1
|
Ghasemi A, Chamanara M, Paknejad B, Yousefizoshk M, Hazrati E. Dexmedetomidine versus sufentanil as adjuvants to bupivacaine for brachial plexus block during upper extremity surgery: a randomized clinical trial. BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIOLOGY (ELSEVIER) 2023; 73:736-743. [PMID: 33932394 PMCID: PMC10625153 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjane.2021.03.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2020] [Revised: 03/15/2021] [Accepted: 03/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Brachial plexus block (BPB) has been accepted as a reliable alternative for general anesthesia in upper limb surgeries. Adding adjuvant drugs like dexmedetomidine and sufentanil has been shown to have clinical and pharmacologic advantages. In this randomized parallel clinical trial, we aim to compare the effects of these two adjuvants for bupivacaine in BPB. METHODS In this double-blinded study, by using computer-assisted block randomization, 40 patients ranged from 20 to 65 years old and scheduled for elective upper limb surgeries were assigned to two equal study groups (n = 20), receiving 1 mL of 5 ..g.mL-1 sufentanil (group S) or 1 mL of 100 ..g.mL-1 dexmedetomidine (group D) in adjunction to 30 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine for supraclavicular BPB under the guidance of ultrasonography. Characteristics of local anesthesia and postoperative analgesia were evaluated (n = 40). RESULTS The duration of blocks significantly improved in group S (sensory: estimated median difference (EMD) [95%CI] = 100.0 [70.0...130.0], p < 0.001; motor: EMD [95%CI] = 120.0 [100.0...130.0], p < 0.001). Group S also had significantly longer postoperative analgesia and lower opioid consumption within 24 hours after the surgery (EMD [95%CI] = 4.0 [3.0...7.0], p < 0.001; EMD [95%CI] = -5.0 [-5.0...-5.0], p < 0.001; respectively). None of the patients showed adverse effects concerning vital signs, nausea, or vomiting. CONCLUSION Our study showed that during ultrasound-guided supraclavicular BPB, sufentanil is a fairly better choice than dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant for bupivacaine and can provide preferable sensory and motor blocks. No significant side effects were seen in either of the study groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ali Ghasemi
- AJA University of Medical Sciences, Department of Anesthesiology, Tehran, Iran
| | - Mohsen Chamanara
- AJA University of Medical Sciences, Department of Pharmacology, Tehran, Iran
| | - Babak Paknejad
- AJA University of Medical Sciences, Department of Toxicology, Tehran, Iran
| | | | - Ebrahim Hazrati
- AJA University of Medical Sciences, Department of Anesthesiology, Tehran, Iran.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Sabesan V, Lapica H, Fernandez C, Fomunung C. Evolution of Perioperative Pain Management in Shoulder Arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am 2023; 54:435-451. [PMID: 37718083 DOI: 10.1016/j.ocl.2023.04.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/19/2023]
Abstract
Historically, opioids have been used as a primary conservative treatment for pain related to glenohumeral osteoarthritis (GHOA). However, this practice is concerning as it often leads to overuse, which has contributed to the current epidemic of addiction and overdoses in the United States. Studies have shown that preoperative opioid use is associated with higher complication rates and worse outcomes following surgery, particularly for shoulder arthroplasty. To address these concerns, perioperative pain management for shoulder arthroplasty has evolved over the years to the use of multimodal analgesia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vani Sabesan
- Department of Orthopedics, JFK/University of Miami, Palm Beach, FL, USA.
