1
|
Vittori A, Tritapepe L, Chiusolo F, Rossetti E, Cascella M, Petrucci E, Pedone R, Marinangeli F, Francia E, Mascilini I, Marchetti G, Picardo SG. Unplanned admissions after day-case surgery in an Italian third-level pediatric hospital: a retrospective study. Perioper Med (Lond) 2023; 12:53. [PMID: 37752610 PMCID: PMC10523757 DOI: 10.1186/s13741-023-00342-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2023] [Accepted: 09/21/2023] [Indexed: 09/28/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Increasing procedures in day-case surgery can mitigate the costs of health service, without reducing safety and quality standards. The Ospedale Pediatrico Bambino Gesù has adopted an educational program for healthcare personnel and patients' families to increase the number of day-case surgery procedures performed without reducing the level of safety. The unplanned admission rate after day-case surgery can be a quality benchmark for pediatric day-case surgery, and in literature, there are no Italian data. METHODS We made a retrospective analysis of the hospital database and focused on children requiring unplanned admission to the central venue of the hospital for the night. The audit covered the period from September 2012 to April 2018. RESULTS We performed general anesthesia for 8826 procedures (urology 33.60%, plastic surgery 30.87%, general surgery 17.44%, dermatology 11.66%, dentistry 3.16%, orthopedics 1.64%, digestive endoscopy 1.63%). Unplanned admission for anesthetic reasons resulted in two cases: one case of syncope and one case of vomit (0.023% rate). No one major complication. CONCLUSIONS Good quality of patient selection, the safety of the structure, family education, and an efficient organizational model combined with an educational program for anesthesiologists can improve the safety of anesthesia for day-case surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandro Vittori
- Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care, ARCO ROMA, Ospedale Pediatrico Bambino Gesù IRCCS, Piazza S. Onofrio 4, 00165, Rome, Italy.
| | - Luigi Tritapepe
- Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, San Camillo Forlanini Hospital, Circonvallazione Gianicolense 87, 00152, Rome, Italy
- Unit of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Sapienza University, Piazzale Aldro Moro 5 00185, Rome, Italy
| | - Fabrizio Chiusolo
- Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care, ARCO ROMA, Ospedale Pediatrico Bambino Gesù IRCCS, Piazza S. Onofrio 4, 00165, Rome, Italy
| | - Emanuele Rossetti
- Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care, ARCO ROMA, Ospedale Pediatrico Bambino Gesù IRCCS, Piazza S. Onofrio 4, 00165, Rome, Italy
| | - Marco Cascella
- Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS, Fondazione Pascale, Via Mariano Semmola, 53, 80131, Naples, Italy
| | - Emiliano Petrucci
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, San Salvatore Academic Hospital of L'Aquila, Via Lorenzo Natali, 1, 67100, Coppito, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Roberto Pedone
- Department of Psychology, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Viale Abramo Lincoln, 5, 81100, Caserta, Italy
| | - Franco Marinangeli
- Department of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Treatment, University of L'Aquila, , L'Aquila, Piazzale Salvatore Tommasi, 1, 67100, Coppito, AQ, Italy
| | - Elisa Francia
- Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care, ARCO ROMA, Ospedale Pediatrico Bambino Gesù IRCCS, Piazza S. Onofrio 4, 00165, Rome, Italy
| | - Ilaria Mascilini
- Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care, ARCO ROMA, Ospedale Pediatrico Bambino Gesù IRCCS, Piazza S. Onofrio 4, 00165, Rome, Italy
| | - Giuliano Marchetti
- Surgery Unit, Bios Medical Center, Via Domenico Chelini, 39, 00197, Rome, Italy
| | - Sergio Giuseppe Picardo
- Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care, ARCO ROMA, Ospedale Pediatrico Bambino Gesù IRCCS, Piazza S. Onofrio 4, 00165, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Maheshwari K, Cywinski JB, Papay F, Khanna AK, Mathur P. Artificial Intelligence for Perioperative Medicine: Perioperative Intelligence. Anesth Analg 2023; 136:637-645. [PMID: 35203086 DOI: 10.1213/ane.0000000000005952] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
The anesthesiologist's role has expanded beyond the operating room, and anesthesiologist-led care teams can deliver coordinated care that spans the entire surgical experience, from preoperative optimization to long-term recovery of surgical patients. This expanded role can help reduce postoperative morbidity and mortality, which are regrettably common, unlike rare intraoperative mortality. Postoperative mortality, if considered a disease category, will be the third leading cause of death just after heart disease and cancer. Rapid advances in technologies like artificial intelligence provide an opportunity to build safe perioperative practices. Artificial intelligence helps by analyzing complex data across disparate systems and producing actionable information. Using artificial intelligence technologies, we can critically examine every aspect of perioperative medicine and devise innovative value-based solutions that can potentially improve patient safety and care delivery, while optimizing cost of care. In this narrative review, we discuss specific applications of artificial intelligence that may help advance all aspects of perioperative medicine, including clinical care, education, quality improvement, and research. We also discuss potential limitations of technology and provide our recommendations for successful adoption.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Ashish K Khanna
- Department of Anesthesiology, Section on Critical Care Medicine, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
- Outcomes Research Consortium, Cleveland, Ohio
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Learning Success and Influencing Factors in Out-of-Hospital Placement of Intravenous Catheters. Prehosp Disaster Med 2022; 37:788-793. [PMID: 36156192 DOI: 10.1017/s1049023x22001327] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Placing peripheral intravenous catheters ("IV lines") is a standard procedure for health care professionals in acute and emergency medicine. The study aimed to determine the learning curve and success rates in applying IV lines during a three-year paramedic training and the factors influencing successful placement. METHODS This was a prospective and noninterventional observational study to determine the influencing factors, learning outcomes, and performance in the placement of IV lines by trainees and experienced paramedics. Trial registration: German Clinical Trials Register, ID DRKS00024631. RESULTS From February 1, 2016 through December 31, 2021, a total of 3,547 peripheral venous accesses attempts were performed: 76.5% (n = 2,712) by trainees and 23.5% (n = 835) by experienced practitioners. The trainee group had one-to-three years of training and the experienced group had 11 (SD = 11) years of work experience after training (one-to-35 years). The learning or success curve in the successful placement of peripheral venous accesses was 85.2% in the first year of training, 88.5% in the second year of training, and 92.5% in the third year (and the end of training). It was then 94.3% in the fourth year (first year of being experienced). Successful insertion of peripheral venous accesses in the experienced group was up to 97.0%. The first-attempt success rate was 90.4% across the entire trainee group versus 95.9% in the experienced group (P <.0001).Significant factors influencing successful placement of IV lines were puncture site (P = .022), catheter size (OR = 0.600; P = .002), and number of attempts (OR = 0.370; P <.001). The time of day (or night) was not influential. Work experience, patient age, or blood pressure were also not significant.
