1
|
Gouel-Chéron A, Neukirch C, Chollet-Martin S, Valent A, Plaud B, Longrois D, Nicaise-Roland P, Montravers P, de Chaisemartin L. Neuromuscular blocking agent drug challenge: a literature review and protocol proposal with biological evaluation. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2024; 41:722-727. [PMID: 38916219 DOI: 10.1097/eja.0000000000002033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/26/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Drug challenge is the gold standard for identifying causative agents of drug allergies. Although clinical guidelines have recently been published, they do not recommend neuromuscular blocking agent (NMBA) drug challenges. NMBA challenges are rendered difficult by the lack of homogeneity of routine allergy work-ups and the necessity of a specialised setting. Several scenarios support NMBA challenges, such as an ambiguous allergy work-up, a high suspicion of a false-positive skin test or identification of a well tolerated alternative NMBA strategy. Furthermore, routine allergy work-ups may not recognise non-IgE mechanisms, such as IgG or MRGPRX2, whereas drug challenges may reveal them. Finally, if the culprit NMBA is not identified, subsequent anaesthesia regimens will be challenging to implement, resulting in increased risk. OBJECTIVES This literature review discusses the indications, strategies, doses, monitoring methods, limitations, and unresolved issues related to drug challenges for NMBAs. DESIGN The literature review included randomised controlled trials, observational studies, reviews, case reports, series, and comments on humans. DATA SOURCES Studies were retrieved from databases (PubMed) and electronic libraries (OVID, EMBASE, Scopus, etc.). ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA All studies that referred to the NMBA challenge were included without publication date limitations. RESULTS NMBA challenge may be considered in NMBA anaphylaxis patients with inconclusive or ambivalent IgE diagnostic work-up under controlled conditions (presence of anaesthetists and allergists with continuous monitoring in a secured environment). To illustrate its utility, a case report of a double NMBA challenge in a patient with NMBA cross-reactivity is presented, along with biological explorations to detect subclinical cellular activation, a novel aspect of this procedure. CONCLUSION Drug challenges could be implemented during the NMBA allergy work-up under strict safety conditions at specialised centres with close collaboration between anaesthetists and allergists. This could decrease uncertainty and contribute to defining a safer strategy for subsequent anaesthetic drug regimens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aurélie Gouel-Chéron
- From the Anaesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine Department, DMU PARABOL, Bichat Hospital, AP-HP (AG-C, DL, PM), Antibody in Therapy and Pathology, Pasteur Institute, UMR 1222 INSERM (AG-C, LdC), Paris Cité University (AG-C, BP, DL, PM, LdC), C2A: WAO Centre of Excellence for Allergy and Asthma (AG-C, CN, SC-M, DL, PN-R, LdC), Pulmonology Department, Bichat Hospital, AP-HP, Paris Cité University (CN), Université Paris Cité, Inserm, PHERE (CN), Immunology department, 'autoimmunity, hypersensitivities, and biologics', DMU BIOGEM, Bichat Hospital, AP-HP, Paris (SC-M, PN-R, LdC), Université Paris-Saclay, Inflammation, Microbiome and Immunosurveillance, INSERM, Orsay (SC-M, PN-R, LdC), Anaesthesiology, Critical Care and Burn Unit Department, DMU PARABOL, Saint-Louis Hospital, AP-HP, Paris (AV, BP) and INSERM UMR-S942, Lariboisière Hospital and INI-CRCT network, France (BP)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Dejoux A, Zhu Q, Ganneau C, Goff ORL, Godon O, Lemaitre J, Relouzat F, Huetz F, Sokal A, Vandenberghe A, Pecalvel C, Hunault L, Derenne T, Gillis CM, Iannascoli B, Wang Y, Rose T, Mertens C, Nicaise-Roland P, England P, Mahévas M, de Chaisemartin L, Le Grand R, Letscher H, Saul F, Pissis C, Haouz A, Reber LL, Chappert P, Jönsson F, Ebo DG, Millot GA, Bay S, Chollet-Martin S, Gouel-Chéron A, Bruhns P. Rocuronium-specific antibodies drive perioperative anaphylaxis but can also function as reversal agents in preclinical models. Sci Transl Med 2024; 16:eado4463. [PMID: 39259810 DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.ado4463] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2024] [Revised: 06/06/2024] [Accepted: 08/05/2024] [Indexed: 09/13/2024]
