1
|
Williams JL, Rahm AK, Zallen DT, Stuckey H, Fultz K, Fan AL, Bonhag M, Feldman L, Segal MM, Williams MS. Impact of a Patient-Facing Enhanced Genomic Results Report to Improve Understanding, Engagement, and Communication. J Genet Couns 2017; 27:358-369. [PMID: 29204811 PMCID: PMC5859697 DOI: 10.1007/s10897-017-0176-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2017] [Accepted: 11/08/2017] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
“The objective of this study was to” test the effectiveness of an enhanced genomic report on patient-centered outcome domains including communication, engagement and satisfaction. “Study design utilized” a prospective, randomized, mixed-methods desctiptive study of a whole genome sequencing results report, GenomeCOMPASS™, that was accessed by providers through the electronic health record and by patients through the associated patient portal. “The study was set in” an integrated healthcare delivery system in central Pennsylvania. “Eighty-four” parents of 46 children with undiagnosed Intellectual Disability, Autism Spectrum Disorder and/or multiple congenital anomalies who had participated in a previous study offering whole genome sequencing for their affected child were invited to enroll. Fifty-two parents enrolled. Following a traditional genetics results informing visit, the study coordinator stratified families by diagnostic result and uninformative result and then randomized families within each group to an intervention arm to receive the GenomeCOMPASS™ report or to the usual care arm to receive a summary letter from the medical geneticist. A letter inviting enrollment included a baseline survey, which once returned, constituted enrollment. Surveys were administered at 3 months post-genetics visit. At 6 months, the usual care arm crossed over to receive the intervention and were administered an additional survey at 3 months. Qualitative interviews were conducted following survey completion to augment the survey data regarding the patient centered outcomes of interest. Patient reported outcomes including communication, engagement, empowerment and satisfaction. In the intervention arm, GenomeCOMPASS™ reports were released to 14 families (N = 28 parents) and of those 21 (75%) returned 3 month surveys. In the usual care arm, 12 families (N = 24 parents) received usual care summary letters and of those 20 (83%) returned 3 month surveys. At crossover, GenomeCOMPASS™ reports were released to 20 individuals and 15 (75%) returned 3 month surveys. Qualitative interviews were conducted with 5 individuals. Use of the GenomeCOMPASS™ report was reported by this small group of parents to improve communication with providers and non-health professionals such as educators and therapists and led to increased engagement and high satisfaction. Providers and others involved in the children’s care also endorsed the report’s effectiveness. Reports that addressed negative findings, i.e. uninformative results, were not found to be useful. Although the number of users was small, this study supports that customizable template reports may provide a useful and durable source of information that can support and enhance the information provided by genetics professionals in traditional face-to-face encounters. Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov (Record 2013–0594).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Janet L Williams
- Geisinger Genomic Medicine Institute, 26-20, 100 N. Academy Ave., Danville, PA, 17822, USA.
| | - Alanna Kulchak Rahm
- Geisinger Genomic Medicine Institute, 26-20, 100 N. Academy Ave., Danville, PA, 17822, USA
| | | | | | - Kara Fultz
- Department of Health, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Marc S Williams
- Geisinger Genomic Medicine Institute, 26-20, 100 N. Academy Ave., Danville, PA, 17822, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Tabor HK, Jamal SM, Yu JH, Crouch JM, Shankar AG, Dent KM, Anderson N, Miller DA, Futral BT, Bamshad MJ. My46: a Web-based tool for self-guided management of genomic test results in research and clinical settings. Genet Med 2016; 19:467-475. [PMID: 27632689 PMCID: PMC5352554 DOI: 10.1038/gim.2016.133] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2016] [Accepted: 07/19/2016] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
A major challenge to implementing precision medicine is the need for an efficient and cost-effective strategy for returning individual genomic test results that is easily scalable and can be incorporated into multiple models of clinical practice. My46 is a web-based tool for managing the return of genetic results that was designed and developed to support a wide range of approaches to results disclosure, ranging from traditional face-to-face disclosure to self-guided models. My46 has five key functions: set and modify results return preferences, return results, educate, manage return of results, and assess return of results. These key functions are supported by six distinct modules and a suite of features that enhance the user experience, ease site navigation, facilitate knowledge sharing, and enable results return tracking. My46 is a potentially effective solution for returning results and supports current trends toward shared decision-making between patient and provider and patient-driven health management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Holly K Tabor
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.,Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Seema M Jamal
- Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Paediatric Laboratory Medicine, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Joon-Ho Yu
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Julia M Crouch
- Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Aditi G Shankar
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Karin M Dent
- Department of Pediatrics University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Nick Anderson
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, California, USA
| | | | | | - Michael J Bamshad