Collapse
|
4
|
Kim K, Baek S, Choi IC, Yang HS. The senior anesthesiologists and their medical profession in Korea: based on a survey. Anesth Pain Med (Seoul) 2021; 16:205-212. [PMID: 33940769 PMCID: PMC8107248 DOI: 10.17085/apm.20071] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2020] [Accepted: 01/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The number of aging physicians is increasing as the global population ages. With aging, anesthesiologists would be expected to experience changes in their professional position. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the current professional status of Korean anesthesiologists aged over 60 years. METHODS Registered anesthesiologists aged over 60 years in Korea were invited for a survey. The questionnaire addressed 10 subjects with 40 questions that focused on demographics, practical activities, work conditions, difficulties experienced due to physical changes caused by aging, and economic status. RESULTS In total, 122 anesthesiologists responded to the survey (response rate: 15.7%). Of them, 30.3% were working in honorary and advisory positions at tertiary hospitals, while 19.7% were working as pain physicians. Majority of the respondents were working for 5 days a week (41.8%) and 6-8 hours/day (48.4%). Majority of them (79.5%) were generally satisfied with their present life. CONCLUSIONS Majority of the senior anesthesiologists were working at general hospitals and they reported being "satisfied" with the current status of their life. However, the clinical practice and retirement strategies of senior anesthesiologists need to be evaluated systematically to prepare for the continuing gradual increase in the number of senior anesthesiologists.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kyungmi Kim
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Asan Medical Center, College of Medicine, University of Ulsan, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sungwoon Baek
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Asan Medical Center, College of Medicine, University of Ulsan, Seoul, Korea
| | - In-Cheol Choi
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Asan Medical Center, College of Medicine, University of Ulsan, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hong-Seuk Yang
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Daejeon Eulji Medical Center, Medical College, Eulji University, Daejeon, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Zaouter C, Smaili S, Leroux L, Bonnet G, Leuillet S, Ouattara A. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation: General anesthesia using transesophageal echocardiography does not decrease the incidence of paravalvular leaks compared to sedation alone. Ann Card Anaesth 2019; 21:277-284. [PMID: 30052215 PMCID: PMC6078031 DOI: 10.4103/aca.aca_204_17] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is a valid option for patients with severe aortic stenosis judged to be at high surgical risk. For this procedure, there is no agreement on the appropriate type of anesthesia. Sedation offers several advantages, but general anesthesia (GA) leads to less paravalvular leaks (PVLs) probably because of the transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) guidance. The objective was to compare the incidence of PVL among patients receiving conscious sedation (TAVI-S) and patients receiving GA (TAVI-GA). We made the hypothesis that a referral center does not necessitate TAVI-GA to reduce the incidence of moderate-to-severe PVL. Aim: The primary outcome was the incidence of moderate-to-severe PVL at 30 days after the implantation. Design and Setting: This study design was a retrospective observational trial in a university hospital. Methods: The TAVI-S group underwent the procedure under conscious sedation. In the TAVI-GA group, an endotracheal tube and a TEE probe were inserted. After the valve deployment, PVL was assessed by hemodynamic and fluoroscopic measurements in the TAVI-S group. TEE was also used in the TAVI-GA group to evaluate the presence of PVL. When PVL was moderate or severe according to the Valve Academic Research Consortium criteria. Results: TAVI-S and TAVI-GA were accomplished in 168 (67.5%) and 81 (32.5%) patients, respectively. Our results show no difference between the two groups regarding the incidence and grade of PVL. Conclusion: Performing TAVI under GA with TEE guidance is not associated with a lower incidence of moderate and severe PVL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cédrick Zaouter
- Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care II, Bordeaux University Hospital, CHU de Bordeaux, 33000 Bordeaux, France
| | - Sara Smaili
- Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care II, Bordeaux University Hospital, CHU de Bordeaux, 33000 Bordeaux, France
| | - Lionel Leroux
- Department of Cardiology, Bordeaux University Hospital, CHU de Bordeaux, 33000 Bordeaux, France
| | - Guillaume Bonnet
- Department of Cardiology, Bordeaux University Hospital, CHU de Bordeaux, 33000 Bordeaux, France
| | | | - Alexandre Ouattara
- Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care II, Bordeaux University Hospital, CHU de Bordeaux, 33000 Bordeaux; University of Bordeaux, INSERM, UMR 1034, Biology of Cardiovascular Diseases, Pessac, France
| |
Collapse
|