1
|
Assessment of the New Acceleromyograph TOF 3D Compared with the Established TOF Watch SX: Bland-Altman Analysis of the Precision and Limits of Agreement between Both Devices-A Randomized Clinical Comparison. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11154583. [PMID: 35956198 PMCID: PMC9369732 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11154583] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2022] [Revised: 07/26/2022] [Accepted: 08/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
The new acceleromyograph TOF 3D was compared with the established TOF Watch SX in patients undergoing elective laparoscopic gynecological surgery. Neuromuscular transmission was assessed by simultaneous recording with both devices. Measurements were performed simultaneously at the left and the right M. adductor pollicis (Group A, 25 patients), or the M. corrugator supercilii (Group CS, 25 patients). The repeatability, time course, and limits of agreement (Bland-Altman) were compared. The primary endpoint was the 90% train-of-four recovery time (TOFR 0.9). Other endpoints included onset time of block, maximum T1 depression, time to 25% T1 recovery, the recovery time course of T1 response, and TOF ratio, respectively. In group CS, the repeatability coefficient of the TOF 3D was lower (4.66 (1.6)) than of the TOF Watch SX (6.02 (1.9); p = 0.026). In group A, the onset of the block was faster when measured by the TOF 3D (98.7 (30) s vs. 112.2 (36) s (mean (SD)); p = 0.032). In group A, time to recovery to a TOFR of 90% was measured earlier by the TOF 3D (bias −0.71 min, limits of agreement from −8.94 to +7.51 min). The TOF 3D provides adequate information with high precision and sensitivity. It is suitable even for measurement sites with small muscle contractions such as the M. corrugator supercilii.
Collapse
|
3
|
Plaud B, Baillard C, Bourgain JL, Bouroche G, Desplanque L, Devys JM, Fletcher D, Fuchs-Buder T, Lebuffe G, Meistelman C, Motamed C, Raft J, Servin F, Sirieix D, Slim K, Velly L, Verdonk F, Debaene B. Guidelines on muscle relaxants and reversal in anaesthesia. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med 2020; 39:125-142. [PMID: 31926308 DOI: 10.1016/j.accpm.2020.01.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 61] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To provide an update to the 1999 French guidelines on "Muscle relaxants and reversal in anaesthesia", a consensus committee of sixteen experts was convened. A formal policy of declaration and monitoring of conflicts of interest (COI) was developed at the outset of the process and enforced throughout. The entire guidelines process was conducted independently of any industrial funding (i.e. pharmaceutical, medical devices). The authors were required to follow the rules of the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE®) system to assess the quality of the evidence on which the recommendations were based. The potential drawbacks of making strong recommendations based on low-quality evidence were stressed. Few of the recommendations remained ungraded. METHODS The panel focused on eight questions: (1) In the absence of difficult mask ventilation criteria, is it necessary to check the possibility of ventilation via a facemask before muscle relaxant injection? Is it necessary to use muscle relaxants to facilitate facemask ventilation? (2) Is the use of muscle relaxants necessary to facilitate tracheal intubation? (3) Is the use of muscle relaxants necessary to facilitate the insertion of a supraglottic device and management of related complications? (4) Is it necessary to monitor neuromuscular blockade for airway management? (5) Is the use of muscle relaxants necessary to facilitate interventional procedures, and if so, which procedures? (6) Is intraoperative monitoring of neuromuscular blockade necessary? (7) What are the strategies for preventing and treating residual neuromuscular blockade? (8) What are the indications and precautions for use of both muscle relaxants and reversal agents in special populations (e.g. electroconvulsive therapy, obese patients, children, neuromuscular diseases, renal/hepatic failure, elderly patients)? All questions were formulated using the Population, Intervention, Comparison and Outcome (PICO) model for clinical questions and evidence profiles were generated. The results of the literature analysis and the recommendations were then assessed using the GRADE® system. RESULTS The summaries prepared by the SFAR Guideline panel resulted in thirty-one recommendations on muscle relaxants and reversal agents in anaesthesia. Of these recommendations, eleven have a high level of evidence (GRADE 1±) while twenty have a low level of evidence (GRADE 2±). No recommendations could be provided using the GRADE® system for five of the questions, and for two of these questions expert opinions were given. After two rounds of discussion and an amendment, a strong agreement was reached for all the recommendations. CONCLUSION Substantial agreement exists among experts regarding many strong recommendations for the improvement of practice concerning the use of muscle relaxants and reversal agents during anaesthesia. In particular, the French Society of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care (SFAR) recommends the use of a device to monitor neuromuscular blockade throughout anaesthesia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benoît Plaud
- Université de Paris, Assistance publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, service d'anesthésie et de réanimation, hôpital Saint-Louis, 1, avenue Claude-Vellefaux, 75010 Paris, France.
