Efficacy and Safety of a New Resilient Hyaluronic Acid Filler in the Correction of Moderate-to-Severe Dynamic Perioral Rhytides: A 52-Week Prospective, Multicenter, Controlled, Randomized, Evaluator-Blinded Study

Safety and Potential Complications of Facial Wrinkle Correction with Dermal Fillers: A Systematic Literature Review

Background and Objectives: The history of facial fillers is very broad, ranging from the use of various materials to modern technologies. Although procedures are considered safe, complications such as skin inflammation, infection, necrosis, or swelling may occur. It is crucial for specialists to be adequately prepared, inform patients how to prepare for corrective procedures, adhere to high safety standards, and continually educate. The goal of this systematic review is to identify complications arising during facial wrinkle correction procedures, as well as to explore safety and potential prevention strategies. Materials and methods: The review of the scientific literature followed the PRISMA guidelines. The search was performed in a single scientific database: PubMed. Considering predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria, articles evaluating the safety of dermal fillers used for facial wrinkle correction, complications, and treatment outcomes were selected. The chosen articles were published from 15 February 2019 to 15 February 2024 (last search date: 25 February 2024). The selected articles compared the complications, product safety, and result longevity of various dermal fillers used for facial wrinkle correction. Results: In thirty-eight articles, which involved 3967 participants, a total of 8795 complications were reported. The majority of complications occurred after injections into the chin and surrounding area (n = 2852). Others were reported in lips and the surrounding area (n = 1911) and cheeks and the surrounding area (n = 1077). Out of the 8795 complications, 1076 were adverse events (AE), including two severe AE cases: mild skin necrosis (n = 1) and abscess (n = 1). There were no cases of vascular occlusion, visual impairment, or deaths related to the performed procedures. A total of 7719 injection site reactions were classified as mild or temporary, such as swelling (n = 1184), sensitivity (n = 1145), pain (n = 1064), bleeding (n = 969), hardening/stiffness (n = 888), nodules/irregularities (n = 849), and erythema (redness) (n = 785). Conclusions: Facial wrinkle correction procedures are generally safe and effective and the results can last from 6 to 24 months, depending on the dermal filler material and its components used. The most common complications after dermal filler injection usually resolve spontaneously, but if they persist, various pharmacological treatment methods can be used according to the condition, and surgical intervention is generally not required.

Additive Orthodiagonal Rhytidoplasty of the Ergotrid: A Novel Treatment Technique for Severe Dynamic Lip Lines

SUMMARY

Dynamic lip lines pose a challenge in perioral rejuvenation despite the availability of numerous hyaluronic acid dermal filler products and techniques. In this article, the authors introduce additive orthodiagonal rhytidoplasty of the ergotrid, or ADORE, a novel technique for the treatment of severe dynamic lip lines. Based on an objective analysis of treatment outcomes, the authors' technique demonstrates the ability to confer substantial improvement in dynamic lip line severity, with a median reduction in lip line intensity of 79% (average, 70%; SD, 19%) at 1 month and 72% (average, 61%; SD, 21%) at 6 months, and a high degree of patient satisfaction.

Adverse Events Associated with Hyaluronic Acid Filler Injection for Non-surgical Facial Aesthetics: A Systematic Review of High Level of Evidence Studies

BACKGROUND

Hyaluronic acid (HA) dermal fillers are widely used in aesthetic medicine. While generally safe, potential complications can arise.

OBJECTIVE

This systematic review aims to identify and classify potential complications linked to the use of HA dermal fillers, as informed by high-quality, low-risk-of-bias studies.

METHODS

This review follows the Cochrane review standards for clinical systematic reviews. This systematic review analyzed 48 high level of evidence studies on the use of hyaluronic acid (HA) dermal fillers in non-surgical facial aesthetics and the adverse events that occurred.The inclusion criteria were randomized control studies on HA dermal fillers and their complications. Excluded were case reports, case series, observational studies, and other non-randomized research due to their inability to provide generalized conclusions and their inherent publication bias.

RESULTS

Adverse events were classified into three categories: expected reactions, product or technique-related adverse events, and severe adverse events. Most adverse events were short-lived injection site reactions, which resolved spontaneously. Specific HA fillers and injection techniques influenced the occurrence of adverse events, which generally resolved within weeks without treatment. Severe adverse events were rare, persisting for months and requiring active medical intervention.

DISCUSSION

This classification system can enhance understanding, prevention, and treatment of HA filler complications, and support patient education. The common complications were injection site reactions, with persistent symptoms treated with topical steroids, NSAIDs, or hyaluronidase. Severe complications included severe edema, angioedema and others, often necessitating specific treatments.

