Usage of augmented reality for interventional neuraxial procedures: A phantom-based study

Comparison of Mixed Reality-Assisted Spinal Puncture with Landmark-Guided Spinal Puncture by Novice Practitioners: A Pilot Study

Background

Performing spinal anaesthesia in elderly patients with ligament calcification or hyperostosis is challenging for novice practitioners. This pilot study aimed to compare the effectiveness of mixed reality-assisted spinal puncture (MRasp) with that of landmark-guided spinal puncture (LGsp) by novice practitioners in elderly patients.

Methods

In this pilot study, 36 patients (aged ≥65 years) scheduled for elective surgery under spinal anaesthesia by anaesthesiology residents were included. Patients were randomly assigned to the MRasp group (n = 18) or the LGsp group (n = 18). The outcomes included the number of needle insertion attempts, redirection attempts, passes, the rate of successful first-attempt needle insertion, the rate of successful first needle pass, the spinal puncture time, the total procedure time, and the incidence of perioperative complications.

Results

The median number of needle insertion attempts was significantly fewer in the MRasp group than in the LGsp group (1.0 vs 2.0, P = 0.023). The proportion of patients with successful first-attempt needle insertion was 72.2% in the MRasp group and 44.4% in the LGsp group (P = 0.176). The incidence of perioperative complications did not significantly differ between the two groups.

Conclusion

This pilot study found that novice practitioners made significantly fewer needle insertion attempts in the MRasp group compared to the LGsp group when performing spinal anaesthesia on elderly patients. A future randomized controlled trial (RCT) is warranted to validate its effectiveness.

Trial Registration

This trial was registered at https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=178960 (ChiCTR-IPR-2300068520). Public title: Mixed reality-assisted versus landmark-guided spinal puncture in elderly patients: a randomized controlled pilot study. Principal investigator: Lei Gao. The registration date was February 22, 2023. The date of the first participant enrolment was February 27, 2023.

Randomized control trial of a holographic needle guidance technique for thoracic epidural placement

INTRODUCTION

The Microsoft HoloLens is a head-mounted mixed reality device, which allows for overlaying hologram-like computer-generated elements onto the real world. This technology can be combined with preprocedural ultrasound during thoracic epidural placement to create a visual of the ideal needle angulation and trajectory in the users' field of view. This could result in a technically easier and potentially safer alternative to traditional blind landmark techniques.

METHODS

Patients were randomly assigned to one of two groups: (1) HoloLens-assisted thoracic epidural technique (intervention-group H) or (2) traditional thoracic epidural technique (control-group C). The primary outcome was needling time (defined as skin puncture to insertion of epidural catheter) during the procedure. The secondary outcomes were number of needle punctures, number of needle movements, number of bone contacts, and epidural failure. Procedural pain and recovery room pain levels were also evaluated.

RESULTS

Eighty-three patients were included in this study. The primary outcome of procedure time was reduced in the HoloLens group compared with control (4.5 min vs 7.3 min, p=0.02, 95% CI), as was the number of needle movements required (7.2 vs 14.4, p=0.01), respectively. There was no difference in intraprocedure or postprocedure pain, bone contacts, or total number of needle punctures. Three patients in the control group experienced epidural failure versus one patient in the HoloLens group.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that thoracic epidural placement may be facilitated by using a guidance hologram and may be more technically efficient.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT04028284.