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.,Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Stuckey H, Williams JL, Fan AL, Rahm AK, Green J, Feldman L, Bonhag M, Zallen DT, Segal MM, Williams MS. Enhancing genomic laboratory reports from the patients' view: A qualitative analysis. Am J Med Genet A 2015; 167A:2238-43. [PMID: 26086630 PMCID: PMC4744953 DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.37174] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2015] [Accepted: 05/07/2015] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to develop a family genomic laboratory report designed to communicate genome sequencing results to parents of children who were participating in a whole genome sequencing clinical research study. Semi‐structured interviews were conducted with parents of children who participated in a whole genome sequencing clinical research study to address the elements, language and format of a sample family‐directed genome laboratory report. The qualitative interviews were followed by two focus groups aimed at evaluating example presentations of information about prognosis and next steps related to the whole genome sequencing result. Three themes emerged from the qualitative data: (i) Parents described a continual search for valid information and resources regarding their child's condition, a need that prior reports did not meet for parents; (ii) Parents believed that the Family Report would help facilitate communication with physicians and family members; and (iii) Parents identified specific items they appreciated in a genomics Family Report: simplicity of language, logical flow, visual appeal, information on what to expect in the future and recommended next steps. Parents affirmed their desire for a family genomic results report designed for their use and reference. They articulated the need for clear, easy to understand language that provided information with temporal detail and specific recommendations regarding relevant findings consistent with that available to clinicians.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heather Stuckey
- Penn State Hershey College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania
| | | | - Audrey L Fan
- Geisinger Genomic Medicine, Danville, Pennsylvania
| | | | - Jamie Green
- Center for Health Research, Danville, Pennsylvani
| | - Lynn Feldman
- SimulConsult, Inc., Chestnut Hill City, Massachusetts
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Williams MS. Perspectives on what is needed to implement genomic medicine. Mol Genet Genomic Med 2015; 3:155-9. [PMID: 26029701 PMCID: PMC4444156 DOI: 10.1002/mgg3.135] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2015] [Accepted: 01/28/2015] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Marc S Williams
- Genomic Medicine Institute, Geisinger Health System 100 N Academy Ave. Mail Stop 26-20, Danville, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Quillin JM, Bodurtha JN, Siminoff LA, Smith TJ. Physicians' current practices and opportunities for DNA banking of dying patients with cancer. J Oncol Pract 2013; 7:183-7. [PMID: 21886501 DOI: 10.1200/jop.2010.000190] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/29/2010] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The availability of genetic tests for cancer susceptibility is increasing. Current tests, however, have limited clinical sensitivity. Even when clinically valid tests are available, the genetic counseling and informed consent process might not be feasible for dying patients with cancer. DNA banking preserves the opportunity for future research or clinical testing and may provide critical opportunities for surviving relatives. This study explored the current practices and potential for DNA banking for cancer susceptibility among oncologists specializing in palliative care. METHODS Palliative care oncologists actively providing clinical care for dying patients with cancer were recruited for an online survey. Descriptive statistics for DNA banking practices, perceived qualification to recommend banking, and potential predictors were assessed. RESULTS Data were collected from 49 physicians (37% recruitment rate). Eighty percent reported assessing at least some patients for genetic cancer susceptibility in the past 12 months. No participants reported banking DNA for patients in the past 12 months. Only 5% reported feeling at least somewhat qualified to order DNA banking. A Web-based risk assessment tool and genetic counselor on staff were perceived as the most helpful potential resources. CONCLUSION Despite its potential, DNA banking is not being used by palliative care oncologists.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John M Quillin
- Department of Human & Molecular Genetics, Department of Social & Behavioral Health, and Department of Medicine, Massey Cancer Center, Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Schiavone MB, Kuo EC, Naumann RW, Burke WM, Lewin SN, Neugut AI, Hershman DL, Herzog TJ, Wright JD. The commercialization of robotic surgery: unsubstantiated marketing of gynecologic surgery by hospitals. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012; 207:174.e1-7. [PMID: 22835493 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.06.050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2012] [Revised: 06/13/2012] [Accepted: 06/27/2012] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We analyzed the content, quality, and accuracy of information provided on hospital web sites about robotic gynecologic surgery. STUDY DESIGN An analysis of hospitals with more than 200 beds from a selection of states was performed. Hospital web sites were analyzed for the content and quality of data regarding robotic-assisted surgery. RESULTS Among 432 hospitals, the web sites of 192 (44.4%) contained marketing for robotic gynecologic surgery. Stock images (64.1%) and text (24.0%) derived from the robot manufacturer were frequent. Although most sites reported improved perioperative outcomes, limitations of robotics including cost, complications, and operative time were discussed only 3.7%, 1.6%, and 3.7% of the time, respectively. Only 47.9% of the web sites described a comparison group. CONCLUSION Marketing of robotic gynecologic surgery is widespread. Much of the content is not based on high-quality data, fails to present alternative procedures, and relies on stock text and images.