| | - Christophe Baillard
- Université de Paris, Assistance publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, service d'anesthésie et de réanimation, hôpital Cochin-Port Royal, 27, rue du Faubourg-Saint-Jacques, 75014 Paris, France
| | - Jean-Louis Bourgain
- Institut Gustave-Roussy, service d'anesthésie, 114, rue Édouard-Vaillant, 94800 Villejuif, France
| | - Gaëlle Bouroche
- Centre Léon-Bérard, service d'anesthésie, 28, promenade Léa-et-Napoléon-Bullukian, 69008 Lyon, France
| | - Laetitia Desplanque
- Assistance publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, service d'anesthésie et de réanimation, hôpital Bichat-Claude-Bernard, 46, rue Henri-Huchard, 75877 Paris cedex, France
| | - Jean-Michel Devys
- Fondation ophtalmologique Adolphe-de-Rothschild, service d'anesthésie et de réanimation, 29, rue Manin, 75019 Paris, France
| | - Dominique Fletcher
- Université de Versailles-Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Assistance publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, hôpital Ambroise-Paré, service d'anesthésie, 9, avenue Charles-de-Gaulle, 92100 Boulogne-Billancourt, France
| | - Thomas Fuchs-Buder
- Université de Lorraine, CHU de Brabois, service d'anesthésie et de réanimation, rue du Morvan, 54511 Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France
| | - Gilles Lebuffe
- Université de Lille, hôpital Huriez, service d'anesthésie et de réanimation, rue Michel-Polonovski, 59037 Lille, France
| | - Claude Meistelman
- Université de Lorraine, CHU de Brabois, service d'anesthésie et de réanimation, rue du Morvan, 54511 Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France
| | - Cyrus Motamed
- Institut Gustave-Roussy, service d'anesthésie, 114, rue Édouard-Vaillant, 94800 Villejuif, France
| | - Julien Raft
- Institut de cancérologie de Lorraine, service d'anesthésie, 6, avenue de Bourgogne, 54519 Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France
| | - Frédérique Servin
- Assistance publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, service d'anesthésie et de réanimation, hôpital Bichat-Claude-Bernard, 46, rue Henri-Huchard, 75877 Paris cedex, France
| | - Didier Sirieix
- Groupe polyclinique Marzet-Navarre, service d'anesthésie, 40, boulevard d'Alsace-Lorraine, 64000 Pau, France
| | - Karem Slim
- Université d'Auvergne, service de chirurgie digestive et hépatobiliaire, hôpital d'Estaing, 1, rue Lucie-Aubrac, 63100 Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Lionel Velly
- Université Aix-Marseille, hôpital de la Timone adultes, service d'anesthésie et de réanimation, 264, rue Saint-Pierre, 13385 Marseille cedex 05, France
| | - Franck Verdonk
- Sorbonne université, hôpital Saint-Antoine, 84, rue du Faubourg-Saint-Antoine, 75012 Paris, France
| | - Bertrand Debaene
- Université de Poitiers, service d'anesthésie et de réanimation, CHU de Poitiers, BP 577, 86021 Poitiers cedex, France
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Soltesz S, Stark C, Noé KG, Anapolski M, Mencke T. Comparison of the trapezius and the adductor pollicis muscle as predictor of good intubating conditions: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Anesthesiol 2017; 17:106. [PMID: 28818054 PMCID: PMC5561588 DOI: 10.1186/s12871-017-0401-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2017] [Accepted: 08/14/2017] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Adequate muscle relaxation is important for ensuring optimal conditions for intubation. Although acceleromyography of the adductor pollicis muscle is commonly used to assess conditions for intubation, we hypothesized that acceleromyography of the trapezius is more indicative of optimal intubating conditions. The primary outcome was the difference between both measurement sites with regard to prediction of good or acceptable intubating conditions. Methods Neuromuscular blockade after injection of rocuronium 0.3 mg/kg IV was measured simultaneously with acceleromyography of the adductor pollicis muscle and the trapezius muscle in sixty female patients, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I to III, undergoing general anesthesia for gynecologic surgery. Exclusion criteria were: expected difficult tracheal intubation (e.g. history of difficult intubation, reduced mouth opening (< 2 cm) and/or Mallampati Score 4), increased risk of pulmonary aspiration (e.g. gastroesophageal reflux or delayed gastric emptying) allergies to drugs used during the study, pregnancy, neuromuscular diseases, medication with potential to influence neuromuscular function (e.g. furosemide, magnesium, cephalosporins) and hepatic or renal insufficiency (serum bilirubin >26 μmol/L, serum creatinine >90 μmol/l). Patients were randomized to 2 groups: group A (n = 30): endotracheal intubation after onset of the neuromuscular block at the adductor pollicis muscle. Group B (n = 30): endotracheal intubation after onset at the trapezius muscle. Intubating conditions were compared between both groups by means of a standardised score (the Copenhagen score) with Fisher’s exact test. Results Onset of the block after rocuronium injection was observed at the adductor pollicis muscle compared to the trapezius with 2.8 (1.1) versus 2.5 (1.1) min (mean ± SD; P = 0.006). Intubating conditions were poor in 2 patients (7%) of group A, and in 1 patient (3%) of group T. They were acceptable (either excellent or good) in 28 patients (93%) in group A, and in 1 patient (97%) in group T (P = 0.82). Conclusions Performing acceleromyography at the trapezius muscle reduced the time between injection of neuromuscular blocking agents and intubation by 18 s (11%). Thus, trapezius muscle acceleromyography is an acceptable alternative to adductor pollicis muscle acceleromyography in predicting acceptable intubating conditions, which allows for earlier indication of adequate intubating conditions. Trial registration ClinicalTrial.gov Identifier: NCT01849198. Registered April 29, 2013.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefan Soltesz
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, KKH Dormagen, Dormagen, Germany. .,Klinik für Anästhesie, Intensiv- und Notfallmedizin, Kreiskrankenhaus Dormagen, D-41540, Dormagen, Germany.
| | - Christian Stark
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, KKH Dormagen, Dormagen, Germany
| | - Karl G Noé
- Department Ob/Gyn, University of Witten-Herdecke, KKH Dormagen, Dormagen, Germany
| | - Michael Anapolski
- Department Ob/Gyn, University of Witten-Herdecke, KKH Dormagen, Dormagen, Germany
| | - Thomas Mencke
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Öztürk T, Ağdanli D, Bayturan Ö, Çikrikci C, Keleş GT. Effects of conventional vs high-dose rocuronium on the QTc interval during anesthesia induction and intubation in patients undergoing coronary artery surgery: a randomized, double-blind, parallel trial. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2015; 48:370-6. [PMID: 25714880 PMCID: PMC4418369 DOI: 10.1590/1414-431x20144294] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2014] [Accepted: 11/11/2014] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Myocardial ischemia, as well as the induction agents used in anesthesia, may cause
corrected QT interval (QTc) prolongation. The objective of this randomized,
double-blind trial was to determine the effects of high- vs
conventional-dose bolus rocuronium on QTc duration and the incidence of dysrhythmias
following anesthesia induction and intubation. Fifty patients about to undergo
coronary artery surgery were randomly allocated to receive conventional-dose (0.6
mg/kg, group C, n=25) or high-dose (1.2 mg/kg, group H, n=25) rocuronium after
induction with etomidate and fentanyl. QTc, heart rate, and mean arterial pressure
were recorded before induction (T0), after induction (T1), after rocuronium (just
before laryngoscopy; T2), 2 min after intubation (T3), and 5 min after intubation
(T4). The occurrence of dysrhythmias was recorded. In both groups, QTc was
significantly longer at T3 than at baseline [475 vs 429 ms in group
C (P=0.001), and 459 vs 434 ms in group H (P=0.005)]. The incidence
of dysrhythmias in group C (28%) and in group H (24%) was similar. The QTc after
high-dose rocuronium was not significantly longer than after conventional-dose
rocuronium in patients about to undergo coronary artery surgery who were induced with
etomidate and fentanyl. In both groups, compared with baseline, QTc was most
prolonged at 2 min after intubation, suggesting that QTc prolongation may be due to
the nociceptive stimulus of intubation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Öztürk
- Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, School of Medicine, Celal Bayar University, Manisa, Turkey
| | - D Ağdanli
- Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, School of Medicine, Celal Bayar University, Manisa, Turkey
| | - Ö Bayturan
- Department of Cardiology, School of Medicine, Celal Bayar University, Manisa, Turkey
| | - C Çikrikci
- Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, School of Medicine, Celal Bayar University, Manisa, Turkey
| | - G T Keleş
- Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, School of Medicine, Celal Bayar University, Manisa, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|