Effects of two stepwise lung recruitment strategies on respiratory function and haemodynamics in anaesthetised pigs: A randomised crossover study

Incidence, characteristics and risk factors for alveolar recruitment maneuver-related hypotension in patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal cancer resection

BACKGROUND

Alveolar recruitment maneuvers (ARMs) may lead to transient hypotension, but the clinical characteristics of this induced hypotension are poorly understood. We investigated the characteristics of ARM-related hypotension in patients who underwent laparoscopic colorectal cancer resection.

AIM

To investigate the characteristics of ARM-related hypotension in patients who underwent laparoscopic colorectal cancer resection.

METHODS

This was a secondary analysis of the PROtective Ventilation using Open Lung approach Or Not trial and included 140 subjects. An ARM was repeated every 30 min during intraoperative mechanical ventilation. The primary endpoint was ARM-related hypotension, defined as a mean arterial pressure (MAP) < 60 mmHg during an ARM or within 5 min after an ARM. The risk factors for hypotension were identified. The peri-ARM changes in blood pressure were analyzed for the first three ARMs (ARM1,2,3) and the last ARM (ARMlast).

RESULTS

Thirty-four subjects (24.3%) developed ARM-related hypotension. Of all 1027 ARMs, 37 (3.61%) induced hypotension. More ARMs under nonpneumoperitoneum (33/349, 9.46%) than under pneumoperitoneum conditions (4/678, 0.59%) induced hypotension (P < 0.01). The incidence of hypotension was higher at ARM1 points than at non-ARM1 points (18/135, 13.3% vs 19/892, 2.1%; P < 0.01). The median percentage decrease in the MAP at ARM1 was 14%. Age ≥ 74 years, blood loss ≥ 150 mL and peak inspiratory pressure under pneumoperitoneum < 24 cm H2O were risk factors for ARM-related hypotension.

CONCLUSION

When the ARM was repeated intraoperatively, a quarter of subjects developed ARM-related hypotension, but only 3.61% of ARMs induced hypotension. ARM-related hypotension most occurred in a hemodynamically unstable state or a hypovolemic state, and in elderly subjects. Fortunately, ARMs that were performed under pneumoperitoneum conditions had less impact on blood pressure.

Variable ventilation versus stepwise lung recruitment manoeuvres for lung recruitment: A comparative study in an experimental model of atelectasis

BACKGROUND

Variable ventilation recruits alveoli in atelectatic lungs, but it is unknown how it compares with conventional recruitment manoeuvres.

OBJECTIVES

To test whether mechanical ventilation with variable tidal volumes and conventional recruitment manoeuvres have comparable effects on lung function.

DESIGN

Randomised crossover study.

SETTING

University hospital research facility.

ANIMALS

Eleven juvenile mechanically ventilated pigs with atelectasis created by saline lung lavage.

INTERVENTIONS

Lung recruitment was performed using two strategies, both with an individualised optimal positive-end expiratory pressure (PEEP) associated with the best respiratory system elastance during a decremental PEEP trial: conventional recruitment manoeuvres (stepwise increase of PEEP) in pressure-controlled mode) followed by 50 min of volume-controlled ventilation (VCV) with constant tidal volume, and variable ventilation, consisting of 50 min of VCV with random variation in tidal volume.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Before and 50 min after each recruitment manoeuvre strategy, lung aeration was assessed by computed tomography, and relative lung perfusion and ventilation (0% = dorsal, 100% = ventral) were determined by electrical impedance tomography.

RESULTS

After 50 min, variable ventilation and stepwise recruitment manoeuvres decreased the relative mass of poorly and nonaerated lung tissue (percent lung mass: 35.3 ± 6.2 versus 34.2 ± 6.6, P  = 0.303); reduced poorly aerated lung mass compared with baseline (-3.5 ± 4.0%, P  = 0.016, and -5.2 ± 2.8%, P  < 0.001, respectively), and reduced nonaerated lung mass compared with baseline (-7.2 ± 2.5%, P  < 0.001; and -4.7 ± 2.8%, P  < 0.001 respectively), while the distribution of relative perfusion was barely affected (variable ventilation: -0.8 ± 1.1%, P  = 0.044; stepwise recruitment manoeuvres: -0.4 ± 0.9%, P  = 0.167). Compared with baseline, variable ventilation and stepwise recruitment manoeuvres increased Pa O 2 (172 ± 85mmHg, P  = 0.001; and 213 ± 73 mmHg, P  < 0.001, respectively), reduced Pa CO 2 (-9.6 ± 8.1 mmHg, P  = 0.003; and -6.7 ± 4.6 mmHg, P  < 0.001, respectively), and decreased elastance (-11.4 ± 6.3 cmH 2 O, P  < 0.001; and -14.1 ± 3.3 cmH 2 O, P  < 0.001, respectively). Mean arterial pressure decreased during stepwise recruitment manoeuvres (-24 ± 8 mmHg, P  = 0.006), but not variable ventilation.

