Neurological diseases in pregnancy

Neurological disorders in pregnant women in low- and middle-income countries-Management gaps, impacts, and future prospects: A review perspective

Neurological disorders during pregnancy are a substantial threat to women's health, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. Furthermore, a critical shortage of mental health workers and neurologists exacerbates the already pressing issue, where a lack of coordination of respective healthcare among multidisciplinary teams involved in managing these conditions perpetuates the current state of affairs. Financial restrictions and societal stigmas associated with neurological disorders in pregnancy amplify the situation. Addressing these difficulties would necessitate a multifaceted approach comprising investments in healthcare infrastructure, healthcare professional education and training, increased government support for research, and the implementation of innovative care models. Improving access to specialized treatment and coordinated management of antenatal neurological diseases will precipitate improved health outcomes for women and their families in low- and middle-income countries.

Neuro-anesthesiology in pregnancy

Management of the pregnant patient requiring neurosurgery poses multiple challenges, juxtaposing pregnancy-specific considerations with that accompanying the safe provision of intracranial or spine surgery. There are no specific evidence-based recommendations, and case-by-case interdisciplinary discussions will guide informed decision-making about the timing of delivery vis-à-vis neurosurgery, the performance of cesarean delivery immediately before neurosurgery, consequences of neurosurgery on subsequent delivery, or even the optimal anesthetic modality for neurosurgery and/or cesarean delivery. In general, identifying whether increased intracranial pressure poses a risk for herniation is crucial before allowing neuraxial procedures. Modified rapid sequence induction with advanced airway approaches (videolaryngoscopic or fiberoptic) allows improved airway manipulation with reduced risks associated with endotracheal intubation of the obstetric airway. Currently, very few anesthetic drugs are avoided in the neurosurgical pregnant patient; however, ensuring access to critical care units for prolonged monitoring and assistance of the respiratory-compromised patient is necessary to ensure safe outcomes.

Neuroimaging During Pregnancy and the Postpartum Period

New onset or exacerbation of preexisting neurologic symptoms during pregnancy often necessitates brain or spinal cord imaging. Magnetic resonance techniques are preferred imaging modalities during pregnancy and the postpartum period. Ionizing radiation with computed tomography and intravenous contrast material with magnetic resonance or computed tomography should be avoided during pregnancy. New onset of headaches in the last trimester or in the postpartum period may indicate cerebrovascular disease or a mass lesion, for which brain imaging is necessary. The continuum of cerebrovascular complications of pregnancy and enlarging lesions may produce neurologic symptoms later in pregnancy and after delivery, necessitating imaging.

Myasthenia Gravis and Pregnancy: Toronto Specialty Center Experience

BACKGROUND

Myasthenia gravis (MG) is an autoimmune disorder that frequently affects young women of reproductive age. The multidirectional interplay between MG, pregnancy, and fetal health poses a complex scenario for pregnant women with MG and the healthcare team. Here, we reviewed our local experience with MG, pregnancy, and outcomes.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective chart review of patients with MG attending the Prosserman Family Neuromuscular Clinic from 2001 to 2019 and who were referred to a high-risk pregnancy clinic. MG status was defined as stable, better, or worse. Information was collected on the delivery route, pregnancy, and neonatal complications.

RESULTS

We identified 20 women with MG for a total of 28 pregnancies. Worsening was observed in 50% of pregnancies: 18% during pregnancy, 25% following delivery, and 7% during both. 66.7% of patients with MG duration of 2 years or less had worsening during pregnancy. Three patients who stopped immunosuppressive treatment during pregnancy worsened and one had a crisis. C-section was done in 29% of pregnancies. The rate of delivery complications was 7% and of neonatal MG was 7%.

CONCLUSION

A high proportion of MG patients worsened during pregnancy, particularly those with disease duration less than 2 years, and those who discontinued immunosuppression during pregnancy. However, pregnancy was largely unaffected, rate of neonatal MG was low, frequencies of C-section, delivery complications, and premature births were similar to the general population. While the study has limitations due to the retrospective nature, these insights provide some guidance when counseling young myasthenic women about family planning.

The Real Maternal Risks in a Pregnancy: A Structured Review to Enhance Maternal Understanding and Education

This review sought to use high-level published data sources for system knowledge translation, collaborative enhanced maternal education and understanding, and prospective maternal quality and safety care planning. The goal was to answer the following question: What are the short- and long-term maternal risks ("near misses," adverse events, severe morbidity and mortality) associated with pregnancy and childbirth? A structured analysis of the literature (systematic review, meta-analysis, observational case-control cohort), focusing on publications between 2016 and April 2019, was undertaken using the following key word search strategy: maternal, morbidity, mortality, co-morbidities (BMI, fertility, hypertension, cardiac, chronic renal disease, diabetes, mental health, stroke), preconception, antepartum, intrapartum, postpartum, "near miss," and adverse events. Only large cohort database sources with control comparison studies were accepted for inclusion because maternal mortality events are rare. Systematic review and meta-analysis were not undertaken because of the wide clinical scope and the goal of creating an education algorithm tool. For this educational tool, the results were presented in a counselling format that included a control group of common maternal morbidity from a regional maternity cohort (2017) of 54 000 births and published risk estimates for pre-conception, pregnancy-associated comorbidity, pregnancy-onset conditions, long-term maternal health associations, and maternal mortality scenarios. Because issues related to maternal comorbidities are increasing in prevalence, personalized pre-conception education on maternal pregnancy risk estimates needs to be encouraged and available to promote greater understanding. This maternal morbidity and mortality evaluation tool allows for patient-provider review and recognition of the possible leading factors associated with an increased risk of maternal morbidity: pre-conception risks (maternal age >45 years; pre-existing cardiac or hypertensive conditions) and pregnancy-obstetrical risks (gestational hypertension, preeclampsia, eclampsia; caesarean delivery, whether preterm or term; operative vaginal delivery; maternal sepsis; placenta accreta spectrum; and antepartum or postpartum hemorrhage).