1550-nm Nonablative Fractional Laser Versus 10,600-nm Ablative Fractional Laser in the Treatment of Surgical and Traumatic Scars: A Comparison Study on Efficacy and Treatment Regimen

Keloid and Hypertrophic Scars Treatment

BACKGROUND

Hypertrophic scars are contained within the site of injury and may regress over time, while keloids spread beyond the borders of the initial injury and do not regress. On histologic examination, hypertrophic scars tend to have collagen in a wavy, regular pattern, whereas keloids have no distinct pattern of collagen.

OBJECTIVE

To retrospectively analyze improvement in keloid and hypertrophic scars characteristics following treatment with Ablative 10600 nm and a non-Ablative 1570 nm Hybrid Laser Device.

METHODS

Treatment parameters with the ProScan Hybrid Mode were 40 W/1.3-1.5 ms for the CO2 and 12 W/4 ms for the 1570 nm in a 1:1 ratio. Outcomes were assessed based on physician scar grading as measured by the Vancouver Scar Scale and patient-reported satisfaction. Excel was used for data analysis, and a p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Adverse events and patient pain were also recorded.

RESULTS

A total of 31 hypertrophic scars and 30 keloid scars were treated. There was a significant reduction in Vancouver Scar Scale scores for both hypertrophic and keloid scars (62% ± 8% and 58% ± 7%; p = 2.6E-17 and p = 8.29E-26, respectively). In a scar-based comparison, a statistically significant difference was observed for all measures reflecting favorable outcomes for hypertrophic scars (VSS, p = 1.1E-05; satisfaction, p = 0.0112; pain, p = 0.00081). Only one adverse event was reported, a superficial burn treated with topical antibiotics.

CONCLUSIONS

The device was found to be safe and effective, with promising results for the treatment of hypertrophic and keloid scars.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE II

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

The Measure of a Scar: Patient Perceptions and Scar Optimization after Skin Cancer Reconstruction

In facial reconstruction after skin cancer resection, management and optimization of postoperative scar is a complex paradigm. Every scar is unique and presents a different challenge-whether due to anatomic, aesthetic, or patient-specific factors. This necessitates a comprehensive evaluation and an understanding of the tools at hand to improve its appearance. How a scar looks is meaningful to patients, and the facial plastic and reconstructive surgeon is tasked with its optimization. Clear documentation of a scar is critical to assess and determine optimal care. Scar scales such as the Vancouver Scar Scale, the Manchester Scar Scale, the Patient and Observer Assessment Scale, the Scar Cosmesis Assessment and Rating "SCAR" Scale, and FACE-Q, among others, are reviewed here in the context of evaluating postoperative or traumatic scar. Measurement tools objectively describe a scar and may also incorporate the patient's assessment of their own scar. In addition to physical exam, these scales quantify scars that are symptomatic or visually unpleasant and would be best served by adjuvant treatment. The current literature regarding the role of postoperative laser treatment is also reviewed. While lasers are an excellent tool to assist in blending of scar and decreasing pigmentation, studies have failed to evaluate laser in a consistent, standardized way that allows for quantifiable and predictable improvement. Regardless, patients may derive benefit from laser treatment given the finding of subjective improvement in their own perception of scar, even when there is not a significant change to the clinician's eye. This article also discusses recent eye fixation studies which demonstrate the importance of careful repair of large and central defects of the face, and that patients value the quality of the reconstruction.

Efficacy and safety of fractional 1064-nm picosecond laser for atrophic traumatic and surgical scars: A randomized, single-blinded, split-scar-controlled study

OBJECTIVE

A fractional 1064-nm picosecond laser is an efficient and safe treatment for atrophic acne scars. However, evidence of using a picosecond laser for atrophic posttraumatic and surgical scar therapy is lacking. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of using a 1064-nm picosecond laser with a microlens array (MLA) for the treatment of atrophic posttraumatic and surgical scars.

METHODS

This was a prospective, intraindividual, single-blinded, randomized split-lesion-controlled trial. Twenty-five subjects with atrophic traumatic or surgical scars that existed for more than 1 year were enrolled. All atrophic scars were divided at the midline into two halves and randomly assigned to a treatment or control side. The treatment group was treated with a 1064-nm picosecond laser with an MLA handpiece (spot size: 6-8 mm, fluence: 1.0-1.2 J/cm² , repetition rate: 5 Hz, three passes) for 3 monthly sessions. The scar volumes were objectively measured using a three-dimensional (3D) photograph at baseline, 1 month after the first and second treatments, and 3 and 6 months after the final treatment. Subjective assessments were conducted by a blinded dermatologist and patients' self-assessment to evaluate improvements at 3 months after the final treatment.

RESULTS

The treated sides exhibited a significant volume reduction, with statistically significant improvements over the control group at 1 month after the first and second treatments and at 3 months after the final treatment (p = 0.024, 0.005, and 0.019, respectively). At 3 months after the final treatment, a blinded dermatologist correctly identified the treated side in 24 of 25 patients (96%). The patients rated the improvements as excellent (>75%) and marked (50%-75%) in 36% and 48% of patients, respectively.

CONCLUSION

At 3 months, the 1064-nm picosecond laser with a fractionated MLA can significantly reduce the posttraumatic and postsurgical atrophic scar volume in patients with Fitzpatrick skin types III-V. Insufficient data preclude inferences regarding efficacy at 6 months.

Effects of multiple modes of UltraPulse fractional CO2 laser treatment on extensive scarring: a retrospective study

The main therapeutic options for extensive scarring (e.g., > 20% of the total body surface area, or TBSA) after burns and trauma have focused on conservative treatments, such as compression, moisturization, and topical agent application. However, these treatments may not achieve optimal effects due to the large size and complexity of the scars. UltraPulse fractional CO₂ laser treatment is a novel approach that is currently a subject of intense interest; this treatment is most widely used to improve texture, pliability, and pigmentation in all types of scars. However, no studies on the independent use of UltraPulse fractional CO₂ laser treatment for extensive scars have been reported. This retrospective study evaluated a total of 21 patients, whose scars covered 20 to 65% TBSA. Scar thickness was measured by ultrasonography before treatment. Personalized treatment modalities and parameters were set according to the scar type and thickness. Scar formation and treatment effects were evaluated by photography, the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS), and patients’ judgment of effectiveness. Where the scars covered joints, joint function was assessed by measuring the maximum range of motion (ROM). With laser therapy, scars became flatter and lighter; furthermore, pruritus, pain, and discomfort decreased significantly. POSAS scores significantly decreased after laser therapy, including the item scores for pain and pruritus. There were no instances of joint contracture, ROM reduction, apparent functional impairment, serious adverse events, or comorbidities. This study demonstrates the safety and efficiency of UltraPulse fractional CO₂ laser treatment for extensive scarring.