CONCLUSION

In this model of lung atelectasis, variable ventilation and stepwise recruitment manoeuvres effectively recruited lungs, but only variable ventilation did not adversely affect haemodynamics.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This study was registered and approved by Landesdirektion Dresden, Germany (DD24-5131/354/64).

Challenges in ARDS Definition, Management, and Identification of Effective Personalized Therapies

Over the last decade, the management of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) has made considerable progress both regarding supportive and pharmacologic therapies. Lung protective mechanical ventilation is the cornerstone of ARDS management. Current recommendations on mechanical ventilation in ARDS include the use of low tidal volume (V_T) 4-6 mL/kg of predicted body weight, plateau pressure (P_PLAT) < 30 cmH₂O, and driving pressure (∆P) < 14 cmH₂O. Moreover, positive end-expiratory pressure should be individualized. Recently, variables such as mechanical power and transpulmonary pressure seem promising for limiting ventilator-induced lung injury and optimizing ventilator settings. Rescue therapies such as recruitment maneuvers, vasodilators, prone positioning, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, and extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal have been considered for patients with severe ARDS. Regarding pharmacotherapies, despite more than 50 years of research, no effective treatment has yet been found. However, the identification of ARDS sub-phenotypes has revealed that some pharmacologic therapies that have failed to provide benefits when considering all patients with ARDS can show beneficial effects when these patients were stratified into specific sub-populations; for example, those with hyperinflammation/hypoinflammation. The aim of this narrative review is to provide an overview on current advances in the management of ARDS from mechanical ventilation to pharmacological treatments, including personalized therapy.

Distribution of ventilation and oxygenation in surgical obese patients ventilated with high versus low positive end-expiratory pressure: A substudy of a randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Intra-operative ventilation using low/physiological tidal volume and positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) with periodic alveolar recruitment manoeuvres (ARMs) is recommended in obese surgery patients.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the effects of PEEP levels and ARMs on ventilation distribution, oxygenation, haemodynamic parameters and cerebral oximetry.

DESIGN

A substudy of a randomised controlled trial.

SETTING

Tertiary medical centre in Geneva, Switzerland, between 2015 and 2018.

PATIENTS

One hundred and sixty-two patients with a BMI at least 35 kg per square metre undergoing elective open or laparoscopic surgery lasting at least 120 min.

INTERVENTION

Patients were randomised to PEEP of 4 cmH 2 O ( n  = 79) or PEEP of 12 cmH 2 O with hourly ARMs ( n  = 83).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary endpoint was the fraction of ventilation in the dependent lung as measured by electrical impedance tomography. Secondary endpoints were the oxygen saturation index (SaO 2 /FIO 2 ratio), respiratory and haemodynamic parameters, and cerebral tissue oximetry.

RESULTS

Compared with low PEEP, high PEEP was associated with smaller intra-operative decreases in dependent lung ventilation [-11.2%; 95% confidence interval (CI) -8.7 to -13.7 vs. -13.9%; 95% CI -11.7 to -16.5; P  = 0.029], oxygen saturation index (-49.6%; 95% CI -48.0 to -51.3 vs. -51.3%; 95% CI -49.6 to -53.1; P  < 0.001) and a lower driving pressure (-6.3 cmH 2 O; 95% CI -5.7 to -7.0). Haemodynamic parameters did not differ between the groups, except at the end of ARMs when arterial pressure and cardiac index decreased on average by -13.7 mmHg (95% CI -12.5 to -14.9) and by -0.54 l min -1  m -2 (95% CI -0.49 to -0.59) along with increased cerebral tissue oximetry (3.0 and 3.2% on left and right front brain, respectively).

CONCLUSION

In obese patients undergoing abdominal surgery, intra-operative PEEP of 12 cmH 2 O with periodic ARMs, compared with intra-operative PEEP of 4 cmH 2 O without ARMs, slightly redistributed ventilation to dependent lung zones with minor improvements in peripheral and cerebral oxygenation.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT02148692, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2.