1
|
Ah YM, Shin J, Lee JY. The association of angiotensin receptor blocker-based combination therapy with persistence and adherence in newly treated, uncomplicated hypertensive patients. Patient Prefer Adherence 2019; 13:241-248. [PMID: 30774320 PMCID: PMC6362963 DOI: 10.2147/ppa.s195423] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE We compared treatment adherence and persistence during treatment with an angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB)-based single pill combination (SPC) and free equivalent combination (FEC) and between SPCs of an ARB with a thiazide diuretic (TD) and an ARB with a calcium channel blocker (CCB) as initial treatment in uncomplicated hypertensive patients who received pre-packaged medications from the pharmacy. PATIENTS AND METHODS Uncomplicated hypertensive patients who started combination treatment consisting of ARB and either TD or CCB were identified from a Korean national claims database. We used propensity score matching to construct two pairs of cohorts: SPC and FEC cohorts (20,175 patients per cohort) and SPC cohorts of ARB + TD and ARB + CCB (45,253 patients per cohort). We compared adherence measured via the medication possession ratio as well as overall 1-year and initial treatment persistence. RESULTS Compared with the FEC cohort, the SPC cohort had significantly higher medication adherence (OR 1.31, 95% CI 1.25-1.37), overall persistence (HR 1.33, 95% CI 1.28-1.38), and initial treatment persistence (HR 1.61, 95% CI 1.56-1.64). Neither the rate of medication adherence nor the rate of treatment persistence differed significantly between the ARB + TD and ARB + CCB cohorts. However, the ARB + CCB cohort had a significantly higher rate of initial treatment persistence than did the ARB + TD cohort (HR 1.12, 95% CI 1.10-1.14). CONCLUSION Our data suggest that, compared with FEC therapy, initiating an ARB-based SPC therapy may increase adherence and persistence in patients with uncomplicated hypertension who also receive pre-packaged medication from the pharmacy. Although using an ARB + CCB SPC may improve initial treatment persistence, it does not increase adherence or overall persistence when compared with an ARB + TD SPC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Young-Mi Ah
- College of Pharmacy, Yeungnam University, Gyeongsangbuk-do, Republic of Korea
| | - Jaekyu Shin
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Ju-Yeun Lee
- College of Pharmacy and Research Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea,
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Effectiveness of Valsartan/Amlodipine Single-pill Combination in Hypertensive Patients With Excess Body Weight: Subanalysis of China Status II. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 2016; 66:497-503. [PMID: 26248276 PMCID: PMC4632118 DOI: 10.1097/fjc.0000000000000301] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
Obesity is a major global health concern and is associated with hypertension. However, there is a lack of studies evaluating the effectiveness of valsartan/amlodipine single-pill combination in Chinese hypertensive patients with excess body weight uncontrolled by monotherapy. To evaluate this effectiveness and its association with obese categories, we performed a prespecified subanalysis and a post hoc analysis of patients from China status II study. In this subanalysis, 11,289 and 11,182 patients stratified by body mass index (BMI) and waist circumference (WC), respectively, were included. Significant mean sitting systolic and diastolic blood pressure (BP) reductions from baseline were observed at week 8 across all BMI and WC subgroups (P < 0.001). The percentages of patients achieving BP control were 65.2%, 62.8%, and 64.5% (men 64.5% and women 64.4%) in the overweight, obesity, and abdominal obesity subgroups, respectively. The positive association between BP control and obese categories could only be found in subgroups stratified by BMI other than WC. Our study demonstrated the effectiveness of valsartan/amlodipine single-pill combination in Chinese hypertensive patients with excess body weight uncontrolled by monotherapy, and its effectiveness was better associated with BMI than WC.
