1
|
Abderahmene A, Ellouz A, Amor D, Ajmi M, Khalij Y, Hamdouni H, Sahtout W, Azzabi A, Omezzine A, Achour A, Bouslama A. The pharmacogenetics of mycophenolate mofetil in Tunisian renal transplant patients. Per Med 2022; 19:383-393. [PMID: 35770851 DOI: 10.2217/pme-2021-0092] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
Aim: The effects of variants in IMPDH, UGT1A9, UGT1A8, UGT2B7 and SLCO1B1 genes on the efficacy and safety of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in the Tunisian population were investigated. Materials & methods: A total of 245 kidney transplant patients being treated with MMF were recruited and cotreated with cyclosporine or tacrolimus. Genotyping was performed using the polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism method. MMF, cyclosporine and tacrolimus trough levels were measured by immunoassay. The AUC (AUC0-12hMPA) was estimated by a Bayesian method. Results: In the tacrolimus-treated group, anemia and diarrhea were associated with the UGT1A9-98C and UGT1A9-275T alleles, respectively (p < 0.05). In the cyclosporine-treated group, leukopenia was associated with the SLCO1B1-521T allele (p < 0.05). Both groups had an increased risk of rejection (p < 0.05) associated with the variant alleles of IMPDH2-3757T>C, UGT1A9-2152C>T and UGT1A9-275C>A and the common allele of SLCO1B1-388A>G. However, no significant association was found between the studied genotypes and AUC0-12hMPA or cotreatment levels. Conclusion: The results constitute preliminary evidence for the inclusion of the pharmacogenetics of MMF in kidney pretransplantation evaluations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amani Abderahmene
- Biochemistry Department, LR12SP11, Sahloul University Hospital, Street Route Ceinture Sahloul, 4054, Sousse, Tunisia.,University of Monastir, Faculty of Pharmacy of Monastir, Street Ibn Sina, 5000, Monastir, Tunisia
| | - Amel Ellouz
- Biochemistry Department, LR12SP11, Sahloul University Hospital, Street Route Ceinture Sahloul, 4054, Sousse, Tunisia.,University of Monastir, Faculty of Pharmacy of Monastir, Street Ibn Sina, 5000, Monastir, Tunisia
| | - Dorra Amor
- Biochemistry Department, LR12SP11, Sahloul University Hospital, Street Route Ceinture Sahloul, 4054, Sousse, Tunisia.,University of Monastir, Faculty of Pharmacy of Monastir, Street Ibn Sina, 5000, Monastir, Tunisia
| | - Marwa Ajmi
- Biochemistry Department, LR12SP11, Sahloul University Hospital, Street Route Ceinture Sahloul, 4054, Sousse, Tunisia.,University of Monastir, Higher Institute of Biotechnology of Monastir, Street Taher Hadded, 5000, Monastir, Tunisia
| | - Yassine Khalij
- Biochemistry Department, LR12SP11, Sahloul University Hospital, Street Route Ceinture Sahloul, 4054, Sousse, Tunisia.,University of Monastir, Faculty of Pharmacy of Monastir, Street Ibn Sina, 5000, Monastir, Tunisia
| | - Haithem Hamdouni
- Biochemistry Department, LR12SP11, Sahloul University Hospital, Street Route Ceinture Sahloul, 4054, Sousse, Tunisia.,University of Monastir, Faculty of Pharmacy of Monastir, Street Ibn Sina, 5000, Monastir, Tunisia
| | - Wissal Sahtout
- Nephrology Department, Sahloul University Hospital, Street Route Ceinture Sahloul, 4054, Sousse, Tunisia
| | - Awatef Azzabi
- Nephrology Department, Sahloul University Hospital, Street Route Ceinture Sahloul, 4054, Sousse, Tunisia
| | - Asma Omezzine
- Biochemistry Department, LR12SP11, Sahloul University Hospital, Street Route Ceinture Sahloul, 4054, Sousse, Tunisia.,University of Monastir, Faculty of Pharmacy of Monastir, Street Ibn Sina, 5000, Monastir, Tunisia
| | - Abdellatif Achour
- Nephrology Department, Sahloul University Hospital, Street Route Ceinture Sahloul, 4054, Sousse, Tunisia
| | - Ali Bouslama
- Biochemistry Department, LR12SP11, Sahloul University Hospital, Street Route Ceinture Sahloul, 4054, Sousse, Tunisia.,University of Monastir, Faculty of Pharmacy of Monastir, Street Ibn Sina, 5000, Monastir, Tunisia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bergan S, Brunet M, Hesselink DA, Johnson-Davis KL, Kunicki PK, Lemaitre F, Marquet P, Molinaro M, Noceti O, Pattanaik S, Pawinski T, Seger C, Shipkova M, Swen JJ, van Gelder T, Venkataramanan R, Wieland E, Woillard JB, Zwart TC, Barten MJ, Budde K, Dieterlen MT, Elens L, Haufroid V, Masuda S, Millan O, Mizuno T, Moes DJAR, Oellerich M, Picard N, Salzmann L, Tönshoff B, van Schaik RHN, Vethe NT, Vinks AA, Wallemacq P, Åsberg A, Langman LJ. Personalized Therapy for Mycophenolate: Consensus Report by the International Association of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring and Clinical Toxicology. Ther Drug Monit 2021; 43:150-200. [PMID: 33711005 DOI: 10.1097/ftd.0000000000000871] [Citation(s) in RCA: 98] [Impact Index Per Article: 32.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2020] [Accepted: 01/29/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
