No Apparent Influence of Nonadherence on Tacrolimus Intrapatient Variability in Stable Kidney Transplant Recipients

Impact of intra-patient variability of tacrolimus on allograft function and CD4 + /CD8 + ratio in kidney transplant recipients: a retrospective single-center study

BACKGROUND

Tacrolimus is a critical component of immunosuppressive therapy for kidney transplant recipients. Intra-patient variation (IPV) of tacrolimus levels affects the function of transplanted kidney.

AIM

This study aimed to investigate the impact of tacrolimus IPV on kidney function, examine its association with post-transplant duration, and assess its effect on the immune status of transplant recipients.

METHOD

This retrospective study was conducted from January 2016 to February 2022. IPV was evaluated using the coefficient of variation (CV) of tacrolimus trough levels from 6 to 48 months after transplantation. Patients were divided into low- and high-IPV groups based on the median CV. Significant differences in kidney function, CD4 + /CD8 + ratio, and post-transplant duration between these groups were analyzed.

RESULTS

Among 189 patients, tacrolimus IPV showed a strong correlation with serum creatinine clearance rate (Ccr) and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (p < 0.05). Tacrolimus IPV was significantly correlated with post-transplant duration in only two patients (p < 0.05). Using a median CV of 15.4% to categorize patients, the high IPV group, compared to the low IPV group, exhibited significantly higher eGFR at 6-9 months (p < 0.05), lower Ccr at 9-12 months (p < 0.05), and reduced Ccr and eGFR at 15-18 months (p < 0.05). Six months after transplantation, the high IPV group had a significantly lower CD4 + /CD8 + ratio than the low IPV group (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

This study highlights the significant impact of tacrolimus IPV on transplant kidney function and immune status in transplant patients at various post-transplantation intervals.

Implementing a self-reported immunosuppression adherence questionnaire to screen for non-adherence in routine care of kidney transplant recipients

INTRODUCTION

Self-reported measures of immunosuppression adherence have been largely examined in research settings.

METHODS

In this single center study of 610 kidney transplant recipients, we examined if a voluntary, non-anonymous self-report measure could identify non-adherence in a routine clinic setting and how patients perceived such a measure. Non-adherence was measured using the Basel Assessment of Adherence to Immunosuppressive Medications Scale (BAASIS) and patient perception was elicited using a customized questionnaire.

RESULTS

Non-responders to the survey (15%) were younger, more likely to be black, and less likely to have had a pre-emptive transplant. Among complete responders (n = 485), 38% reported non-adherence with non-adherent patients being younger (54 y vs. 60 y; p = .01), less likely to have been on dialysis pre-transplant (59% vs. 68%; p = .04), further out from transplant (37 vs. 22 months; p < .001) and had more rejections in the preceding year (8% vs. 3%; p = .02). Self-reported non-adherence was associated with higher calcineurin inhibitor intra-patient variability (27.4% vs. 24.5%; p = .02), but not with donor-specific antibody detection (27.8% vs. 21.2%, p = .15). Of patients providing feedback (n = 500), the majority of patients felt comfortable reporting adherence (92%), that the survey was relevant to their visit (71%), and that the survey did not interfere with their clinic visit (88%).

CONCLUSION

In summary, a self-reported questionnaire during clinic visits identified immunosuppression non-adherence in a significant proportion of patients and was well received by patients. Integrating self-report measures into routine post-transplant care may enable early identification of non-adherence.

Impact of tacrolimus intra-patient variability in adverse outcomes after organ transplantation

Tacrolimus (Tac) is currently the most common calcineurin-inhibitor employed in solid organ transplantation. High intra-patient variability (IPV) of Tac (Tac IPV) has been associated with an increased risk of immune-mediated rejection and poor outcomes after kidney transplantation. Few data are available concerning the impact of high Tac IPV in non-kidney transplants. However, even in kidney transplantation, there is still a controversy whether high Tac IPV is indeed detrimental in respect to graft and/or patient survival. This may be due to different methods employed to evaluate IPV and distinct time frames adopted to assess graft and patient survival in those reports published up to now in the literature. Little is also known about the influence of high Tac IPV in the development of other untoward adverse events, update of the current knowledge regarding the impact of Tac IPV in different outcomes following kidney, liver, heart, lung, and pancreas tran splantation to better evaluate its use in clinical practice.

