Does Double-Pass Pulsed-Dye Laser With Long and Short Pulse Duration Increase Treatment Efficacy of Port-Wine Stain? A Randomized Clinical Trial

Complication rates and safety of pulsed dye laser treatment for port-wine stain: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Pulsed dye laser (PDL) is the most commonly used method for port-wine stain (PWS); however, no studies have reported the safety of PDL. This review aimed to collect and summarize complications reported in relevant literature, assess complication rates in treating PWS with PDL, and explore the relevant influencing factors. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to search for related studies in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library until August 2022. Two reviewers independently evaluated the risk of bias of included studies. Stata Software version 17.0 was used for the analysis. All complications reported in the literature are divided into acute phase complications and long-term complications. Overall pooled purpura, edema, crusting, blistering, hyperpigmentation, hypopigmentation, and scarring rates were 98.3%, 97.6%, 21.5%, 8.7%, 12.8%, 0.9%, and 0.2%, respectively. Although the acute adverse reactions were found to be common, the long-term permanent complications clearly have a lower frequency, and the occurrence of scarring is much lower than that initially thought. This indicates that effective protective measures after treatment are very important for preventing scar formation. Overall, PDL treatment for PWS shows a high level of safety and low chances of causing long-term complications.

Hemoporfin-Mediated Photodynamic Therapy for Port-Wine Stains on Extremities

INTRODUCTION

Pulsed dye laser (PDL) is currently considered to be the first-line treatment for port-wine stains (PWSs) on the extremities despite its less than satisfactory therapeutic efficacy. Hemoporfin-mediated photodynamic therapy (HMME-PDT) is a vascular-targeted therapy that has rarely been used to treat PWSs on the extremities. Here, we evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of HMME-PDT for the treatment of PWSs on the extremities.

METHODS

Clinical data and dermoscopic images of PWSs on the extremities were obtained from 65 patients who underwent HMME-PDT between February 2019 and December 2022. The clinical efficacy of HMME-PDT was analyzed by comparing the pre- and post-treatment images. The safety of HMME-PDT was evaluated through observation during the treatment period and post-treatment follow-up.

RESULTS

The efficacy rate of a single HMME-PDT session was 63.0% and that of two and three to six sessions was 86.7% and 91.3%, respectively. A positive correlation was found between therapeutic efficacy and the number of HMME-PDT sessions. The therapeutic efficacy of HMME-PDT was better on the proximal extremities than on other parts of the extremities (P = 0.038), and the efficacy of treating PWSs in each site was relatively improved with an increase of treatment time. The clinical efficacy of HMME-PDT differed across four PWS vascular patterns identified by dermoscopy (P = 0.019). However, there was no statistical difference in the therapeutic efficacy based on age, sex, type of PWS, and treatment history (P > 0.05), which may be partly attributed to the relatively small sample size or poor cooperation of infant patients. No obvious adverse reactions were observed during the follow-up period.

CONCLUSIONS

HMME-PDT is a very safe and effective treatment for PWSs on the extremities. Multiple HMME-PDT treatments, lesions located in proximal limbs, and PWSs with type I and IV vascular patterns under dermoscopy were associated with higher efficacy of HMME-PDT. Dermoscopy may help predict the clinical efficacy of HMME-PDT.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NO

2020KJT085.

TFOS Lifestyle: Impact of cosmetics on the ocular surface

In this report the use of eye cosmetic products and procedures and how this represents a lifestyle challenge that may exacerbate or promote the development of ocular surface and adnexal disease is discussed. Multiple aspects of eye cosmetics are addressed, including their history and market value, psychological and social impacts, possible problems associated with cosmetic ingredients, products, and procedures, and regulations for eye cosmetic use. In addition, a systematic review that critically appraises randomized controlled trial evidence concerning the ocular effects of eyelash growth products is included. The findings of this systematic review highlight the evidence gaps and indicate future directions for research to focus on ocular surface outcomes associated with eyelash growth products.