Falsely Increased Blood Tacrolimus Concentrations Using the ACMIA Assay Due to Circulating Endogenous Antibodies in a Liver Transplant Recipient: A Tentative Approach to Obtaining Reliable Results

Falsely Elevated Tacrolimus (FK506) Trough Levels in a Liver Transplant Recipient

Antibody-conjugated magnetic immunoassay (ACMIA) for tacrolimus (FK506) may detect falsely elevated tacrolimus trough levels, a commonly underreported event. We report a case of falsely elevated whole-blood tacrolimus levels in a patient post-orthotopic liver transplantation. A 71-year-old male patient underwent liver transplantation in 2012. Post-transplantation, the patient was immediately started on tacrolimus for maintenance immunosuppression. His most recent dose was 0.5 mg four times weekly. During monitoring, trough levels were at 25.9 ng/mL using ACMIA. After this result, a decision was made to hold tacrolimus. After holding tacrolimus for seven days, detected trough levels were still continually greater than 20 ng/mL. Upon suspicion of falsely elevated results, liquid chromatography with mass spectroscopy (LC-MS) was used to check tacrolimus trough levels. Results showed normal trough levels of 7.6 ng/mL. Because of its narrow therapeutic window, tacrolimus levels need to be carefully monitored throughout treatment. When high tacrolimus levels are detected using ACMIA without a correlating clinical scenario, trough levels should be re-confirmed using LC-MS to prevent clinical decisions from being made based on falsely elevated results.

Puzzling Interference in the Siemens Tacrolimus Assay in a Renal Transplant Patient: A Case Report

BACKGROUND

Therapeutic drug monitoring is a key tool for optimizing tacrolimus therapy in transplant recipients. The modified ACMIA assay from Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics is an immunoassay commonly used for tacrolimus monitoring, but it is not known whether this assay is resistant to interference from endogenous substances in real-world use.

OBJECTIVE

To describe a case of unexpected interference in tacrolimus monitoring using the modified ACMIA method in a kidney transplant recipient, and to highlight the importance of careful interpretation of laboratory results and effective communication with clinicians in optimizing patient care.

CASE DESCRIPTION

This case report describes a significant interference in the monitoring of tacrolimus in a kidney transplant recipient using the new ACMIA method. In this case, when aberrant results for tacrolimus were found using the new ACMIA method, they were re-analyzed using the CMIA method from Abbott. The presence of positive ANCA-MPO autoantibodies was found to be the most likely cause of the interference after an extensive workup.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first report of major interference with the modified ACMIA tacrolimus method and emphasizes the importance of proper interpretation of laboratory results and effective communication with clinicians in optimizing patient care.

Ultra-High Performance Liquid Chromatography Tandem Mass Spectrometry for Cyclosporine Analysis in Human Whole Blood and Comparison With an Antibody-Conjugated Magnetic Immunoassay

BACKGROUND

Various immunoassays have been used for cyclosporine A (CsA) analysis in human whole blood; however, they could not fully satisfy the requirements of criteria for accuracy and specificity in CsA measurement. The liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry is a gold method for CsA analysis. The aim of the study was to develop and validate an ultra-high performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (UHPLC-MS/MS) method for CsA analysis and establish its agreement with an antibody-conjugated magnetic immunoassay (ACMIA) in clinical sample analysis.

METHODS

An UHPLC-MS/MS method for CsA analysis in human whole blood was developed, validated, and applied in 85 samples, which were also tested by ACMIA. The agreement between UHPLC-MS/MS and ACMIA was evaluated by Bland-Altman plot.

RESULTS

The calibration range was 5-2000 ng/mL. The inaccuracy and imprecision were -4.60% to 5.56% and less than 8.57%, respectively. The internal standard-normalized recovery and matrix factor were 100.4%-110.5% and 93.5%-107.6%, respectively. The measurements of ACMIA and UHPLC-MS/MS were strongly correlated (r > 0.98). Evaluated by Bland-Altman plot, the 95% limit of agreement of the ACMIA:UHPLC-MS/MS ratio was 88.7%-165.6%, and the mean bias of the ratio was 21.1%.

CONCLUSIONS

A rapid, simple, accurate, and reliable UHPLC-MS/MS method for CsA analysis in human whole blood was developed, validated, and applied in 85 samples. On average, 21.1% overestimation was observed in ACMIA compared with that in the UHPLC-MS/MS. Further and larger studies are required to identify whether this degree of variance could be accepted by clinicians.

