Population Pharmacokinetics of Ganciclovir in Critically Ill Patients

Optimizing ganciclovir and valganciclovir dosing regimens in pediatric patients with cytomegalovirus infection: a spotlight on therapeutic drug monitoring

INTRODUCTION

Infants and immunocompromised children with cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection have significant morbidity and mortality. Ganciclovir (GCV) and its oral prodrug valganciclovir (VGCV) are the major antiviral options of choice for the prophylaxis and treatment of CMV infection. However, with the currently recommended dosing regimens used in pediatric patients, large intra- and inter-individual variability of pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters and exposure are observed.

AREAS COVERED

This review describes the PK and pharmacodynamic (PD) characteristics of GCV and VGCV in pediatrics. Moreover, the role of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) and current clinical practice for GCV and VGCV dosing regimens optimization in pediatrics are discussed.

EXPERT OPINION

GCV/VGCV TDM has shown the potential value to improve the benefit/risk ratio in pediatrics when using the therapeutic ranges derived from adults. However, well-designed studies are required to evaluate the relationship of TDM with clinical outcomes. Furthermore, studies to explore the children-specific dose-response-effect relationships will be helpful to facilitate the TDM practice. In the clinical setting, optimal sampling methods such as limited sampling strategies for pediatrics can be used in TDM and intracellular ganciclovir triphosphate may be used as an alternative TDM marker.

Establishment and Evaluation of a Parametric Population Pharmacokinetic Model Repository for Ganciclovir and Valganciclovir

BACKGROUND

Ganciclovir and valganciclovir are used for prophylaxis and treatment of cytomegalovirus infection. However, there is great interindividual variability in ganciclovir's pharmacokinetics (PK), highlighting the importance of individualized dosing. To facilitate model-informed precision dosing (MIPD), this study aimed to establish a parametric model repository of ganciclovir and valganciclovir by summarizing existing population pharmacokinetic information and analyzing the sources of variability. (2) Methods: A total of four databases were searched for published population PK models. We replicated these models, evaluated the impact of covariates on clearance, calculated the probability of target attainment for each model based on a predetermined dosing regimen, and developed an area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) calculator using maximum a posteriori Bayesian estimation. (3) Results: A total of 16 models, one- or two-compartment models, were included. The most significant covariates were body size (weight and body surface area) and renal function. The results show that 5 mg/kg/12 h of ganciclovir could make the AUC_0-24h within 40-80 mg·h/L for 50.03% pediatrics but cause AUC_0-24h exceeding the exposure thresholds for toxicity (120 mg·h/L) in 51.24% adults. (4) Conclusions: Dosing regimens of ganciclovir and valganciclovir should be adjusted according to body size and renal function. This model repository has a broad range of potential applications in MIPD.

Population Pharmacokinetics of Ganciclovir in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Patients

Treatment of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHCT) patients with ganciclovir is complicated by toxicity and resistance. This study aimed to develop an intravenous ganciclovir population pharmacokinetic model for post-alloHCT patients and to determine dosing regimens likely to achieve suggested therapeutic exposure targets. We performed a prospective observational single-center pharmacokinetic study in adult alloHCT patients requiring treatment with intravenous ganciclovir for CMV viremia or disease. Samples were analyzed using a validated ultraperformance liquid chromatography method. Population pharmacokinetic analysis and Monte Carlo simulations (n = 1000) were performed using Pmetrics for R. Twenty patients aged 18 to 69 years were included in the study. A 2-compartment model with linear elimination from the central compartment and between occasion variability best described the data. Incorporating creatinine clearance (CLCR) estimated by the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation and presence of continuous renal replacement therapy as covariates for ganciclovir clearance improved the model. Compared to current dosing recommendations, simulations demonstrated loading doses were required to achieve a target AUC24 of 80 to 120 mg.h/L on day 1 of induction therapy. Increased individualization of post-loading induction and maintenance doses based on CLCR is required to achieve the suggested exposures for efficacy (AUC24 >80/>40 mg.h/L for induction/maintenance) while remaining below the exposure thresholds for toxicity (AUC24 <120/<60 mg.h/L for induction/maintenance). Intravenous ganciclovir dosing in alloHCT patients can be guided by CLCR estimated by CKD-EPI. Incorporation of loading doses into induction dosing regimens should be considered for timely achievement of currently suggested exposures.

Difference between Acyclovir and Ganciclovir in the Treatment of Children with Epstein-Barr Virus-Associated Infectious Mononucleosis

Objective

To investigate the efficacy differences between acyclovir and ganciclovir in the treatment of children with Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)- associated infectious mononucleosis (IM).

Methods

A total of 128 children with EBV-IM who were admitted to our hospital from February 2019 to February 2021 were selected and randomly divided into the acyclovir group (n = 64) and the ganciclovir group (n = 64) according to the random number table method. All the children were given symptomatic treatments such as protecting the liver and reducing fever. On this basis, the acyclovir group was given an intravenous drip of acyclovir, while the ganciclovir group was given an intravenous drip of ganciclovir. The treatment was continued for 7 days. After the treatment, the clinical efficacy, disappearance time of symptoms and signs, related blood routine indexes, EBV-DNA negative conversion rate, and the incidence of adverse reactions during the treatment were compared between the two groups.

