospectively analyzed; 98 were found to have metachronous mCRC while 107 were found to have synchronous mCRC. The EGFR expressions were determinate by IHC (immunohistochemistry) analysis and categorized 1+ (weak intensity), 2+ (moderate intensity), and 3+ (strong intensity). Genomic DNA was isolated from frozen primary CRC tissues and direct sequencing of KRAS was performed. The clinicopathological features of these mCRC patients were retrospectively investigated according to EGFR expression and KRAS mutation status. Moreover, we analyzed the prognostic values of EGFR expression and KRAS mutation among these patients.

Results

Of the 205 patients with mCRC, EGFR expression was analyzed in 167 patients, and positive EGFR expression was noted in 140 of those patients (83.8%). KRAS mutation was investigated in 205 patients and mutations were noted in 88 of those patients (42.9%). In patients with metachronous mCRC, positive EGFR expression was significantly correlated with well-and moderately-differentiated tumors (P = 0.028), poorer disease-free survival (DFS) (P < 0.001), and overall survival (OS) (P < 0.001). Furthermore, positive EGFR expression was a significant independent prognostic factor of DFS (P = 0.006, HR: 4.012, 95% CI: 1.130–8.445) and OS (P = 0.028, HR: 3.090, 95% CI: 1.477–10.900) in metachronous mCRC patients. KRAS mutation status was not significantly related to DFS and OS of patients with metachronous mCRC; likewise, KRAS mutation status was not significantly different in the progression-free survival (PFS) and OS of patients with synchronous mCRC (all P > 0.05).

Conclusions

The present study demonstrated that EGFR expression has prognostic value only for patients with metachronous mCRC. However, KRAS mutation did not have prognostic value in patients with metachronous or synchronous mCRC.

BRAF mutation is associated with distinct clinicopathological characteristics in colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

AIM

Colorectal cancer is a heterogeneous disease with multiple underlying genetic mutations resulting in different phenotypes. Mutation in the v-Raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B1 (BRAF) proto-oncogene is an important event in the methylator pathway. There is no consensus, however, on the clinicopathological characteristics associated with BRAF mutation.

METHOD

A comprehensive search for published studies examining the effect of BRAF mutation on colorectal cancer was performed. Random effects methods were used to combine data.

RESULTS

Data were retrieved from 21 studies describing 9885 patients. BRAF associated colorectal cancer is associated with proximal tumour location (OR 5.222, 95% CI 3.801-7.174, P < 0.001), T4 tumours (OR 1.761, 95% CI 1.164-2.663, P = 0.007) and poor differentiation (OR 3.816, 95% CI 2.714-5.365, P < 0.001) and is negatively associated with male sex (OR 0.623, 95% CI 0.505-0.769, P < 0.001), age of diagnosis under 60 years (OR 0.453, 95% CI 0.280-0.733, P = 0.001) and rectal cancer (OR 0.266, 95% CI 0.122-0.422, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

BRAF mutation appears to be associated with distinct, unfavourable clinicopathological characteristics in colorectal cancer.

Survival in stage II/III colorectal cancer is independently predicted by chromosomal and microsatellite instability, but not by specific driver mutations

OBJECTIVES

Microsatellite instability (MSI) is an established marker of good prognosis in colorectal cancer (CRC). Chromosomal instability (CIN) is strongly negatively associated with MSI and has been shown to be a marker of poor prognosis in a small number of studies. However, a substantial group of "double-negative" (MSI-/CIN-) CRCs exists. The prognosis of these patients is unclear. Furthermore, MSI and CIN are each associated with specific molecular changes, such as mutations in KRAS and BRAF, that have been associated with prognosis. It is not known which of MSI, CIN, and the specific gene mutations are primary predictors of survival.

METHODS

We evaluated the prognostic value (disease-free survival, DFS) of CIN, MSI, mutations in KRAS, NRAS, BRAF, PIK3CA, FBXW7, and TP53, and chromosome 18q loss-of-heterozygosity (LOH) in 822 patients from the VICTOR trial of stage II/III CRC. We followed up promising associations in an Australian community-based cohort (N=375).

RESULTS

In the VICTOR patients, no specific mutation was associated with DFS, but individually MSI and CIN showed significant associations after adjusting for stage, age, gender, tumor location, and therapy. A combined analysis of the VICTOR and community-based cohorts showed that MSI and CIN were independent predictors of DFS (for MSI, hazard ratio (HR)=0.58, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.36-0.93, and P=0.021; for CIN, HR=1.54, 95% CI 1.14-2.08, and P=0.005), and joint CIN/MSI testing significantly improved the prognostic prediction of MSI alone (P=0.028). Higher levels of CIN were monotonically associated with progressively poorer DFS, and a semi-quantitative measure of CIN was a better predictor of outcome than a simple CIN+/- variable. All measures of CIN predicted DFS better than the recently described Watanabe LOH ratio.

CONCLUSIONS

MSI and CIN are independent predictors of DFS for stage II/III CRC. Prognostic molecular tests for CRC relapse should currently use MSI and a quantitative measure of CIN rather than specific gene mutations.