| | - Hans Lapica
- Department of Orthopedics, JFK/University of Miami, Palm Beach, FL, USA
| | - Carlos Fernandez
- Department of Orthopedics, JFK/University of Miami, Palm Beach, FL, USA
| | - Clyde Fomunung
- Department of Orthopedics, JFK/University of Miami, Palm Beach, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Su P, Liu Y, Zhang L, Bai LB. Comparison of Analgesia Treatment Methods After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: A Network Meta-analysis of 42 Randomized Controlled Trials. Orthop J Sports Med 2023; 11:23259671231167128. [PMID: 37346775 PMCID: PMC10280546 DOI: 10.1177/23259671231167128] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2022] [Accepted: 11/09/2022] [Indexed: 06/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The optimal method for postoperative analgesia after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR) is still unclear. Purpose To compare the efficacy of postoperative analgesic methods after ARCR through network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and prospective controlled trials. Study Design Systematic review; Level of evidence, 2. Methods Following the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, we searched PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science from inception until April 12, 2022, for randomized controlled trials and prospective controlled trials evaluating neuraxial analgesia, peripheral nerve block, periarticular local anesthetic infiltration, intravenous patient-controlled analgesia, oral analgesia, or any combination of these methods for pain management after ARCR. Outcomes included pain scores at rest, morphine consumption, and complications (nausea and vomiting). Study quality was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. Network meta-analysis was used to assess the relative efficacy of the methods for postoperative analgesia. The best choice for postoperative analgesia was defined as the one with significant differences in pain scores and morphine consumption compared with placebo, with no significant difference in complications, during the initial 48 hours postoperatively. Results Included were 42 studies with 3110 patients. Only suprascapular nerve block (SSNB) was significantly superior to placebo in pain scores (mean difference [MD], -0.93 [95% CI, -1.31 to -0.54] at 6 hours; MD, -2.34 [95% CI, -3.49 to -1.19] at 12 hours) and morphine consumption (MD, -17.70 [95% CI, -32.98 to -2.42] at 24 hours) (P < .05 for all), with no difference in complications (odds ratio, 0.96 [95% CI, 0.21 to 4.32]; P > .05). Pain scores were significantly lower with interscalene nerve block compared with SSNB (MD, -0.69 [95% CI, -1.17 to -0.20] at 6 hours; MD, -1.44 [95% CI, -2.21 to -0.67] at 12 hours) and with SSNB + axillary nerve block compared with SSNB (MD, -3.09 [95% CI, -4.18 to -1.99] at 6 hours; MD, -0.87 [95% CI, -1.71 to -0.03] at 12 hours) (P < .05 for all). Conclusion Based on the current evidence, most analgesic methods lowered pain and morphine consumption compared with placebo. There were significant differences in pain scores between interscalene nerve block and SSNB during the first 12 hours postoperatively, and adding axillary nerve block to SSNB enhanced the analgesic effect.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peng Su
- Department of Hand and Foot Surgery,
Shandong Provincial Hospital, Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, China
| | - Yijia Liu
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, West
China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Lu Zhang
- School of Finance, Qilu University of
Technology (Shandong Academy of Sciences), Jinan, China
| | - Long-bin Bai
- Department of Hand and Foot Surgery,
Shandong Provincial Hospital, Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Bloc du plexus brachial pour la chirurgie de l’épaule. ANESTHÉSIE & RÉANIMATION 2023. [DOI: 10.1016/j.anrea.2022.12.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
|
5
|
Mahrous RSS, Ismail TI. Comparison of subomohyoid plane block and interscalene nerve block for arthroscopic shoulder surgery. EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA 2022. [DOI: 10.1080/11101849.2022.2131348] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Rabab S. S Mahrous
- Department of Anesthesia and Surgical Intensive Care, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt
| | - Tarek I Ismail
- Department of Anesthesia and Surgical Intensive Care, Helwan University, Cairo, Egypt
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Liu Z, Li YB, Wang JH, Wu GH, Shi PC. Efficacy and adverse effects of peripheral nerve blocks and local infiltration anesthesia after arthroscopic shoulder surgery: A Bayesian network meta-analysis. Front Med (Lausanne) 2022; 9:1032253. [PMID: 36438028 PMCID: PMC9684667 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.1032253] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2022] [Accepted: 10/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Study objective To quantitatively assess and compare the efficacy and adverse effects of six different peripheral nerve block techniques after arthroscopic shoulder surgery (ASS). Design Bayesian network meta-analysis. Methods The PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, China National Knowledge Infrastructure database, Chinese Scientific Journal database, Wan Fang databases were searched to retrieve randomized clinical trials comparing interscalene brachial plexus block, continuous interscalene brachial plexus block, supraclavicular brachial plexus block, suprascapular nerve block, combined suprascapular and axillary nerve block and local infiltration analgesia on postoperative pain, opioid consumption, and adverse effects (defined as Horner’s