ATX-101 (Deoxycholic Acid Injection) for Paradoxical Adipose Hyperplasia Secondary to Cryolipolysis

Characteristics and Treatment of Patients Diagnosed With Paradoxical Adipose Hyperplasia After Cryolipolysis: A Case Series and Scoping Review

BACKGROUND

Paradoxical adipose hyperplasia (PAH), a rare side effect of CoolSculpting (cryolipolysis), is characterized by fatty enlargement of the treatment area occurring months after the procedure.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to report a retrospective case series of patients diagnosed with PAH at the authors' institution, increase the collective understanding of this complication and subsequent management, and raise the question of who should ethically perform cryolipolysis.

METHODS

All participants diagnosed with PAH by a plastic surgeon at a large academic medical center were identified. Demographic information, medical history, procedure details, time to PAH diagnosis, and corrective surgical intervention details were collected. Mean duration of time from cryolipolysis treatment to diagnosis of PAH was calculated, along with other descriptive statistics. A scoping review of all PAH literature published in PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science was also conducted.

RESULTS

Four patients diagnosed with PAH after cryolipolysis were identified for inclusion in this study. The calculated incidence of PAH at our center was 0.67%. All patients requested therapy for PAH and subsequently underwent either liposuction, abdominoplasty, or both. The mean duration of in-person follow-up time after final surgical treatment of PAH was 13.8 + 19.8 months (range, 2.8-43.5). Fortunately, no patients showed signs of PAH recurrence, and 3 out of 4 patients did not show signs of residual deformity.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings from this patient cohort and scoping review provide evidence that although revisions may be required, conventional body contouring methods, not in the armamentarium of non-plastic surgeon practitioners, effectively alleviated PAH.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4

Alternative Cosmetic and Medical Applications of Injectable Deoxycholic Acid: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Beyond submental fat reduction, injectable deoxycholic acid (DCA) has gained popularity in recent years for various minimally invasive lipolysis applications.

OBJECTIVE

To summarize and evaluate the evidence of off-label uses of injectable DCA.

METHODS

MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, and CENTRAL were searched. The outcomes measured included applications of DCA, treatment regimen, and its efficacy. An overall success rate for each condition was calculated based on the improvement defined in the included studies.

RESULTS

Eleven studies evaluated the cosmetic use of DCA for excess adipose tissue on various anatomical locations. The outcomes were evaluated at time points ranging from 1 to 21 months post-treatment, with overall success rates over 85%. Eight case reports and series reported the success of using DCA treating lipomas, xanthelasmas, paradoxical adipose hyperplasia, fibrofatty residue of infantile hemangioma, piezogenic pedal papules, and HIV-associated lipohypertrophy. Although the preliminary efficacies were high, the overall recommendations for off-label uses are weak because of the lack of high-level studies.

CONCLUSION

The review emphasizes the diversity of injectable DCA as a minimally invasive technique for lipolysis. Further high-level studies demonstrating consistent treatment regimens and methods of evaluation are warranted to make more definitive recommendations regarding off-label DCA use.

Orbital Hemorrhagic Necrosis, Globe Rupture, and Death From Intraorbital Injection of 1% Sodium Deoxycholate in a Murine Model

PURPOSE

Deoxycholic acid (DCA) 1% is an injectable detergent indicated for submental fat reduction, although clinically it is being injected off-label for orbital fat prolapse. It is known to cause severe inflammation, local nerve dysfunction, and tissue necrosis, all of which could be catastrophic in the orbit and periocular region. This study evaluated the effects of periocular DCA on orbital and ocular adnexal tissues in a murine model.

METHODS

Mice were treated via split-face intraorbital injections, subcutaneous injections, and topical cornea application with DCA versus phosphate-buffered saline. Whole heads were fixed, decalcified, and sectioned for orbital histology after 1-7 days. Matched pairs of human globes and mouse globes were immersed in either phosphate-buffered saline or 1% DCA for 72 hours.

RESULTS

Six of 11 mice receiving intraorbital DCA injections died within minutes. Surviving mice developed severe orbital inflammatory necrosis. All orbits injected with phosphate-buffered saline were clinically and histologically normal. Six mice were treated with lower concentrations of DCA and all developed variable amounts of orbital inflammation, hemorrhage, and globe necrosis. Mice receiving subcutaneous DCA injection to the lower eyelid showed inflammatory necrosis, edema, and lid malposition. Topical application of DCA to mouse corneas caused no external or histologic changes. Human and mouse globes immersed ex vivo in DCA developed corneal edema and cataract formation without observable scleral changes.

CONCLUSION

Intraorbital and periocular injection of DCA can cause devastating complications in a murine model, and significant caution is advised for off-label use in the periocular region.

Adverse Events Associated With Cryolipolysis: A Systematic Review of the Literature

BACKGROUND

Cryolipolysis is a popular procedure for people seeking noninvasive body contouring. As with any novel therapy, it is critical for providers to familiarize themselves with related adverse events (AEs), to provide appropriate information to patients before treatment.

OBJECTIVE

To describe reported complications and AEs associated with cryolipolysis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic review was completed using the PubMed database and following search terms: "cryolipolysis" or "lipocryolysis" or "CoolSculpting." Only randomized clinical trials, prospective cohort studies, retrospective studies, case series, and case reports describing AEs related to cryolipolysis as well as studies written in English were included for review.

RESULTS

Fifty-three articles were included in this review. The most common AEs associated with cryolipolysis were treatment site erythema, numbness/paresthesia, bruising, and edema. More serious complications of cryolipolysis include severe/persistent pain, dysesthesia, skin hyperpigmentation, motor neuropathy, and paradoxical adipose hyperplasia.

CONCLUSION

Cryolipolysis is a safe option for patients seeking noninvasive body contouring. Most reported AEs are minimal and resolve quickly. It is important that physicians are aware of serious, irreversible AEs and are prepared to counsel patients appropriately before treatment.