Invasive Melanoma and Melanoma in Situ Treated With Modified Mohs Micrographic Surgery With En Face Permanent Sectioning: A 10-Year Retrospective Review

Intraoperative Immunohistochemistry During Mohs Micrographic Surgery and Staged Excision Decreases Local Recurrence Rates for Invasive Cutaneous Melanoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) is increasingly used to treat cutaneous melanoma. However, it is unclear whether intraoperative immunohistochemistry (IHC) improves surgical outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether intraoperative IHC during MMS and staged excision is associated with a decreased risk of poor surgical outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Search of 6 databases identified comparative and noncomparative studies that reported local recurrence after MMS or staged excision with or without IHC for melanoma. Random-effects meta-analysis was used to estimate pooled local recurrence rates, nodal recurrence, distant recurrence, and disease-specific mortality.

RESULTS

Overall, 57 studies representing 12,043 patients with cutaneous melanoma and 12,590 tumors met inclusion criteria. Combined MMS and staged excision with IHC was associated with decreased local recurrence in patients with invasive melanoma (0.3%, 95% CI: 0-0.6) versus hematoxylin and eosin alone (1.8%, 95% CI: 0.8%-2.8%) [ p < .001]. Secondary outcomes including nodal recurrence, distant recurrence, and disease-specific mortality were not significantly different between these 2 groups. Study heterogeneity was moderately-high.

CONCLUSION

Local recurrence of invasive melanoma is significantly lower after MMS and staged excision with IHC as opposed to without IHC. These findings suggest that the use of intraoperative IHC during MMS or staged excision should strongly be considered, particularly for invasive melanoma.Trial Registration PROSPERO Identifier: CRD42023435630.

Mohs Micrographic Surgery for Invasive Melanoma Allows for Tissue Preservation Compared With Wide Local Excision: A Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

While increasing evidence supports the safety and effectiveness of immunohistochemistry-assisted Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) for superficially invasive melanoma, there is a paucity of the literature investigating its effect on final defect size.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the tissue sparing effect of MMS for melanoma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Three hundred and twenty-eight patients with early-stage (T1a/T1b) cutaneous melanomas treated with MMS from January 2008 to December 2018 were evaluated. Measured defect sizes after Mohs tumor extirpation were compared with anticipated defect size that would result from standard-margin wide local excision (WLE). Average actual versus anticipated defect areas were compared using a paired t-test (95% confidence intervals).

RESULTS

The following groups demonstrated a significantly smaller defect area for MMS-treated tumors when compared with anticipated standard-margin WLE defect: All tumors combined (13.8 cm2 vs 10.4 cm2, p < .001), tumors requiring 1 stage (13.6 cm2 vs 10.1 cm2,p < .001), and tumors requiring 2 stages (13.2 cm2 vs 10.5 cm2, p = .004). The majority of patients (83.5%, n = 274) achieved clear margins with 1 stage.

CONCLUSION

Immunohistochemistry-assisted MMS for early-stage invasive melanoma is associated with smaller final defect size and overall tissue sparing effect compared with standard WLE margins.

Mohs Micrographic Surgery With Immunohistochemistry for the Treatment of Periocular Melanoma In Situ

PURPOSE

Mohs micrographic surgery with immunohistochemistry allows for same-day comprehensive margin assessment of melanoma in situ prior to subspecialty reconstruction. This study describes the oncologic and reconstructive outcomes of eyelid and periorbital melanoma in situ and identifies risk factors for complex reconstructive demands.

METHODS

Retrospective case series of all patients treated with Mohs micrographic surgery with immunohistochemistry for melanoma in situ affecting the eyelids or periorbital region from 2008 to 2018 at a single institution. Tumors were assigned to the eyelid group if the clinically visible tumor involved the skin inside the orbital rim. Reconstructive variables were compared between the eyelid and periorbital cohorts.