Collapse
|
3
|
Kim KI, Shin MS, Ihm SH, Youn HJ, Sung KC, Chae SC, Nam CW, Seo HS, Park SM, Rhee MY, Kim MH, Cha KS, Kim YJ, Kim JJ, Chun KJ, Yoo BS, Park S, Shin ES, Kim DS, Il Kim D, Kim KH, Joo SJ, Jeong JO, Shin J, Kim CH. A Randomized, Double-blind, Multicenter, Phase III Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Fimasartan/Amlodipine Combined Therapy Versus Fimasartan Monotherapy in Patients With Essential Hypertension Unresponsive to Fimasartan Monotherapy. Clin Ther 2016; 38:2159-2170. [PMID: 27502326 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2016.07.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2016] [Revised: 06/28/2016] [Accepted: 07/11/2016] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The goal of this study was to evaluate whether the blood pressure-lowering efficacy of fimasartan/amlodipine combination therapy was superior to that of fimasartan monotherapy after 8 weeks of treatment in patients with hypertension who had failed to respond adequately to fimasartan monotherapy. METHODS This trial was a randomized, double-blind, multicenter, Phase III clinical study. Patients who failed to respond after 4 weeks of treatment with 60 mg daily of fimasartan (sitting systolic blood pressure [SiSBP]) ≥140 mm Hg) were randomized to receive either daily fimasartan 60 mg or fimasartan/amlodipine 60 mg/10 mg. The primary efficacy end point was the change in SiSBP from baseline to week 8. Secondary end points included the change in SiSBP from baseline to week 4, the changes in sitting diastolic blood pressure from baseline to weeks 4 and 8, and the response rate (SiSBP <140 mm Hg or decrease in SiSBP ≥20 mm Hg) or control rate (SiSBP <140 mm Hg) at week 8. Treatment-emergent adverse events were also assessed. FINDINGS Of 143 patients randomized to treatment, 137 patients who had available efficacy data were analyzed. The mean age of patients was 59.1 (8.9) years, and 100 (73.0%) were male. Baseline SiSBP and sitting diastolic blood pressure were 150.6 (9.2) mm Hg and 91.7 (8.6) mm Hg, respectively. In the fimasartan/amlodipine combination group, a greater reduction in SiSBP from baseline to week 8 was observed compared with the fimasartan group (7.8 [13.3] mm Hg in the fimasartan group vs 20.5 [14.6] mm Hg in the fimasartan/amlodipine group; P < 0.0001). This reduction was observed after 4 weeks. The mean SiSBP changes from baseline to week 4 were 8.1 (15.8) mm Hg in the fimasartan group and 20.1 (14.7) mm Hg in the fimasartan/amlodipine group (P < 0.0001). At week 8, the response rate was significantly higher in the fimasartan/amlodipine (82.1%) group than in the fimasartan (32.9%) group (P < 0.0001). The control rate at week 8 was also higher in the fimasartan/amlodipine (79.1%) group than in the fimasartan (31.4%) group (P < 0.0001). Adverse drug reactions were observed in 9 patients (6.3%), with no significant differences between treatment groups. There were no serious adverse events associated with the study drugs. IMPLICATIONS Fimasartan/amlodipine combination therapy exhibited superior efficacy in reducing blood pressure, with no increase in adverse drug reactions, compared with fimasartan monotherapy. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02152306.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kwang-Il Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Republic of Korea
| | - Mi-Seung Shin
- Division of Cardiology, Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Incheon, Republic of Korea
| | - Sang-Hyun Ihm
- Department of Internal Medicine, Bucheon St. Mary׳s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Koreau, Bucheon, Republic of Korea
| | - Ho-Joong Youn
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Ki-Chul Sung
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Shung Chull Chae
- Department of Internal Medicine, Kyungpook National University Hospital, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| | - Chang-Wook Nam
- Department of Internal Medicine, Dongsan Medical Center, Keimyung University, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| | - Hong Seog Seo
- Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University Guro Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Seong-Mi Park
- Division of Cardiology, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Moo-Yong Rhee
- Cardiovascular Center, Dongguk University Ilsan Hospital, Goyang, Republic of Korea
| | - Moo Hyun Kim