syndrome, dyspnea, hoarseness, vomiting, and nausea) after ASS under general anesthesia (GA). Two reviewers independently screened the literature, extracted data, and evaluated the risk of bias in the included studies. Results A total of 1,348 articles were retrieved initially and 36 randomized clinical trials involving 3,124 patients were included in the final analysis. The network meta-analysis showed that interscalene brachial plexus block was superior in reducing pain and opioid consumption compared to the five other interventions. However, adverse effects were reduced using suprascapular nerve block and combined suprascapular and axillary nerve block compared to interscalene brachial plexus block. Conclusion Interscalene brachial plexus block was superior in reducing pain and opioid consumption compared to other peripheral nerve blocks but had a higher frequency of adverse events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zheng Liu
- Department of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, China
| | - Yi-bo Li
- Huaiyin District Center for Disease Control and Prevent, Jinan, China
| | - Ji-hua Wang
- Department of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, China
| | - Guang-han Wu
- Department of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, China
| | - Peng-cai Shi
- Department of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, China
- *Correspondence: Peng-cai Shi,
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Jiangping W, Xiaolin Q, Han S, Zhou X, Mao N, Zhibo D, Ting G, Shidong H, Xiangwei L, Xin Y, Guoyin S. Network Meta-Analysis of Perioperative Analgesic Effects of Different Interventions on Postoperative Pain After Arthroscopic Shoulder Surgery Based on Randomized Controlled Trials. Front Med (Lausanne) 2022; 9:921016. [PMID: 35872801 PMCID: PMC9304654 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.921016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2022] [Accepted: 06/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BackgroundShoulder arthroscopic surgery is a common surgical method used in orthopedics. However, severe postoperative pain can significantly limit the early joint movement of patients and adversely affect the impact of the surgery. At present, there is no consistent and effective analgesic scheme for the management of postoperative pain after arthroscopic surgery of the shoulder.PurposeThe aim of this study was to search for the most effective analgesic scheme to control pain in the perioperative period of arthroscopic surgery of the shoulder.Study DesignNetwork meta-analysis.MethodsWe searched 5 different databases (i.e., Medline, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library) from January 2011 to January 2021 for English literature. Thereafter, we sifted out randomized controlled trials (RCTs), which compared different intervention schemes for pain management after shoulder arthroscopy and selected only 12 h, 24 h, or 48 h after the patient leaves the operating room as an optimal period for administration of analgesic intervention schemes. Only patients with shoulder disease who have undergone arthroscopic shoulder surgery were included in this study. The Cochrane “risk of bias” was used for the quality assessment. Moreover, some additional tests were performed to enhance the credibility of the results.ResultsTwenty-nine RCTs involving 1,885 patients were included in this frequentist network meta-analysis (NMA). These articles mainly were divided into two distinct groups, namely, the nerve block group and the non-nerve block group. Regarding the nerve block group, at postoperative 12 h, the intervention suprascapular nerve block + interscalene nerve block (SSNB + INB) was ranked first, whereas INB + intra-articular injection (INB + IAI) was ranked first at 24 h and 48 h postoperation. In the non-nerve block group, external application (EA) was ranked first at postoperative 12 h, but oral administration (OA) exhibited a better analgesic effect at postoperative 24 h and postoperative 48 h.ConclusionWe conclude that the analgesic effect of SSNB+INB was the best at postoperative 12 h, and INB+IAI was the best at postoperative 24 h and 48 h in the nerve block group. For the non-nerve block group, the effect of EA was the best at postoperative 12 h, and the analgesic effect of OA at postoperative 24 h and 48 h was significantly better than any other interventions.Systematic Review Registrationhttps://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier: CRD42021286777.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wu Jiangping
- Center for Joint Surgery, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
- Chongqing Clinical Research Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Chongqing, China
| | - Quan Xiaolin
- Center for Joint Surgery, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
- Chongqing Clinical Research Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Chongqing, China
| | - Shu Han
- Center for Joint Surgery, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
- Chongqing Clinical Research Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Chongqing, China
- *Correspondence: Shu Han
| | - Xiaolan Zhou
- Medical Record Statistics Section, The Second Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
- Xiaolan Zhou
| | - Nie Mao
- Center for Joint Surgery, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
- Chongqing Clinical Research Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Chongqing, China
| | - Deng Zhibo
- Center for Joint Surgery, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
- Chongqing Clinical Research Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Chongqing, China
| | - Gong Ting
- Center for Joint Surgery, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