RESULTS

There were 24 eyelid and 141 periorbital tumors included. The initial surgical margin for all tumors was 5.34 ± 1.54 mm and multiple Mohs stages were required in 24.2% of cases. Eyelid tumors included more recurrences (p = 0.003), and the average defect size was larger (14.0 ± 13.3 cm2 vs. 7.7 ± 5.4 cm2, p = 0.03). Risk factors for complex reconstruction included: initial tumor diameter >2 cm (odds ratio [OR]: 3.84, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.95-7.57) and eyelid involved by initial tumor (OR: 4.88, 95% CI: 1.94-12.28). At an average follow-up of 4.8 years, there were no melanoma-related deaths and 1 local recurrence (0.6% recurrence rate).

CONCLUSIONS

Mohs micrographic surgery with immunohistochemistry achieves excellent local control rates for periocular melanoma in situ. An initial surgical margin of 5 mm is frequently insufficient to achieve clear margins. The resulting defects are large, and the complexity of reconstruction can be predicted by tumor size and clinical involvement of eyelid skin.

Comparative Analysis of Slow Mohs Surgery in Melanoma and Mohs Micrographic Surgery in Squamous Cell Carcinoma and Basal Cell Carcinoma

Skin cancer is one of the most common types of cancer worldwide, and it can affect people of all ages, races, and genders. Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS), a specialized type of skin cancer surgery, boasts the highest cure rates for various types of skin malignancies. Slow Mohs surgery (SMS) is a methodical and meticulous approach to MMS that involves careful and deliberate examination of tissue samples to ensure the complete removal of skin cancer while preserving as much healthy tissue as possible. Both SMS and MMS have been indicated to be effective treatment options for skin cancer, depending on the type and stage of cancer. This case-control study analysis compares the efficacy of SMS for melanoma with that of MMS for squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and basal cell carcinoma (BCC). We analyzed data from the past two decades to assess recurrence rates and treatment-related complications. Our findings suggest that SMS for melanoma achieves comparable outcomes to MMS in SCC and BCC. Both approaches demonstrated similar cure rates and complication profiles. However, further prospective studies are necessary to solidify these findings and refine the specific role of SMS in melanoma therapy.

An Update and Review of Clinical Outcomes Using Immunohistochemical Stains in Mohs Micrographic Surgery for Melanoma

BACKGROUND

Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) provides optimal margin control through complete peripheral and deep margin assessment. The treatment of melanoma using MMS has historically been limited by difficulty in interpreting melanocytes using frozen sections. Immunohistochemical (IHC) staining, a technique whereby chromogen-tagged antibodies are used to detect antigens of interest, has revolutionized the surgical treatment of melanoma.

OBJECTIVES

This article provides an update and literature review of current IHC stains used in MMS for melanoma, their sensitivities and specificities, and clinical outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A PubMed search was performed using keywords including "immunohistochemistry," "staining," and "Mohs surgery." Articles related to the use of IHC staining for the treatment of melanoma with MMS were included.

RESULTS

Six IHC stains met the criteria for the review including melanoma antigen recognized by T cells (MART-1), SRY-related HMG-box (SOX10), microphthalmia-associated transcription factor, HMB-45, MEL-5, S-100, and preferentially expressed antigen in melanoma.

CONCLUSION

The adaptation of IHC methods to frozen sections has enabled MMS to become a preferred treatment option for melanoma in special-site areas. Future studies are needed to standardize IHC techniques and to define best practices when using frozen section in the treatment of melanoma.

Understanding melanoma in situ: Lentigo maligna surgical treatment terminology and guideline adherence, a targeted review

BACKGROUND

Malignant melanoma in-situ, lentigo maligna (MMIS-LM) can be successfully treated with several different surgical techniques; however, the literature is inconsistent in defining them.

OBJECTIVE

To comprehensively define and describe the national guideline recommended surgical techniques used to treat MMIS-LM to help clarify and standardize this terminology to ensure compliance with the guidelines.

METHODS

A targeted literature review was performed from 1990 to 2022 focusing on articles that discussed the national guideline recommended surgical techniques of wide local excision, Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS), modified Mohs surgery, and staged excision/Slow-Mohs for MMIS-LM, as well as the related methods of tissue processing. National Comprehensive Cancer Network and American Academy of Dermatology guidelines were reviewed to identify how the techniques need to be employed to be compliant with guideline recommendations.