Abstract
Neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBAs) relax skeletal muscles to facilitate surgeries and ease intubation but can lead to adverse reactions, including complications because of postoperative residual neuromuscular blockade (rNMB) and, in rare cases, anaphylaxis. Both adverse reactions vary between types of NMBAs, with rocuronium, a widely used nondepolarizing NMBA, inducing one of the longest rNMB durations and highest anaphylaxis incidences. rNMB induced by rocuronium can be reversed by the synthetic γ-cyclodextrin sugammadex. However, in rare cases, sugammadex can provoke anaphylaxis. Thus, additional therapeutic options are needed. Rocuronium-induced anaphylaxis is proposed to rely on preexisting rocuronium-binding antibodies. To understand the pathogenesis of rocuronium-induced anaphylaxis and to identify potential therapeutics, we investigated the memory B cell antibody repertoire of patients with suspected hypersensitivity to rocuronium. We identified polyclonal antibody repertoires with a high diversity among V(D)J genes without evidence of clonal groups. When recombinantly expressed, these antibodies demonstrated specificity and low affinity for rocuronium without cross-reactivity for other NMBAs. Moreover, when these antibodies were expressed as human immunoglobulin E (IgE), they triggered human mast cell activation and passive systemic anaphylaxis in transgenic mice, although their affinities were insufficient to serve as reversal agents. Rocuronium-specific, high-affinity antibodies were thus isolated from rocuronium-immunized mice. The highest-affinity antibody was able to reverse rocuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade in nonhuman primates with kinetics comparable to that of sugammadex. Together, these data support the hypothesis that antibodies cause anaphylactic reactions to rocuronium and pave the way for improved diagnostics and neuromuscular blockade reversal agents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alice Dejoux
- Institut Pasteur, Université Paris Cité, INSERM UMR1222, Antibodies in Therapy and Pathology, 75015 Paris, France
- Sorbonne Université, Collège Doctoral, 75005 Paris, France
| | - Qianqian Zhu
- Institut Pasteur, Université Paris Cité, INSERM UMR1222, Antibodies in Therapy and Pathology, 75015 Paris, France
- Université Paris-Saclay, INSERM, Inflammation Microbiome Immunosurveillance, 91400 Orsay, France
| | - Christelle Ganneau
- Institut Pasteur, Université Paris Cité, CNRS UMR3523, Chimie des Biomolécules, 75015 Paris, France
| | - Odile Richard-Le Goff
- Institut Pasteur, Université Paris Cité, INSERM UMR1222, Antibodies in Therapy and Pathology, 75015 Paris, France
| | - Ophélie Godon
- Institut Pasteur, Université Paris Cité, INSERM UMR1222, Antibodies in Therapy and Pathology, 75015 Paris, France
| | - Julien Lemaitre
- Université Paris-Saclay, INSERM, CEA, Center for Immunology of Viral, Autoimmune, Hematological and Bacterial Diseases, 92260 Fontenay-aux-Roses and 94250 Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
| | - Francis Relouzat
- Université Paris-Saclay, INSERM, CEA, Center for Immunology of Viral, Autoimmune, Hematological and Bacterial Diseases, 92260 Fontenay-aux-Roses and 94250 Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
| | - François Huetz
- Institut Pasteur, Université Paris Cité, INSERM UMR1222, Antibodies in Therapy and Pathology, 75015 Paris, France
| | - Aurélien Sokal
- Institut Necker Enfants Malades, INSERM U1151/CNRS UMR 8253, Action thématique incitative sur programme-Avenir Team, Auto-Immune and Immune B cells, Université Paris Cité, Université Paris Est-Créteil, 94000 Créteil, France; INSERM U955, équipe 2. Institut Mondor de Recherche Biomédicale, Université Paris-Est Créteil, 94000 Créteil, France