- Chongqing Clinical Research Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Chongqing, China
| | - Hu Shidong
- Center for Joint Surgery, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
- Chongqing Clinical Research Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Chongqing, China
| | - Li Xiangwei
- Center for Joint Surgery, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
- Chongqing Clinical Research Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Chongqing, China
| | - Yuan Xin
- Center for Joint Surgery, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
- Chongqing Clinical Research Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Chongqing, China
| | - Shu Guoyin
- Center for Joint Surgery, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
- Chongqing Clinical Research Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Chongqing, China
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Davis WH, Sandler AB, Scanaliato JP, Dunn JC, Parnes N. Use of Opioids in the Early Postoperative Period After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: A Systematic Review. Orthop J Sports Med 2022; 10:23259671221112086. [PMID: 35898204 PMCID: PMC9310229 DOI: 10.1177/23259671221112086] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2022] [Accepted: 05/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Postoperative treatment plans after orthopaedic procedures frequently include opioids for pain relief. Purpose: To evaluate opioid use in the early postoperative phase after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR) to develop a procedure-specific understanding of the current role of opioids in pain management for this procedure. Study Design: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: A PubMed search was used to identify eligible studies. Data on patient demographics, visual analog scale pain scores, and opioid use patterns (in morphine milligram equivalents [MMEs]) were collected and assessed. Cumulative MMEs were reported on postoperative day (POD) zero, and mean MMEs were reported on subsequent PODs (days 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, and 14). Metaregression, I2 indices, and Cochran Q tests were used to evaluate study variation, heterogeneity, and variance. Results: A total of 1487 patients in 22 studies were included in the analysis. An estimated 51% (95% CI, 31%-70%) of patients with nerve blocks (NBs) were opioid-free through POD-0 versus 40% (95% CI, 1.2%-97%) of patients without NBs, which increased to 65% (95% CI, 55%-74%) versus 25% (95% CI, 1.7%-86%) by POD-1. Opioid requirements were highest in the first 72 hours after ARCR. NB use reduced opioid requirement on POD-0 compared with no NB use (15.8 vs 45.0 MMEs, respectively; P < .001) but did not reduce requirements after that. In addition, NB use led to a statistically significant increase in opioid requirements on POD-7 (28.6 vs 9.5 MMEs, respectively; P < .001). Using a model that assumes stable opioid requirements between our time points, weighted mean cumulative opioid consumption was 163 MMEs in the first week and 273 MMEs in the first 2 weeks (150 and 287 MMEs in patients with NB; 180 and 261 MMEs in patients without NB, respectively). Conclusion: Opioid use is relatively common in the early postoperative period after ARCR. Pain scores and opioid requirements may spike on POD-1; however, patients should be educated and reassured that they will gradually decrease usage over the initial 2-week postoperative period.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William H Davis
- Paul Foster School of Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, El Paso, Texas, USA
| | - Alexis B Sandler
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, William Beaumont Army Medical Center-Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, El Paso, Texas, USA
| | - John P Scanaliato
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, William Beaumont Army Medical Center-Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, El Paso, Texas, USA
| | - John C Dunn
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, William Beaumont Army Medical Center-Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, El Paso, Texas, USA
| | - Nata Parnes
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Carthage Area Hospital, Carthage, New York, USA.,Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Claxton-Hepburn Medical Center, Odensburg, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Kim YS, Park Y, Koh HJ. Is There a Difference between Perineural Dexamethasone with Single-Shot Interscalene Block (SSIB) and Interscalene Indwelling Catheter Analgesia (IICA) for Early Pain after Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair? A Pilot Study. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11123409. [PMID: 35743486 PMCID: PMC9224652 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11123409] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2022] [Revised: 06/07/2022] [Accepted: 06/11/2022] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Interscalene block is applied to control acute postoperative pain after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR), typically with single-shot interscalene block (SSIB) or continuous interscalene indwelling catheter analgesia (IICA), and dexamethasone (Dex) for extending the analgesic effect. This study investigated whether perineural Dex can extend the postoperative analgesic effect of SSIB to match that of IICA. A total of 130 patients were recruited and divided into two groups (Group D, SSIB with perineural Dex, n = 94; Group C, IICA, n = 36). The surgical and anesthetic processes were identical except for the method of nerve block. Pain was measured by a visual analog scale (VAS) at 6, 12, 24, and 48 h after ARCR. The number of each and the total analgesics used and adverse effects were compared. The duration of ARCR was longer in group D. The VAS score was higher in group C 6 h after ARCR, but there was no difference at other time points. More postoperative analgesics were administered to group C, and there was no difference in the number of adverse effects. In conclusion, combining perineural Dex with SSIB can reduce rebound hyperalgesia after 6 h and extend the duration of the analgesic effect to that of IICA. Therefore, IICA could be substituted with SSIB and Dex between at 6 and 48 h after ARCR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yang-Soo Kim