RESULTS

We describe the various surgical and tissue processing techniques and discuss advantages and disadvantages of each.

LIMITATIONS

This paper was styled as a narrative review defining and clarifying terminology and technique and does not investigate these topics more broadly.

CONCLUSION

Understanding the methodology and terminology for these surgical procedures and tissue processing methods is critical so that both general dermatologists and surgeons can employ these techniques effectively for optimal patient care.

Permanent section margin concordance after Mohs micrographic surgery with immunohistochemistry for invasive melanoma and melanoma in situ: A retrospective dual-center analysis

BACKGROUND

Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) for melanoma practices vary among dermatologic surgeons. The implementation of immunohistochemical staining in MMS for melanoma mitigates challenges associated with slide interpretation; however, the reliability of melanoma antigen recognized by T cells 1 (MART-1), the preferred immunostain for melanoma, has yet to be compared with permanent section pathology.

OBJECTIVE

To assess concordance rates of MART-1 frozen sections and permanent section pathologic interpretation of melanoma treated with MMS.

METHODS

A dual-center retrospective analysis was conducted to collect concordance and demographic data. Chi-square tests were performed for group comparisons of categorical variables.

RESULTS

Of the 379 permanent sections sent, 367 were concordant with frozen section pathology for an overall concordance rate of 96.8%. Cases were stratified into indeterminately concordant and indisputably concordant. Twenty-two (6%) of cases were indeterminately concordant, whereas 345 (94.0%) of cases were indisputably concordant.

LIMITATIONS

The concordance rate is derived from a comparison of adjacent tissue margins, an inevitable consequence of utilizing 2 techniques.

CONCLUSION

To the author's knowledge, this study represents the largest investigation examining concordance rates of MART-1 frozen sections in Mohs for melanoma. High concordance disputes the ongoing need for additional permanent margins when using MART-1 in routine cases.

No Recurrence in Primary Invasive Stage 1a and 1b Melanoma and Melanoma in Situ Treated With Serial Disk Staged Excision

BACKGROUND

Optimal surgical treatment modality for invasive melanoma (IM) and melanoma in situ (MIS) has been debated with proponents for standard wide local excision (WLE), serial disk staged excision, and Mohs micrographic surgery.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study is to identify the recurrence rates and surgical margins of invasive stage 1 melanoma and MIS lesions using serial disk staged excision technique with rush permanent processing and "bread loafing" microscopic analysis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Recurrence rates and surgical margins of 63 IM and 207 MIS at the University of California Dermatology Surgery Unit were retrospectively reviewed.

RESULTS

No recurrences were observed with average follow-up of 34 and 36 months for IM and MIS, respectively (range, 10-92 months). Average surgical margins were 19.8 mm (SD 9.7) for IM and 12.1 mm (SD 12.2) for MIS.

CONCLUSION

This SSE technique for the treatment of IM and MIS is comparable in efficacy to other SSE techniques, and it offers physicians a simple and accessible alternative to WLE and MMS.

A review of Mohs Micrographic Surgery for skin cancer: Part 1 - melanoma and rare skin cancers

Mohs micrographic surgery is a precise and effective method commonly used to treat high risk basal cell carcinoma (BCC) and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) on the head and neck. Whilst the majority of evidence for Mohs relates to keratinocyte cancers, there is published evidence for other types of skin cancer. This review aims to discuss the evidence for using MMS to treat six different types of skin cancer, including melanoma, lentigo maligna, dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans, atypical fibroxanthoma, microcystic adnexal carcinoma and pleomorphic dermal sarcoma, particularly in the context of survival rates and cancer recurrence. These cancers were chosen as there was sufficient literature for inclusion and given MMS is most useful when cancers are contiguous, rather than for cancers with marked metastatic potential such as angiosarcoma or merkel cell carcinoma. We searched Medline, Pubmed and Embase using the keywords: 'melanoma', 'mohs micrographic surgery', 'lentigo maligna', 'dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans', 'atypical fibroxanthoma', 'microcystic adnexal carcinoma' and 'pleomorphic dermal sarcoma' along with their appropriate synonyms, to identify the relevant English-language articles from the year 2000 onwards given that literature for Mohs on non-keratinocyte is sparse prior to this date. A MeaSurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) was used to assess the validity of systematic reviews. Further high-quality, multi-centre randomised trials are necessary to establish the indications and efficacy of MMS for rarer cancers, particularly for AFX and PDS, where limited studies were identified.