- Service de Médecine interne, Hôpital Beaujon, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Université de Paris Cité, 92110 Clichy, France
| | - Alexis Vandenberghe
- Institut Necker Enfants Malades, INSERM U1151/CNRS UMR 8253, Action thématique incitative sur programme-Avenir Team, Auto-Immune and Immune B cells, Université Paris Cité, Université Paris Est-Créteil, 94000 Créteil, France; INSERM U955, équipe 2. Institut Mondor de Recherche Biomédicale, Université Paris-Est Créteil, 94000 Créteil, France
| | - Cyprien Pecalvel
- Toulouse Institute for Infectious and Inflammatory Diseases (Infinity), INSERM UMR1291, CNRS UMR5051, University Toulouse III, 31000 Toulouse, France
| | - Lise Hunault
- Institut Pasteur, Université Paris Cité, INSERM UMR1222, Antibodies in Therapy and Pathology, 75015 Paris, France
- Sorbonne Université, Collège Doctoral, 75005 Paris, France
| | - Thomas Derenne
- Institut Pasteur, Université Paris Cité, INSERM UMR1222, Antibodies in Therapy and Pathology, 75015 Paris, France
- Sorbonne Université, Collège Doctoral, 75005 Paris, France
| | - Caitlin M Gillis
- Institut Pasteur, Université Paris Cité, INSERM UMR1222, Antibodies in Therapy and Pathology, 75015 Paris, France
| | - Bruno Iannascoli
- Institut Pasteur, Université Paris Cité, INSERM UMR1222, Antibodies in Therapy and Pathology, 75015 Paris, France
| | - Yidan Wang
- Institut Pasteur, Université Paris Cité, INSERM UMR1222, Antibodies in Therapy and Pathology, 75015 Paris, France
| | - Thierry Rose
- Institut Pasteur, Université Paris Cité, INSERM UMR1224, Biologie Cellulaire des Lymphocytes, Ligue Nationale Contre le Cancer, Équipe Labellisée Ligue 2018, 75015 Paris, France
| | - Christel Mertens
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, Department of Immunology-Allergology-Rheumatology, Antwerp University Hospital and the Infla-Med Center of Excellence, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium; Department of Immunology and Allergology, AZ Jan Palfijn Ghent, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
| | - Pascale Nicaise-Roland
- Service d'immunologie Biologique, DMU BIOGEM, Hôpital Bichat, APHP, 75018, Paris, France
| | - Patrick England
- Institut Pasteur, Université Paris Cité, CNRS UMR3528, Molecular Biophysics Core Facility, 75015 Paris, France
| | - Matthieu Mahévas
- Institut Necker Enfants Malades, INSERM U1151/CNRS UMR 8253, Action thématique incitative sur programme-Avenir Team, Auto-Immune and Immune B cells, Université Paris Cité, Université Paris Est-Créteil, 94000 Créteil, France; INSERM U955, équipe 2. Institut Mondor de Recherche Biomédicale, Université Paris-Est Créteil, 94000 Créteil, France
| | - Luc de Chaisemartin
- Université Paris-Saclay, INSERM, Inflammation Microbiome Immunosurveillance, 91400 Orsay, France
- Service d'immunologie Biologique, DMU BIOGEM, Hôpital Bichat, APHP, 75018, Paris, France
| | - Roger Le Grand
- Université Paris-Saclay, INSERM, CEA, Center for Immunology of Viral, Autoimmune, Hematological and Bacterial Diseases, 92260 Fontenay-aux-Roses and 94250 Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
| | - Hélène Letscher
- Université Paris-Saclay, INSERM, CEA, Center for Immunology of Viral, Autoimmune, Hematological and Bacterial Diseases, 92260 Fontenay-aux-Roses and 94250 Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
| | - Frederick Saul
- Institut Pasteur, Université Paris Cité, CNRS UMR3528, Plate-forme Cristallographie-C2RT, 75015 Paris, France
| | - Cédric Pissis
- Institut Pasteur, Université Paris Cité, CNRS UMR3528, Plate-forme Cristallographie-C2RT, 75015 Paris, France
| | - Ahmed Haouz
- Institut Pasteur, Université Paris Cité, CNRS UMR3528, Plate-forme Cristallographie-C2RT, 75015 Paris, France
| | - Laurent L Reber
- Toulouse Institute for Infectious and Inflammatory Diseases (Infinity), INSERM UMR1291, CNRS UMR5051, University Toulouse III, 31000 Toulouse, France
| | - Pascal Chappert