Evaluation of the Relationship between Medication Adherence and Tacrolimus Coefficient of Variation

Introduction: High tacrolimus intrapatient variability is associated with poor outcomes following transplantation. A commonly hypothesized cause of this variability is medication non-adherence, but this has not been conclusively demonstrated. Research Question: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between medication adherence and tacrolimus intrapatient variability. Design: This was a retrospective cohort study of kidney transplant recipients. Adherence was assessed at the 12-month clinic visit as a composite of patient self-report, pharmacist assessment, and lab monitoring frequency. Tacrolimus intrapatient variability was calculated as the coefficient of variation (CV). Linear regression and receiver operating curve (ROC) analysis were used to assess the relationship between adherence and CV. Results: Nonadherence was identified in 37.5% of patients. The median CV was 27.1% for adherent patients and 29.8% for non-adherent patients (P = 0.051). In the multivariable analysis, the only significant predictor of CV was the incidence of dose changes (P = 0.002). ROC analysis demonstrated poor discriminant power with an AUC of 0.597. Discussion: The results fail to support a clinically meaningful relationship between medication adherence and tacrolimus CV. There is very little evidence at this time that adherence is the primary contributing factor to tacrolimus intrapatient variability and, by extension, that CV can be used as a surrogate for adherence.

Use of an electronic medication monitoring device to estimate medication adherence in kidney transplant patients

Electronic medication monitoring devices (EMD) have been used as a gold standard for assessing medication adherence. We used a wireless EMD (SimpleMed+), assessed its usability in patients after kidney transplantation (KTx), evaluated adherence, and analyzed concordance with other adherence measures. Fifty-five patients (53% female, mean age 46 years) at least 6 months after KTx agreed to use the EMD over a period of 8 weeks. Self-reported adherence was measured with the BAASIS, and immunosuppressant trough level variability was assessed prior to and again during the study period. Fourteen patients stopped using the EMD or were low users (<70%). These non-completers reported that using the EMD would interfere with their daily activities. Taking-adherence of the completers was high with 98.3% (±1.9) over the entire study period. Timing-adherence was somewhat lower (94.6% ± 7.9) and decreased during the second half of the study. We found statistically significant correlations between EMD results and self-reported adherence with moderate effect sizes, but no significant association with trough level variability. The low usage of the EMD supports the need to assess the practicability of an EMD before applying it in research and clinical routine. Taking- and timing-adherence of KTx patients using the EMD was satisfactory. Self-reported adherence might be a good enough estimate of medication adherence.

Retrospective Analysis of Tacrolimus Intrapatient Variability as a Measure of Medication Adherence

Background:

Increased intrapatient variability (IPV) in tacrolimus levels is associated with graft rejection, de novo donor-specific antibodies, and graft loss. Medication nonadherence may be a significant contributor to high IPV.

Objective:

The objective of this study is to determine the utility of tacrolimus IPV in detecting nonadherence by examining the relationship between self-reported adherence and tacrolimus coefficient of variability (COV), a measure of IPV.

Design:

Retrospective cohort study.

Setting:

St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, Ontario.

Patients:

All patients who were at least 1-year post-kidney transplant as of March 31, 2019, prescribed tacrolimus as an immunosuppressant and had a self-reported adherence status. Patients were excluded from the primary analysis of examining the correlation between COV and self-reported adherence if they lacked a calculatable COV.

Measurements:

Self-reported adherence, COV, demographic data, transplant, and medication history.