ABSTRACT When mycophenolic acid (MPA) was originally marketed for immunosuppressive therapy, fixed doses were recommended by the manufacturer. Awareness of the potential for a more personalized dosing has led to development of methods to estimate MPA area under the curve based on the measurement of drug concentrations in only a few samples. This approach is feasible in the clinical routine and has proven successful in terms of correlation with outcome. However, the search for superior correlates has continued, and numerous studies in search of biomarkers that could better predict the perfect dosage for the individual patient have been published. As it was considered timely for an updated and comprehensive presentation of consensus on the status for personalized treatment with MPA, this report was prepared following an initiative from members of the International Association of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring and Clinical Toxicology (IATDMCT). Topics included are the criteria for analytics, methods to estimate exposure including pharmacometrics, the potential influence of pharmacogenetics, development of biomarkers, and the practical aspects of implementation of target concentration intervention. For selected topics with sufficient evidence, such as the application of limited sampling strategies for MPA area under the curve, graded recommendations on target ranges are presented. To provide a comprehensive review, this report also includes updates on the status of potential biomarkers including those which may be promising but with a low level of evidence. In view of the fact that there are very few new immunosuppressive drugs under development for the transplant field, it is likely that MPA will continue to be prescribed on a large scale in the upcoming years. Discontinuation of therapy due to adverse effects is relatively common, increasing the risk for late rejections, which may contribute to graft loss. Therefore, the continued search for innovative methods to better personalize MPA dosage is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stein Bergan
- Department of Pharmacology, Oslo University Hospital and Department of Pharmacy, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Mercè Brunet
- Pharmacology and Toxicology Laboratory, Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics Department, Biomedical Diagnostic Center, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, University of Barcelona, IDIBAPS, CIBERehd, Spain
| | - Dennis A Hesselink
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology and Transplantation, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Kamisha L Johnson-Davis
- Department of Pathology, University of Utah Health Sciences Center and ARUP Laboratories, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Paweł K Kunicki
- Department of Drug Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, Medical University of Warsaw, Warszawa, Poland
| | - Florian Lemaitre
- Univ Rennes, CHU Rennes, Inserm, EHESP, Irset (Institut de recherche en santé, environnement et travail)-UMR_S 1085, Rennes, France
| | - Pierre Marquet
- INSERM, Université de Limoges, Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, CHU de Limoges, U1248 IPPRITT, Limoges, France
| | - Mariadelfina Molinaro
- Clinical and Experimental Pharmacokinetics Lab, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
| | - Ofelia Noceti
- National Center for Liver Tansplantation and Liver Diseases, Army Forces Hospital, Montevideo, Uruguay
| | | | - Tomasz Pawinski
- Department of Drug Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, Medical University of Warsaw, Warszawa, Poland
| | | | - Maria Shipkova
- Synlab TDM Competence Center, Synlab MVZ Leinfelden-Echterdingen GmbH, Leinfelden-Echterdingen, Germany
| | - Jesse J Swen
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy & Toxicology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Teun van Gelder
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy & Toxicology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Raman Venkataramanan
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy and Department of Pathology, Starzl Transplantation Institute, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Eberhard Wieland
- Synlab TDM Competence Center, Synlab MVZ Leinfelden-Echterdingen GmbH, Leinfelden-Echterdingen, Germany
| | - Jean-Baptiste Woillard
- INSERM, Université de Limoges, Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, CHU de Limoges, U1248 IPPRITT, Limoges, France
| | - Tom C Zwart
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy & Toxicology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Markus J Barten
- Department of Cardiac- and Vascular Surgery, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Klemens Budde
- Department of Nephrology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Maja-Theresa Dieterlen
