Changes in Saphenous Vein Stump and Low Incidence of Endovenous Heat-Induced Thrombosis After Radiofrequency Ablation of Great Saphenous Vein Incompetence

Selective crossectomy combined with mechanochemical ablation in the treatment of great saphenous vein insufficiency: Early results of a single center experience

Background

Selective crossectomy and mechanochemical ablation (MOCA) of great saphenous vein (GSV) have been used, for years, individually in the treatment of chronic venous insufficiency. In this paper, we focus on the advantages of a combination of the two techniques, in order to prevent complications and recurrence.

Methods

A preoperative clinical and instrumental screening phase was conducted for the purpose of dividing patients into three groups: “Saph+Cross” group (51/139 patients) underwent saphenectomy and crossectomy; “MOCA” group (44/139 patients) underwent MOCA of GSV with Flebogrif® device; “MOCA + Cross” group (44/139 patients) subjected to both MOCA and crossectomy procedures. Recurrence rate, defined as total recanalization of GSV and/or onset of neosaphena and/or new varicose veins, was used as a primary outcome. Secondary outcomes were procedural time and intra- and post-procedural complications.

Results

We conducted a 1-, 6-, and 12-month follow-up with Duplex scan. The recurrence rates were 3.9%, 21.8%, and 4.5% for “Saph+Cross,” “MOCA,” and “MOCA+Cross,” respectively, with a significant difference for the comparison between “MOCA” and “Saph+Cross” (MOCA vs Saph+Cross: OR 5.35, CI95% [0.98; 54.6], p-value .040). The sub-analysis of primary outcome highlighted a lower recanalization rate of GSV when combining the crossectomy with MOCA procedure (2.2% MOCA+Cross vs 15.9% MOCA; 0.12 OR, [0.002; 1.02] CI95%, p-value .029). Among the secondary outcomes, “MOCA” showed a shorter procedural time than the other groups (Saph+Cross: 51.3 ± 11.4; MOCA: 45.1 ± 7.5; MOCA+Cross: 50.4 ± 10; p-value .027). No significant differences were noted in terms of intra- and post-procedural complications.

Conclusions

The results showed that patients treated with saphenectomy and crossectomy have a lower recurrence rate compared to MOCA alone and MOCA + crossectomy procedures. The association of crossectomy with MOCA significantly reduces the recanalization rate of GSV, and it is also characterized by a higher free survival from recurrence (SSF) than with MOCA alone.

Changes of stump length depending on starting position of glue injection related to venous diameter during cyanoacrylate closure for incompetent saphenous veins

OBJECTIVES

A common pattern of recurrence after cyanoacrylate treatment of incompetent saphenous veins has been associated with reflux from the residual stump. The purpose of this study was to analyze the starting point of cyanoacrylate glue injection from the junction to decrease stump length.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed using prospectively collected data of patients with cyanoacrylate closure (CAC). Preoperatively, the diameter of the saphenous vein was measured. CAC was performed according to the manufacturer's instructions. After the procedure, clinical outcomes including pain, venous clinical severity score (VCSS), and quality of life (QoL) using the Aberdeen Varicose Vein Questionnaire (AVVQ) were evaluated. Postoperative duplex scanning was performed to evaluate the occlusion rate of the target vein, stump length, and presence of endovenous glue-induced thrombosis (EGIT). The stump length was analyzed according to the preoperative venous diameter to determine the proper point of glue injection to decrease the stump length.

RESULTS

During the study period, CAC was performed in 408 patients. Mean age was 56.2±11.5 years (range, 19 to 84 years). A total of 279 patients (68.4%) were women. Occlusion of the target vein was achieved in all patients. After the procedure, pain, VCSS, and QoL were improved (P<.001). EGIT developed in 5.8% of patients. There was a 1.53-fold linear increase in the stump length by for every 1-mm increment of the preoperative venous diameter. In 20 patients with a venous diameter ≥5 mm, glue injection was performed safely 4 cm distal to the junction to decrease the stump length.

CONCLUSION

The stump length linearly increased with an increase in the saphenous vein diameter. If the diameter of the saphenous vein is more than 5 mm, cyanoacrylate glue may be injected 4 cm distal to the junction to decrease stump length.

Current status of endothermal heat induced thrombosis

BACKGROUND

There remain many questions regarding the pathophysiology and risk factors for endothermal heat induced thrombosis formation. Moreover, there are a paucity of data on the timing of its occurrence, and there has been no consensus regarding for its treatment. The purpose of this review is to summarize the current knowledge on the pathophysiology, risk factors and treatment strategies for endothermal heat induced thrombosis.

METHODS

The PubMed database was searched from 2001 to present for endothermal heat induced thrombosis, EHIT, deep vein thrombosis, chronic venous insufficiency, varicose veins, endovenous laser and radiofrequency ablation (treatment). All relevant articles identified by the authors mentioning endothermal heat induced thrombosis were included in this review.

RESULTS

A multitude of risk factors, several pathophysiological hypotheses and different treatment strategies are described in the literature.