CONCLUSION

HA dermal fillers are generally safe and effective, with most adverse events being transient and mild to moderate in severity. Severe adverse events, although rare, do occur and are generally non-treatment related. Informed consent, patient education, and professional training are crucial for safe and successful outcomes. Level of Evidence II This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Best Practices for FACE-Q Aesthetics Research: A Systematic Review of Study Methodology

BACKGROUND

The FACE-Q Aesthetics module is a validated patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) that evaluates perspectives on facial aesthetic treatments. Improper administration and poor study methodology can compromise the validity and interpretation of this PROM.

OBJECTIVES

This systematic review sought to evaluate the administration and scoring of the FACE-Q Aesthetics scales within the literature.

METHODS

A search of Ovid Medline, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science was performed on December 20, 2022, with the assistance of a health-research librarian (CRD42022383676). Studies that examined facial aesthetic interventions using the FACE-Q Aesthetics module as a primary or secondary outcome measure were included for analysis.

RESULTS

There were 114 studies included. The Face Overall (n = 52, 45.6%), Psychological (n = 45, 39.4%), and Social (n = 43, 37.7%) scales were most frequently reported. Errors in FACE-Q administration were identified in 30 (26.3%) studies. The most common error was the presentation of raw ordinal scores rather than the converted Q score (n = 23). Most studies reported a time horizon for their primary analysis (n = 76, 66.7%); however, only 4 studies provided a rationale for this selection. Sample size calculations for the primary outcome were rarely performed (n = 9, 7.9%).

CONCLUSIONS

There continues to be limitations in PROM administration and the quality of articles that report FACE-Q Aesthetic scale data. The authors suggest that future investigators using the FACE-Q refer to the User's Guide regarding administration and scoring of this scale, report a rationale for the study time horizon, and provide an a priori sample size calculation for the primary outcome of interest.

Anti-Aging and Depigmentation Effect of a Hyaluronic Acid Mechanically Stabilized Complex on Human Skin Explants

Solar radiation and environmental pollutants are factors that cause changes in the skin that trigger skin aging. The objective of the study is to evaluate the rejuvenating effects of a complex formed by hyaluronic acid supplemented with vitamins, amino acids and oligopeptides in explants of human skin. For this, surplus skin samples have been obtained from donors that have been resected and cultivated on slides with membrane inserts. The complex was administered to some skin explants and the percentage of cells with low, medium and high levels of melanin was evaluated as an indicator of the degree of pigmentation. Other skin segments were irradiated with UVA/UVB, then the product was administered on several slides and the levels of collagen, elastin, sulfated GAG and MMP1 were evaluated. The results show that the administration of the complex significantly reduces the percentage of skin cells with a high melanin content by 16%, and that in skin irradiated with UVA/UVB, there is a decrease in the content of collagen, elastin and sulfate GAGs, and the complex reverses this reduction without changing MMP1 levels. This suggests that the compound has anti-aging and depigmentation effects on the skin, giving a skin rejuvenation appearance.

Adverse Events Reported From Hyaluronic Acid Dermal Filler Injections to the Facial Region: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Dermal filler injections are one of the most popular cosmetic procedures in the United States. Of the many options available, hyaluronic acid (HA) dermal fillers like Juvederm or Restylane are often used. Despite their use and popularity, adverse events are known to occur from these procedures. Although most outcomes may be mild and resolve over time, rare instances of severe complications cannot be ignored, as these effects may be irreversible. Healthcare practitioners and patients must be aware of these risks, as these cosmetic procedures can affect the patient's quality of life. The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence of adverse events (AEs) reported from the use of hyaluronic acid dermal fillers in the facial region. A systemized search of randomized controlled trials was conducted using Cochrane Central, Embase, Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE), and the Web of Science databases. After screening for eligibility and conducting a critical appraisal of the articles, 19 studies were retained for the final review. The meta-analysis results included different side effects by facial location, i.e., nasolabial fold (NLF) vs. other (midface, perioral line, and lip region). The midface includes the anteromedial cheek region, the zygomaticomalar region, and the submalar region. The adverse events were swelling, pain, erythema, bruising, lumps and bumps, firmness, tenderness, itching, and skin discoloration. A significant difference was found in the proportion of individuals experiencing swelling, lumps or bumps, and firmness at the nasolabial fold site versus the midface, perioral line, and lip region. There was no significant difference in the proportion of individuals experiencing pain, erythema, bruising, tenderness, itching, or skin discoloration at the nasolabial fold site versus the other sites. The study highlights the prevalence of common AEs that can result from HA dermal fillers like Juvederm or Restylane, thus emphasizing the importance of healthcare professionals explaining the risk and benefits to patients.