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 06591, Korea;
| | - Youngkyung Park
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 06591, Korea;
| | - Hyun Jung Koh
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 06591, Korea;
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +82-1037865593; Fax: +82-25371951
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Paul RW, Szukics PF, Brutico J, Tjoumakaris FP, Freedman KB. Postoperative Multimodal Pain Management and Opioid Consumption in Arthroscopy Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil 2022; 4:e721-e746. [PMID: 35494281 PMCID: PMC9042766 DOI: 10.1016/j.asmr.2021.09.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2021] [Accepted: 09/17/2021] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan W. Paul
- Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, U.S.A
| | - Patrick F. Szukics
- Rowan University School of Osteopathic Medicine, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stratford, New Jersey, U.S.A
| | - Joseph Brutico
- Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, U.S.A
| | | | - Kevin B. Freedman
- Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, U.S.A
- Address correspondence to Kevin B. Freedman, M.D., Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, Thomas Jefferson University, 825 Old Lancaster Rd., Suite 200, Bryn Mawr, PA, 19010, U.S.A.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Huang L, Li P, Zhang L, Kang G, Zhou H, Zhao Z. Analgesic comparison between perineural and intravenous dexamethasone for shoulder arthroscopy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Orthop Surg Res 2022; 17:103. [PMID: 35177116 PMCID: PMC8851776 DOI: 10.1186/s13018-022-02952-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2021] [Accepted: 01/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction The analgesic comparison between perineural and intravenous dexamethasone on interscalene block for pain management after shoulder arthroscopy remains controversial. We conduct this meta-analysis to explore the influence of perineural versus intravenous dexamethasone on interscalene block for pain control after shoulder arthroscopy. Methods We have searched PubMed, Embase, Web of science, EBSCO and Cochrane library databases through April 2021 and included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the effect of perineural and intravenous dexamethasone on interscalene block in patients with shoulder arthroscopy. Results Five RCTs were included in the meta-analysis. Overall, compared with intravenous dexamethasone for shoulder arthroscopy, perineural dexamethasone led to similar block duration (SMD = 0.12; 95% CI − 0.12 to 0.35; P = 0.33), pain scores at 12 h (SMD = − 0.67; 95% CI − 1.48 to 0.15; P = 0.11), pain scores at 24 h (SMD = − 0.33; 95% CI − 0.79 to 0.14; P = 0.17), opioid consumption (SMD = 0.01; 95% CI − 0.18 to 0.19; P = 0.95) and incidence of nausea/vomiting (OR = 0.74; 95% CI 0.38–1.44; P = 0.38). Conclusions Perineural and intravenous dexamethasone demonstrated comparable pain relief after shoulder arthroscopy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liangku Huang
- Department of Hand Surgery, Xi'an Honghui Hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University Health Science Center, Xi'an, 710054, Shaanxi, China
| | - Peng Li
- Department of Hand Surgery, Xi'an Honghui Hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University Health Science Center, Xi'an, 710054, Shaanxi, China
| | - Liang Zhang
- Sports Medicine Center, Xi'an Honghui Hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University Health Science Center, No. 555 Youyidong Street, Beilin District, Xi'an, 710054, Shaanxi, China
| | - Guangming Kang
- Department of Hand Surgery, Xi'an Honghui Hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University Health Science Center, Xi'an, 710054, Shaanxi, China
| | - Haizhen Zhou
- Department of Orthopaedic Oncology, Xi'an Honghui Hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University Health Science Center, Xi'an, 710054, Shaanxi, China
| | - Zandong Zhao
- Sports Medicine Center, Xi'an Honghui Hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University Health Science Center, No. 555 Youyidong Street, Beilin District, Xi'an, 710054, Shaanxi, China.