Results

After treatment, the total effective rate of the ganciclovir group (92.19%) was higher than that of the acyclovir group (73.44%) and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). The disappearance time for the symptoms and signs of angina, fever, lymphadenopathy, hepatomegaly, and splenomegaly in the ganciclovir group was lower than that in the acyclovir group, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). After treatment, the levels of atypical lymphocyte proportion, lymphocyte proportion, and WBC count in the two groups were lower than those before treatment, the levels in the ganciclovir group were lower than those in the acyclovir group, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). After treatment, the EBV-DNA negative conversion rate (81.25%) in the ganciclovir group was higher than that in the acyclovir group (60.93%) and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). During treatment, the incidence of adverse reactions in the ganciclovir group was significantly lower than that in the acyclovir group and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

In the treatment of children with EBV-IM, the therapeutic effect of ganciclovir is obviously superior to that of acyclovir. Ganciclovir can quickly eliminate the symptoms of angina, fever, enlarged lymph nodes, and other signs in children, can improve abnormal blood indicators, and has a higher negative conversion rate of EBV and less adverse reactions.

Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Valganciclovir and Ganciclovir in Transplantation

Ganciclovir and valganciclovir are first choice drugs for the prevention and treatment of cytomegalovirus infection and disease in solid organ and stem cell transplant recipients. Only a few studies on the pharmacokinetics and exposure/efficacy or exposure/safety relationships of ganciclovir and valganciclovir in transplant recipients have been published so far, and there are still controversies about the exposure parameter to use for therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). We performed an extensive literature review of the clinical pharmacokinetics data, the exposure/effect relationships in terms of efficacy and safety, and the available tools for valganciclovir and ganciclovir TDM in adults and pediatrics transplant recipients. The pharmacokinetics of ganciclovir and valganciclovir is well described in adults and children, and a high interindividual variability is commonly observed. In contrast, the drug pharmacodynamics has been poorly described in adults and barely in children. The average 24-hour area under the concentration-time curve (AUC_0-24h ) seems to be the best predictor of efficacy and toxicity. The benefit of TDM remains controversial in adult patients but should be considered in children due to higher interindividual variability and lower probability of target attainment. Several bayesian estimators based on limited sampling strategies have been developed with this aim and may be used in clinical practice for the AUC-based individual dose adjustment of ganciclovir and valganciclovir.

Optimization of Ganciclovir use in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant recipients - the role of therapeutic drug monitoring

Introduction: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is an opportunistic infectious complication that can occur after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). The mainstay of treatment and prevention of this infection is ganciclovir and its ester prodrug valganciclovir. There is conflicting evidence on the clinical utility of routine ganciclovir therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) as a means to optimize treatment.Areas covered: This review aims to describe the current knowledge of the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics of ganciclovir and valganciclovir, and to explore the evidence and challenges surrounding ganciclovir TDM within the allogeneic HCT cohort.Expert opinion: Ganciclovir TDM is important to optimize efficacy in selected patient groups where there are variable pharmacokinetic factors or inadequate response to treatment. However, defined pharmacokinetic exposures which correlate with treatment efficacy and toxicity remain elusive. Prospective clinical studies in specific patient groups are required to clarify this issue. Alternative TDM targets such as the intracellular ganciclovir triphosphate should be explored as they may prove to have better correlation with clinical outcomes and adverse effects. With recent advances in CMV immune monitoring, novel approaches integrating TDM with specific CMV immune phenotyping in a predictive model will be advantageous in optimizing ganciclovir dosing by combining TDM with a risk stratification approach.

Population Pharmacokinetics and Bayesian Estimation of the Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve for Ganciclovir in Adult Chinese Renal Allograft Recipients After Valganciclovir Administration

Valganciclovir (VGCV) is the prodrug of ganciclovir (GCV). The objective of this study was to establish a population pharmacokinetic model (PPK) of GCV to investigate the PK characteristics of GCV after administration of VGCV in adult Chinese renal allograft recipients. Seventy Chinese renal allograft recipients were given 450 mg (n = 41) or 900 mg (n = 29) VGCV daily. Blood samples were drawn 0-24 hours after 5 days' therapy, and GCV plasma levels were determined. The PPK model was constructed using nonlinear mixed-effects modeling, and the Bayesian estimation of AUC_0-24h was constructed for an individual patient based on limited plasma samples. The PK of GCV was best described by a 2-compartment model with a first-order absorption process. The CL/F, V₂ /F, Q/F, V₃ /F, K_a , and lag time of GCV were 15.8 ± 0.71 L/h, 10.9 ± 2.38 L, 3.98 ± 0.40 L/h, 167 ± 44.0 L, 0.23 ± 0.0078 1/h, and 0.93 ± 0.017 hours, respectively. Clearance of creatinine was found to have a significant impact on the CL/F of GCV (P < .01). Sampling strategies consisted of plasma concentrations 0 and 2 and 0, 2, and 4 hours after VGCV administration were shown to be suitable for the estimation of the GCV AUC_0-24h . The PPK model was acceptable and can describe the PK of GCV in Chinese renal transplant patients administered VGCV. The AUC_0-24h of GCV in Chinese renal transplant patients can be calculated by a limited sampling strategy method.

What Are the Current Approaches to Optimising Antimicrobial Dosing in the Intensive Care Unit?

Antimicrobial dosing in the intensive care unit (ICU) can be problematic due to various challenges including unique physiological changes observed in critically ill patients and the presence of pathogens with reduced susceptibility. These challenges result in reduced likelihood of standard antimicrobial dosing regimens achieving target exposures associated with optimal patient outcomes. Therefore, the aim of this review is to explore the various methods for optimisation of antimicrobial dosing in ICU patients. Dosing nomograms developed from pharmacokinetic/statistical models and therapeutic drug monitoring are commonly used. However, recent advances in mathematical and statistical modelling have resulted in the development of novel dosing software that utilise Bayesian forecasting and/or artificial intelligence. These programs utilise therapeutic drug monitoring results to further personalise antimicrobial therapy based on each patient’s clinical characteristics. Studies quantifying the clinical and cost benefits associated with dosing software are required before widespread use as a point-of-care system can be justified.