Early postoperative recovery after peri-acetabular osteotomy: A double-blind, randomised single-centre trial of 48 vs. 8 mg dexamethasone

Efficacy of regional anesthesia in hip preservation surgeries: a systematic review

The purpose of this study was to review the current literature on perioperative pain management in hip arthroscopy, periacetabular osteotomy and surgical hip dislocation. A systematic review of the literature published from January 2000 to December 2022 was performed. Selection criteria included published randomized controlled trials, prospective reviews and retrospective reviews of all human subjects undergoing hip preservation surgery. Exclusion criteria included case reports, animal studies and studies not reporting perioperative pain control protocols. Thirty-four studies included hip arthroscopy in which peripheral nerve blocks were associated with a significant reduction in pain score (P = 0.037) compared with general anesthesia alone. However, no pain control modality was associated with a significant difference in postanesthesia care unit opioid use (P = 0.127) or length of stay (P = 0.251) compared with general anesthesia alone. Falls were the most common complication reported, accounting for 37% of all complications. Five studies included periacetabular osteotomy and surgical hip dislocation in which peripheral nerve blocks were associated with an 18% reduction in pain on postoperative Day 2, a 48% reduction in cumulative opioid use on postoperative Day 2 and a 40% reduction in hospital stay. Due to the low sample size of the periacetabular osteotomy and surgical hip dislocation studies, we were unable to determine the significant difference between the means. Due to significant between-study heterogeneity, additional studies with congruent outcome measures need to be conducted to determine the efficacy of regional anesthesia in hip arthroscopy, periacetabular osteotomy and surgical hip dislocation.

Laser Speckle Contrast Imaging-based diagnosis of severe mesenteric traction syndrome: Hemodynamics and prostacyclin - A prospective cohort study

BRIEF ABSTRACT

Today, the diagnosis and grading of mesenteric traction syndrome relies on a subjective assessment of facial flushing. However, this method has several limitations. In this study, Laser Speckle Contrast Imaging and a predefined cut-off value are assessed and validated for the objective identification of severe mesenteric traction syndrome.

BACKGROUND

Severe mesenteric traction syndrome (MTS) is associated with increased postoperative morbidity. The diagnosis is based on an assessment of the developed facial flushing. Today this is performed subjectively, as no objective method exists. One possible objective method is Laser Speckle Contrast Imaging (LSCI), which has been used to show significantly higher facial skin blood flow in patients developing severe MTS. Using these data, a cut-off value has been identified. This study aimed to validate our predefined LSCI cut-off value for identifying severe MTS.

METHODS

A prospective cohort study was performed on patients planned for open esophagectomy or pancreatic surgery from March 2021 to April 2022. All patients underwent continuous measurement of forehead skin blood flow using LSCI during the first hour of surgery. Using the predefined cut-off value, the severity of MTS was graded. In addition, blood samples for prostacyclin (PGI₂) analysis and hemodynamics were collected at predefined time points to validate the cut-off value.

MAIN RESULTS

Sixty patients were included in the study. Using our predefined LSCI cut-off value, 21 (35 %) patients were identified as developing severe MTS. These patients were found to have higher concentrations of 6-Keto-PGF_aα (p = 0.002), lower SVR (p < 0.001), lower MAP (p = 0.004), and higher CO (p < 0.001) 15 min into surgery, as compared with patients not developing severe MTS.

CONCLUSION

This study validated our LSCI cut-off value for the objective identification of severe MTS patients as this group developed increased concentrations of PGI₂ and more pronounced hemodynamic alterations compared with patients not developing severe MTS.