- Institut Necker Enfants Malades, INSERM U1151/CNRS UMR 8253, Action thématique incitative sur programme-Avenir Team, Auto-Immune and Immune B cells, Université Paris Cité, Université Paris Est-Créteil, 94000 Créteil, France; INSERM U955, équipe 2. Institut Mondor de Recherche Biomédicale, Université Paris-Est Créteil, 94000 Créteil, France
| | - Friederike Jönsson
- Institut Pasteur, Université Paris Cité, INSERM UMR1222, Antibodies in Therapy and Pathology, 75015 Paris, France
- CNRS, F-75015 Paris, France
| | - Didier G Ebo
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, Department of Immunology-Allergology-Rheumatology, Antwerp University Hospital and the Infla-Med Center of Excellence, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium; Department of Immunology and Allergology, AZ Jan Palfijn Ghent, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
| | - Gaël A Millot
- Institut Pasteur, Université Paris Cité, INSERM UMR1222, Antibodies in Therapy and Pathology, 75015 Paris, France
- Institut Pasteur, Université Paris Cité, Bioinformatics and Biostatistics Hub, 75015 Paris, France
| | - Sylvie Bay
- Institut Pasteur, Université Paris Cité, CNRS UMR3523, Chimie des Biomolécules, 75015 Paris, France
| | - Sylvie Chollet-Martin
- Université Paris-Saclay, INSERM, Inflammation Microbiome Immunosurveillance, 91400 Orsay, France
- Service d'immunologie Biologique, DMU BIOGEM, Hôpital Bichat, APHP, 75018, Paris, France
| | - Aurélie Gouel-Chéron
- Institut Pasteur, Université Paris Cité, INSERM UMR1222, Antibodies in Therapy and Pathology, 75015 Paris, France
- Anaesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine Department, DMU Parabol, Bichat-Claude Bernard Hospital, AP-HP, 75018 Paris, France
- Université Paris Cité, 75010 Paris, France
| | - Pierre Bruhns
- Institut Pasteur, Université Paris Cité, INSERM UMR1222, Antibodies in Therapy and Pathology, 75015 Paris, France
- INSERM 1152, DHU FIRE, Labex Inflamex, Université Paris Diderot Paris 7, 75018 Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Butranova O, Zyryanov S, Gorbacheva A, Asetskaya I, Polivanov V. Drug-Induced Anaphylaxis: National Database Analysis. Pharmaceuticals (Basel) 2024; 17:90. [PMID: 38256923 PMCID: PMC10821106 DOI: 10.3390/ph17010090] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2023] [Revised: 01/05/2024] [Accepted: 01/08/2024] [Indexed: 01/24/2024] Open
Abstract
(1) Background: National health system databases represent an important source of information about the epidemiology of adverse drug reactions including drug-induced allergy and anaphylaxis. Analysis of such databases may enhance the knowledge of healthcare professionals regarding the problem of drug-induced anaphylaxis. (2) Methods: A retrospective descriptive analysis was carried out of spontaneous reports (SRs) with data on drug-induced anaphylaxis (SRsAs) extracted from the Russian National Pharmacovigilance database (analyzed period 2 April 2019-21 June 2023). The percentage of SRsAs among SRs of drug-induced allergy (SRsDIAs) was calculated, as well as of pediatric, elderly, and fatal SrsAs. Drugs involved in anaphylaxis were assessed among total SRsAs, pediatric, and elderly SRsAs, and among fatal SRsAs. Demographic parameters of patients were assessed. (3) Results: SRsAs were reported in 8.3% of SRsDIAs (2304/27,727), the mean age of patients was 48.2 ± 15.8 years, and females accounted for 53.2% of cases. The main causative groups of drugs were antibacterials (ABs) for systemic use (44.6%), local anesthetics (20.0%), and cyclooxygenase (COX) inhibitors (10.1%). Fatal SRsAs were reported in 9.5% (218/2304) of cases, the mean age of patients was 48.0 ± 16.7 years, and females accounted for 56.4% of cases. Pediatric SRsAs accounted for 3.9% of pediatric SRsDIAs and 5.8% of all SRsAs, with a mean age of 11.8 ± 4.5 years, and females acccounted for 51.9% of cases. Elderly SRsAs accounted for 2% of elderly SRsDIAs and 2.8% of all SRsAs, and the mean age was 73.0 ± 5.3 years, and females accounted for 43.5% of cases. ABs caused 40% of SRsAs in the elderly, 42.9% in children, and 50% of fatal SRsAs. (4) Conclusions: Our study revealed a relatively high proportion of anaphylaxis among SRs of drug-induced allergy. ABs were the most prevalent causative agents, especially in fatal SRsAs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olga Butranova