CONCLUSIONS

Endothermal heat induced thrombosis is marginally understood. There remains a theoretical risk for significant venous thromboembolic complications. With the new uniform classification of EHIT (American Venous Forum), healthcare providers should continue to investigate the nature of this event.

Classification and treatment of endothermal heat-induced thrombosis: Recommendations from the American Venous Forum and the Society for Vascular Surgery

The American Venous Forum (AVF) and the Society for Vascular Surgery set forth these guidelines for the management of endothermal heat-induced thrombosis (EHIT). The guidelines serve to compile the body of literature on EHIT and to put forth evidence-based recommendations. The guidelines are divided into the following categories: classification of EHIT, risk factors and prevention, and treatment of EHIT. One major feature is to standardize the reporting under one classification system. The Kabnick and Lawrence classification systems are now combined into the AVF EHIT classification system. The novel classification system affords standardization in reporting but also allows continued combined evaluation with the current body of literature. Recommendations codify the use of duplex ultrasound for the diagnosis of EHIT. Risk factor assessments and methods of prevention including mechanical prophylaxis, chemical prophylaxis, and ablation distance are discussed. Treatment guidelines are tailored to the AVF EHIT class (ie, I, II, III, IV). Reference is made to the use of surveillance, antiplatelet therapy, and anticoagulants as deemed indicated, and the recommendations incorporate the use of the novel direct oral anticoagulants. Last, EHIT management as it relates to the great and small saphenous veins is discussed.

Classification and treatment of endothermal heat-induced thrombosis: Recommendations from the American Venous Forum and the Society for Vascular Surgery This Practice Guidelines document has been co-published in Phlebology [DOI: 10.1177/0268355520953759] and Journal of Vascular Surgery: Venous and Lymphatic Disorders [DOI: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2020.06.008]. The publications are identical except for minor stylistic and spelling differences in keeping with each journal's style. The contribution has been published under a Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

The American Venous Forum (AVF) and the Society for Vascular Surgery set forth these guidelines for the management of endothermal heat-induced thrombosis (EHIT). The guidelines serve to compile the body of literature on EHIT and to put forth evidence-based recommendations. The guidelines are divided into the following categories: classification of EHIT, risk factors and prevention, and treatment of EHIT.

One major feature is to standardize the reporting under one classification system. The Kabnick and Lawrence classification systems are now combined into the AVF EHIT classification system. The novel classification system affords standardization in reporting but also allows continued combined evaluation with the current body of literature. Recommendations codify the use of duplex ultrasound for the diagnosis of EHIT. Risk factor assessments and methods of prevention including mechanical prophylaxis, chemical prophylaxis, and ablation distance are discussed.

Treatment guidelines are tailored to the AVF EHIT class (ie, I, II, III, IV). Reference is made to the use of surveillance, antiplatelet therapy, and anticoagulants as deemed indicated, and the recommendations incorporate the use of the novel direct oral anticoagulants. Last, EHIT management as it relates to the great and small saphenous veins is discussed.

The effect of increasing catheter distance from the deep junction on the outcomes of radiofrequency vein ablation

OBJECTIVE

Thermal vein ablation (VA) is the recommended treatment modality for superficial venous reflux, with a recommended positioning of the catheter at 2 to 3 cm from the junction of the deep venous system. In contrast, novel sealing technology for saphenous VA involves treatment starting at 3 to 5 cm distal to the deep junction. This study examines the effect of increasing catheter distance from the junction on the outcomes of VA using radiofrequency.

METHODS

A retrospective single-center review of patients treated with VA was performed. Demographics, symptoms, clinical class (Clinical, Etiology, Anatomy, and Pathophysiology classification), and ultrasound data were reviewed. The treatment groups were divided on the basis of the position of the catheter <3 cm (group A) or ≥3 cm (group B) from the deep junction. Clinical success, technical success, complications, and recurrence were compared between the two groups. Long-term follow-up was collected by telephone survey inquiring about intensity of symptoms on a numeric rating scale of 0 to 10 before and after treatment. A multivariable analysis was performed to identify predictors of recurrence.

RESULTS

There were 362 patients with 529 veins treated. The mean age was 59.2 ± 14.4 years (63% women). There was a significantly higher proportion of patients with past medical history of hypertension (P = .02) and deep venous thrombosis (P = .02) in group B compared with group A. Group B also had significantly larger vein diameter on ultrasound (P = .04). The clinical success, technical success, and complication rates were 80%, 95.6%, and 11.5%. There were no significant differences between the two groups in outcomes. After a mean follow-up of 27.5 months, recurrence rate was 22.2%. There was a trend toward higher recurrence in group B that did not, however, reach statistical significance (P = .1). On multivariable analysis, there was no clinical or technical factor that could predict recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

The experience with radiofrequency ablation does not support difference in outcomes when treatment starts at ≥3 cm from the junction. However, there is a trend toward increased long-term recurrence that warrants further investigation with newer technology.