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Kim H, Kim HJ, Lee ES, Lee S, Park JH, Kim H, Jeon IH, Koh WU, Koh KH. Postoperative Pain Control After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: Arthroscopy-Guided Continuous Suprascapular Nerve Block Versus Ultrasound-Guided Continuous Interscalene Block. Arthroscopy 2021; 37:3229-3237. [PMID: 33989719 DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2021.04.067] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2020] [Revised: 04/14/2021] [Accepted: 04/23/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To compare the clinical efficacy and safety of arthroscopy-guided continuous suprascapular nerve block and ultrasound-guided continuous interscalene block in postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. METHODS A prospective study was performed between March and November 2020. In total, 76 patients were enrolled and divided into 2 groups: in the 38 patients of group 1 (arthroscopy-guided continuous suprascapular nerve block), an indwelling catheter was introduced via the Neviaser portal under arthroscopic view before closing the portal at the end of the surgery; and in the 38 patients of group 2 (ultrasound-guided continuous interscalene block), an indwelling catheter was inserted and directed toward the interscalene brachial plexus prior to the surgery under ultrasound guidance. The primary outcome was the pain score measured by the visual analog scale at postoperative 24 hours during admission. Comparisons were conducted at different time points (postoperative 4, 8, 24, and 48 hours). The secondary outcome was any of these events: neurologic complications, such as sensory/motor change in the upper extremities; hemidiaphragmatic paresis; dyspnea; dysphonia; and Horner's syndrome. Opioid usage until postoperative 3 weeks was compared between the groups. RESULTS The visual analog scale scores in groups 1 and 2 were comparable at each postoperative time point (analysis of variance, P = .919; trends, P = .132). Neurologic deficits were more common in group 2 than in group 1 (8 vs 32 patients, P < .001). Decreased excursion of the diaphragm was more common in group 2 (partial or complete paresis of the hemidiaphragm: 1 vs 29 patients, P < .001). Opioid consumption was similar in both groups (morphine milligram equivalents per kilogram; 1.75 vs 1.55, P = .195). CONCLUSIONS Our findings show that arthroscopy-guided continuous suprascapular nerve block is not inferior to ultrasound-guided continuous interscalene block for postoperative pain control after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair while showing fewer temporary neurologic complications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level II, prospective cohort study, interventional study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hyojune Kim
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Daejeon Eulji Medical Center, Eulji University School of Medicine, Daejeon, Republic of Korea; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Asan Medical Center, College of Medicine, University of Ulsan, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Ha-Jung Kim
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Asan Medical Center, College of Medicine, University of Ulsan, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Eui-Sup Lee
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Asan Medical Center, College of Medicine, University of Ulsan, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Seonjeong Lee
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Asan Medical Center, College of Medicine, University of Ulsan, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jeong Hee Park
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Asan Medical Center, College of Medicine, University of Ulsan, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Hyungtae Kim
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Asan Medical Center, College of Medicine, University of Ulsan, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - In-Ho Jeon
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Asan Medical Center, College of Medicine, University of Ulsan, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Won Uk Koh
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Asan Medical Center, College of Medicine, University of Ulsan, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Kyoung Hwan Koh
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Asan Medical Center, College of Medicine, University of Ulsan, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Berton A, Longo UG, De Salvatore S, Sciotti G, Santamaria G, Piergentili I, De Marinis MG, Denaro V. A Historical Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials in the Management of Pain in Rotator Cuff Tears. J Clin Med 2021; 10:jcm10184072. [PMID: 34575180 PMCID: PMC8470804 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10184072] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2021] [Revised: 08/31/2021] [Accepted: 09/07/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
The aim of this analysis was to assess the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) relating to pain management in rotator cuff (RC) tears. This review evaluated the quality of the studies in the literature regarding this topic through the use of some factors and trends. The online databases used to search all RCTs on the topic of RC surgery were Medline, Scopus, CINAHL, EMBASE, and CENTRAL. This research was completed in September 2020. To assess the quality of reports, the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) and the modified Coleman methodology score (MCMS) were used. From the research, 262 articles emerged. Finally, 79 studies were included in this historical analysis. There were no statistically significant changes in MCMS across trials that included or did not include a CONSORT diagram (p = 0.10). A statistically significant difference in MCMS was discovered between papers produced prior to 2009 and publications produced after 2015 (p = 0.03). There was no association between the number of checklist items for each article and the Coleman score. During the years there has been a significant increase in both quantity and quality of RCTs relating to pain in RC tears.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandra Berton
- Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Campus Bio-Medico di Roma University, Via Alvaro del Portillo, 200, Trigoria, 00128 Rome, Italy; (A.B.); (S.D.S.); (I.P.); (V.D.)