- Department of General and Clinical Pharmacology, Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia Named after Patrice Lumumba (RUDN), 6 Miklukho-Maklaya St., 117198 Moscow, Russia; (S.Z.); (A.G.); (I.A.)
| | - Sergey Zyryanov
- Department of General and Clinical Pharmacology, Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia Named after Patrice Lumumba (RUDN), 6 Miklukho-Maklaya St., 117198 Moscow, Russia; (S.Z.); (A.G.); (I.A.)
- Moscow City Health Department, City Clinical Hospital No. 24, State Budgetary Institution of Healthcare of the City of Moscow, Pistzovaya Srt. 10, 127015 Moscow, Russia
| | - Anastasia Gorbacheva
- Department of General and Clinical Pharmacology, Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia Named after Patrice Lumumba (RUDN), 6 Miklukho-Maklaya St., 117198 Moscow, Russia; (S.Z.); (A.G.); (I.A.)
| | - Irina Asetskaya
- Department of General and Clinical Pharmacology, Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia Named after Patrice Lumumba (RUDN), 6 Miklukho-Maklaya St., 117198 Moscow, Russia; (S.Z.); (A.G.); (I.A.)
| | - Vitaly Polivanov
- Pharmacovigilance Center, Information and Methodological Center for Expert Evaluation, Record and Analysis of Circulation of Medical Products under the Federal Service for Surveillance in Healthcare, 4-1 Slavyanskaya Square, 109074 Moscow, Russia;
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Gouel-Chéron A, Dejoux A, Lamanna E, Bruhns P. Animal Models of IgE Anaphylaxis. BIOLOGY 2023; 12:931. [PMID: 37508362 PMCID: PMC10376466 DOI: 10.3390/biology12070931] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2023] [Revised: 06/16/2023] [Accepted: 06/21/2023] [Indexed: 07/30/2023]
Abstract
Allergies and atopy have emerged as significant public health concerns, with a progressively increasing incidence over the last two decades. Anaphylaxis is the most severe form of allergic reactions, characterized by a rapid onset and potentially fatal outcome, even in healthy individuals. Due to the unpredictable nature and potential lethality of anaphylaxis and the wide range of allergens involved, clinical studies in human patients have proven to be challenging. Diagnosis is further complicated by the lack of reliable laboratory biomarkers to confirm clinical suspicion. Thus, animal models have been developed to replicate human anaphylaxis and explore its pathophysiology. Whereas results obtained from animal models may not always be directly translatable to humans, they serve as a foundation for understanding the underlying mechanisms. Animal models are an essential tool for investigating new biomarkers that could be incorporated into the allergy workup for patients, as well as for the development of novel treatments. Two primary pathways have been described in animals and humans: classic, predominantly involving IgE and histamine, and alternative, reliant on IgG and the platelet-activating factor. This review will focus essentially on the former and aims to describe the most utilized IgE-mediated anaphylaxis animal models, including their respective advantages and limitations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aurélie Gouel-Chéron
- Université Paris Cité, 75010 Paris, France
- Anaesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine Department, DMU Parabol, Bichat-Claude Bernard Hospital, AP-HP, 75018 Paris, France
- Institut Pasteur, Université de Paris Cité, INSERM UMR1222, Antibodies in Therapy and Pathology, 75015 Paris, France
| | - Alice Dejoux
- Institut Pasteur, Université de Paris Cité, INSERM UMR1222, Antibodies in Therapy and Pathology, 75015 Paris, France
- Sorbonne Université, Collège Doctoral, 75005 Paris, France
| | - Emma Lamanna
- Institut Pasteur, Université de Paris Cité, INSERM UMR1222, Antibodies in Therapy and Pathology, 75015 Paris, France
- Neovacs SA, 92150 Suresnes, France
| | - Pierre Bruhns
