Nonabortal pregnancy complications of chorionic villous sampling

Chorionic villous sampling-related complications: a cohort study

Purpose: To compare the adverse pregnancy outcomes between the pregnant women undergoing chorionic villous sampling (CVS) and those without CVS.Materials and methods: A cohort study was conducted on low risk pregnancies attending Chiang Mai University Hospital between years 2003 and 2017 and identify the database of women undergoing CVS (study group) and control group. Each case in study group was matched for 10 cases of the control by maternal age and year of procedure.Results and conclusions: Of 1384 pregnancies undergoing CVS, 776 cases met criteria and were matched with 7760 controls. The gestational age at delivery and actual birth weight were significantly different between two groups (38.02 versus 38.96 weeks, p value <.001 and 3025 versus 3092 g, p value .001). Moreover, CVS group had significantly higher preterm birth (9.4 versus 7.3%, p value .037; RR 1.287, 95% CI 1.017-1.629). However, there was no significant difference in fetal loss rate before 24 weeks (1.16 versus 1.9%, p value .14), small for gestational age (SGA); SGA (4 versus 4%, p value .948) and low birth weight (LBW); LBW (8.9 versus 8.0%, p value .41). Pregnancies undergoing CVS tend to deliver earlier and has significantly higher preterm birth. However, the incidences of fetal loss, SGA and LBW are not significantly increased.

Comparison of adverse perinatal outcomes after single-needle and double-needle CVS techniques

OBJECTIVE

To determine the impact of the chorion villus sampling (CVS) technique on adverse perinatal outcomes.

METHODS

In this case-control study, 412 women who underwent CVS at 11-14 weeks of gestation and 231 women who did not undergo any invasive procedure were retrospectively evaluated. The women in the CVS group were further divided into two groups according to the use of single-needle technique (n=148) vs. double-needle technique (n=264). The adverse outcomes were compared between controls and the two CVS groups, and regression analysis was used to determine the significance of independent contribution.

RESULTS

The rate of preeclampsia for the control group was 2.2%, for the double-needle group was 3% and for the single-needle group was 8.1%. CVS with single-needle technique was found to be an independent and statistically significant risk factor for preeclampsia [odds ratio (OR)=2.1, 95% confidence interval (CI); 1.4-2.7, P=0.008].

CONCLUSION

The risk of preeclampsia after CVS appears to be increased with single-needle technique compared with double-needle technique.

How to perform transabdominal chorionic villus sampling: a practical guideline

The spread of both first trimester screening for chromosomal abnormalities and the possibility to check for single gene disorders at DNA-analysis has increased the request for chorionic villus sampling (CVS) in the first trimester. In order to perform placental biopsy, two routes are possible: the transcervical (TC) and the transabdominal (TA). In early days, the trancervical technique was the most diffused, but since its introduction into clinical practice, the TA technique has become the approach of choice in detriment of the TC technique. In our institution, we have a 30-year experience in TA-CVS with more than 26 000 procedures performed. Considering the expertise and the volume of procedures undertaken at our unit, we suggest a practical guideline for novel operators in TA-CVS.