- Department of Cardiology, Dong-A University Hospital, Busan, Republic of Korea
| | - Kwang Soo Cha
- Department of Cardiology, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, Republic of Korea
| | - Yong-Jin Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jae-Joong Kim
- Division of Cardiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Kook Jin Chun
- Department of Internal Medicine, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Yangsan, Republic of Korea
| | - Byung-Su Yoo
- Division of Cardiology, Wonju Severance Christian Hospital, Wonju, Republic of Korea
| | - Sungha Park
- Division of Cardiology, Yonsei Cardiovascular Hospital, Yonsei Health System, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Eun-Seok Shin
- Department of Cardiology, Ulsan University Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine,Ulsan, Republic of Korea
| | - Dong-Soo Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Inje University Busan Paik Hospital, Busan, Republic of Korea
| | - Doo Il Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Haeundae Paik Hospital, Busan, Republic of Korea
| | - Kye Hun Kim
- Department of Cardiology, Chonnam National University Hospital, Gwangju, Republic of Korea
| | - Seung-Jae Joo
- Department of Internal Medicine, Jeju National University Hospital, Jeju, Republic of Korea
| | - Jin-Ok Jeong
- Department of Internal Medicine, Chungnam National University Hospital, Daejeon, Republic of Korea
| | - Jinho Shin
- Division of Cardiology, Hanyang University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Cheol Ho Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lee HY, Kim YJ, Ahn T, Youn HJ, Chull Chae S, Seog Seo H, Kim KS, Rhee MY, Choi DJ, Kim JJ, Chun KJ, Yoo BS, Park JS, Oh SK, Kim DS, Kwan J, Ahn Y, Bae Park J, Jeong JO, Hyon MS, Cho EJ, Han KR, Kim DI, Joo SJ, Shin JH, Sung KC, Jeon ES. A Randomized, Multicenter, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, 3 × 3 Factorial Design, Phase II Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of the Combination of Fimasartan/Amlodipine in Patients With Essential Hypertension. Clin Ther 2015; 37:2581-2596.e3. [PMID: 25850881 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2015.02.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2014] [Revised: 01/16/2015] [Accepted: 02/04/2015] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a fimasartan/amlodipine combination in patients with hypertension and to determine the optimal composition for a future single-pill combination formulation. METHODS This Phase II study was conducted by using a randomized, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 3 × 3 factorial design. After a 2-week placebo run-in period, eligible hypertensive patients (with a sitting diastolic blood pressure [SiDBP] between 90 and 114 mm Hg) were randomized to treatment. They received single or combined administration of fimasartan at 3 doses (0, 30, and 60 mg) and amlodipine at 3 doses (0, 5, and 10 mg) for 8 weeks. The primary efficacy end point was the change in SiDBP from baseline and at week 8; secondary end points included the change in SiDBP from baseline and at week 4 and the changes in sitting systolic blood pressure from baseline and at weeks 4 and 8. Treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) were also assessed. FINDINGS 420 Korean patients with mild to moderate hypertension were randomly allocated to the 9 groups. Mean (SD) SiDBP changes in each group after 8 weeks were as follows: placebo, -6.0 (8.5) mm Hg; amlodipine 5 mg, -10.6 (9.2) mm Hg; amlodipine 10 mg, -15.9 (7.2) mm Hg; fimasartan 30 mg, -10.1 (9.1) mm Hg; fimasartan 60 mg, -13.0 (10.0) mm Hg; fimasartan 30 mg/amlodipine 5 mg, -16.2 (8.5) mm Hg; fimasartan 30 mg/amlodipine 10 mg, -19.5 (7.5) mm Hg; fimasartan 60 mg/amlodipine 5 mg, -16.6 (6.9) mm Hg; and fimasartan 60 mg/amlodipine 10 mg, -21.5 (8.3) mm Hg. All treatment groups produced significantly greater reductions in blood pressure compared with the placebo group. In addition, all combination treatment groups had superior reductions in blood pressure compared with the monotherapy groups. In the combination treatment groups, doubling fimasartan dose in the given dose of amlodipine did not show further BP reduction, whereas doubling amlodipine dose showed significantly further BP reduction in the given dose of fimasartan. During the study period, 75 (17.9%) of 419 patients experienced 110 AEs. Ninety-five AEs were mild, 9 were moderate, and 6 were severe in intensity. Eight patients discontinued the study due to AEs. There was no significant difference in incidence of AEs among groups (P = 0.0884). The most common AE was headache (12 patients [2.9%]), followed by dizziness (11 patients [2.6%]) and elevated blood creatine phosphokinase levels (6 patients [1.4%]). IMPLICATIONS Fimasartan combined with amlodipine produced superior blood pressure reductions and low levels of AEs compared with either monotherapy. Therefore, a single-pill combination with fimasartan 60 mg/amlodipine 10 mg will be developed. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01518998.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hae-Young Lee
- Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Yong-Jin Kim
- Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Taehoon Ahn
- Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Incheon, Republic of Korea
| | - Ho-Joong Youn
- Catholic University of Korea, Seoul St. Mary׳s Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Shung Chull Chae
- Kyungpook National University Hospital, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| | - Hong Seog Seo
- Korea University Guro Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Ki-Sik Kim
- Daegu Catholic University Medical Center, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| | - Moo-Yong Rhee
- Dongguk University Ilsan Hospital, Ilsan, Republic of Korea
| | - Dong-Ju Choi
- Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Sungnam, Busan, Republic of Korea
| | | | - Kook-Jin Chun
- Pusan University Yangsan Hospital, Busan, Republic of Korea
| | - Byung-Su Yoo
- Wonju Christian Hospital, Wonju, Republic of Korea
| | - Jong-Seon Park
- Yeungnam University Medical Center, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| | - Seok-Kyu Oh
- Wonkwang University School of Medicine and Hospital, Iksan, Republic of Korea
| | - Dong-Soo Kim
- Inje University Busan Paik Hospital, Busan, Republic of Korea
| | - Jun Kwan
- Inha University Hospital, Incheon, Republic of Korea
| | - Youngkeun Ahn
- Chonnam National University Hospital, Gwangju, Republic of Korea
| | | | - Jin-Ok Jeong
- Chungnam National University Hospital, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| | - Min-Soo Hyon
- Soonchunhyang University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Eun-Joo Cho
- Catholic University of Korea, St. Paul׳s Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Kyoo-Rok Han
- Kangdong Sacred Heart Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Doo-Il Kim
- Inje University Haeundae Paik Hospital, Busan, Republic of Korea
| | | | - Jin-Ho Shin
- Hanyang University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Ki-Chul Sung
- Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Rubio-Guerra AF, Castro-Serna D, Barrera CIE, Ramos-Brizuela LM. Current concepts in combination therapy for the treatment of hypertension: combined calcium channel blockers and RAAS inhibitors. Integr Blood Press Control 2009; 2:55-62. [PMID: 21949615 PMCID: PMC3172088 DOI: 10.2147/ibpc.s6232] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2009] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Recent guidelines for the management of hypertension recommend target blood pressures <140/90 mmHg in hypertensive patients, or <130/80 mmHg in subjects with diabetes, chronic kidney disease, or coronary artery disease. Despite the availability and efficacy of antihypertensive drugs, most hypertensive patients do not reach the recommended treatment targets with monotherapy, making combination therapy necessary to achieve the therapeutic goal. Combination therapy with 2 or more agents is the most effective method for achieving strict blood pressure goals. Fixed-dose combination simplifies treatment, reduces costs, and improves adherence. There are many drug choices for combination therapy, but few data are available about the efficacy and safety of some specific combinations. Combination therapy of calcium antagonists and inhibitors of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) are efficacious and safe, and have been considered rational by both the JNC 7 and the 2007 European Society of Hypertension – European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension. The aim of this review is to discuss some relevant issues about the use of combinations with calcium channel blockers and RAAS inhibitors in the treatment of hypertension.
Collapse
|