| | - Umile Giuseppe Longo
- Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Campus Bio-Medico di Roma University, Via Alvaro del Portillo, 200, Trigoria, 00128 Rome, Italy; (A.B.); (S.D.S.); (I.P.); (V.D.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +39-062-2541-1613
| | - Sergio De Salvatore
- Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Campus Bio-Medico di Roma University, Via Alvaro del Portillo, 200, Trigoria, 00128 Rome, Italy; (A.B.); (S.D.S.); (I.P.); (V.D.)
| | - Gaia Sciotti
- Research Unit Nursing Science, Campus Bio-Medico di Roma University, 00128 Rome, Italy; (G.S.); (G.S.); (M.G.D.M.)
| | - Giulia Santamaria
- Research Unit Nursing Science, Campus Bio-Medico di Roma University, 00128 Rome, Italy; (G.S.); (G.S.); (M.G.D.M.)
| | - Ilaria Piergentili
- Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Campus Bio-Medico di Roma University, Via Alvaro del Portillo, 200, Trigoria, 00128 Rome, Italy; (A.B.); (S.D.S.); (I.P.); (V.D.)
| | - Maria Grazia De Marinis
- Research Unit Nursing Science, Campus Bio-Medico di Roma University, 00128 Rome, Italy; (G.S.); (G.S.); (M.G.D.M.)
| | - Vincenzo Denaro
- Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Campus Bio-Medico di Roma University, Via Alvaro del Portillo, 200, Trigoria, 00128 Rome, Italy; (A.B.); (S.D.S.); (I.P.); (V.D.)
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Patel MS, Abboud JA, Sethi PM. Perioperative pain management for shoulder surgery: evolving techniques. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2020; 29:e416-e433. [PMID: 32844751 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2020.04.049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2020] [Revised: 04/13/2020] [Accepted: 04/21/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
Improving management of postoperative pain following shoulder surgery is vital for optimizing patient outcomes, length of stay, and decreasing addiction to narcotic medications. Multimodal analgesia (ie, controlling pain via multiple different analgesic methods with differing mechanisms) is an ever-evolving approach to enhancing pain control perioperatively after shoulder surgery. With a variety of options for the shoulder surgeon to turn to, this article succinctly reviews the pros and cons of each approach and proposes a potential pain management algorithm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manan S Patel
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Rothman Institute at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
| | - Joseph A Abboud
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Rothman Institute at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Paul M Sethi
- Orthopaedic & Neurosurgery Specialists, Greenwich, CT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Lim JA, Sung SY, Lee JH, Lee SY, Kwak SG, Ryu T, Roh WS. Comparison of ultrasound-guided and nerve stimulator-guided interscalene blocks as a sole anesthesia in shoulder arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: A retrospective study. Medicine (Baltimore) 2020; 99:e21684. [PMID: 32871884 PMCID: PMC7458219 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000021684] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Ultrasound-guided interscalene block (US-ISB) and nerve stimulator-guided interscalene block (NS-ISB) have both been commonly used for anesthesia in shoulder arthroscopic surgery.This study aims to compare which method provides surgical block as a sole anesthesia. In this retrospective study, 1158 patients who underwent shoulder arthroscopic rotator cuff tear repair surgery under ISB between October 2002 and March 2018 were classified into either the US-ISB or NS-ISB anesthesia groups. Demographic and anesthetic characteristics and intraoperative medications were analyzed after propensity score matching and compared between the 2 groups.There was a 0.5% rate of conversion to general anesthesia in the US-ISB group and a 6.7% rate in the NS-ISB group (P < .001). The volume of local anesthetics used for ISB was 29.7 ± 8.9 mL in the US-ISB group versus 38.1 ± 4.8 mL in the NS-ISB group (P < .001). The intraoperative use of analgesics and sedatives such as fentanyl, midazolam and propofol in combination was significantly lowered in the US-ISB group (P < .001).US-ISB is a more effective and safer approach for providing intense block to NS-ISB because it can decrease the incidence of conversion to general anesthesia and reduce the use of analgesics and sedatives during arthroscopic shoulder surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jung A. Lim
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Catholic University of Daegu School of Medicine