Efficacy and Safety of Resilient Hyaluronic Acid Fillers Injected with a Cannula: A Randomized, Evaluator-Blinded, Split-Face Controlled Study

Purpose

Cannulas are increasingly used for injecting hyaluronic acid fillers, as they are thought to improve patient comfort safety and treatment tolerability. This study aimed to demonstrate the non-inferiority of a Resilient Hyaluronic Acid 4 (RHA 4) filler injected with a cannula versus a needle for the treatment of moderate to severe nasolabial folds (NLF).

Patients and Methods

A total of 50 subjects were included in a randomized, evaluator-blinded, split-face trial. The NLF were injected with RHA 4 using a cannula on one side of the face and using a needle on the other side on Day 0. A touch-up could be performed 4 weeks later. The subjects were followed up for 12 weeks after the last injection, ie, injection on Day 0 or touch-up. Efficacy was evaluated using a Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale (WSRS), the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS), and patient-reported outcomes. Safety assessments included the injection-site pain, common treatment reactions (CTRs), and adverse events (AEs).

Results

Twelve weeks after the last injection, the efficacy of the cannula treatment was found to be non-inferior to that of the needle treatment, based on the WSRS score improvements. The other study endpoints showed the equivalent efficacy and safety of the two methods. No serious or unexpected AEs were reported.

Conclusion

RHA 4 may be effectively and safely injected into the NLF using a cannula or a needle, provided it is administrated by a trained practitioner.

Effect of Stromal Vascular Fraction on Sustained Volume Retention of Five Different Hyaluronic Acid Fillers

BACKGROUND

The technology of manufacturing hyaluronic acid (HA) fillers is evolving to increase their safety and durability. This study aimed to compare the volume maintenance effect of stromal vascular fraction (SVF) on different types of HA fillers.

METHODS

In this controlled experiment, HA fillers mixed with SVF were injected into the right upper back and HA fillers alone were injected into the left upper back of each mouse. A total of 35 mice were separated into five groups according to the type of commercially used HA filler: Juvederm Voluma XC, Restylane Lyft, Restylane Skinboosters Vital, Giselle Ligne Signature 2, and Giselle Ligne Universal. Nodule size inspection was performed on post-injection days 0, 3, and 56. Ultrasonography for maximal two-dimensional area of filler nodule measurement and histology were performed on the last day of the inspection.

RESULTS

While most of the groups showed a volume reduction of over 50% on day 56, regardless of SVF administration, significant volume maintenance was observed when Giselle Ligne Signature 2 was injected with SVF. Ultrasonographic measurement of two-dimensional filler nodule size showed no significant difference regarding filler types and SVF injection. When compared with the histological results of other fillers mixed with SVF, Giselle Ligne Signature 2 showed marked increase in cell survival and extracellular matrix components in HA particles.

CONCLUSION

SVF showed different efficacies in terms of volume maintenance and cell survival for various HA filler types. The SVF mixture in selective HA filler injections may improve maintenance in clinical settings.

NO LEVEL ASSIGNED

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each submission to which Evidence-Based Medicine rankings are applicable. This excludes Review Articles, Book Reviews, and manuscripts that concern Basic Science, Animal Studies, Cadaver Studies, and Experimental Studies. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

Patient Comfort, Safety, and Effectiveness of Resilient Hyaluronic Acid Fillers Formulated With Different Local Anesthetics

Supplemental Digital Content is Available in the Text.

Maximizing patient comfort during hyaluronic acid gel injection is a common concern that is usually addressed by selecting fillers with lidocaine.

Injection techniques for midface volumization using soft tissue hyaluronic acid fillers designed for dynamic facial movement

Volume loss of the face occurs over time; thus, volume enhancement of the midface can counteract the effects of aging. Hyaluronic acid (HA) fillers are often used for facial revolumization for a more youthful appearance due to their favorable outcomes and safety profiles. A patient‐centric approach, in which dynamic facial expressions are considered, is needed for optimal aesthetic results. In addition, injectors must be familiar with midface anatomy, how it is affected by the aging process, and must also consider the rheological and physical properties of fillers, including their stretch and dynamic strength.

In this article, optimal injection techniques are described for a new range of HA‐based fillers for midface revolumization using a needle, cannula, or both. The layering technique involves product placement in both the deep and superficial fat compartments to achieve natural‐looking outcomes at rest and during motion.

The Resilient Hyaluronic Acid (RHA^®) line of fillers was designed to maintain their durability and integrity while adapting to the dynamic movements of the face. RHA 2 is applicable for superficial placement, whereas the balanced stretch and dynamic strength of RHA 3 render it more versatile. The novel rheological properties of RHA 4, with the highest dynamic strength and sufficient stretch, allow it to be injected superficially and into deep facial compartments.

Depending on patient characteristics, the appropriate RHA filler can be chosen to reach the goal of a natural, younger appearance and avoid overfilling.