Anaesthesia and orphan disease: rocuronium and sugammadex in the anaesthetic management of a parturient with Becker's myotonia congenita

Comparison of recovery profiles in patients with Parkinson's disease for 2 types of neuromuscular blockade reversal agent following deep brain stimulator implantation

As an anesthetic reversal agent, there are concerns with cholinesterase inhibitors regarding worsening of Parkinson's disease (PD)-related symptoms. Sugammadex, a relatively new reversal agent, does not inhibit acetylcholinesterase and does not require co-administration of an antimuscarinic agent. The present study compared the recovery profiles of 2 agents initially administered for reversal of neuromuscular blockade in patients with advanced PD who underwent deep brain stimulator implantation.A total of 121 patients with PD who underwent deep brain stimulator implantation were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into 1 of 2 groups according to the type of neuromuscular blockade reversal agent (pyridostigmine vs sugammadex) initially administered. Recovery profiles reflecting time to extubation, reversal failure at first attempt, and hemodynamic stability, including incidence of hypertension or tachycardia during the emergence period, were compared.Time to extubation in the sugammadex group was significantly shorter (P < .001). In the sugammadex group, reversal failure at first attempt did not occur in any patient, while it occurred in seven (9.7%) patients in the pyridostigmine group (P = .064), necessitating an additional dose of pyridostigmine (n = 3) or sugammadex (n = 4). The incidence of hemodynamic instability during anesthetic emergence was significantly lower in the sugammadex group than in the pyridostigmine group (P = .019).Sugammadex yielded a recovery profile superior to that of pyridostigmine during the anesthesia emergence period in advanced PD patients. Sugammadex is also likely to be associated with fewer adverse effects than traditional reversal agents, which in turn would also improve overall postoperative management in this patient population.

Anesthetic management of a patient with sodium-channel myotonia: a case report

Background

Sodium-channel myotonia (SCM) is a nondystrophic myotonia, characterized by pure myotonia without muscle weakness or paramyotonia. The prevalence of skeletal muscle channelopathies is approximately 1 in 100,000, and the prevalence of SCM is much lower. To our knowledge, this is the first report on anesthetic management of a patient with SCM.

Case presentation

A 23-year-old woman with congenital nasal dysplasia and SCM was scheduled to undergo rhinoplasty with autologous costal cartilage. Total intravenous anesthesia without muscle relaxants was administered followed by continuous intercostal nerve block. Although transient elevation of potassium level in the blood was observed during surgery, the patient did not show exacerbation of myotonic or paralytic symptoms in the postoperative period.

Conclusion

Total intravenous anesthesia and peripheral nerve block can be administered safely to a patient with SCM. However, careful monitoring of the symptoms and electrolytes is recommended.

Use of sugammadex in patients with neuromuscular disorders: a systematic review of case reports

Background

Sugammadex is a modified gamma-cyclodextrin that acts by selectively encapsulating free amino-steroidal neuromuscular relaxants. Several case reports have been published on the use of sugammadex in patients with neuromuscular disorders that include neuromuscular junction diseases, myopathies, neuropathies, and motor neurone disorders. The primary aim of this review is to systematically review the evidence on the use of sugammadex in patients with this heterogeneous group of diseases and provide recommendations for clinical practice.

Methods

A systematic electronic search of Medline, Embase and CINAHL databases was done until June 2019, to identify case reports describing the use of sugammadex in adult surgical patients with neuromuscular disorders.

Results

Of the 578 records identified through database searches, 43 articles were finally included for the systematic review. Of these, 17 reports were on patients with myopathy, 15 reports on myasthenia gravis, 9 reports on motor neuron diseases and 2 reports on neuropathies.

Conclusions

Majority of the articles reviewed report successful use of sugammadex to reverse steroidal muscle relaxants, especially rocuronium, in patients with neuromuscular diseases. However, with sugammadex, unpredictability in response and uncertainty regarding optimum dose still remain issues. Quantitative neuromuscular monitoring to ensure complete reversal and adequate postoperative monitoring is strongly recommended in these patients, despite the use of sugammadex.

Opioid-free general anesthesia in patient with Steinert syndrome (myotonic dystrophy): Case report

INTRODUCTION

We report on the anesthetic management using opioid-free method of a patient with Steinert syndrome (myotonic dystrophy, MD), autosomal dominant dystrophy which is characterized by consistent contracture of muscle following stimulation. A myotonic crisis can be induced by numerous factors including hypothermia, shivering, and mechanical or electrical stimulation. In patients with MD, hypersensitivity to anesthetic drugs, especially muscle relaxants and opioids, may complicate postoperative management. If opioids are employed (systemic or neuraxial), then ICU care and continuous pulse oximetry must be considered given the high risk for respiratory depression and aspiration. Patients with MD present high sensitivity to the usual anesthetics such as volatile and muscle relaxants (both depolarizing and nondepolarizing). Opioids may induce muscle rigidity in this type of MD. Therefore, omitting opioids is recommended. Due to hypersensitivity to opioids and increased susceptibility to intra- and postoperative complications, it is recommended to introduce opioid-free anesthesia (OFA), for example, with use of dexmedetomidine (DEX). This is a new method of conducting general anesthesia without opioids and is based on concept of multimodal approach to pain management.

METHODS

A 31-year-old male patient (183 cm, 69 kg) was scheduled for laparoscopic operation of cholecystectomy. The patient received intravenously (IV): propofol in a dose of 250 mg followed by continuous infusion, rocuronium in a dose of 20 mg, and DEX in a loading dose of 0.6 μg/kg over 10 minutes followed by continuous infusion of dose of 0.2 μg/kg/hour.

RESULTS

The course of anesthesia and postoperative period were uneventful. The patient exited the operating theatre in a good medical state, with vitals within normal limits and fully regained consciousness.

CONCLUSION

DEX is effective and safe for moderately painful procedures in patients with the elevated risk of respiratory and cardiovascular failure. This substance provides adequate analgesia level during surgeries of patients suffering from MD.