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Heart Center, HELIOS Clinic, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Laure Elens
- Integrated PharmacoMetrics, PharmacoGenomics and PharmacoKinetics (PMGK) Research Group, Louvain Drug Research Institute (LDRI), Université Catholique de Louvain (UCLouvain), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Vincent Haufroid
- Louvain Centre for Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology (LTAP), Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique, UCLouvain and Department of Clinical Chemistry, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Satohiro Masuda
- Department of Pharmacy, International University of Health and Welfare Narita Hospital, Chiba, Japan
| | - Olga Millan
- Pharmacology and Toxicology Laboratory, Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics Department, Biomedical Diagnostic Center, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, University of Barcelona, IDIBAPS, CIBERehd, Spain
| | - Tomoyuki Mizuno
- Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Dirk J A R Moes
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy & Toxicology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Michael Oellerich
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Georg-August-University Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Nicolas Picard
- INSERM, Université de Limoges, Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, CHU de Limoges, U1248 IPPRITT, Limoges, France
| | | | - Burkhard Tönshoff
- Department of Pediatrics I, University Children's Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Ron H N van Schaik
- Department of Clinical Chemistry, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Nils Tore Vethe
- Department of Pharmacology, Oslo University Hospital and Department of Pharmacy, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Alexander A Vinks
- Department of Pharmacy, International University of Health and Welfare Narita Hospital, Chiba, Japan
| | - Pierre Wallemacq
- Clinical Chemistry Department, Cliniques Universitaires St Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, LTAP, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Anders Åsberg
- Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital-Rikshospitalet and Department of Pharmacy, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; and
| | - Loralie J Langman
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ehren R, Schijvens AM, Hackl A, Schreuder MF, Weber LT. Therapeutic drug monitoring of mycophenolate mofetil in pediatric patients: novel techniques and current opinion. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol 2020; 17:201-213. [PMID: 33107768 DOI: 10.1080/17425255.2021.1843633] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
Introduction: Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is an ester prodrug of the immunosuppressant mycophenolic acid (MPA) and is recommended and widely used for maintenance immunosuppressive therapy in solid organ and stem-cell transplantation as well as in immunological kidney diseases. MPA is a potent, reversible, noncompetitive inhibitor of the inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase (IMPDH), a crucial enzyme in the de novo purine synthesis in T- and B-lymphocytes, thereby inhibiting cell-mediated immunity and antibody formation. The use of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of MMF is still controversial as outcome data of clinical trials are equivocal. Areas covered: This review covers in great depth the existing literature on TDM of MMF in the field of pediatric (kidney) transplantation. In addition, the relevance of TDM in immunological kidney diseases, in particular childhood nephrotic syndrome is highlighted. Expert opinion: TDM of MMF has the potential to optimize therapy in pediatric transplantation as well as in nephrotic syndrome. Limited sampling strategies to estimate MPA exposure increase its feasibility. Future perspectives rather encompass approaches reflecting total immunosuppressive load than single drug TDM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rasmus Ehren
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Department of Pediatrics, University of Cologne , Cologne, Germany
| | - Anne M Schijvens
- Department of Pediatric Nephrology, Amalia Children's Hospital, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center , Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Agnes Hackl
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Department of Pediatrics, University of Cologne , Cologne, Germany
| | - Michiel F Schreuder
- Department of Pediatric Nephrology, Amalia Children's Hospital, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center , Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Lutz T Weber
