Smartphones in Dermatology: Acceptance of Smartphone Photography by the Informed Patient

Improving Medical Photography in a Level 1 Trauma Center by Implementing a Specialized Smartphone-Based App in Comparison to the Usage of Digital Cameras: Prospective Panel Study

BACKGROUND

Medical photography plays a pivotal role in modern health care, serving multiple purposes ranging from patient care to medical documentation and education. Specifically, it aids in wound management, surgical planning, and medical training. While digital cameras have traditionally been used, smartphones equipped with specialized apps present an intriguing alternative. Smartphones offer several advantages, including increased usability and efficiency and the capability to uphold medicolegal standards more effectively and consistently.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to assess whether implementing a specialized smartphone app could lead to more frequent and efficient use of medical photography.

METHODS

We carried out this study as a comprehensive single-center panel investigation at a level 1 trauma center, encompassing various settings including the emergency department, operating theaters, and surgical wards, over a 6-month period from June to November 2020. Using weekly questionnaires, health care providers were asked about their experiences and preferences with using both digital cameras and smartphones equipped with a specialized medical photography app. Parameters such as the frequency of use, time taken for image upload, and general usability were assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 65 questionnaires were assessed for digital camera use and 68 for smartphone use. Usage increased significantly by 5.4 (SD 1.9) times per week (95% CI 1.7-9.2; P=.005) when the smartphone was used. The time it took to upload pictures to the clinical picture and archiving system was significantly shorter for the app (mean 1.8, SD 1.2 min) than for the camera (mean 14.9, SD 24.0 h; P<.001). Smartphone usage also outperformed the digital camera in terms of technical failure (4.4% vs 9.7%; P=.04) and for the technical process of archiving (P<.001) pictures to the picture archiving and communication system (PACS) and display images (P<.001) from it. No difference was found in regard to the photographer's intent (P=.31) or reasoning (P=.94) behind the pictures. Additionally, the study highlighted that potential concerns regarding data security and patient confidentiality were also better addressed through the smartphone app, given its encryption capabilities and password protection.

CONCLUSIONS

Specialized smartphone apps provide a secure, rapid, and user-friendly platform for medical photography, showing significant advantages over traditional digital cameras. This study supports the notion that these apps not only have the potential to improve patient care, particularly in the realm of wound management, but also offer substantial medicolegal and economic benefits. Future research should focus on additional aspects such as patient comfort and preference, image resolution, and the quality of photographs, as well as seek to corroborate these findings through a larger sample size.

Digital photography in the evaluation and management of female patients with congenital adrenal hyperplasia: A standardized protocol for quality improvement

INTRODUCTION

Digital photography can be securely stored in the medical record and enhance documentation of physical exam findings and monitor wound healing. A standardized protocol that respects the dignity of the patient and maintains the fidelity of objective documentation is needed for patients with differences in sexual development (DSD) and congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH).

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, and applications of a HIPAA-compliant digital photography protocol in the care of female patients with CAH.

STUDY DESIGN

A protocol for standardized digital imaging including consent, permission, data capture, and storage in the electronic medical record (EMR) was implemented. Patients undergoing physical examination during multidisciplinary CAH clinic visits, preoperative evaluation, and postoperative follow-up from October 2020 through May 2021 were included. Male patients with CAH, patients with clitoromegaly or urogenital sinus not from CAH, and patients seen through telehealth were excluded. Consent was obtained from caregivers and permission from patients. Images of the exam were taken during clinic visits or at the time of surgery with no identifying features included. Images were directly uploaded into the patient's chart in the HIPAA-protected EMR separate from other clinical documentation and not stored on personal devices.

RESULTS

There were 17 patients with CAH seen with median age 6 years (range 2 weeks-18 years). There was a median of 3 photos per patient during the study period with cooperation from both the patient and their caregiver. Amongst the patients seen, 6 patients underwent reconstruction with a median of 10 photos per patient. Images were available and used for preoperative planning and counseling. Patients with previous images did not require repeat examinations and were subjected to fewer genital examinations. Fewer providers were present during exams. Images taken by providers and caregivers during the postoperative period were used to monitor wound healing and surgical outcomes.

DISCUSSION

Protocol implementation improved patient care by reducing the number of exams and number of providers present, enhancing clinical documentation, and providing a means of tracking the physical exam over time. This was in concordance with guidelines for limiting exams for patients with DSD and CAH. Implementation of best practices for medical photography was important in respecting patient dignity and confidentiality.

CONCLUSION

Implementation of standardized digital photography was feasible and acceptable to patients and caregivers. Digital images reduced the need for repeat physical examination and provided a visual means of enhancing clinical documentation.

Usefulness of Smartphones in Dermatology: A US-Based Review

(1) Background: As smartphones have become more widely used, they have become an appealing tool for health-related functions. For dermatology alone, hundreds of applications (apps) are available to download for both patients and providers. (2) Methods: The Google Play Store and Apple App Store were searched from the United States using dermatology-related terms. Apps were categorized based on description, and the number of reviews, download cost, target audience, and use of AI were recorded. The top apps from each category by number of reviews were reported. Additionally, literature on the benefits and limitations of using smartphones for dermatology were reviewed. (3) Results: A total of 632 apps were included in the study: 395 (62.5%) were marketed towards patients, 203 (32.1%) towards providers, and 34 (5.4%) towards both; 265 (41.9%) were available only on the Google Play Store, 146 (23.1%) only on the Apple App Store, and 221 (35.0%) were available on both; and 595 (94.1%) were free to download and 37 (5.9%) had a cost to download, ranging from USD 0.99 to USD 349.99 (median USD 37.49). A total of 99 apps (15.7%) reported the use of artificial intelligence. (4) Conclusions: Although there are many benefits of using smartphones for dermatology, lack of regulation and high-quality evidence supporting the efficacy and accuracy of apps hinders their potential.

