Ureteral stents and retrograde studies: a primer for the gynecologist

Application, Advancement, and Complication of Ureteral Stent and Encrustation: A Major Complication

Three technological aspects have a significant impact on the functioning of an optimal stent. The substance it is made up of, model or design, and coating of the surface are important areas for research. To give recognition of an ideal stent, it summarizes some essential breakthroughs that occurred. Encrustation is a regular problem that can happen when a ureteral stent is implanted in the urinary tract, and it may be dangerous. The part of the paper covers the mechanism of encrustation, stent management, and the most recent technologies created to solve this problem. Encrustation has a complicated and diverse mechanism that includes the time it stays inside, patient-specific risk factors, controlled film production, formation of biofilm, and deposition of minerals. A number of high-tech advancements in stent substances and coverings/coatings could help to reduce the danger of encrustation of stents. It's critical to determine the amount of encrustation of a stent so that therapy options can be tailored properly. For the care of ureteral stents, which are encrusted, we offer a unique therapeutic protocol. The duration of stent indwelling time has been repeatedly established to be a critical risk factor for the evolution of encrustation. The period of stent indwelling time has consistently been established to be a critical risk element for the evolution of encrustation. Patients who are predisposed to bacteriuria and urinary lithiasis are also predisposed to encrustation. Repeated urinary tract infections, diabetes, and chronic kidney failure are among the factors that might escalate urine bacterial load, which can lead to stent encrustation. Due to the prevalence of ureteral stents in urology, it's critical to keep up to date on the best ways to prevent stent encrustation, recognize high-risk patients, and remove them using multimodal techniques.

The role of perioperative ureteral stenting for urologic complications in radical surgery of cervical cancer

INTRODUCTION

This study aimed to establish the urologic complications of radical type C2 hysterectomy in cervical cancer patients with or without ureteral stenting.

METHODS

This prospective randomized study included 76 (100%) patients with clinically and pathologically established cervical cancer stages I and II treated with radical type C2 hysterectomy with pelvic lymph node dissection for the last 5 years (2014-2019). Patients were randomized into two groups (2:1 ratio): group II received perioperative ureteral stenting (n = 24, 31.6%) and group I did not (n = 52, 68.4%). Urologic complications observed during follow-up include intraoperative ureter and urinary bladder lesions and postoperative ureterovaginal and vesicovaginal fistulas.

RESULTS

Of the 52 patients in group I who underwent surgery for cervical cancer, urologic complications were observed in 8 (10.5%) patients, 2 (2.6%) of whom underwent preoperative radiation therapy. In group II, urologic complications were observed in 2 (2.6%) patients, of which 1 (1.3%) received preoperative radiation therapy. Intraoperative urologic complications in group I (6.6%) included 3 (3.9%) ureteral lesions cases and 2 (2.6%) cases of urinary bladder lesions, wherein 1 patient received preoperative radiation therapy. One case of (1.3%) urinary bladder lesion was observed in group II. Postoperative complications were observed in 3 patients (3.9%) in group I, including 2 (2.6%) ureterovaginal fistula cases, wherein 1 (1.3%) patient received preoperative radiation therapy, and 1 (1.3%) case of vesicovaginal fistula. In group II, 1 (1.3%) patient who received perioperative radiotherapy developed postoperative vesicovaginal fistula.

DISCUSSION

Urologic complications are extremely common during and after radical surgery (hysterectomy type C2) for cervical cancer. The cervical cancer stage had a significant effect on intra- and postoperative urologic complication rates in this study; however, no such effect was observed for preoperative radiation therapy and ureteral stenting, and significant differences were observed between the two study groups.

Evaluation of Strategies to Prevent Urinary Tract Injury in Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVE

To systematically review tools for the prevention of urinary tract injury in adult women undergoing minimally invasive gynecologic surgery.

DATA SOURCES

A medical librarian (M.P.H.) searched Ovid Medline 1946 to, Ovid Embase 1929 to, CINAHL 1965 to, Cochrane Library 1974 to, Web of Science 1926 to, and SCOPUS 1974 to present on April 2 and April 3, 2020.

METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION

Articles evaluating strategies for the prevention of urinary tract injury at the time of minimally invasive gynecologic surgery were included. Articles that were nongynecologic, nonhuman, and nonadult were excluded. If a study did not describe the surgical approach or type of surgical procedures performed, it was excluded. If the study population was <50% gynecologic or <50% minimally invasive, it was excluded. Articles evaluating techniques for the diagnosis or management of injury, rather than prevention, were excluded.

TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS

The search yielded 2344 citations; duplicates were removed, inclusion criteria were applied, and 9 studies remained for analysis. Three studies evaluated bladder catheters, and 6 evaluated ureteral catheters. In the 3 studies evaluating bladder catheters, there were no urinary tract injuries. Urinary tract infection was greater in women who received a bladder catheter. In the studies evaluating the use of ureteral catheters, we found inconsistent reporting and heterogeneity that precluded meta-analysis. The results of the available studies do not indicate that ureteral catheters decrease the risk of injury, and indicate that they increase morbidity.

CONCLUSION

The evidence is insufficient to support the routine use of bladder catheters or ureteral catheters for the prevention of urinary tract injury at the time of minimally invasive gynecologic surgery.

Clinical application of fluoroscopic guided percutaneous antegrade ureteral stents placement for the treatment of malignant ureteral obstruction

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the clinical efficacy and safety of fluoroscopic guided percutaneous antegrade ureteral stents placement used for treatment of malignant ureteral obstruction.

METHODS

Between April 2016 and March 2018, fluoroscopic guided percutaneous ureteral stents was performed in 25 patients, including 7 patients (28%) with bilateral obstruction. The most common cancer diagnoses were cervical cancer (28%), rectal cancer (24%) and colon cancer (16%) among these patients. Clinical data were retrospectively analyzed with respect to the efficacy, safety and outcome of this treatment method.

RESULTS

Percutaneous antegrade placement of ureteral stents was performed in all cases, including 12 ureters that failed in the initial retrograde ureteral stents placement. The median stent patency time for the antegrade ureteral stents were 10.4 (95% CI: 8.3-12.6) months. The primary complications included mild flank pain and discomfort (44%), hematuria (44%), urinary tract infection (8%), bladder irritation symptoms (4%), and arterial bleeding (4%).

CONCLUSION

Fluoroscopic guided percutaneous ureteral stents placement is a safe, efficient procedure and has a high success rate in patients with malignant ureteral obstruction.

Ovarian lymphoma and hydronephrosis

This report discusses the association of ovarian lymphoma and hydroureteronephrosis managed by laparoscopic surgery and endoscopy.

Introduction:

Ovarian lymphoma is a rare entity, and hydronephrosis from lymphoma is even rarer. Most reports describe a laparoscopic approach to the disease, but we report a case of hydroureteronephrosis associated with ovarian lymphoma managed completely by mini-invasive techniques.

Case Report:

A 51-year-old woman was referred to us for back pain and renal colic and computed tomography scan findings of right hydroureteronephrosis and a mass in the right mesorectum and uterosacral ligament.

After magnetic resonance imaging was performed, the patient underwent laparoscopic adnexectomy and ureterolysis after ureteroscopy and stenting. Histology results showed diffuse B-cell lymphoma of the ovary occluding the ureter without infiltration. The patient has undergone 6 cycles of chemotherapy.

Discussion:

This is the first report to describe ovarian lymphoma and hydroureteronephrosis managed completely by laparoscopic surgery and endoscopy. Frequency in clinical practice, differential diagnosis, and endoscopic approach are discussed. The advantages of a multidisciplinary endoscopic team are underlined.