Differential effects of context on psychomotor sensitization to ethanol and cocaine

Long-term exposure to daily ethanol injections in DBA/2J and Swiss mice: Lessons for the interpretation of ethanol sensitization

Most mice ethanol sensitization studies focused on neurobiology at the expense of its behavioral characterization. Furthermore, relatively short ethanol exposures (10 to 20 injections) were used in these studies. The first aim of the present study is to better characterize the development and expression of ethanol sensitization after an extended exposure of 45 daily injections. In some previous studies, mice were classified as "respondent" and "resistant" to ethanol sensitization. The second aim of the present study is to test the long-term reliability of such categorizations and the consequences of their use on the interpretation of the ethanol sensitization results. Swiss and DBA/2J female mice received 45 consecutive daily ethanol administrations (respectively 2.5 and 2.0 g/kg) and their locomotor activity was daily recorded to test the development of ethanol sensitization. At the end of the procedure, a challenge test assessed the inter-group ethanol sensitization.The results of the present study show that ethanol sensitization continues to develop beyond 20 days to reach maximal levels after about 25 injections in DBA/2J mice and 40 injections in Swiss mice, although the core phase of the development of ethanol sensitization occurred in both strains during the first 20 days. Remarkably, ethanol sensitization after such a long daily ethanol treatment resulted in both an upward shift of the magnitude of ethanol stimulant effects and a prolongation of these effects in time (up to 30 minutes). Mice classified as "resistant to ethanol sensitization" according to previous studies developed very significant levels of ethanol sensitization when tested after 45 ethanol injections and are best described as showing a delayed development of ethanol sensitization. Furthermore, mice classified as respondent or resistant to ethanol sensitization also differ in their acute response to ethanol, such that it is difficult to ascertain whether these classifications are specifically related to the sensitization process.

Investigating the reciprocal relationships between locomotor sensitization to ethanol and PTSD-like clusters in DBA/2J mice

BACKGROUND

Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and alcohol use disorder (AUD) are two conditions that co-occur frequently. The mechanistic explanations of this co-morbidity are still unclear. The goal of this study was twofold. First to investigate whether PTSD reduces the threshold for the acquisition of ethanol sensitization in an animal model of PTSD. Then to investigate whether ethanol sensitization modulates the expression of PTSD.

METHODS

152 female inbred DBA/2 J mice were submitted to an inescapable footshock paradigm to induce a PTSD-like condition (PTSDLC) and to a paradigm of locomotor sensitization to ethanol. In a first experiment, mice were submitted to the PTSDLC and then repeatedly injected with either saline, 1 g/kg ethanol or 2 g/kg ethanol. Their sensitization to the locomotor stimulant effects of ethanol was then tested in an open field. In a second experiment, mice were first sensitized to the locomotor stimulant effects of ethanol and then tested for their behavioral response to PTSDLC.

RESULTS

In the first experiment, PTSDLC failed to induce a significant locomotor sensitization at the subthreshold dose of 1 g/kg ethanol. However, with 2 g/kg ethanol, a stronger ethanol sensitization was observed in mice submitted to the footshock relative to the control group. In the second experiment, ethanol sensitization increased only some of the behavioral clusters of PTSDLC, namely the fear generalization in a new context.

CONCLUSION

PTSDLC did not reduce the dose threshold for the acquisition of ethanol sensitization but strengthened the development of ethanol sensitization with effective doses. This suggests that PTSD might interact with one of the mechanisms underlying the development of alcohol sensitization. When the relationship between ethanol sensitization and PTSDLC is tested in the reverse direction, the present study only shows a significant effect of ethanol administration on the "sensitized fear" PTSD cluster.

Resistance to ethanol sensitization is associated with a loss of synaptic plasticity in the hippocampus

Behavioral sensitization to repeated ethanol (EtOH) exposure induces an increase in locomotor activity in mice. However, not all animals express such sensitization. Although the literature indicated that the hippocampus may play a role in EtOH sensitization, it is not known whether behavioral sensitization to EtOH is associated with preferential changes in bidirectional synaptic plasticity, i.e., LTP and LTD, two markers of learning capabilities that have also been shown to be involved in addictive behavior. In the present study, we examined whether the vulnerability to develop and express behavioral sensitization to EtOH is associated with altered bidirectional synaptic plasticity in the CA1 area of the dorsal hippocampus. For this purpose, we analyzed both LTP and LTD in resistant and sensitized mice during the expression phase, i.e., 7 days after 10 days of repeated EtOH i.p. administration. We found that resistant mice showed a lack of LTD without changes in LTP. The lack of LTD was associated with an increase in GluN2A protein level and was not due to an altered level of neuronal activity, since no difference was observed between the number of c-FOS positive neurons in sensitized and resistant mice. Given that both types of synaptic plasticity signals may have distinct roles in specific learning and behaviors, our results suggest that resistant mice could exhibit different phenotypes in terms of learning/memory and addictive behaviors compared to sensitized ones. Synapse 71:e21899, 2017. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.