Systematic Review of Surgical Treatment and Outcomes After Local Surgery of Primary Cutaneous Melanomas of the Penis and Scrotum

Clinicopathological and Molecular Features of Penile Melanoma With a Proposed Staging System

Penile melanomas (PM) are an exceedingly rare subtype of mucosal melanoma (MM), and we reviewed the clinicopathologic features and molecular profile in 8 PMs. The patient ages ranged from 46 to 78 (mean: 62.8) years with involvement on the glans (n=5; 62.5%), penile urethra (n=2; 25%), and foreskin (n=1, 12.5%). Tumor depth ranged from 1.6 to 10.0 (mean: 5.25) mm. Most of the patients underwent partial penectomy (n=6; 75%) and sentinel lymph node (LN) biopsy N=7; 87.5%). Seven patients had metastatic disease at diagnosis, 6 involving LNs and 1 the adrenal gland, and 4 died of disease with a mean follow-up period of 40.5 (2 to 95) months. Five of 7 (71%) cases identified 15 molecular alterations within KIT , CDKN2A , NF1 , PTEN , and APC (n=2 each), and NRAS , MAP3K1 , CDH1 , MSH6 , and TERT (n=1 each). Two cases were not found to harbor genetic aberrations, and 1 case failed testing. In addition, we reviewed the English literature and included 93 cases with a reported depth of invasion and follow-up. A total of 101 PMs were analyzed for prognostic parameters, and the overall survival was significantly worse in patients with LN metastasis (P=0.0008), distant metastasis (P=0.0016), and greater depth of invasion (P=0.0222) based upon T-stage. While T4 conferred substantially worse survival, the delineation of the survival curves between T2 and T3 was less clear, and combining T2+T3 disease had a strong prognostic impact ( P =0.0024). Prognostic parameters used in the staging of cutaneous melanomas may also be used in PMs. An alternative staging system expanding the inclusion criteria for T2 might provide a more accurate prognostic stratification.

Genitourinary melanoma: An overview for the clinician

Genitourinary (GU) melanoma is a rare presentation of melanoma accounting for approximately 0.5% of all melanomas. GU melanomas include primary melanomas of the vulva, vagina, uterine cervix, ovary, penis, scrotum, urethra, bladder, ureter, and kidney. These melanomas are often diagnosed in advanced stages and stigma is thought to contribute to delays in presentation. As the likely diagnosing provider, it is imperative that dermatologists, urologists, and gynecologists are aware of these uncommon sites of presentation. While there have been major advances in the treatment of melanomas as a whole in the last 10 years, their applications to GU melanomas have often been overlooked. GU melanomas have not been included in many of the major phase III clinical trials which brought contemporary advanced treatments to market and the prognoses for GU melanomas remain poor. Due to the rarity of GU melanomas, much of the literature provides generalized recommendations across multiple different organs affected by GU melanomas or omits certain topics, making it difficult to appreciate the fundamentals of the individual presentations. This review aimed to provide background information on the pathogenesis and epidemiology of the different sites of GU melanomas and categorize data specific to the presentation, staging, treatment, and prognosis of each type of GU melanoma to guide the clinician. It was also meant to encourage a multidisciplinary approach to the management of these patients as it spans the expertise of surgical oncologists, medical oncologists, radiation oncologist, dermatologists, urologists, and gynecologists.

Compounding Benefits of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy for Perineal Melanoma: A Population-Based Retrospective Cohort Analysis

INTRODUCTION

Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in the treatment of melanoma is known to provide valuable prognostic information. However, there is no literature describing an overall or disease-specific survival (DDS) benefit of SLNB. In the perineum, melanoma is often more advanced at presentation with current treatment guidelines translated from nonanatomic specific melanoma. As a result, there is little understanding surrounding the role of SLNB in melanoma of the perineum. Our objective is to better understand the therapeutic benefits of SLNB in perineal melanoma.

METHODS

The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program is a large population-based cancer registry including survival data from millions of patients in the United States. The registry was used to generate patient data for analysis from 2004 to 2016. Inclusion criteria included melanoma of the perineum; Breslow depth of 0.80 mm or greater and less than 0.80 mm with ulceration; SLNB or no intervention; clinically negative nodal disease; and available overall survival data.

RESULTS

For 879 patients from 2004 to 2016 with perineal melanoma, significant predictors of reduced survival include older than 75 years, Clark level IV-V, Breslow depth of greater than 4.00 mm, positive ulceration status, regional and distant nodal micrometastases, and clinically positive nodes on presentation. Aggregates for overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) were improved with implementation of SLNB. The 5-year survival rates with SLNB versus no SLNB were 54.0% and 43.0% for OS (P = 0.001) and 57.8% and 53.1% for DSS (P = 0.044). Stratification by Breslow depth yielded significant OS and DSS advantage for greater than 1.00 to 2.00 mm (21.3% benefit, P =0.021, and 16.8% benefit, P = 0.044) and greater than 4.00 mm (30.3% benefit, P = 0.005, and 21.0% benefit, P = 0.007) Breslow depths.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Sentinel lymph node biopsy may provide therapeutic benefits in addition to prognostic information for melanoma of the perineum through an increase in 5-year OS.

Cutaneous and Mucosal Melanomas of Uncommon Sites: Where Do We Stand Now?

Melanomas arising at uncommon sites include a group of lesions related to unusual localizations in specific ethnic groups. The rarity of the disease often represents a limit to the participation of patients in specific trials. However, this peculiar genetic scenario has important therapeutic implications regarding new oncologic therapies. The aim of this article is to review the clinical features, somatic alterations and therapeutic options for melanomas of uncommon sites. They can be classified as cutaneous and mucosal lesions affecting the nail apparatus, palms/soles, oral mucosa, genital area and scalp. The prognosis may be worse compared to melanomas of other districts, and a prompt diagnosis may dramatically influence the outcome. Dermatologists and oncologists should therefore distinguish this melanoma subgroup in terms of surgical intervention and medical treatment. Due to the lack of mutations in genes usually found in cutaneous melanomas, the discovery of novel targets is required to develop new strategies and to change the prognosis of non-responders or wild-type patients.