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Department of Pediatrics, University of Cologne , Cologne, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Zhu A, Leto A, Shaked A, Keating B. Immunologic Monitoring to Personalize Immunosuppression After Liver Transplant. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 2018; 47:281-296. [PMID: 29735024 DOI: 10.1016/j.gtc.2018.01.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/21/2023]
Abstract
Although immunosuppressive drugs have enhanced patient outcomes in transplantation, the liver transplant community has made significant research efforts into the discovery of more accurate and precise methods of posttransplant monitoring and diagnosing. Current research in biomarkers reveals many promising approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew Zhu
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Penn Transplant Institute, The University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce Street, Two Dulles Pavilion, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Alexandra Leto
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Penn Transplant Institute, The University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce Street, Two Dulles Pavilion, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Abraham Shaked
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Penn Transplant Institute, The University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce Street, Two Dulles Pavilion, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
| | - Brendan Keating
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Penn Transplant Institute, The University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce Street, Two Dulles Pavilion, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Parant F, Ranchin B, Gagnieu MC. The Roche Total Mycophenolic Acid® assay: An application protocol for the ABX Pentra 400 analyzer and comparison with LC-MS in children with idiopathic nephrotic syndrome. Pract Lab Med 2017; 7:19-26. [PMID: 28856214 PMCID: PMC5575364 DOI: 10.1016/j.plabm.2016.12.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2016] [Revised: 12/17/2016] [Accepted: 12/26/2016] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background For TDM of mycophenolate acid (MPA), the Roche Total Mycophenolic Acid® assay based on the inhibition of recombinant inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase (IMPDH) has been shown to be a simple and reliable alternative to chromatographic methods. We have adapted this assay on the ABX Pentra 400 analyzer (HORIBA). Objective To investigate the analytical performances of the Roche Total Mycophenolic Acid® assay on the ABX Pentra 400 and to compare it to an LC-MS method using samples from children with nephrotic syndrome treated with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF). Material and methods Configuration of the open-channel on the ABX Pentra 400 was based on the Roche MPA assay package insert. Precision was determined as described in the CLSI protocol EP5-A2. Comparison with the LC-MS method was performed using 356 plasma samples from 42 children with nephrotic syndrome (8 h pharmacokinetic profiles). Results The enzymatic assay demonstrated high precision. The %CV for Within Run Imprecision ranged from 5.5% at 1.2 mg/L to 1.5% at 14.1 mg/L and Total Imprecision ranged from 9.3% to 2.5%. The method comparison with plasma samples from children yielded overall a good correlation and a good agreement between both methods. The Passing Bablok regression analysis showed the following results: [Roche MPA assay]=1.058 [MPA LC-MS] −0.06; rho=0.996. Conclusion The Roche Total Mycophenolic Acid® assay is adaptable to the ABX Pentra 400 analyzer, and demonstrates accurate and precise measurement of MPA in plasma obtained from children with nephrotic syndrome. Adaptation of the Roche Total Mycophenolic Acid® assay to the Pentra 400 analyzer. Comparison with LC-MS in children with idiopathic nephrotic syndrome. Therapeutic drug monitoring of mycophenolate mofetil.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- François Parant
- Hospices Civils de Lyon, GHS - Centre de Biologie Sud, UM Pharmacologie - Toxicologie, Pierre Bénite F-69495, France
| | - Bruno Ranchin
- Hospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital Femme Mère Enfant, Service de Néphrologie et Rhumatologie Pédiatriques, Bron F-69677, France
| | - Marie-Claude Gagnieu
- Hospices Civils de Lyon, GHS - Centre de Biologie Sud, UM Pharmacologie - Toxicologie, Pierre Bénite F-69495, France
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Shipkova M, Valbuena H. Liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry for therapeutic drug monitoring of immunosuppressive drugs: Achievements, lessons and open issues. Trends Analyt Chem 2016. [DOI: 10.1016/j.trac.2016.01.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
|
7
|
