Videolaryngoscopy vs. Direct Laryngoscopy for Elective Airway Management in Paediatric Anaesthesia: A prospective randomised controlled trial

A Comparison of McGrath Mac and HugeMed Video Laryngoscopes in Pediatric Patients Under 3 Years Old-A Prospective Randomized Trial

BACKGROUND

Children generally face a higher incidence of airway management complications, intubation difficulties, and the risk of failed intubation. Currently, there is sufficient evidence in clinical practice for the use of videolaryngoscopes in pediatric airway management. However, there are a number of standard-blade videolaryngoscopes available for children. In addition, there is no clear recommendation on which videolaryngoscope is superior. The primary objective of this study is to compare the first pass success rate and the Percentage of Glottic Opening (POGO) scores with Cormack-Lehane (CML) scores obtained through direct and indirect laryngoscopy with HugeMed and McGrath Mac videolaryngoscopes in pediatric patients with an unanticipated, difficult airway.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Following the Ethics Committee approval and written parental consents, a total of 40 elective surgical patients, aged 3 and under, with ASA 1-3 risk classification, and undergoing general anesthesia, were included in the study. After induction of general anesthesia, the first group of patients (Group McGrath, n = 20) was intubated with the McGrath Mac videolaryngoscope, and the second group (Group HugeMed, n = 20) with the HugeMed videolaryngoscope. Before intubation, CML and POGO scores were recorded for both groups using direct and indirect laryngoscopy with videolaryngoscopes. Intubation time, number of attempts, need for cricoid pressure, optimization maneuver requirement, and hemodynamic parameters were recorded for both groups.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference between groups in demographic data including age, gender, body mass index, ASA, and hemodynamic parameters. A significant improvement was observed in CML and POGO scores using indirect laryngoscopy (p < 0.001). CML scores obtained with the McGrath Mac were significantly lower than the HugeMed Group (p = 0.0034). The mean POGO value calculated with indirect laryngoscopy was significantly higher in the McGrath Group compared to the HugeMed Group (92.63 ± 6.09 vs. 88.75 ± 4.44, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Videolaryngoscopes improved laryngeal visualization in children under 3 years old. Compared to HugeMed, in indirect laryngoscopy, the McGrath Mac videolaryngoscope was found to be superior, with better CML and POGO scores. However, number of tracheal intubation attempts, success rate, complication risk, and hemodynamic parameters did not show any significant difference between the groups. Clinical trial registration number was NCT06484517.

A randomized controlled trail comparing the visual stylet and visual laryngoscope for transoral single lumen tracheal intubation

Visual laryngoscope, as the most commonly used tracheal intubation tool in clinical practice, has a high intubation success rate and is quick to learn, but there are risks of over flexion of the neck, tooth loss, etc. The visual stylet helps to make up for these shortcomings. This study aimed to compare the effects of the visual stylet and visual laryngoscope on transoral single lumen tracheal intubation in non-difficult airways. The primary outcome was intubation time, and secondary outcomes included glottic exposure time, first success rates, hemodynamic indices, intubation-related complications. A total of 148 patients were included, with 75 in the visual stylet (VS) group and 73 in the visual laryngoscope (VL) group. The intubation time in the VS group was 35 (11) seconds, significantly shorter than the 41 (9) seconds in the VL group (P < 0.001). Immediately post-intubation, the MAP in the VS group was 80 (20.5) mmHg, lower than 87 (23) mmHg in the VL group (P < 0.01). Intubation-related complications are also lower in VS group compared to VL group. Other outcomes don't have significant difference. Our study has demonstrated that the visual stylet significantly reduces intubation time and provides more stable hemodynamics. For patients with limited mouth opening, shorter thyromental distance, or higher Cormack-Lehane grades, the visual stylet may potentially be a better choice compared to video laryngoscopy for tracheal intubation.Trial registration China Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2100051812) (05/10/2021).

Videolaryngoscopy in paediatrics: in search of the clinical evidence

Despite the numerous recent trials, systematic reviews and meta-analyses have not conclusively shown superiority of videolaryngoscopy over other techniques for tracheal intubation of children. Clinical trials have shown significant differences using various outcome measures, but the overall clinical evidence remains weak. An international group of experts is currently working on developing good clinical research practice guidelines for paediatric airway management research, with the ultimate aim of identifying a core set of outcomes to be applied to develop future robust and comparable trials.