Systematic Review of Technical Variations for Mohs Micrographic Surgery for Melanoma

BACKGROUND

Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) for cutaneous melanoma is becoming more prevalent, but surgical technique varies.

OBJECTIVE

To define variations in published techniques for MMS for melanoma.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A systematic review was performed of PubMed, EMBASE, and Scopus databases to identify all articles describing surgical techniques for MMS for melanoma. Technical details were recorded for the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative phases of MMS.

RESULTS

Twenty-four articles were included. Mohs surgeons vary in how they assess clinical margins, how wide a margin they excise on the first MMS layer, and how they process tissue to determine tumor stage and margin clearance during MMS for melanoma.

CONCLUSION

Mohs micrographic surgery for melanoma is performed with varied surgical techniques. To establish best practices, additional research is necessary to determine how different techniques affect outcomes.

Systematic Review of the Role of Mohs Micrographic Surgery in the Management of Early-Stage Melanoma of the Head and Neck

BACKGROUND

The role of Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) in the management of melanoma of the head and neck (HNM) has been controversial. The authors systematically reviewed the local recurrence rate of melanoma in situ (MIS) and T1a melanomas using MMS compared with conventional wide local excision (WLE) and staged excision (SE).

OBJECTIVE

To systematically review the local recurrence rate of early-stage melanomas of the HNM treated with MMS versus WLE or SE.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A search of English medical literature was conducted through the common databases until November 26, 2019. Using PRISMA guidelines for the treatment of MIS and T1a melanoma with MMS, WLE, or SE, our search yielded a total of 32 articles.

RESULTS

Mohs micrographic surgery has a lower local recurrence rate for early-stage melanomas over both SE and WLE {pooled recurrence risk 0.8% (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.4-1.1) versus 2.5% (95% CI 1.5-3.4) versus 8.7% (95% CI 5.1-12.2) (p < .001), respectively}.

CONCLUSION

Mohs micrographic surgery may offer a lower recurrence rate than SE or WLE in the management of early-stage melanomas of the face or HNM. Further clinical validation in a randomized controlled trial is required.

Melanoma In Situ: A Critical Review and Re-Evaluation of Current Excision Margin Recommendations

Most international clinical guidelines recommend 5-10 mm clinical margins for excision of melanoma in situ (MIS). While the evidence supporting this is weak, these guidelines are generally consistent. However, as a result of the high incidence of subclinical extension of MIS, especially of the lentigo maligna (LM) subtype, wider margins will often be needed to achieve complete histologic clearance. In this review, we assessed all available contemporary evidence on clearance margins for MIS. No randomized trials were identified and the 31 non-randomized studies were largely retrospective reviews of single-surgeon or single-institution experiences using Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) for LM or staged excision (SE) for treatment of MIS on the head/neck and/or LM specifically. The available data challenge the adequacy of current international guidelines as they consistently demonstrate the need for clinical margins > 5 mm and often > 10 mm. For LM, any MIS on the head/neck, and/or ≥ 3 cm in diameter, all may require wider clinical margins because of the higher likelihood of subclinical spread. Histologic clearance should be confirmed prior to undertaking complex reconstruction. However, it is not clear whether wider margins are necessary for all MIS subtypes. Indeed, it seems that this is unlikely to be the case. Until optimal surgical margins can be better defined in a randomized trial setting, ideally controlling for MIS subtype and including correlation with histologic excision margins, techniques such as preliminary border mapping of large, ill-defined lesions and, most importantly, sound clinical judgement will be needed when planning surgical clearance margins for the treatment of MIS.