Underappreciated Utility of the Purse-String Suture in Head and Neck Skin Cancer Defect Reconstruction

Practice Patterns and Outcomes of Skin Cancer Reconstruction of the Head, Neck, and Face by Surgical Specialty: An NSQIP Analysis

INTRODUCTION

Reconstructive procedures of the head, neck, and face after skin cancer resection are typically performed by surgeons trained in either ENT facial plastic surgery or plastic and reconstructive surgery. We analyzed a large national database to compare patient populations, practice, and outcomes of skin cancer reconstruction of the head, neck, and face performed by these 2 surgical specialties.

METHODS

Cases were selected from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Variables that differed significantly on univariate analysis were included in a nominal logistic regression, with having at least 1 wound-specific complication, medical complication, or unplanned reoperation within 30 days as the dependent variables.

RESULTS

There were a total of 2850 cases, of which 61.36% were performed by ENT. Surgical specialty was not found to be a predictor of wound complications, medical complications, or unplanned reoperations. On multivariate analysis, operative times greater than 6 hours and anatomical location (specifically, skin cancer of the nose) predicted adverse outcomes. Significant differences were observed between the patient populations of the 2 specialties in terms of demographics, comorbidities, and the anatomical location of the cancer defect.

CONCLUSION

Reconstruction of the head, neck, and face after skin cancer removal represents an important and common element in the scope of practice of both ENT facial plastic surgeons and plastic surgeons. No evidence was found to suggest that surgical specialty is associated with adverse postoperative outcomes. However, ENT facial plastic surgeons and plastic surgeons seem to manage unique patient populations and use different reconstructive techniques, reflecting their distinct training and areas of expertise. A multidisciplinary approach where the complementary skills of both specialties can be leveraged may optimize patient outcomes.

Various Applications of Purse-String Suture and Its Cosmetic Outcome in Cutaneous Surgical Defects

BACKGROUND

Purse-string suture is a simple technique to reduce wound size and to achieve complete or partial closure of skin defects.

OBJECTIVE

To classify situations in which purse-string sutures can be utilized and to assess the long-term size reduction and cosmetic outcome of the final scar.

METHODS

Patients (93 from Severance hospital and 12 from Gangnam Severance hospital) in whom purse-string sutures were used between January 2015 and December 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Wound site, final reconstruction method, repair duration, final wound size, and Vancouver scar scale were assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 105 patients were reviewed. Lesions were located on the trunk (48 [45.7%]), limbs (32 [30.5%]), and face (25 [23.8%]). Mean ratio of wound length/primary defect length was 0.79±0.30. Multilayered purse-string suture showed the shortest duration from excision to final repair (p<0.001) and most effectively minimized the scar size (scar to defect size ratio 0.67±0.23, p=0.002). The average Vancouver scar scale measured at the latest follow-up visit at least 6 months postoperatively was 1.62, and the risk of hypertrophic scarring was 8.6%. There was no significant difference in the Vancouver scar scale and the risk of hypertrophic scarring between the different surgical method groups.

CONCLUSION

Purse-string sutures can be utilized in many stages of reconstruction to effectively reduce scar size without compromising the final cosmetic outcome.

Purse-string suture versus full-thickness skin graft: An efficacy and safety comparison study

Purse-string suture (PSS) and full-thickness skin graft (FTSG) are two different approaches to the closure of circular skin defects. In this study, we compare the feasibility and the aesthetic outcome of these two techniques in high operatory risk non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC) patients. We performed a retrospective study on 65 patients, treated with PSS or FTSG, and evaluated after a minimum follow-up of 6 months. The post-surgery assessment was based on the Vancouver scar scale (VSS) and differences in terms of defect areas, operative and healing times were performed both with parametric and nonparametric tests. Operative times in PSS were significantly lower than those needed for FTSG, without perioperative adverse events; PSS required a waiting time before removing the suture greater than FTSG. After surgery, PSS resulted in a median defect area reduction of 73%. No significant differences were found in the median value for VSS in the two groups. Based on our clinical experience, the PSS advantages in terms of feasibility, rapidity of execution, and mean defect area reduction were confirmed. So, this technique seems to be appropriate for fragile patients affected by NMSC, that cannot hold long surgical sessions.