Multi-center Performance Evaluations of Tacrolimus and Cyclosporine Electrochemiluminescence Immunoassays in the Asia-Pacific Region

Background

The immunosuppressant drugs (ISDs), tacrolimus and cyclosporine, are vital for solid organ transplant patients to prevent rejection. However, toxicity is a concern, and absorption is highly variable across patients; therefore, ISD levels need to be precisely monitored. In the Asia-Pacific (APAC) region, tacrolimus and cyclosporine concentrations are typically measured using immunoassays. The objective of this study was to assess the analytical performance of Roche Elecsystacrolimus and cyclosporinee electrochemiluminescence immunoassays (ECLIAs).

Methods

This evaluation was performed in seven centers across China, South Korea, and Malaysia. Imprecision (repeatability and reproducibility), assay accuracy, and lot-to-lot reagent variability were tested. The Elecsys ECLIAs were compared with commercially available immunoassays (Architect, Dimension, and Viva-E systems) using whole blood samples from patients with various transplant types (kidney, liver, heart, and bone marrow).

Results

Coefficients of variation for repeatability and reproducibility were ≤5.4% and ≤12.4%, respectively, for the tacrolimus ECLIA, and ≤5.1% and ≤7.3%, respectively, for the cyclosporine ECLIA. Method comparisons of the tacrolimus ECLIA with Architect, Dimension, and Viva-E systems yielded slope values of 1.01, 1.14, and 0.897, respectively. The cyclosporine ECLIA showed even closer agreements with the Architect, Dimension, and Viva-E systems (slope values of 1.04, 1.04, and 1.09, respectively). No major differences were observed among the different transplant types.

Conclusions

The tacrolimus and cyclosporine ECLIAs demonstrated excellent precision and close agreement with other immunoassays tested. These results show that both assays are suitable for ISD monitoring in an APAC population across a range of different transplant types.

False Elevation of the Blood Tacrolimus Concentration, as Assessed by an Affinity Column-mediated Immunoassay (ACMIA), Led to Acute T Cell-mediated Rejection after Kidney Transplantation

Tacrolimus is the most commonly used immunosuppressant. Because of its narrow therapeutic range, it is necessary to frequently monitor its concentration. We report the case of a 25-year-old man who underwent kidney transplantation whose tacrolimus concentrations, as measured by an affinity column-mediated immunoassay, were falsely elevated. As we reduced the dose of tacrolimus, the recipient developed T cell-mediated rejection. Using the same blood samples, an enzyme-multiplied immunoassay technique showed that the patient's levels of tacrolimus were extremely low. A further examination indicated that the false increase in the tacrolimus concentration was likely due to an unknown interfering substance. We administered methylprednisolone and antithymocyte-globulin. The patient's serum creatinine level decreased and remained stable after these treatments.

Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics and Pharmacogenomics of Immunosuppressants in Allogeneic Haematopoietic Cell Transplantation: Part I

Although immunosuppressive treatments and target concentration intervention (TCI) have significantly contributed to the success of allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT), there is currently no consensus on the best immunosuppressive strategies. Compared with solid organ transplantation, alloHCT is unique because of the potential for bidirectional reactions (i.e. host-versus-graft and graft-versus-host). Postgraft immunosuppression typically includes a calcineurin inhibitor (cyclosporine or tacrolimus) and a short course of methotrexate after high-dose myeloablative conditioning, or a calcineurin inhibitor and mycophenolate mofetil after reduced-intensity conditioning. There are evolving roles for the antithymyocyte globulins (ATGs) and sirolimus as postgraft immunosuppression. A review of the pharmacokinetics and TCI of the main postgraft immunosuppressants is presented in this two-part review. All immunosuppressants are characterized by large intra- and interindividual pharmacokinetic variability and by narrow therapeutic indices. It is essential to understand immunosuppressants' pharmacokinetic properties and how to use them for individualized treatment incorporating TCI to improve outcomes. TCI, which is mandatory for the calcineurin inhibitors and sirolimus, has become an integral part of postgraft immunosuppression. TCI is usually based on trough concentration monitoring, but other approaches include measurement of the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) over the dosing interval or limited sampling schedules with maximum a posteriori Bayesian personalization approaches. Interpretation of pharmacodynamic results is hindered by the prevalence of studies enrolling only a small number of patients, variability in the allogeneic graft source and variability in postgraft immunosuppression. Given the curative potential of alloHCT, the pharmacodynamics of these immunosuppressants deserves to be explored in depth. Development of sophisticated systems pharmacology models and improved TCI tools are needed to accurately evaluate patients' exposure to drugs in general and to immunosuppressants in particular. Sequential studies, first without and then with TCI, should be conducted to validate the clinical benefit of TCI in homogenous populations; randomized trials are not feasible, because there are higher-priority research questions in alloHCT. In Part I of this article, we review the alloHCT process to facilitate optimal design of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamics studies. We also review the pharmacokinetics and TCI of calcineurin inhibitors and methotrexate.