Methods:

A modified Basel Assessment of Adherence to Immunosuppressive Medications Scale (BAASIS) administered by healthcare professionals to assess self-reported adherence was used. The COV of tacrolimus trough levels was calculated and its correlation to BAASIS response was noted. The median COV was used as a cutoff to examine the characteristics of patients deemed “high COV” and “low COV.”

Results:

A total of 591 patients fit the initial criteria; however, only 525 had a recent calculatable COV. Overall, 92.38% of the population were adherent by self-report. Primary analysis identified a COV of 25.2% and 29.6% in self-reported adherent and nonadherent patients, respectively, though the result was not significant (P = .2). Secondary analyses showed a significant correlation between younger age at transplant and at the time of adherence self-reporting with nonadherence (P = .01). In addition, there was a strong correlation between those nonadherent with routine post-transplant blood work and younger age (P < .01).

Limitations:

The limitations included modified nonvalidated BAASIS questionnaire, social desirability bias, BAASIS only administered in English, and patients with graft failure not active in clinic not being captured.

Conclusions:

The COV should not be used as the sole method for determining medication adherence. However, COV may have some utility in capturing individuals who are not adherent to their blood work or patients who are having a poor response to tacrolimus and should be switched to another medication.

Association between medication adherence and intrapatient variability in tacrolimus concentration among stable kidney transplant recipients

This study analyzed the association between medication adherence and the intrapatient variability (IPV) of tacrolimus concentrations among kidney transplant recipients through a post hoc analysis of the dataset from a recently conducted randomized controlled trial. Among 138 patients enrolled in the original trial, 92 patients with ≥ 5 months of medication event monitoring system (MEMS) use and ≥ 4 tacrolimus trough values were included in this post hoc analysis. The variability of tacrolimus trough levels was calculated using coefficient variation (CV) and mean absolute deviation. Adherence was assessed using MEMS and self-report via the Basal Assessment of Adherence to Immunosuppressive Medication Scale. There were no statistically significant differences in the CV [median 16.5% [interquartile range 11.6–25.5%] and 16.0% [11.5–23.5%], respectively, P = .602] between the nonadherent (n = 59) and adherent groups (n = 33). There was also no significant correlation between the CV and adherence detected by MEMS (taking adherence, ρ = − 0.067, P = .527; dosing adherence, ρ = − 0.098, P = .352; timing adherence, ρ = − 0.113, P = .284). Similarly, adherence measured by self-report did not significantly affect the IPV (P = .452). In this post hoc analysis, nonadherent behavior, measured through electronic monitoring or self-report, did not affect the IPV.

Tacrolimus intrapatient variability in solid organ transplantation: A multiorgan perspective

BACKGROUND

Tacrolimus therapy in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients is challenging due to its narrow therapeutic window and pharmacokinetic variability both between patients and within a single patient. Intrapatient variability (IPV) of tacrolimus trough concentrations has become a novel marker of interest for predicting transplant outcomes. The purpose of this review is to evaluate the association of tacrolimus IPV with graft and patient outcomes and identify interventions to improve IPV in SOT recipients.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature was performed using PubMed and Embase from database inception to September 20, 2020. Studies were eligible only if they evaluated an association between tacrolimus IPV and transplant outcomes. Both pediatric and adult studies were included. Measures of variability were limited to standard deviation, coefficient of variation, and time in therapeutic range.

RESULTS

Forty-four studies met the inclusion criteria. Studies were published between 2008 and 2020 and were observational in nature. Majority of data were published in adult kidney transplant recipients and identified an association with rejection, de novo donor specific antibody (dnDSA) formation, graft loss, and patient survival. Evaluation of IPV-directed interventions was limited to small preliminary studies.

CONCLUSIONS

High tacrolimus IPV has been associated with poor outcomes including acute rejection, dnDSA formation, graft loss, and patient mortality in SOT recipients. Future research should prospectively explore IPV-directed interventions to improve transplant outcomes.