Rissling O, Bauer S, Shipkova M, Glander P, Mai M, Hambach P, Budde K. Simultaneous determination of mycophenolate and its metabolite mycophenolate-7-o-glucuronide with an isocratic HPLC-UV-based method in human plasma and stability evaluation. Scandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation 2016; 76:612-619. [PMID: 27676419 DOI: 10.1080/00365513.2016.1230775] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Mycophenolic acid (MPA) is an immunosuppressive agent which is commonly used in a fixed dose regime in solid organ transplantation. For clinical trials and therapeutic drug monitoring measuring plasma concentrations is necessary. Also, stability issues have to be addressed. METHODS We describe an isocratic, RP-based HPLC-UV method for simultaneous determination of MPA and its major metabolite Mycophenolic acid 7-o Glucuronide (MPAG) in human plasma. Pre-analytics included protein precipitation with acetonitrile. The method was validated according to EMA/FDA guidelines. Patient lithium-heparin plasma and blood was used for evaluation of short-term (72 hours at room temperature = RT) and long-term stability (2 years at -80 °C) without acidification. RESULTS Linearity was assessed in the concentration range of 0.5-40.0 μg/mL for MPA and 5.0-350.0 μg/mL for MPAG, respectively. For MPA coefficient of variation was <7.0% (lower limit of quantification = LLOQ: 10.8%), for MPAG <9.6% (LLOQ: 10.6%). Bias ranged between -1.9 and +1.5% for MPA and for MPAG between -4.3 and -0.3%. The method showed agreement with a reference method for both analytes. MPA remained stable for 7 h (-1.6 to +8.4% change to the initial concentration) and MPAG for 24 h (-1.8 to -11.5% change) at RT in lithium heparin blood. After 2 years of storage at -80 °C MPA, MPAG concentrations and 95% CIs remained within ±15% of the initial value. CONCLUSION The presented assay is applicable for clinical studies. Blood samples were stable for 7 hours at RT and plasma for 2 years stored at -80 °C.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olesja Rissling
- a Department of Nephrology , Charité Universitätsmedizin , Berlin , Germany.,b Institute of Pharmacy, Freie Universitaet Berlin , Berlin , Germany
| | - Steffen Bauer
- c Institute of Medical Diagnostics , Berlin , Germany
| | - Maria Shipkova
- d Central Institute for Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine , Klinikum Stuttgart , Stuttgart , Germany
| | - Petra Glander
- a Department of Nephrology , Charité Universitätsmedizin , Berlin , Germany
| | - Marco Mai
- a Department of Nephrology , Charité Universitätsmedizin , Berlin , Germany
| | - Pia Hambach
- a Department of Nephrology , Charité Universitätsmedizin , Berlin , Germany
| | - Klemens Budde
- a Department of Nephrology , Charité Universitätsmedizin , Berlin , Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Abstract
Mycophenolic acid (MPA) is an immunosuppressant requiring therapeutic drug monitoring. Although immunoassays are commercially available, there is significant positive bias using this approach when compared to high-performance liquid chromatography or LC combined with mass spectrometry (LC/MS) or tandem mass spectrometry (LC/MS/MS). Positive bias is due to variable cross-reactivity of MPA acyl glucuronide with antibodies traditionally used in immunoassay formats. As can be expected, the magnitude of bias varies considerably. MPA strongly binds albumin and, as a result, disproportionate increases in free MPA occur in patients with uremia, hypoalbuminemia, and hepatic dysfunction. As such, monitoring free MPA poses additional challenges. Because MPA inhibits inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase, monitoring this enzyme may provide an alternative approach.
Collapse
|
9
|
Kunicki PK, Pawiński T, Boczek A, Waś J, Bodnar-Broniarczyk M. A Comparison of the Immunochemical Methods, PETINIA and EMIT, With That of HPLC-UV for the Routine Monitoring of Mycophenolic Acid in Heart Transplant Patients. Ther Drug Monit 2016; 37:311-8. [PMID: 25380305 DOI: 10.1097/ftd.0000000000000151] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to evaluate particle enhanced turbidimetric inhibition immunoassay (PETINIA) recently developed for mycophenolic acid (MPA) determination in plasma and to compare it with a reference high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) method, using samples from heart transplant recipients. The results are presented in the context of PETINIA being compared with enzyme multiplied immunoassay technique (EMIT). METHODS PETINIA evaluation was performed using 194 routine trough plasma samples at steady state. EMIT was evaluated using 677 samples from 61 steady-state 12-hour profiles obtained from 35 heart transplant patients. Evaluation was undertaken on a Dimension EXL 200 analyzer (PETINIA) and on a Viva-E analyzer (EMIT). RESULTS The mean MPA concentration measured by PETINIA was significantly higher