Collapse
|
7
|
|
8
|
Tonkin E, Calzone K, Jenkins J, Lea D, Prows C. Genomic education resources for nursing faculty. J Nurs Scholarsh 2011; 43:330-40. [PMID: 22034967 DOI: 10.1111/j.1547-5069.2011.01415.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The increasing recognition regarding the relevance of genomics across the scope of nursing healthcare practice has resulted in the drive to integrate appropriate genomic knowledge and skills into nurse education and training. In this final article of the series Genetics-Genomics and Nursing Education, we will look at genetic and genomic education resources and the factors that influence both their creation and use. ORGANIZING CONSTRUCT In considering nurse education from faculty and student perspectives, four identified areas of need have been used as the organizing constructs: guidance (what should be taught and at what level of complexity); support and training; access to genetics professionals and service users; and quality resources. This paper sets out to address the following points: (a) why there is a need for quality genomics education resources to support nurse education; (b) what is required from a resource to make it "useful" for the user; and (c) how the quality and impact of a resource can be measured. While not exhaustive, information is provided to a number of globally accessible resources, along with detailed descriptions of selected teaching or learning tools. Strategies for evaluating the suitability of a resource and suggestions on how genomic resources can be used within nurse education are provided. CONCLUSIONS The use of clinically relevant resources that link theory to professional practice and which meet predefined learning outcomes and practice indicators for nurse education and training will facilitate the integration of genomics into curricula by nurse faculty. CLINICAL RELEVANCE Providing clinically meaningful education and training in genomics is central to enabling every nurse to develop the appropriate knowledge and skills in genomics in order to provide optimum care to individuals and families now, and to facilitate the integration of new information and technology as it becomes available across mainstream healthcare services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma Tonkin
- National Health Service, National Genetics Education & Development Centre, University of Glamorgan, Pontypridd, Wales, U.K.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Webb EA, Smith TD, Cotton RGH. Difficulties in finding DNA mutations and associated phenotypic data in web resources using simple, uncomplicated search terms, and a suggested solution. Hum Genomics 2011; 5:141-55. [PMID: 21504866 PMCID: PMC3500169 DOI: 10.1186/1479-7364-5-3-141] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
DNA mutation data currently reside in many online databases, which differ markedly in the terminology used to describe or define the mutation and also in completeness of content, potentially making it difficult both to locate a mutation of interest and to find sought-after data (eg phenotypic effect). To highlight the current deficiencies in the accessibility of web-based genetic variation information, we examined the ease with which various resources could be interrogated for five model mutations, using a set of simple search terms relating to the change in amino acid or nucleotide. Fifteen databases were investigated for the time and/or number of mouse clicks; clicks required to find the mutations; availability of phenotype data; the procedure for finding information; and site layout. Google and PubMed were also examined. The three locus-specific databases (LSDBs) generally yielded positive outcomes, but the 12 genome-wide databases gave poorer results, with most proving not to be search-able and only three yielding successful outcomes. Google and PubMed searches found some mutations and provided patchy information on phenotype. The results show that many web-based resources are not currently configured for fast and easy access to comprehensive mutation data, with only the isolated LSDBs providing optimal outcomes. Centralising this information within a common repository, coupled with a simple, all-inclusive interrogation process, would improve searching for all gene variation data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth A Webb
- Genomic Disorders Research Centre, Melbourne, Vic 3053, Australia.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Electronic medical records and personalized medicine. Hum Genet 2011; 130:33-9. [PMID: 21519832 DOI: 10.1007/s00439-011-0992-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2011] [Accepted: 04/15/2011] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
If the dream of personalized medicine is to be realized, tremendous amounts of data specific to each individual must be captured, synthesized and presented to clinicians at the time this information is needed to make care decisions for the patient. This can only be accomplished through the use of sophisticated electronic medical record (EMR) systems that are designed to support this function. This article will define two important aspects of a fully functional EMR the ability to: present patients or clinicians with high quality context specific information at the point of care (so-called "just-in time" education) and to combine clinically relevant information from disparate sources in order to guide the clinician to the optimized intervention for a given patient (clinical decision support). Personalized medicine examples are used to illustrate these concepts. As implemented most EMR systems are not being used to assimilate the information needed to provide personalized medicine. A description of necessary enhancements to currently available systems that will be needed to create a "personalized medicine enabled" EMR is provided.
Collapse
|
11
|
O'Daniel JM. The prospect of genome-guided preventive medicine: a need and opportunity for genetic counselors. J Genet Couns 2010; 19:315-27. [PMID: 20440545 DOI: 10.1007/s10897-010-9302-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2009] [Accepted: 04/07/2010] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
One of the major anticipated benefits of genomic medicine is the area of preventive medicine. Commercially available genomic profiling is now able to generate risk information for a number of common conditions several of which have recognized preventive guidelines. Similarly, family history assessment affords powerful health risk prediction based on the shared genetic, physical and lifestyle environments within families. Thus, with the ability to help predict disease risk and enable preemptive health plans, genome-guided preventive medicine has the potential to improve population health on an individualized level. To realize this potential, steps to broaden access to accurate genomic health information must be considered. With expertise in genetic science, risk assessment and communication, and a patient-centered practice approach, genetic counselors are poised to play a critical role in facilitating the incorporation of genomic health risks into the burgeoning field of genome-guided preventive medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julianne M O'Daniel
- Duke Institute for Genome Sciences & Policy, Duke University, 450 Research Drive, LSRC B342C, Box 91009, Durham, NC 27708, USA.
| |
Collapse
|