A New Subtype of Lichen Planopilaris Affecting Vellus Hairs and Clinically Mimicking Androgenetic Alopecia

Chronic diffuse alopecia in women: a retrospective review of histopathologic diagnoses

INTRODUCTION

The diseases causing chronic diffuse alopecia and having similar clinical findings, namely chronic telogen effluvium, androgenetic alopecia, and the alopecia with overlapping features, should be differentiated. Recently, diffuse variants of lichen planopilaris have been described with histopathologic features of lichen planopilaris but clinically presenting with diffuse hair loss mostly in an androgenetic pattern.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the accurate diagnosis underlying chronic diffuse alopecia in women by evaluating histopathologic findings.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The study included 32 patients with diffuse and clinically noncicatricial alopecia for at least 6 months with no identifiable etiologic factor after general medical history, review of organ systems, and appropriate laboratory tests. Two 4 mm punch biopsies, one from vertex and the other from mid-occiput, were obtained and sectioned transversely.

RESULTS

The median age was 30.5 years (range: 22-40 years), and the median duration of hair loss was 4 years (range: 1.5-10 years). The histopathologic diagnosis was androgenetic alopecia, chronic telogen effluvium, and overlapping alopecia in 13 (40.6%), three (9.4%), and four (12.5%) patients, respectively. In the remaining 12 (32.5%) patients, a lichenoid inflammatory reaction affecting the infundibulum and isthmus was noted, and the probable diagnosis of diffuse variant of lichen planopilaris was made.

LIMITATIONS

The retrospective nature and the small sample size.

CONCLUSION

When the clinical diagnosis is not straightforward and no etiologic factor is found, histopathologic examination is mandatory for the accurate diagnosis of the disorder leading to chronic diffuse alopecia in women.

Differentiation of frontal fibrosing alopecia and Lichen planopilaris on trichoscopy: A comprehensive review

Trichoscopy in dermatology has opened up the new concept in overcoming the optical challenge faced clinically. It reveals the diagnostic details to the depth of superficial dermis, and thereby increasing the clinician's diagnostic accuracy and the level of confidence. The importance of trichoscopy in cicatricial alopecia is very evident in the current scenario for its precise diagnosis. The clinical picture in delineating lichen planopilaris (LPP) and frontal fibrosing alopecia (FFA) from each other and also from other close mimickers such as androgenetic alopecia, alopecia areata, female patterned hair loss, and other cicatricial alopecia is bewildered due to its varied presentation and co-existence with the above disease. The indecisive comparative findings on histopathology make the situation even more perplexed. In this article, we have reviewed the characteristic trichoscopy patterns that can differentiate LPP and FFA and from their close mimickers.

Clinicopathological characteristics and treatment outcomes of fibrosing alopecia in a pattern distribution: A retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Fibrosing alopecia in a pattern distribution (FAPD) is a primary cicatricial alopecia considered a subtype of lichen planopilaris (LPP).

OBJECTIVE

The clinical and histopathological features, and treatment response of 24 female patients with FAPD were evaluated.

METHODS

Demographic, clinical, histopathological and treatment data of patients with FAPD were retrospectively collected.

RESULTS

Twenty-four women were included (mean age 60.7 years). The mean Lichen Planopilaris Activity Index score was 1.50, and the median Sinclair grade was 3. Twelve patients had diffuse alopecia in the centroparietal region, four had frontal accentuation and eight had vertex accentuation of hair loss. Eight had associated loss of facial hair. Predominant trichoscopic features included hair shaft diameter variability (100%), perifollicular erythema and/or scaling (95%) and loss of follicular ostia (95%). Histopathological examination revealed features of scarring alopecia with interface changes in follicular epithelia mainly targeting terminal and intermediate hairs, and less frequently, vellus hairs. Treatment with hair growth-promoting, anti-inflammatory and anti-androgen agents arrested disease progression in 14 patients and resulted in hair regrowth in two patients. Six patients had progression of their hair loss in spite of treatment.

LIMITATIONS

Referral bias to a specialist hair clinic, retrospective design and small sample size.

CONCLUSIONS

We present clinicopathological features of FAPD which can aid in the diagnosis of this insidious scarring alopecia. Our findings suggest a more favourable outcome if treatment is initiated in early stages of the disease.

Lichen planopilaris in men: a retrospective clinicopathologic study of 19 patients

BACKGROUND

Lichen planopilaris (LPP) is a scarring alopecia rarely described in men.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the clinical and histopathologic features of LPP in men.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study of male patients with LPP seen at Mayo Clinic between 1992 and 2016.

RESULTS

Nineteen men with biopsy-confirmed LPP were included. The disease most commonly presented with diffuse (42.1%) or vertex scalp (42.1%) involvement. None of the patients had eyebrow or body hair involvement. Perifollicular erythema (94.7%) and pruritus (57.9%) were the most frequent clinical findings. Androgenetic alopecia (AGA) co-occurred in 26.3% of patients. Mucosal lichen planus was found in four patients (21.1%). Thyroid disease occurred in three patients (15.8%). Disease improvement (47.3%) occurred with combination topical and systemic therapy, topical clobetasol monotherapy, and minocycline monotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

LPP in men has similar clinical and histologic presentations as reported in women. Nonscalp hair loss appears less likely in men with classic LPP than reported in men with frontal fibrosing alopecia, while mucosal lichen planus and thyroid disease appear to be more common in classic LPP. Men with AGA can present with new-onset concomitant LPP. Limitations included small study size, variable follow-up, and lack of standardized clinical assessment due the study's retrospective nature.

Dermoscopic features of lichen planopilaris in Northern Iran: a prospective observational study

BACKGROUND

Dermoscopy can be helpful in assessing nonpigmented lesions and inflammatory processes like lichen planopilaris (LPP).

MATERIAL & METHODS

In this observational prospective study, 81 patients with a cicatricial alopecic patch on their scalp were included and underwent dermatologic examination. A biopsy was taken from the active part of the lesion based on dermoscopy evaluation.

RESULTS

Analysis of 44 patients with definite diagnosis of LPP revealed that the mean age at the time of presentation was 44.05 ± 12.62 years. More than 77% of patients had at least one form of the follicular opening disorder. About 75% of patients had shaft disorders. The most common pattern of pigmentation was milky-red (97.73%). The irregular and ectatic vascular network were seen in 59.09% of patients. Patients with coiled and twisted hairs, small yellow dots, large yellow dots, and peripilar sign were more likely to have shorter disease duration (P < 0.05). Those with overall shaft disorders were younger (P = 0.02). Small yellow dots (P = 0.025) and peripilar sign (P = 0.039) were more common in female patients.

CONCLUSION

Dermoscopy can be a helpful diagnostic tool in differentiating LPP among patients with primary cicatricial alopecia (PCA). Larger cohort studies are recommended to find the role of demographic factors in predicting the dermoscopic patterns among LPP patients.