than that measured by high-performance liquid chromatography combined with UV detector (2.36 ± 1.30 mcg/mL versus 1.82 ± 1.23 mcg/mL, respectively, P < 0.0001). Bland-Altman analysis revealed a mean bias of 0.54 mcg/mL [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.49-0.59] comprising 33.48% (95% CI, 30.34-36.61). Passing-Bablok regression was: y = 1.100x + 0.38 (95% CI for slope: 1.044-1.154 and for intercept: 0.30-0.47). Regardless of a significant observed correlation (r = 0.9230, P < 0.0001), the statistical analyses showed a significant difference between PETINIA and the reference chromatographic method. The mean MPA concentration measured by EMIT was significantly higher than that measured by HPLC (7.48 ± 8.34 mcg/mL versus 5.57 ± 6.61 mcg/mL, respectively, P < 0.0001) with a mean bias of 1.91 mcg/mL (95% CI, 1.75-2.07) comprising 35.91% (95% CI, 34.37-37.45). The significant difference between EMIT and HPLC was confirmed by Passing-Bablok regression: y = 1.300x + 0.24 (95% CI for slope: 1.279-1.324 and for intercept: 0.18-0.29). The analysis of the determinations, grouped by sampling time, revealed positive bias between EMIT and HPLC ranging from 24.54% to 42.77% and inversely proportional to MPA concentrations with r = 0.9122 (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS The new immunochemical PETINIA method was associated with significantly higher MPA concentrations in routine therapeutic drug monitoring samples from heart transplant patients. The magnitude of the MPA overestimation was similar to that observed by use of the EMIT method.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paweł K Kunicki
- *Clinical Pharmacology Unit, Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Institute of Cardiology; and †Department of Drug Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, Medical University of Warsaw, Poland
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Ham JY, Jung HY, Choi JY, Park SH, Kim YL, Kim HK, Huh S, Kim CD, Won DIL, Song KE, Cho JH. Usefulness of mycophenolic acid monitoring with PETINIA for prediction of adverse events in kidney transplant recipients. Scandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation 2016; 76:296-303. [DOI: 10.3109/00365513.2016.1149879] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
|
11
|
Dasgupta A, Johnson M. Positive bias in mycophenolic acid concentrations determined by the CEDIA assay compared to HPLC-UV method: is CEDIA assay suitable for therapeutic drug monitoring of mycophenolic acid? J Clin Lab Anal 2013; 27:77-80. [PMID: 23325745 DOI: 10.1002/jcla.21565] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2012] [Accepted: 11/01/2012] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Both immunoassays and chromatographic methods are available for therapeutic drug monitoring of mycophenolic acid (MPA), an immunosuppressant. We studied the suitability of cloned enzyme donor immunoassay (CEDIA) assay for routine monitoring of MPA by comparing values obtained by the CEDIA assay with corresponding values obtained by using a high-performance liquid chromatography combined with ultraviolet detection (HPLC-UV) method. METHODS We compared MPA concentrations obtained by a reference HPLC-UV method and CEDIA assay on Hitachi 917 analyzer (Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, IN) using 60 patient specimens (18 liver transplant recipient and 42 kidney transplant recipients). RESULTS When MPA concentrations in all 60 transplant recipients obtained by the HPLC-UV (x-axis) method were compared with corresponding values obtained by the CEDIA method (y-axis), the following regression equation was obtained: y = 1.1558x + 0.2876 (r = 0.97). Interestingly, much lower bias was observed in 42 renal transplant recipients as revealed by the following regression equation; y = 1.1181x + 0.2745 (r = 0.98). However, more significant positive bias was observed in 18 liver transplant recipients as following regression equation as observed: y = 1.3337x + 0.1493 (r = 0.94). CONCLUSIONS We conclude that MPA concentrations determined by the CEDIA assay showed significant positive bias compared to HPLC-UV method. Therefore, caution must be exercised in interpreting therapeutic drug monitoring result of MPA if CEDIA assay is used.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amitava Dasgupta
- Department of Pathology, University of Texas-Houston Medical School and Laboratory Services Memorial-Hermann Hospital at Texas Medical Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Comparison of mycophenolic acid concentrations determined by a new PETINIA assay on the Dimension EXL analyzer and a HPLC-UV method. Clin Biochem 2013; 46:685-7. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2012.11.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2012] [Revised: 11/15/2012] [Accepted: 11/27/2012] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