Can K-ras gene mutation be utilized as prognostic biomarker for colorectal cancer patients receiving chemotherapy? A meta-analysis and systematic review

INTRODUCTION

K-ras gene mutations were common in colorectal patients, but their relationship with prognosis was unclear.

OBJECTIVE

Verify prognostic differences between patient with and without mutant K-ras genes by reviewing the published evidence.

METHOD

Systematic reviews and data bases were searched for cohort/case-control studies of prognosis of colorectal cancer patients with detected K-ras mutations versus those without mutant K-ras genes, both of whom received chemotherapy. Number of patients, regimens of chemotherapy, and short-term or long-term survival rate (disease-free or overall) were extracted. Quality of studies was also evaluated.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

7 studies of comparisons with a control group were identified. No association between K-ras gene status with neither short-term disease free-survival (OR=1.01, 95% CI, 0.73-1.38, P=0.97) nor overall survival (OR=1.06, 95% CI, 0.82-1.36, P=0.66) in CRC patients who received chemotherapy was indicated. Comparison of long-term survival between two groups also indicated no significant difference after heterogeneity was eliminated (OR=1.09, 95% CI, 0.85-1.40, P=0.49).

CONCLUSIONS

K-ras gene mutations may not be a prognostic index for colorectal cancer patients who received chemotherapy.

Context-dependent interpretation of the prognostic value of BRAF and KRAS mutations in colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

The mutation status of the BRAF and KRAS genes has been proposed as prognostic biomarker in colorectal cancer. Of them, only the BRAF V600E mutation has been validated independently as prognostic for overall survival and survival after relapse, while the prognostic value of KRAS mutation is still unclear. We investigated the prognostic value of BRAF and KRAS mutations in various contexts defined by stratifications of the patient population.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed a cohort of patients with stage II and III colorectal cancer from the PETACC-3 clinical trial (N = 1,423), by assessing the prognostic value of the BRAF and KRAS mutations in subpopulations defined by all possible combinations of the following clinico-pathological variables: T stage, N stage, tumor site, tumor grade and microsatellite instability status. In each such subpopulation, the prognostic value was assessed by log rank test for three endpoints: overall survival, relapse-free survival, and survival after relapse. The significance level was set to 0.01 for Bonferroni-adjusted p-values, and a second threshold for a trend towards statistical significance was set at 0.05 for unadjusted p-values. The significance of the interactions was tested by Wald test, with significance level of 0.05.

RESULTS

In stage II-III colorectal cancer, BRAF mutation was confirmed a marker of poor survival only in subpopulations involving microsatellite stable and left-sided tumors, with higher effects than in the whole population. There was no evidence for prognostic value in microsatellite instable or right-sided tumor groups. We found that BRAF was also prognostic for relapse-free survival in some subpopulations. We found no evidence that KRAS mutations had prognostic value, although a trend was observed in some stratifications. We also show evidence of heterogeneity in survival of patients with BRAF V600E mutation.

CONCLUSIONS

The BRAF mutation represents an additional risk factor only in some subpopulations of colorectal cancers, in others having limited prognostic value. However, in the subpopulations where it is prognostic, it represents a marker of much higher risk than previously considered. KRAS mutation status does not seem to represent a strong prognostic variable.

Phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase pathway aberrations in gastric and colorectal cancer: meta-analysis, co-occurrence and ethnic variation

Inhibition of the phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase (PI3K) signaling pathway is a cancer treatment strategy that has entered into clinical trials. We performed a meta-analysis on the frequency of prominent genetic (PIK3CA mutation, PIK3CA amplification and PTEN deletion) and protein expression (high PI3K, PTEN loss and high pAkt) aberrations in the PI3K pathway in gastric cancer (GC) and colorectal cancer (CRC). We also performed laboratory analysis to investigate the co-occurrence of these aberrations. The meta-analysis indicated that East Asian and Caucasian GC patients differ significantly for the frequencies of PIK3CA Exon 9 and 20 mutations (7% vs. 15%, respectively), PTEN deletion (21% vs. 4%) and PTEN loss (47% vs. 78%), while CRC patients differed for PTEN loss (57% vs. 26%). High study heterogeneity (I(2) > 80) was observed for all aberrations except PIK3CA mutations. Laboratory analysis of tumors from East Asian patients revealed significant differences between GC (n = 79) and CRC (n = 116) for the frequencies of PIK3CA amplification (46% vs. 4%) and PTEN loss (54% vs. 78%). The incidence of GC cases with 0, 1, 2 and 3 concurrent aberrations was 14%, 52%, 27% and 8%, respectively, while for CRC it was 10%, 60%, 25% and 4%, respectively. Our study consolidates knowledge on the frequency, co-occurrence and clinical relevance of PI3K pathway aberrations in GC and CRC. Up to 86% of GC and 90% of CRC have at least one aberration in the PI3K pathway, and there are significant differences in the frequencies of these aberrations according to cancer type and ethnicity.