Out-of-Hospital Pediatric Video Laryngoscopy With an Adult Device: A Case Series Presented With a Contemporary Group Intubated With Direct Laryngoscopy

OBJECTIVES

After introducing an adult video laryngoscope (VL) in our physician-paramedic prehospital and retrieval medical service, our quality assurance process identified this blade being used during pediatric intubations. We present a case series of pediatric intubations using this oversized adult VL alongside a contemporaneous group of direct laryngoscopy (DL) intubations.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of intubated patients 15 years or younger in our electronic quality assurance registry from January 1, 2017, to December 31, 2020. Data collected were demographic details, intubation equipment, drug doses, the number of intubation attempts, and complications. Results are presented according to those intubated with C-MAC4 VL (Karl Storz) alongside age-appropriate DL sizes.

RESULTS

Ninety-nine pediatric patients were intubated, 67 (67%) by CMAC4 and 32 (33%) by DL. Video laryngoscopy had a first-attempt success rate of 96% and DL 91%. A Cormach and Lehane view 1 or 2 was found in 66 VL (99%) and 29 DL patients (91%). Desaturation was reported in two VL and 1 DL patient.

CONCLUSIONS

Adult VL became the most common method of intubation in patients older than 1 year during the study period. An adult C-MAC4 VL could be considered for clinicians who prefer VL when a pediatric VL is unavailable or as a second-line device if a pediatric VL is not present when intubating children older than 1 year.

Non-channeled Video Laryngoscopy as an Alternative to Conventional Laryngoscopy for Intubating Adult Patients in the Intensive Care Unit

Background Endotracheal intubation in the intensive care unit (ICU) is often a risky procedure due to the emergency situation, unstable condition of the patient, and technical problems such as inadequate positioning. Several new techniques, such as video laryngoscopy, have been developed recently to improve the success rate of first-pass intubations and reduce complications. We conducted this study to compare a non-channeled reusable video laryngoscope BPL VL-02 (manufactured by BPL Medical Technologies, Bangalore, India) with a conventional laryngoscope for intubation of adult patients in the ICU. Methodology A total of 72 ICU patients were randomly allocated to be intubated with either conventional direct laryngoscopy via Macintosh blade (group A) or video laryngoscopy with BPL VL-02 (group B). All patients were intubated by the primary investigator and the assistant noted the following parameters: the total number of intubation attempts, total duration of intubation, assistance or alternative technique required, Cormack Lehane grading, and any complications. Results There was no significant difference in the Cormack Lehane grading, number of attempts, or complications between the two groups. On comparing the assistance required during intubation in patients, it was observed that four (11.11%) patients in group A and seven (19.44%) patients in group B needed backward, upward, and rightward pressure on the larynx assistance during intubation. In five (13.89%) patients in group B, Stylet was required during intubation. The difference was statistically significant (p = 0.0308). The video laryngoscopy group (group B) had a longer mean duration of intubation (64.36 ± 6.28 seconds) compared to group A (45.72 ± 11.45 seconds), and the difference was statistically significant (p < 0.0001). Conclusions Non-channeled video laryngoscope (BPL VL-02) is not a suitable alternative to conventional direct laryngoscopy with a Macintosh blade in terms of successful first-pass intubation, total duration of intubation, and assistance required.

Does videolaryngoscopy improve tracheal intubation first attempt success in the NICUs? A report from the NEAR4NEOS

OBJECTIVE

We hypothesized that videolaryngoscope use for tracheal intubations would differ across NICUs, be associated with higher first attempt success and lower adverse events.

STUDY DESIGN

Data from the National Emergency Airway Registry for Neonates (01/2015 to 12/2017) included intubation with direct laryngoscope or videolaryngoscope. Primary outcome was first attempt success. Secondary outcomes were adverse tracheal intubation associated events and severe desaturation.

RESULTS

Of 2730 encounters (13 NICUs), 626 (23%) utilized a videolaryngoscope (3% to 64% per site). Videolaryngoscope use was associated with higher first attempt success (p < 0.001), lower adverse tracheal intubation associated events (p < 0.001), but no difference in severe desaturation. After adjustment, videolaryngoscope use was not associated with higher first attempt success (OR:1.18, p = 0.136), but was associated with lower tracheal intubation associated events (OR:0.45, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Videolaryngoscope use is variable, not independently associated with higher first attempt success but associated with fewer tracheal intubation associated events.