|
13
|
Downing HJ, Pirmohamed M, Beresford MW, Smyth RL. Paediatric use of mycophenolate mofetil. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2013; 75:45-59. [PMID: 22519685 PMCID: PMC3555046 DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2012.04305.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2012] [Accepted: 04/16/2012] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
A number of medications do not have a licence, or label, for use in the paediatric age group nor for the specific indication for which they are being used in children. Over recent years, mycophenolate mofetil has increasingly been used off-label (i.e. off-licence) in adults for a number of indications, including autoimmune conditions; progressively, this wider use has been extended to children. This review summarizes current use of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in children, looking at how MMF works, the pharmacokinetics, the clinical conditions for which it is used, the advantages it has when compared with other immunosuppressants and the unresolved issues remaining with use in children. The review aims to focus on off-label use in children so as to identify areas that require further research and investigation. The overall commercial value of MMF is limited because it has now come off patent in adults. Given the increasing knowledge of the pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics and pharmacogenomics demonstrating the clinical benefits of MMF, new, formal, investigator-led studies, including trials focusing on the use of MMF in children, would be of immense value.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heather J Downing
- Department of Women's and Children's Health, Institute of Translational Medicine, The University of Liverpool, Alder Hey Children's NHS Foundation TrustEaton Road, Liverpool L12 2AP, UK
| | - Munir Pirmohamed
- Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, The University of LiverpoolAshton Street, Liverpool L69 3GE, UK
| | - Michael W Beresford
- Department of Women's and Children's Health, Institute of Translational Medicine, The University of Liverpool, Alder Hey Children's NHS Foundation TrustEaton Road, Liverpool L12 2AP, UK
| | - Rosalind L Smyth
- Department of Women's and Children's Health, Institute of Translational Medicine, The University of Liverpool, Alder Hey Children's NHS Foundation TrustEaton Road, Liverpool L12 2AP, UK
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Stachulski AV, Baillie TA, Kevin Park B, Scott Obach R, Dalvie DK, Williams DP, Srivastava A, Regan SL, Antoine DJ, Goldring CEP, Chia AJL, Kitteringham NR, Randle LE, Callan H, Castrejon JL, Farrell J, Naisbitt DJ, Lennard MS. The Generation, Detection, and Effects of Reactive Drug Metabolites. Med Res Rev 2012; 33:985-1080. [DOI: 10.1002/med.21273] [Citation(s) in RCA: 65] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew V. Stachulski
- Department of Chemistry, Robert Robinson Laboratories; University of Liverpool; Liverpool; L69 7ZD; UK
| | - Thomas A. Baillie
- School of Pharmacy; University of Washington; Box 357631; Seattle; Washington; 98195-7631
| | - B. Kevin Park
- Department of Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology; MRC Centre for Drug Safety Science; Institute of Translational Medicine; University of Liverpool; Sherrington Buildings, Ashton Street; Liverpool L69 3GE; UK
| | - R. Scott Obach
- Pharmacokinetics, Dynamics and Metabolism; Pfizer Worldwide Research & Development; Groton; Connecticut 06340
| | - Deepak K. Dalvie
- Pharmacokinetics, Dynamics and Metabolism; Pfizer Worldwide Research & Development; La Jolla; California 94121
| | - Dominic P. Williams
- Department of Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology; MRC Centre for Drug Safety Science; Institute of Translational Medicine; University of Liverpool; Sherrington Buildings, Ashton Street; Liverpool L69 3GE; UK
| | - Abhishek Srivastava
- Department of Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology; MRC Centre for Drug Safety Science; Institute of Translational Medicine; University of Liverpool; Sherrington Buildings, Ashton Street; Liverpool L69 3GE; UK
| | - Sophie L. Regan
- Department of Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology; MRC Centre for Drug Safety Science; Institute of Translational Medicine; University of Liverpool; Sherrington Buildings, Ashton Street; Liverpool L69 3GE; UK
| | - Daniel J. Antoine
- Department of Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology; MRC Centre for Drug Safety Science; Institute of Translational Medicine; University of Liverpool; Sherrington Buildings, Ashton Street; Liverpool L69 3GE; UK
| | - Christopher E. P. Goldring
- Department of Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology; MRC Centre for Drug Safety Science; Institute of Translational Medicine; University of Liverpool; Sherrington Buildings, Ashton Street; Liverpool L69 3GE; UK
