Comparison of Mohs Surgery and Surgical Excision in the Treatment of Localized Sebaceous Carcinoma

Characteristics of Hispanic patients with nonmelanoma skin cancer undergoing Mohs micrographic surgery: a review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Nonmelanoma skin cancer (NMSC) is the most common cancer worldwide and is frequently treated with Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS); however, data regarding characteristics of Hispanic patients undergoing MMS for NMSC are limited.

OBJECTIVE

To review the characteristics of Hispanic patients undergoing MMS for NMSC in the United States.

METHODS

A systematic review of PubMed articles from inception through September 2022 providing data for Hispanic patients undergoing MMS for NMSC was completed.

RESULTS

Overall, six publications met inclusion criteria and provided data for 2,856 Hispanic patients that underwent MMS for 2,955 NMSCs. Results demonstrate 60% of Hispanic patients were male, and the majority of NMSCs were basal cell carcinoma (BCC) (71%), followed by squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) (21%). Additionally, a larger percentage of pigmented BCC was found in the Hispanic population. While there is conflicting data in the literature, Hispanic patients may also have larger MMS defects when controlled for additional variables. Finally, over 64% of NMSCs in Hispanic patients were in high-risk locations.

CONCLUSION

Literature regarding the characteristics of Hispanic patients undergoing MMS for NMSC demonstrates most patients were male, BCC was the most common tumor subtype, and the majority of NMSCs were in high-risk locations.

Clinical Features and Prognosis of Young and Middle-Aged Adults With Skin Sebaceous Adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Sebaceous adenocarcinoma (SAC) mostly occurs in the elderly, and SAC in young and middle-aged population is inadequately investigated.

OBJECTIVE

To explore the clinical features and prognosis of young and middle-aged adults with SAC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with skin SAC between ages 18 and 59 years from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (1975-2016) were eligible for this study.

RESULTS

Seven hundred thirty-nine cases were identified. The proportion of extraocular SAC in the nonelderly increased from 1975-2005 to 2006-2016 ( p = .001), male predominance was observed in overall patients whereas female predominance in Asian population, and young patients had more head and neck SAC than middle-aged patients ( p = .014). The prognosis of young patients was better than middle-aged patients ( p = .004). Other independent prognostic factors included sex, marital status, tumor size, surgery, chemotherapy, and multiple primary cancer history.

CONCLUSION

An increasing proportion of extraocular SAC was observed in young and middle-aged patients, and the young developed more head and neck SAC than the middle-aged. Female predominance was found in Asian population, and female patients had better prognosis. Younger age and married status indicated better prognosis, and around 20% of young and middle-aged patients might have poorer survival because of Muir-Torre syndrome.

Localized sebaceous carcinoma treatment: Wide local excision verses Mohs micrographic surgery

The optimal surgical management of sebaceous carcinoma (SC) has yet to be determined between Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) and wide local excision (WLE). To investigate overall survival (OS) differences for SC undergoing WLE or MMS, The National Cancer Database (NCDB) was queried for all SC from 2004 to 2015 (n = 2863). Cases missing staging data, undergoing palliative care, showing lymph node extension, or of AJCC Stage III/IV were omitted. Chi-squared tests were used to analyze patient demographics, cancer characteristics, and treatment modalities. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards regression modeling analyzed OS outcomes. A total of 554 cases met inclusion criteria (WLE [n = 243], MMS [n = 311]). Multivariate analysis revealed that cases treated in academic facilities (ref: non-acad; OR = 2.273; CI95% [1.448-3.568]; P < .001] were independently associated with greater MMS rates, whereas those with primaries on the trunk (ref: head/neck OR = 0.359; CI95%[0.203-0.634]; P < .001) and extremities (ref: head/neck OR = 0.399; CI95% [0.182-0.877]; P = .022) held lower MMS rates. Between surgical modalities, Kaplan-Meier survival showed no significant difference in outcomes (P = .611), with WLE and MMS demonstrating 5-year OS rates of 65.8% and 61.4%, respectively. On Cox proportional hazard regression, the survival outcomes of MMS and WLE did not show any significant differences in OS (HR = 0.832; CI95% [0.996-3.662]; P = .334). MMS and WLE of localized SC demonstrate similar overall survival outcomes. MMS may be preferred for margin control, tissue conservation, and cosmesis.