Fermented Rice Flour in Pediatric Atopic Dermatitis

Postbiotics: From emerging concept to application

The microbiome innovation has resulted in an umbrella term, postbiotics, which refers to non-viable microbial cells, metabolic byproducts and their microbial components released after lysis. Postbiotics, modulate immune response, gene expression, inhibit pathogen binding, maintain intestinal barriers, help in controlling carcinogenesis and pathogen infections. Postbiotics have antimicrobial, antioxidant, and immunomodulatory properties with favorable physiological, immunological, neuro-hormonal, regulatory and metabolic reactions. Consumption of postbiotics relieves symptoms of various diseases and viral infections such as SARS-CoV-2. Postbiotics can act as alternatives for pre-probiotic specially in immunosuppressed patients, children and premature neonates. Postbiotics are used to preserve and enhance nutritional properties of food, elimination of biofilms and skin conditioning in cosmetics. Postbiotics have numerous advantages over live bacteria with no risk of bacterial translocation from the gut to blood, acquisition of antibiotic resistance genes. The process of extraction, standardization, transport, and storage of postbiotic is more natural. Bioengineering techniques such as fermentation technology, high pressure etc., may be used for the synthesis of different postbiotics. Safety assessment and quality assurance of postbiotic is important as they may induce stomach discomfort, sepsis and/or toxic shock. Postbiotics are still in their infancy compared to pre- and pro- biotics but future research in this field may contribute to improved physiological functions and host health. The current review comprehensively summarizes new frontiers of research in postbiotics.

Comparative effectiveness of probiotic strains for the treatment of pediatric atopic dermatitis: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The current evidence on the use of probiotics in treating atopic dermatitis is inconclusive. This study determined the comparative effectiveness of the different types of probiotic strains in treating pediatric atopic dermatitis.

METHODOLOGY

Systematic and manual search for all randomized controlled trials available from inception until January 31, 2020, was done. Two independent authors conducted the search, screening, appraisal, and data abstraction. Network meta-analysis was conducted using STATA 14 software.

RESULTS

Twenty-two studies involving 28 different probiotic strains were included. The top three ranked probiotic strains in terms of efficacy are Mix1 (Bifidobacterium animalis subsp lactis CECT 8145, Bifidobacterium longum CECT 7347, and Lactobacillus casei CECT 9104); Lactobacillus casei DN-114001; and Mix6 (Bifidobacterium bifidum, Lactobacillus acidophilus, Lactobacillus casei, and Lactobacillus salivarius). Compared with placebo, Mix1 reduces atopic dermatitis symptoms with high certainty evidence (SMD -1.94, 95% CI -2.65 to -1.24; 47 participants). Mix6 compared with placebo probably reduces atopic dermatitis symptoms based on moderate certainty evidence (SMD -0.85, 95% CI -1.50 to -0.20; 40 participants). Lactobacillus casei DN-114001 compared with placebo may reduce atopic dermatitis symptoms based on low certainty evidence (SMD -1.35, 95% CI -2.04 to -0.65). In terms of safety, the highest ranked strain is Lactobacillus fermentum VRI-003, while the lowest ranked strain is Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG.

CONCLUSION

Certain probiotic preparations show benefit in reducing allergic symptoms in pediatric atopic dermatitis.

Rice flour fermented with Lactobacillus paracasei CBA L74 in the treatment of atopic dermatitis in infants: A randomized, double- blind, placebo- controlled trial

To assess the effect of a fermented rice-flour obtained from Lactobacillus paracasei CBA L74 in managing infants with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis. Infants with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis, aged 6-36 months, were randomly assigned to receive once-daily consumption of rice flour containing heat-killed probiotic Lactobacillus paracasei CBA L74 or placebo for 12 weeks as supplementary approach to topical treatment. Primary outcome was SCORAD index change from baseline to 12 weeks; secondary outcomes were gut microbiota composition, as evaluated by the analysis of fecal samples, and serum cytokines at baseline and at the end of the intervention period in both groups, and steroid usage over the treatment period and one month after stopping it. V3-V4 region of the 16S ribosomal RNA gene was sequenced to evaluate changes in the gut microbiota. SCORAD index decreased over the treatment period in both groups. The difference in the SCORAD change was -2.1 (-5.5 to 1.3; p = 0.223) for the experimental vs. the placebo group, not reaching the minimal clinical difference of 8.7 units. The use of topical steroids, measured as finger tips units, decreased from 4 to 16 weeks, in both groups; the reduction was significantly higher in experimental than in placebo group (p value from Wilcoxon rank sum test = 0.031). No significant differences were observed for cytokines levels between groups. The composition of gut microbiota at the phylum and class taxonomic levels resulted very similar, at baseline and after intervention, in both groups. Similarly, no significant differences were observed in the relative abundance of bacterial genera between groups. In conclusion, though the heat-killed Lactobacillus paracaseiwas not proved to be effective in reducing the severity of atopic dermatitis, it showed a steroid sparing effect the value of which needs to be further investigated.

The Role of Environmental Exposures in Atopic Dermatitis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Although genetic factors clearly play a role in the development of atopic dermatitis (AD), the recent dramatic increase in the prevalence of AD in low- and middle-income countries is not consistent with only a role of genetic factors. These findings strongly suggest that environmental factors may play an important role in the pathogenesis of AD.

RECENT FINDINGS

We reviewed the role of gene-environment studies; in utero exposures including tobacco smoke, alcohol, maternal stress, various digestive supplements, and gestational diabetes; early-life exposures including diet, gut microbiota, antibiotics, and breastfeeding; climate including temperature, ultraviolet radiation exposure, and air pollution; and household products, indoor allergens, water hardness, pH, and skin microbiota and their effects on AD. Environmental factors definitely play a role in the pathogenesis of AD. However, identifying definitive factors continues to be difficult in the setting of conflicting evidence and the complex interactions between genotypes and the environment resulting in a multitude of AD phenotypes. All of the different environmental interactions discussed highlight the importance of intervening on multiple levels in a patient's environment to improve or even prevent AD symptoms. Further, the importance of modifying environmental factors early on in a person's life is demonstrated. When possible, all of these environmental factors should be considered in treating a patient with AD and the appropriate modifications should be made at population and individual levels.