| | - Alvin J. L. Chia
- Department of Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology; MRC Centre for Drug Safety Science; Institute of Translational Medicine; University of Liverpool; Sherrington Buildings, Ashton Street; Liverpool L69 3GE; UK
| | - Neil R. Kitteringham
- Department of Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology; MRC Centre for Drug Safety Science; Institute of Translational Medicine; University of Liverpool; Sherrington Buildings, Ashton Street; Liverpool L69 3GE; UK
| | - Laura E. Randle
- School of Pharmacy and Biomolecular Sciences, Faculty of Science; Liverpool John Moores University; James Parsons Building, Byrom Street; Liverpool L3 3AF; UK
| | - Hayley Callan
- Department of Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology; MRC Centre for Drug Safety Science; Institute of Translational Medicine; University of Liverpool; Sherrington Buildings, Ashton Street; Liverpool L69 3GE; UK
| | - J. Luis Castrejon
- Department of Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology; MRC Centre for Drug Safety Science; Institute of Translational Medicine; University of Liverpool; Sherrington Buildings, Ashton Street; Liverpool L69 3GE; UK
| | - John Farrell
- Department of Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology; MRC Centre for Drug Safety Science; Institute of Translational Medicine; University of Liverpool; Sherrington Buildings, Ashton Street; Liverpool L69 3GE; UK
| | - Dean J. Naisbitt
- Department of Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology; MRC Centre for Drug Safety Science; Institute of Translational Medicine; University of Liverpool; Sherrington Buildings, Ashton Street; Liverpool L69 3GE; UK
| | - Martin S. Lennard
- Academic Unit of Medical Education; University of Sheffield; 85 Wilkinson Street; Sheffield S10 2GJ; UK
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Laverdière I, Caron P, Couture F, Lévesque E, Guillemette C. A liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method for monitoring drug exposure in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci 2012; 885-886:131-7. [PMID: 22265668 DOI: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2011.12.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2011] [Revised: 12/23/2011] [Accepted: 12/30/2011] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
A liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method was developed for the quantification of circulating levels of multiple immunosuppressant drugs including cyclosporine (CsA), tacrolimus, methotrexate (Mtx), prednisone, prednisolone, methylprednisone, total and free mycophenolic acid (MPA), as well as MPA phenolic (MPAG) and acyl (AcMPAG) glucuronide metabolites. Linearity, precision and accuracy were validated within the typical therapeutic range of concentrations for each compound. The assay was linear over 0.125-25ng/mL for tacrolimus, 1-500ng/mL for prednisone/methylprednisone, 2-400ng/mL for Mtx, 2-1000ng/mL for prednisolone and from 7.5 to 1500ng/mL for CsA with the lowest limit of quantification (LLOQ) being 0.125, 1.00, 2.00, 2.00 and 7.5ng/mL, respectively. The calibration curve concentrations for MPA and MPAG ranged from 50 to 50,000ng/mL (LLOQ: 50ng/mL) and 10 to 10,000ng/mL (LLOQ: 10ng/mL) for AcMPAG. Mean recoveries in blood and plasma were 84%±5.7%. The method could measure individual drugs with high sensitivity, accuracy (bias≤14%), and reproducibility (CV≤12.8%). Its clinical application was validated by measuring levels of these drugs in samples obtained from hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients treated with combined immunosuppressive drug therapy. Our results indicate that this approach is suitable for simultaneous determination of in vivo levels of immunosuppressive drugs commonly used in combined therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isabelle Laverdière
- Pharmacogenomics Laboratory, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec (CHUQ) Research Center, Canada
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Rockwood AL, Johnson-Davis KL. Mass spectrometry for clinical toxicology: therapeutic drug management and trace element analysis. Clin Lab Med 2011; 31:407-28. [PMID: 21907106 DOI: 10.1016/j.cll.2011.07.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Alan L Rockwood
- Department of Pathology, University of Utah School of Medicine and ARUP Laboratories, Salt Lake City, UT 84065, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Decavele ASC, Favoreel N, Heyden FV, Verstraete AG. Performance of the Roche Total Mycophenolic Acid® assay on the Cobas Integra 400®, Cobas 6000® and comparison to LC-MS/MS in liver transplant patients. Clin Chem Lab Med 2011; 49:1159-65. [DOI: 10.1515/cclm.2011.194] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
|