| | | | - Ji Hyeon Lee
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Catholic University of Daegu School of Medicine
| | - So Young Lee
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Catholic University of Daegu School of Medicine
| | - Sang Gyu Kwak
- Department of Medical Statistics, School of Medicine, Catholic University of Daegu, Daegu, Korea
| | - Taeha Ryu
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Catholic University of Daegu School of Medicine
| | - Woon Seok Roh
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Catholic University of Daegu School of Medicine
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Hussain N, Costache I, Kumar N, Essandoh M, Weaver T, Wong P, Tierney S, Rose P, McCartney CJL, Abdallah FW. Is Supraclavicular Block as Good as Interscalene Block for Acute Pain Control Following Shoulder Surgery? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Anesth Analg 2020; 130:1304-1319. [PMID: 32102013 DOI: 10.1213/ane.0000000000004692] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Interscalene block (ISB) is the acute pain management technique of choice for shoulder surgery, but its undesirable respiratory side effects have prompted seeking alternatives. Supraclavicular block (SCB) is proposed as an ISB alternative, but evidence of comparative analgesic and respiratory-sparing effects is inconsistent. We compared the analgesic and respiratory effects of SCB and ISB for shoulder surgery. METHODS Trials comparing ISB to SCB for shoulder surgery were sought. We decided a priori that SCB would be an acceptable alternative if it were noninferior for (1) postoperative 24-hour cumulative oral morphine equivalent consumption (primary outcome, noninferiority margin Δ = -25 mg) and (2) postoperative pain (secondary outcome, noninferiority margin Δ = 4.0 cm·hour); and superior for (3) postblock respiratory dysfunction (primary outcome). Opioid-related side effects and block-related complications were also evaluated. RESULTS Fifteen studies (1065 patients) were analyzed. In single-injection blocks, SCB was noninferior to ISB for 24-hour morphine consumption (mean difference for SCB-ISB, MD [95% confidence interval {CI}] = -3.11 mg [-9.42 to 3.19], Δ = -25 mg); it was also noninferior for 24-hour pain scores (MD = 0.78 cm·hour [0.07-1.49], Δ = 4.0 cm·hour); and decreased the odds of respiratory dysfunction (odds ratio [OR] [95% CI] = 0.08 [0.01-0.68]). Similarly, in continuous blocks, SCB was noninferior to ISB for 24-hour morphine consumption (MD = 0.46 mg [-6.08 to 5.15], Δ = -25 mg), and decreased the odds of respiratory dysfunction (OR = 0.22 [0.08-0.57]). SCB also decreased odds of minor block-related complications (OR = 0.36 [0.20-0.68] and OR = 0.25 [0.15-0.41] for single-injection and continuous blocks, respectively). Consequently, the null joint-hypothesis was rejected, and SCB can be considered an acceptable alternative to ISB. CONCLUSIONS For acute pain control following shoulder surgery, high-quality evidence indicates that SCB can be used as an effective ISB alternative. SCB is noninferior for postoperative opioid consumption and acute pain, and it reduces the odds of postblock respiratory dysfunction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nasir Hussain
- From the Department of Anesthesiology, The Ohio State University, Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Ioana Costache
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, and the Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Nicolas Kumar
- From the Department of Anesthesiology, The Ohio State University, Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio.,Faculty of Medicine, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Michael Essandoh
- From the Department of Anesthesiology, The Ohio State University, Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Tristan Weaver
- From the Department of Anesthesiology, The Ohio State University, Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Patrick Wong
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, and the Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sarah Tierney
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, and the Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Peter Rose
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, and the Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Colin J L McCartney
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, and the Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Faraj W Abdallah
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, and the Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Anesthesia, and the Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|