- Institut Pasteur, Université de Paris Cité, INSERM UMR1222, Antibodies in Therapy and Pathology, 75015 Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Au EYL, Mak HWF, Yeung MHY, Chiang V, Lam K, Wong JCY, Yeung HHF, Chan EYT, Lau CS, Li PH. Ten-year outcomes of Perioperative Anaphylaxis Workup Study in Hong Kong (PAWS-HK): Performance of diagnostic modalities. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2023:S1081-1206(23)00125-4. [PMID: 36842494 DOI: 10.1016/j.anai.2023.02.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2022] [Revised: 02/16/2023] [Accepted: 02/17/2023] [Indexed: 02/26/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Studies on perioperative anaphylaxis (PA) in Asia are lacking. Furthermore, allergy workup for PA has largely been limited to the "silver standard" of skin tests (ST). Using in vitro tests as an adjunct to ST may improve and overcome these diagnostic challenges. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the clinical characteristics and diagnostic tests of patients with suspected PA through the Perioperative Anaphylaxis Workup Study in Hong Kong cohort. METHODS Patients with a diagnosis of PA over a 10-year period were recruited into the Perioperative Anaphylaxis Workup Study in Hong Kong. We reviewed the medical records, tryptase elevation, and diagnostic tests including ST, specific immunoglobulin E, and basophil activation tests (BAT). RESULTS In 151 patients with PA, diagnosis was reached in three-fourths of the cases (113/151, 74.8%). The most common culprits identified were neuromuscular blocking agents (25.8%), β lactams (17.2%) and chlorhexidine (13.9%). Severe anaphylaxis was associated with female sex, older age, elevated acute tryptase levels, and more cardiovascular manifestations during induction. Skin tests remained the most sensitive diagnostic modality overall (66.2%). BAT showed better performance for chlorhexidine and gelofusine anaphylaxis, with sensitivity of 80.0% and 79.6%, respectively. Specific Immunoglobulin E indicated even higher sensitivity (95.2%) than did ST (85.0%) and BAT (80.0%) for chlorhexidine anaphylaxis but performed poorly for other drugs. CONCLUSION Neuromuscular blocking agents remain the most common culprit in PA. There was a higher prevalence of gelofusine anaphylaxis in our cohort than was seen in the literature. Skin tests remain the most sensitive testing modality. In vitro tests for chlorhexidine and gelofusine showed promising results, but more studies to further elucidate its use are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elaine Y L Au
- Division of Clinical Immunology, Department of Pathology Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong
| | - Hugo W F Mak
- Division of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Department of Medicine, Queen Mary Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Maegan H Y Yeung
- Division of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Department of Medicine, Queen Mary Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Valerie Chiang
- Division of Clinical Immunology, Department of Pathology Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong
| | - Ki Lam
- Division of Clinical Immunology, Department of Pathology Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong
| | - Jane C Y Wong
- Division of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Department of Medicine, Queen Mary Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Heather H F Yeung
- Division of Clinical Immunology, Department of Pathology Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong
| | - Eric Y T Chan
- Division of Clinical Immunology, Department of Pathology Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong
| | - Chak-Sing Lau
- Division of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Department of Medicine, Queen Mary Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Philip H Li
- Division of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Department of Medicine, Queen Mary Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
| |
Collapse
|