Effective Use of Mass Spectrometry in the Clinical Laboratory

BACKGROUND

Historically the success of mass spectrometry in the clinical laboratory has focused on drugs of abuse confirmations, newborn screening, and steroid analysis. Clinical applications of mass spectrometry continue to expand, and mass spectrometry is now being used in almost all areas of laboratory medicine.

CONTENT

A brief background of the evolution of mass spectrometry in the clinical laboratory is provided with a discussion of future applications. Prominent examples of mass spectrometry are covered to illustrate how it has improved the practice of medicine and enabled physicians to provide better patient care. With increasing economic pressures and decreasing laboratory test reimbursement, mass spectrometry testing has been shown to provide cost-effective solutions. In addition to pointing out the numerous benefits, the challenges of implementing mass spectrometry in the clinical laboratory are also covered.

SUMMARY

Mass spectrometry continues to play a prominent role in the field of laboratory medicine. The advancement of this technology along with the development of new applications will only accelerate the incorporation of mass spectrometry into more areas of medicine.

False tacrolimus concentrations measured by antibody-conjugated magnetic immunoassay in liver transplant patient: 2 case reports and literature review

Safe use of tacrolimus relies on regular whole-blood drug monitoring. Of the methods used to assess whole-blood tacrolimus concentration, antibody-conjugated magnetic immunoassay is mostly used for therapeutic drug monitoring because it requires only a minimal sample preparation and no pretreatment procedure. However, several cases recently have been reported in which abnormally false elevated tacrolimus concentrations were measured by antibody-conjugated magnetic immunoassay (>15 ng/mL), despite the absence of clinical symptoms. We present 2 cases of falsely detected tacrolimus concentrations that did not show abnormally high values within the therapeutic range. Whole-blood tacrolimus concentrations obtained by antibody-conjugated magnetic immunoassay showed well-controlled concentrations (approximately 2-8 ng/mL), whereas those obtained by another immunoassay and in washed erythrocytes were below the assay range (< 1.2 ng/mL). Thus, antibody-conjugated magnetic immunoassay can elicit falsely positive results of tacrolimus concentrations, even though they are within the therapeutic range.

The effect of paraproteins and rheumatoid factor on four commercial immunoassays for vancomycin: implications for laboratorians and other health care professionals

BACKGROUND

Paraproteins, immunoglobulins (Igs), which are elevated in various autoimmune disorders, are known to interfere with various laboratory immunoassays, including vancomycin (VANC). Rheumatoid factor (RF), a known immunoassay interferant, may cause falsely elevated results.

OBJECTIVES

The aims of this study were to (1) evaluate the effect of 3 paraproteins (IgA, IgG, and IgM) on 4 commercial VANC immunoassays [fluorescence polarization immunoassay; enzyme multiplied immunoassay; 2 particle-enhanced turbidimetric inhibition immunoassays]; (2) determine the concentration at which the effect is obtained, and (3) examine the influence of RF on the VANC methods.

METHOD

Serum and plasma pools from patients prescribed VANC and a spiked VANC pool (20 mg/L) were each mixed 1:1 with individual patient specimens containing IgA (6-63 g/L), IgG (6-54 g/L), IgM (3-30 g/L) (n = 4 for each Ig), and a patient RF pool (196 IU/L). The mixtures (n = 39) were split and distributed for VANC analysis.

RESULTS

IgA and IgG in serum and plasma did not affect any of the VANC immunoassays. RF added to plasma specimens did not interfere, but in serum, elevated VAN results were observed. IgM did not affect the fluorescence polarization immunoassay and enzyme multiplied immunoassay methods but did attenuate VANC concentrations by both particle-enhanced turbidimetric inhibition immunoassays (Siemens, Beckman Coulter), with a more pronounced effect on the latter, producing concentrations >20% lower than expected in the patient serum and spiked plasma pools. The effect was progressively negative at effective IgM concentrations of 10 and 15 mg/L.

CONCLUSIONS

This phenomenon is a major analytical and clinical issue that must be communicated to health care professionals caring for patients receiving VANC, so optimal therapy is achieved.

A liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method for monitoring drug exposure in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients

A liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method was developed for the quantification of circulating levels of multiple immunosuppressant drugs including cyclosporine (CsA), tacrolimus, methotrexate (Mtx), prednisone, prednisolone, methylprednisone, total and free mycophenolic acid (MPA), as well as MPA phenolic (MPAG) and acyl (AcMPAG) glucuronide metabolites. Linearity, precision and accuracy were validated within the typical therapeutic range of concentrations for each compound. The assay was linear over 0.125-25ng/mL for tacrolimus, 1-500ng/mL for prednisone/methylprednisone, 2-400ng/mL for Mtx, 2-1000ng/mL for prednisolone and from 7.5 to 1500ng/mL for CsA with the lowest limit of quantification (LLOQ) being 0.125, 1.00, 2.00, 2.00 and 7.5ng/mL, respectively. The calibration curve concentrations for MPA and MPAG ranged from 50 to 50,000ng/mL (LLOQ: 50ng/mL) and 10 to 10,000ng/mL (LLOQ: 10ng/mL) for AcMPAG. Mean recoveries in blood and plasma were 84%±5.7%. The method could measure individual drugs with high sensitivity, accuracy (bias≤14%), and reproducibility (CV≤12.8%). Its clinical application was validated by measuring levels of these drugs in samples obtained from hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients treated with combined immunosuppressive drug therapy. Our results indicate that this approach is suitable for simultaneous determination of in vivo levels of immunosuppressive drugs commonly used in combined therapies.

The Need for Standardization of Tacrolimus Assays

BACKGROUND

Owing to the lack of an internationally recognized tacrolimus reference material and reference method, current LC-MS and immunoassay test methods used to monitor tacrolimus concentrations in whole blood are not standardized. The aim of this study was to assess the need for tacrolimus assay standardization.

METHODS

We sent a blinded 40-member whole-blood tacrolimus proficiency panel (0–30 μg/L) to 22 clinical laboratories in 14 countries to be tested by the following assays: Abbott ARCHITECT (n = 17), LC-MS (n = 9), and Siemens Dade Dimension (n = 5). Selected LC-MS laboratories (n = 4) also received a common calibrator set. We compared test results to a validated LC-MS method. Four samples from the proficiency panel were assigned reference values by using exact-matching isotope-dilution mass spectrometr at LGC.

RESULTS

The range of CVs observed with the tacrolimus proficiency panel was as follows: LC-MS 11.4%–18.7%, ARCHITECT 3.9%–9.5%, and Siemens Dade 5.0%–48.1%. The range of historical within-site QC CVs obtained with the use of 3 control concentrations were as follows: LC-MS low 3.8%–10.7%, medium 2.0%–9.3%, high 2.3%–9.0%; ARCHITECT low 2.5%–9.5%, medium 2.5%–8.6%, high 2.9%–18.6%; and Siemens/Dade Dimension low 8.7%–23.0%, medium 7.6%–13.2%, high 4.4%–10.4%. Assay bias observed between the 4 LC-MS sites was not corrected by implementation of a common calibrator set.

CONCLUSIONS

Tacrolimus assay standardization will be necessary to compare patient results between clinical laboratories. Improved assay accuracy is required to provide optimized drug dosing and consistent care across transplant centers globally.

Rheumatoid factor and its interference with cytokine measurements: problems and solutions

Use of cytokines as biomarkers for disease is getting more widespread. Cytokines are conveniently determined by immunoassay, but interference from present antibodies is known to cause problems. In rheumatoid arthritis (RA), interference of rheumatoid factor (RF) may be problematic. RF covers a group of autoantibodies from immunoglobulin subclasses and is present in 65–80% of RA patients. Partly removal of RF is possible by precipitation. This study aims at determining the effects of presence of RF in blood and synovial fluid on cytokine measurements in samples from RA patients and finding possible solutions for recognized problems. IL-1β, IL-4, IL-6, and IL-8 were determined with multiplex immunoassays (MIA) in samples from RA patients prior to and after polyethylene glycol (PEG 6000) precipitation. Presence of RF does interfere with MIA. PEG 6000 precipitation abolishes this RF interference. We recommend PEG precipitation for all immunoassay measurements of plasma samples from RA patients.

The current role of liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry in therapeutic drug monitoring of immunosuppressant and antiretroviral drugs

Therapeutic drug monitoring of critical dose immunosuppressant drugs is established clinical practice and there are similar good reasons to monitor antiretrovirals. The aim of this article is to review the recent literature (last five years), with particular reference to the use of liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). LC-MS/MS offers many potential advantages. The superior selectivity of LC-MS/MS over immunoassays for immunosuppressant drugs has been widely reported. Simultaneous measurement of a number of drugs can be performed. It is currently routine practice for the four major immunosuppressants (cyclosporin, tacrolimus, sirolimus and everolimus) to be simultaneously measured in whole blood. While up to 17 antiretroviral drugs have been simultaneously measured in plasma. The exquisite sensitivity of LC-MS/MS also provides the opportunity to measure these drugs in alternative matrices, such as dried blood spots, saliva, peripheral blood mononuclear cells and tissue. However, the clinical utility of measuring these classes of drugs in alternative matrices is still to be determined.