Patient Perceptions of Dermatologic Photography: Scoping Review

BACKGROUND

Medical photography is used extensively in dermatology to record disease progression, measure treatment response, and help teach patients about skin disease; such photos are also commonly utilized in teledermatology, medical education, research, and medical reference websites. Understanding patient perceptions of medical photographs obtained during dermatologic care in the clinic or hospital setting is critical to enable the delivery of high-quality, patient-centered medical care.

OBJECTIVE

The aims of this study were to elucidate patient perceptions of skin photos in dermatology and to explore possible next steps in improving the patient experience with medical photography in the hospital or clinic setting.

METHODS

A scoping review of the literature was performed using the PubMed database, with clinic- or hospital-based full-text publications in English spanning the last 10 years considered for inclusion.

RESULTS

The majority of included studies (10/11, 91%) found positive patient attitudes toward medical photographs. The majority of patients (1197/1511, 79.2%) felt that medical photographs could improve medical care in the clinic setting. Written consent detailing all photo uses, including secondary uses (such as research or teaching), was preferred, apart from in 1 study. Patients preferred or found it acceptable for the photographer of their medical photos to be a physician (1301/1444, 90.1%). Clinic-owned cameras with departmental record storage were the preferred modality. Latinx and African American patients expressed less trust in the utility of medical photographs to improve care, compared with Asian and White patients. The minimal number of available publications on this topic and the inclusion of articles older than 5 years are limitations, since patient perceptions of medical photography may have rapidly changed during this time span, particularly in light of the COVID-19 pandemic and the subsequent increase in teledermatology visits.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients reported positive perceptions of dermatologic photography for improving their medical care. Ethnic disparities in patient perceptions require further exploration to better elucidate nuances and develop interventions to improve the experience of marginalized patients. Building patient trust in nonphysician photographers may enhance clinic efficiency. Although clinic-owned cameras are well-accepted by patients, improved patient education surrounding the safety of electronic medical record phone applications is needed.

Experiences of Health Care Providers Using a Mobile Medical Photography Application

OBJECTIVE

To understand the ways in which providers use a mobile photography application integrated with the electronic health record (EHR) to facilitate clinical care, and the process outcomes that result from the application's use.

METHODS

An e-mail survey was sent on November 13, 2017, to 1,463 health care providers at Mayo Clinic who had used an internally developed, EHR-integrated medical photography application.

RESULTS

The survey was completed by 712 (49%) providers. Providers reported using the application on approximately 1 in 7 days spent in clinical practice. Median provider satisfaction with the use of the application (0-100 scale; higher numbers indicate favorable response) was 94 (interquartile range [IQR]: 74-100). Although the use for store-and-forward telemedicine was reported (22% often or frequently used the application to send photographs to a specialist for advice), the most common use was for clinical documentation (65% often or frequently used the application to supplement text-based notes with photographs, and 71% often or frequently used the application to take photographs for reference by a colleague who may see the patient in the future). Of the health care providers, 36% indicated that the application's use often or frequently expedited treatment.

DISCUSSION

Health care providers reported using a mobile point-of-care medical photography application regularly in clinical practice and were generally satisfied with the application.

CONCLUSION

Point-of-care medical photography using a secure mobile, EHR-integrated application has potential to become a new standard of care for clinical documentation and may facilitate continuity across the continuum of care with multiple providers who see a patient.

Use of an EHR-Integrated Point-of-Care Mobile Medical Photography Application in a Pediatric Emergency Department

BACKGROUND

Mobile applications allow health care providers to capture point-of-care medical photographs and transfer them to the electronic health record (EHR). It is unclear how providers use these photographs or how they affect clinical care.

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to understand the content, purpose, and outcomes of point-of-care medical photography performed in the pediatric emergency department (ED) at large academic medical center.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was conducted of patients <21 years of age who were seen in the ED and photographed between March 29, 2015 and July 1, 2017 using a secure smartphone application integrated with the EHR. Inter-rater agreement and reliability between the two reviewers was assessed for the first 50 charts, and any discrepancies in interpretation were resolved before proceeding with the remaining data abstraction. The documented rationale for photography, content of photographs, and outcomes were recorded.

RESULTS

We identified 619 clinical encounters involving photographs of 605 patients who were eligible for inclusion. Skin was photographed in 499 (81%). The most common finding was rash (N = 177; 29%). Photos were of acceptable quality, with 569 (94%) achieving a score between 4 and 5 out of 5. The primary use of photography was documentation (N = 334; 54%), though teleconsultation was noted in 38 (6%). Nearly one-third (N = 187; 30%) of patients were seen in the ED or outpatient clinic for any reason within 2 weeks, and in 25 (13%), clinical notes explicitly referenced the initial photograph(s). In 53 (9%) cases, patients were photographed at a clinical visit in the subsequent 2 weeks, suggesting that photography was used to track changes over time.

CONCLUSION

Documentation of findings using mobile point-of-care photography allows for high-fidelity documentation and facilitates continuity of care.